AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT00845832

A Study of Combination Treatment With MabThera (Rituximab) and RoActemra (Tocilizumab) Versus RoActemra in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis With an Incomplete Response to Methotrexate

A Phase 2 study testing rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan] and tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in 8 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 2 part study will investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of MabT hera in combination with RoActemra in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite a stable dose of methotrexate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan] and tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
24 participants
Where
24 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Mar 2009to Mar 2013
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients, 18-65 years of age;
  • rheumatoid arthritis, functional status I-III;
  • SJC>=4 (28 joint count) and TJC>=4 (28 joint count) at screening and baseline;
  • RF and/or anti-CCP positive;
  • may have failed up to 1 approved anti-TNF agent (infliximab, etanercept or adalimumab);
  • inadequate response to methotrexate, at a dose of 7.5-25mg weekly for at least 12 weeks, at a stable dose for past 4 weeks.

Who cannot join

  • rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis, or significant systemic involvement secondary to rheumatoid arthritis;
  • history of, or current, inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis;
  • diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and/or rheumatoid arthritis before age 16;
  • significant cardiac or pulmonary disease;
  • previous treatment with any biologic agent for rheumatoid arthritis (other than infliximab, etanercept or adalimumab).

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 8 countries.

24 sites in 8 countries

Germany5 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin, 10117

  • Study site

    Berlin, 14059

  • Study site

    Cologne, 50924

  • Study site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Study site

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

France4 sites
  • Study site

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275

  • Study site

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Study site

    Paris, 75679

  • Study site

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

Spain4 sites
  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28007

  • Study site

    Santander, Cantabria, 39008

  • Study site

    Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, 15706

  • Study site

    Seville, Sevilla, 41009

Other trials in Spain

Poland3 sites
  • Study site

    Bytom, 41-902

  • Study site

    Lublin, 20-607

  • Study site

    Poznan, 60-218

Other trials in Poland

Greece2 sites
  • Study site

    Athens, 15121

  • Study site

    Thessaloniki, 54636

Other trials in Greece

Netherlands2 sites
  • Study site

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

  • Study site

    Leiden, 2333 ZA

Other trials in Netherlands

Switzerland2 sites
  • Study site

    Bern, 3010

  • Study site

    Lausanne, 1011

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Study site

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP

  • Study site

    Southampton, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Active Controlled, Double-blind, Study to Compare the Safety and Reduction in Disease Activity With the Combination of Rituximab (MabThera®)and Tocilizumab (RoActemra®) Versus Tocilizumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With an Incomplete Response to Methotrexate

This 2 part study will investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of MabT hera in combination with RoActemra in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite a stable dose of methotrexate. In Part 1 of the study, patients will be randomized to receive either MabThera 0.5g iv or placebo on days 1 and 15, follo wed by RoActemra at one of the ascending doses between 2mg/kg and 8mg/kg at week s 4, 8 and 12 (MabThera arm) or 8mg/kg (placebo arm). In Part 2, additional pati ents will be randomized to one of 2 groups to receive MabThera 0.5g on days 1 an d 15 followed by the selected dose (from Part 1)of RoActemra at weeks 4, 8 and 1 2, or placebo on days 1 and 15 followed by RoActemra 8mg/kg at weeks 4,8 and 12.

All patients will then be eligible to receive extension treatment withRoActemra every 4 weeks. The anticipated time on study treatment is 12 months, and the tar get sample size is <100 individuals.

Being tested
Placebo, rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan], tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    iv on days 1 and 15 (Parts 1 and 2)

  • rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]Drug

    0.5g iv on days 1 and 15 (Parts 1 and 2)

  • tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug

    2mg/kg-8mg/kg iv in Part 1 and selected dose in Part 2, on weeks 4, 8 and 12---Arm 1\n8mg/kg iv on weeks 4,8 and 12 (Parts 1 and 2)--- Arm 2

Study groups in NCT00845832
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]; Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
2Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 16 Assessed Using Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR)

    The Disease Activity Score based on 28 joint count (DAS28) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the Tender Joint Count (TJC [28 joints]), Swollen Joint Count (SJC [28 joints]), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in millimeters (mm), and ESR in millimeters per hour (mm/hour). DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 - 10. Definition of LDA was based on DAS28-ESR scores. To achieve LDA the DAS28-ESR had to be (less than or equal to) ≤ 3.2.

    DAS28-ESR equals (=) (0.56 times (*) (square root)√ TJC plus (+) (0.28 * √ SJC + (0.70 * ln(ESR))+(0.014 * (Global Health) GH)

    Where:

    TJC = based on 28 joints SJC = based on 28 joints ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate in mm/hour GH = participant's global assessment of disease activity ln = natural log

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 16 Assessed Using DAS28-ESR

    The DAS28-ESR score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), participant's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR (mm/hour). DAS28-ESR is expressed on a unit on a scale with the minimum score=0 (best) to maximum score=10 (worst). Remission was defined as DAS28-ESR less than (<) 2.6

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Category at Week 16

    DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline (greater than) >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or DAS28-ESR >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; nonresponders: change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR

    The DAS28-ESR score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), participant's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR (mm/hour). DAS28-ESR is expressed as a score on a scale with the minimum score=0 (best) to maximum score=10 (worst).

    DAS28-ESR scores were calculated as follows: DAS28-ESR = (0.56 * √TJC)+(0.28 * √SJC)+(0.70 * ln(ESR))+(0.014 * GH).

    No imputation used for tender and swollen joint counts, ESR, and patient's global assessment of disease activity VAS.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48

  4. Clinical Disease Activity Index Scores

    The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score was calculated according to the following formula: CDAI = SJC + TJC + GH/10 + EGA/10

    Where:

    SJC = swollen joint count based on 28 joints; TJC = tender joint count based on 28 joints; GH = Participant's global assessment of disease activity; EGA = evaluator's (physician's) global assessment of disease activity. CDAI scores range from 0-76 and the following cut-off points for different disease activity states have been used: high disease activity >22; moderate disease activity >10 and ≤22; LDA >2.8 and ≤10; and remission ≤ 2.8. No imputation used for TJC, SJC, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS and Physicians global assessment of disease activity VAS.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40 and 48

  5. Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Scores

    The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), Participant and Physician assessed global disease activity (assessed on 0-100 mm VAS; higher scores = greater affection due to disease activity), and ESR (mm/hour). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 48

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in SJC and TJC

    An assessment of 28 joints for swelling and tenderness will be made. Joints will be assessed and classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) and tender(1)/not tender (0) by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Joint prosthesis, arthrodesis or fused joints were not taken into consideration for swelling or tenderness. The 28 joints assessed comprise shoulders (2 joints), elbows (2 joints), wrists (2 joints), metacarpophalangeal joints on digits 1-5 (10 joints), interphalangeal on digit 1 (2 joints), proximal interphalangeal joints on digits 2-5 (8 joints), and knees (2 joints).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)

    The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index specific for rheumatoid arthritis was completed by the participants for efficacy assessments.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    CRP is an acute phase reactant and is a measure of inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in ESR

    ESR is an acute phase reactant and is a measure of inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm= maximum disease activity. The physician marked the line according to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = maximum disease activity. The participant marked the line according to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Participant's Assessment of Pain

    Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = maximum pain. The participant marked the line according to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2013

Why it stopped: The study was terminated early because of a related decision to stop the development of ocrelizumab in rheumatoid arthritis.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00845832
Sponsor's protocol ID
WX21956
Other IDs
2008-005525-11, 2008
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
17 Feb 2009
Last updated
24 Dec 2014

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan] and tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in Germany, France, Spain, Poland, Greece and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 16 Assessed Using Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in