Total Hip ArthroplastyNCT00831363
Minimal Invasive Versus Traditional Transgluteal Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparative Gait Analysis
An observational study of Total Hip Arthroplasty, run by Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising at 1 site in Austria.
Trial summary
The hypothesis for the present study was that patients receiving a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty will show a faster improvement on walking ability and mobilization in the immediate postoperative period compared to patients with the standard Hardinge approach. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Total Hip Arthroplasty
- What is being tested?
- minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty and standard approach total hip arthroplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteAustria
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: primary care clinic
Who may be able to join
- unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip
- BMI below 30
Who cannot join
- previous surgery on the evaluated hip,
- previous arthroplasties on other joints,
- a leg length discrepancy of more than 0.5cm,
- rheumatoid osteoarthritis
- decreased mobility due to non joint related factors
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The hypothesis for the present study was that patients receiving a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty will show a faster improvement on walking ability and mobilization in the immediate postoperative period compared to patients with the standard Hardinge approach. Therefore, the main goal was to evaluate the differences in early rehabilitation of these two different surgical approaches by gait analysis and electromyographical examination as objective methods.
- Conditions
- Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Being tested
- minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty, standard approach total hip arthroplasty
- Keywords
- gait analysis, minimal invasive approach, transgluteal approach, THA
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
minimally invasive total hip arthroplastyProcedure or surgery
minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
standard approach total hip arthroplastyProcedure or surgery
standard Hardinge approach/traditional transgluteal approach
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | minimal invasive approach Receives: Procedure: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty | |
| 2 | traditional transgluteal approach Receives: Procedure: standard approach total hip arthroplasty |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2009 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Total Hip ArthroplastyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00831363
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GA-0001-MP
- Status last verified
- Jan 2009
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2009
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Minimal Invasive Versus Traditional Transgluteal Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparative Gait Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00831363
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GA-0001-MP
- Conditions
- Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Keywords
- gait analysis, minimal invasive approach, transgluteal approach, THA
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Orthopedic Hospital Vienna SpeisingUniversity, hospital or other
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The hypothesis for the present study was that patients receiving a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty will show a faster improvement on walking ability and mobilization in the immediate postoperative period compared to patients with the standard Hardinge approach. Therefore, the main goal was to evaluate the differences in early rehabilitation of these two different surgical approaches by gait analysis and electromyographical examination as objective methods.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Procedure: minimally invasive total hip arthroplastyminimal invasive approach |
| 2 | – | Procedure: standard approach total hip arthroplastytraditional transgluteal approach |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- primary care clinic
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip
- BMI below 30
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- previous surgery on the evaluated hip,
- previous arthroplasties on other joints,
- a leg length discrepancy of more than 0.5cm,
- rheumatoid osteoarthritis
- decreased mobility due to non joint related factors
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| minimally invasive total hip arthroplastyminimally invasive total hip arthroplasty | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
| standard approach total hip arthroplastystandard Hardinge approach/traditional transgluteal approach | Procedure or surgery | 2 |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2009.
Related trials for Total Hip Arthroplasty
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthropathy
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexmedetomidine as a Perioperative Autonomic-Immune Neuromodulator
Hip Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Combined Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Blocks on Anaesthetic Requirements and Electroencephalographic Depth of Anaesthesia During Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Total Hip Arthroplasty, run by Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising at 1 site in Austria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2009.