AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokePhase 4GAS-SAHNCT00830843

Inhalatorial Sedation in Patient With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Versus Conventional Intravenous Sedation

A Phase 4 study testing Propofol and Isoflurane in people with Stroke and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo di Monza at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recent study has shown that inhalatory sedation is a practicable, effective and not risky method in Intensive Care Unit. Sevoflurane effect on cerebral system have been described in previous studies: it causes an increasing of cerebral blood flow and a decrease of oxygen cerebral consumption. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
What is being tested?
Propofol and Isoflurane
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jan 2009to Jul 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosis of aSAH
  • indication to DVE positioning
  • clinical indication to sedation and assisted ventilation
  • indication to ICP and CBF monitoring
  • age > 18

Who cannot join

  • documented cranial hypertension (ICP>18) not controller by liquor drainage
  • age < 18.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo

    Monza, Monza

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Inhalatorial Sedation in Patient With SAH Versus Conventional Intravenous Sedation (GAS-SAH)

Recent study has shown that inhalatory sedation is a practicable, effective and not risky method in Intensive Care Unit. Sevoflurane effect on cerebral system have been described in previous studies: it causes an increasing of cerebral blood flow and a decrease of oxygen cerebral consumption. Clinical strategy for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage is orientated to increase cerebral blood flow to limit vasospasm phenomena after SAH. Scope of this study is to evaluate the Cerebral Blood Flow variation associated to Isoflurane sedation versus conventional sedation with propofol .

Being tested
Propofol, Isoflurane
Keywords
SAH, sedation, anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PropofolDrug

    Also called Diprivan

    Propofol(3-4 mg/kg/ora)administrated for 2 hours.

  • IsofluraneDrug

    Isoflurane inhalatorial administration for 2 hours at 0.8-1.0% Minimum Alveolar Concentration

Study groups in NCT00830843
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PropofolActive comparatorPropofol(3-4 mg/kg/ora)administrated for 2 hours.
Receives: Drug: Propofol
IsofluraneExperimentalIsoflurane inhalatorial administration for 2 hours at 0.8-1.0% Minimum Alveolar Concentration
Receives: Drug: Isoflurane

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cerebral Blood Flow

    Measured: after 2 hours of drug administration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionJul 2011
  4. Study completionJul 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00830843
Sponsor's protocol ID
1-citerio
Acronym
GAS-SAH
Status last verified
Nov 2011
First submitted
27 Jan 2009
Last updated
22 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Newberg LA, Milde JH, Michenfelder JD. The cerebral metabolic effects of isoflurane at and above concentrations that suppress cortical electrical activity. Anesthesiology. 1983 Jul;59(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198307000-00005.

    PubMed 6859608
  • Maekawa T, Tommasino C, Shapiro HM, Keifer-Goodman J, Kohlenberger RW. Local cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization during isoflurane anesthesia in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1986 Aug;65(2):144-51. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198608000-00003.

    PubMed 3740503
  • Reinstrup P, Ryding E, Algotsson L, Messeter K, Asgeirsson B, Uski T. Distribution of cerebral blood flow during anesthesia with isoflurane or halothane in humans. Anesthesiology. 1995 Feb;82(2):359-66. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199502000-00006.

    PubMed 7856894
  • Zhao P, Peng L, Li L, Xu X, Zuo Z. Isoflurane preconditioning improves long-term neurologic outcome after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal rats. Anesthesiology. 2007 Dec;107(6):963-70. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000291447.21046.4d.

    PubMed 18043065
  • Zhao P, Zuo Z. Isoflurane preconditioning induces neuroprotection that is inducible nitric oxide synthase-dependent in neonatal rats. Anesthesiology. 2004 Sep;101(3):695-703. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200409000-00018.

    PubMed 15329594
  • McAuliffe JJ, Joseph B, Vorhees CV. Isoflurane-delayed preconditioning reduces immediate mortality and improves striatal function in adult mice after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1066-77, tables of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260321.62377.74.

    PubMed 17456654
  • Zheng S, Zuo Z. Isoflurane preconditioning induces neuroprotection against ischemia via activation of P38 mitogen-activated protein kinases. Mol Pharmacol. 2004 May;65(5):1172-80. doi: 10.1124/mol.65.5.1172.

    PubMed 15102945
  • Lee JJ, Li L, Jung HH, Zuo Z. Postconditioning with isoflurane reduced ischemia-induced brain injury in rats. Anesthesiology. 2008 Jun;108(6):1055-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181730257.

    PubMed 18497606
  • Kapinya KJ, Lowl D, Futterer C, Maurer M, Waschke KF, Isaev NK, Dirnagl U. Tolerance against ischemic neuronal injury can be induced by volatile anesthetics and is inducible NO synthase dependent. Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1889-98. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000020092.41820.58.

    PubMed 12105371
  • L'her E, Dy L, Pili R, Prat G, Tonnelier JM, Lefevre M, Renault A, Boles JM. Feasibility and potential cost/benefit of routine isoflurane sedation using an anesthetic-conserving device: a prospective observational study. Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1295-303.

    PubMed 18811990
  • Berton J, Sargentini C, Nguyen JL, Belii A, Beydon L. AnaConDa reflection filter: bench and patient evaluation of safety and volatile anesthetic conservation. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):130-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000248221.44383.43.

    PubMed 17179257
  • Sackey PV, Martling CR, Nise G, Radell PJ. Ambient isoflurane pollution and isoflurane consumption during intensive care unit sedation with the Anesthetic Conserving Device. Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):585-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000156294.92415.e2.

    PubMed 15753751
  • Sackey PV, Martling CR, Granath F, Radell PJ. Prolonged isoflurane sedation of intensive care unit patients with the Anesthetic Conserving Device. Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2241-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145951.76082.77.

    PubMed 15640636
  • Villa F, Iacca C, Molinari AF, Giussani C, Aletti G, Pesenti A, Citerio G. Inhalation versus endovenous sedation in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: effects on regional cerebral blood flow. Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2797-804. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825b8bc6.

    PubMed 22824929

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Propofol and Isoflurane in people with Stroke and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo di Monza at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cerebral Blood Flow (time frame: after 2 hours of drug administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00830843, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in