AzTrials
AzTrials

TumorsPhase 3NCT00830778

Reduced Pancreatic Fistula Rate Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Trial on Pancreaticogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy

A Phase 3 study testing Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy in people with Tumors, run by Baki Topal at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is around 50 %. The postoperative course after PD is strongly dependent of the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (POPF), which determines postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay and costs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Tumors
What is being tested?
Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
336 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jun 2009to Sep 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients, male or female, who undergo PD for a pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumor
  • Age between 18 to 85 years
  • Patients with and without pre-operative biliary drainage (for obstructive jaundice)
  • Concomitant surgical procedures such as simultaneous colonic resection etc.
  • Reconstruction of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18years
  • Pregnancy
  • Pre-operative radiotherapy
  • PD for IPMT
  • PD for chronic pancreatitis
  • PD for pancreatic trauma
  • PD for post-ERCP complications
  • Any arterial reconstruction at the time of surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospital Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Reduced Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Rate Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial on Pancreaticogastrostomy vs. Pancreaticojejunostomy

The incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is around 50 %. The postoperative course after PD is strongly dependent of the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (POPF), which determines postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay and costs. The incidence of POPF after PD is dependent of its definition, and is reported in up to 20% of patients.

There is disagreement on whether to perform a pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) or a pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after PD. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to study whether PG significantly reduces the rate of POPF following PD for pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumours. Secondary endpoints are the reduction of overall postoperative complication rate and their severity.

Read the detailed description

Therapeutic intervention

  • Surgeons who have performed a minimum of five (5) PG and PJ procedures can include patients in this randomized trial.
  • Any dissection device or technique is allowed.
  • Pancreatic anastomosis (PG or PJ)
  • 1-layer or 2-layer anastomosis is allowed but has to be registered
  • mono-filament and/or poly-filament suture material is allowed but has to be registered
  • no pancreatic stent will be placed
  • Drainage: one (1) or more closed drain(s) with or without suction is allowed in the vicinity of the pancreatic anastomosis
  • Enteral tube feeding (tube positioned in the jejunum at the time of surgery, and distal to the pancreatic anastomosis) as well as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is allowed
  • Gastrostomy tube (percutaneous) is allowed
  • Somatostatin: start intra-operatively and administered for seven (7) days after surgery at a dose of 6 mg/d
  • Prophylactic use of antibiotics during 24h post-operatively
  • Prophylactic use of Ranitidine as well as any PPI (proton pump inhibitor) is allowed to prevent peptic ulcer

Clinical evaluation and assessment criteria

  • The number and type of POPF will be recorded according to the ISGPF guidelines and based on findings on day 3 (three) after surgery
  • The number and type of postoperative complications will be recorded. The therapy-oriented severity grading system (TOSGS) of complications will be used and complications will be allocated to surgical (SSC) and non-surgical site (NSSC) complications
  • The adequacy of the surgical resection margins (pR0) and the magnitude of the tumour-free resection margin (millimetres) will be monitored
  • Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) will be registered

Patient randomization and registration procedure (randomization lists attached)

  • This is a multicentric randomized controlled trial.
  • Patient randomization will be done intra-operatively since a substantial number of patients could be dropped out intra-operatively because of the presence of unexpected intra-abdominal metastases at the time of surgery.
  • Patient stratification will be performed for each centre and will be based on the diameter of the pancreatic duct. A pancreatic duct at the level of the surgical transsection margin measuring 3 millimetres or less in diameter is defined as being a "soft pancreas". A pancreatic duct measuring more than 3 millimetres is defined as a "hard pancreas".
  • A prospective registration of following parameters will be performed: intra-operative diameter of the pancreatic duct at the surgical transection margin, diameter of the pancreas at the surgical transection margin, pancreatic tissue consistency assessed by the surgeon: soft vs. hard, post-operative pathology parameters.

Statistical analysis and sample size calculation based on a stratified design

  • 40% of patients are expected to have a hard pancreas and 60% a soft pancreas.
  • It is assumed that the magnitude of the effect of the intervention (PJ vs. PG) on the POPF rate, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), is similar in both strata.
  • The needed sample size is calculated to have 80% power to detect a common odds ratio of 2.7. POPF rates of 12% and 20% are assumed after PJ within the hard and soft pancreas stratum respectively (yielding 4.8% and 8.4% after PG). Note that, given the unequal size strata, this leads to an expected POPF rate of 16.8% after PJ and 7% after PG (≈12% POPF overall).
  • A 2-sided (with alpha=5%) Mantel-Haenszel test of OR=1 for stratified 2x2 tables is planned
  • 168 patients are required per group (total patient population 336)
  • Expected duration of recruitment: 3-4 years
  • An interim analysis will be performed annually (i.e. after inclusion of 1/3 and 2/3 of the patients) to to allow early stop of the study (or accrual of patients in a specific treatment group) due to rejection of the null hypothesis. Using the O'Brien-Fleming method (O'Brien and Fleming 1979) results in respectively |3.471|, |2.454| and |2.004| as critical values for the Z-statistic at the three analysis moments. Otherwise stated, p-values are declared significant if <.00052, <0.0141 and <0.0451 at respectively the first interim analysis, the second interim analysis and at the final analysis.
  • Exact 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for the POPF and post-operative complication rates within each stratum. A stratified Mann-Whitney U test will be used for the TOSGS grading.

Translational research: optional Prognostic relevance of gene expression profiling in pancreatic cancer: analyses will be performed at UZ.Leuven/KU.Leuven (project coordinator B.Topal)

  • Fresh tissue samples from pancreatic cancer and from non-tumoral pancreatic tissue will be stored in RNA-later (samples in 2 separate tubes; 5-10 volumes of RNA-later)
  • Sample tubes will be transported (or picked up by the coördinator's research team), within 3 days from sampling, to be stored in -80°C for further analyses
Conditions
Tumors
Being tested
Pancreaticojejunostomy, Pancreaticogastrostomy
Keywords
pancreas, surgery, cancer, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), peri-ampullary tumours (ampulla, duodenum, distal bile duct, and miscellaneous tumours), pancreatic tumors, peri-ampullary tumors
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PancreaticojejunostomyProcedure or surgery

    Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis

  • PancreaticogastrostomyProcedure or surgery

    Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis

Study groups in NCT00830778
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PG anastomosisExperimentalPancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)
Receives: Procedure: Pancreaticogastrostomy
PJ anastomosisActive comparatorPancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)
Receives: Procedure: Pancreaticojejunostomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Reduction of overall postoperative pancreatic fistula rate

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Reduction of the severity of postoperative complications

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2009
  3. Primary completionAug 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Enrolment
336 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00830778
Sponsor's protocol ID
S51480
Status last verified
Sep 2012
First submitted
27 Jan 2009
Last updated
12 Sep 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Bertrand C, Hubert C, Janssens M, Closset J; Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):655-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8. Epub 2013 May 2.

    PubMed 23643139
  • Bertrand C, Squifflet JP, Gys T, Berrevoet F, Jehaes C, Lerut T, Malaise J, Topal B. The Society for Internet-based Scientific Studies: a new platform to promote multicentric studies in the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2010 Jan-Feb;110(1):3-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2010.11680554. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20306901

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy in people with Tumors, run by Baki Topal at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00830778, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in