Stable Angina PectorisPhase 2LOBSTRNCT00825604
Quality of Life and Target Achievement After Treatment of Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris
A Phase 2 study testing Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in people with Stable Angina Pectoris, run by Göteborg University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to, in patients with stable angina pectoris, assess the additional benefit of PCI on top of optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation with regard to quality of life, achievement of target of treatment and clinical events such as death, acute myocardial… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stable Angina Pectoris
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Jan 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable coronary artery disease
- Angina pectoris with at least angina class 2 according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS)
- Angiographic verified stenos in a native vessel
- Accepted for PCI
Who cannot join
- Instable coronary artery disease or AMI withín two months
- CCS class IV
- Stenosis in Left main and/or proximal LAD
- NYHA- III-IV
- Fall in blood pressure during exercise test > 10mm Hg, measured two times
- Contraindication or allergy against clopidogrel or ASA
Show all 9Show fewer
- Unable to communicate verbal or i writing
- Unwillingness to participate in the study
- Participating in an other study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Quality of Life and Achievement of Target of Treatment After Optimized Medical Treatment, Physical Training and Smoking Cessation With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris.
The purpose of this study is to, in patients with stable angina pectoris, assess the additional benefit of PCI on top of optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation with regard to quality of life, achievement of target of treatment and clinical events such as death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke and revascularization.
Read the detailed description
Patients with stable angina pectoris with a significant coronary stenosis will be randomized to optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation or to optimized medical treatment, physical training, smoking cessation and complimentary treatment with PCI. All patients will be followed up at six months and at one and five years regarding symptoms, blood lipids, systemic blood pressure, physical training status, smoking habits, and maximal exercise ECG.
Achievement of target of treatment will be measured by questions regarding the patients' expectation of the treatment at baseline and at a 6 month follow-up. The questions at 6 months will be based on the interviews at inclusion. Furthermore quality of life will be measured with three different measuring instrument; SF-36 short form, Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), and EQ-5D. These instruments will be given to the patients at baseline, at six months and at the five year follow up.
- Conditions
- Stable Angina Pectoris
- Being tested
- Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI)
- Keywords
- stable coronary artery disease, quality of life, target achievement, physical training, percutaneous coronary intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Angina, Stable
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI)Procedure or surgery
Also called PCI
optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation with complimentary treatment with coronary angioplasty (PCI):
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Without PCI | No intervention | Optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation |
| With PCI | Active comparator | optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation with complimentary treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of life measured by SF36
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Achievement of target of treatment based on interview of the patients
Measured: 6 months
Death, myocardial infarction, stroke or new revascularization
Measured: 6 months, one year and five years after randomization
To assess expectations of treatment at inclusion and fulfilment of expectations
Measured: 6 months
Quality of life measured by EQ5D and Seattle angina questionaire
Measured: 6 months and 5 years
Health economy
Measured: 6 months, one year and five years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionJan 2010
Why it stopped: Because of poor inclusion difficulties to find patient
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stable Angina PectorisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Göteborg UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Göteborg University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lars Grip, Prof., Principal investigator, Göteborgs Universty
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00825604
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Dnr: 056-08
- Acronym
- LOBSTR
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 21 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, Knudtson M, Dada M, Casperson P, Harris CL, Chaitman BR, Shaw L, Gosselin G, Nawaz S, Title LM, Gau G, Blaustein AS, Booth DC, Bates ER, Spertus JA, Berman DS, Mancini GB, Weintraub WS; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070829. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
PubMed 17387127Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, Knight R, Fox KA, Julian DG, Chamberlain DA; Second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) Trial Participants. Seven-year outcome in the RITA-2 trial: coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;42(7):1161-70. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00951-3.
PubMed 14522473Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, van Boven AJ, Schwartz L, Title LM, Eisenberg D, Shurzinske L, McCormick LS. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 8;341(2):70-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907083410202.
PubMed 10395630Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, Maron DJ, Zhang Z, Jurkovitz C, Zhang W, Hartigan PM, Lewis C, Veledar E, Bowen J, Dunbar SB, Deaton C, Kaufman S, O'Rourke RA, Goeree R, Barnett PG, Teo KK, Boden WE; COURAGE Trial Research Group; Mancini GB. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 14;359(7):677-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072771.
PubMed 18703470Sullivan M, Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1105-13. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00102-4.
PubMed 9817128Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Fihn SD. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Dec 15;74(12):1240-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90555-x.
PubMed 7977097Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Prodzinski J, McDonell M, Fihn SD. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):333-41. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9.
PubMed 7829785Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-q.
PubMed 8560302Jones B, Jarvis P, Lewis JA, Ebbutt AF. Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):36-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36.
PubMed 8664772Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.
PubMed 11491192Hambrecht R, Walther C, Mobius-Winkler S, Gielen S, Linke A, Conradi K, Erbs S, Kluge R, Kendziorra K, Sabri O, Sick P, Schuler G. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2004 Mar 23;109(11):1371-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121360.31954.1F. Epub 2004 Mar 8.
PubMed 15007010
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quality of Life and Achievement of Target of Treatment After Optimized Medical Treatment, Physical Training and Smoking Cessation With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00825604
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LOBSTR / Dnr: 056-08
- Conditions
- Stable Angina Pectoris
- Keywords
- stable coronary artery disease, quality of life, target achievement, physical training, percutaneous coronary intervention
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Because of poor inclusion difficulties to find patient
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Göteborg UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to, in patients with stable angina pectoris, assess the additional benefit of PCI on top of optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation with regard to quality of life, achievement of target of treatment and clinical events such as death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke and revascularization.
Detailed description
Patients with stable angina pectoris with a significant coronary stenosis will be randomized to optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation or to optimized medical treatment, physical training, smoking cessation and complimentary treatment with PCI. All patients will be followed up at six months and at one and five years regarding symptoms, blood lipids, systemic blood pressure, physical training status, smoking habits, and maximal exercise ECG.
Achievement of target of treatment will be measured by questions regarding the patients' expectation of the treatment at baseline and at a 6 month follow-up. The questions at 6 months will be based on the interviews at inclusion. Furthermore quality of life will be measured with three different measuring instrument; SF-36 short form, Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), and EQ-5D. These instruments will be given to the patients at baseline, at six months and at the five year follow up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Without PCI | No intervention | –Optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation |
| With PCI | Active comparator | Procedure: Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI)optimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation with complimentary treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Stable coronary artery disease
- Angina pectoris with at least angina class 2 according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS)
- Angiographic verified stenos in a native vessel
- Accepted for PCI
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Instable coronary artery disease or AMI withín two months
- CCS class IV
- Stenosis in Left main and/or proximal LAD
- NYHA- III-IV
- Fall in blood pressure during exercise test > 10mm Hg, measured two times
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI)Also: PCIoptimized medical treatment, physical training and smoking cessation with complimentary treatment with coronary angioplasty (PCI): | Procedure or surgery | With PCI |
Primary outcome
Quality of life measured by SF36
Time frame: 6 months
5 secondary outcomes
Achievement of target of treatment based on interview of the patients
Time frame: 6 months
Death, myocardial infarction, stroke or new revascularization
Time frame: 6 months, one year and five years after randomization
To assess expectations of treatment at inclusion and fulfilment of expectations
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life measured by EQ5D and Seattle angina questionaire
Time frame: 6 months and 5 years
Health economy
Time frame: 6 months, one year and five years
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2019.
- Background: PubMed 17387127Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, Knudtson M, Dada M, Casperson P, Harris CL, Chaitman BR, Shaw L, Gosselin G, Nawaz S, Title LM, Gau G, Blaustein AS, Booth DC, Bates ER, Spertus JA, Berman DS, Mancini GB, Weintraub WS; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070829. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 14522473Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, Knight R, Fox KA, Julian DG, Chamberlain DA; Second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) Trial Participants. Seven-year outcome in the RITA-2 trial: coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;42(7):1161-70. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00951-3.
- Background: PubMed 10395630Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, van Boven AJ, Schwartz L, Title LM, Eisenberg D, Shurzinske L, McCormick LS. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 8;341(2):70-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907083410202.
- Background: PubMed 18703470Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, Maron DJ, Zhang Z, Jurkovitz C, Zhang W, Hartigan PM, Lewis C, Veledar E, Bowen J, Dunbar SB, Deaton C, Kaufman S, O'Rourke RA, Goeree R, Barnett PG, Teo KK, Boden WE; COURAGE Trial Research Group; Mancini GB. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 14;359(7):677-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072771.
- Background: PubMed 9817128Sullivan M, Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1105-13. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00102-4.
- Background: PubMed 7977097Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Fihn SD. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Dec 15;74(12):1240-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90555-x.
- Background: PubMed 7829785Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Prodzinski J, McDonell M, Fihn SD. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):333-41. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9.
- Background: PubMed 8560302Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-q.
- Background: PubMed 8664772Jones B, Jarvis P, Lewis JA, Ebbutt AF. Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):36-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36.
- Background: PubMed 11491192Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.
- Background: PubMed 15007010Hambrecht R, Walther C, Mobius-Winkler S, Gielen S, Linke A, Conradi K, Erbs S, Kluge R, Kendziorra K, Sabri O, Sick P, Schuler G. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2004 Mar 23;109(11):1371-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121360.31954.1F. Epub 2004 Mar 8.
Related trials for Stable Angina Pectoris
Recruiting
Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Plaque
Recruiting
Multivessel Balloon Occlusion to Investigate Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and aNgina
Stable Angina, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Study of Lesion-Specific Invasive Haemodynamic Angina Thresholds
Angina (Stable), Coronary Artery Disease(CAD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REDUCER-I: An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer™ System
Angina Pectoris, Angina Pectoris, Stable
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Lesion Characteristics in Coronary Plaques Using Multimodality Intravascular Imaging and Novel Photon-counting CT in Stable Angina
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Stable Angina Pectoris
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lars Grip, Prof. principal investigator
Göteborgs Universty
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in people with Stable Angina Pectoris, run by Göteborg University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of life measured by SF36 (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00825604, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2019.