AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseasePhase 3NCT00823836

Clinical Evaluation of Ropinirole Prolonged Release/Extended Release (PR/XR) Tablet for Adjunctive Therapy to L-dopa in Subjects With Advanced Parkinson's Disease

A Phase 3 study testing ropinirole PR/XR and ropinirole IR in people with Parkinson Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 54 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate the efficacy and the safety of ropinirole PR/XR tablets to ropinirole immediate release (IR) tablets with advanced Parkinson's disease in conjunction with L-dopa in a double-blind, parallel group comparison study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
What is being tested?
ropinirole PR/XR and ropinirole IR
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
302 participants
Where
54 sitesJapan
Study dates
Mar 2009to Dec 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who are diagnosed with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) with severity of the modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria Stages II-IV.
  • Subjects receiving a stable dose of L-dopa for at least 4 weeks prior to screening phase and demonstrating lack of control with L-dopa therapy in the following circumstances. Wearing-off phenomena. On-off fluctuations. Delayed-on/No on phenomena. Not adequately controlled on L-dopa
  • QTc<450 millisecond (msec) or <480msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block - values based on either single ECG values or triplicate electrocardiogram (ECG) averaged QTc values obtained over a brief recording period.
  • Age:20 years or older(at the time of informed written consent)
  • Informed consent: Patients who are able to give informed written consent in person. (i.e. patients who are capable of giving informed written consent on one's own)
  • Sex: either sex. Female of child-bearing potential will be eligible for inclusion in this study. However they have to have a negative pregnancy test at the screening visit, agree to further pregnancy testing at the time points determined in study assessments and procedures and practice one of the following methods of contraception from the screening visit until the end of the follow-up examination. Abstinence. Injectable progestogen. Implants of levonorgestrel. Estrogenic vaginal ring. Percutaneous contraceptive patches. Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria as stated in the product label. Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject. Double barrier method: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical / vault caps) plus spermicidal agent (foam /gel / film / cream / suppository)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Both inpatient and outpatient status.
  • Inclusion Criteria at the start of the non-inferiority verification phase
  • -Patients whose Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) PartIII total (on) scores is 10 points or more at week 0.

Who cannot join

  • Late stage advanced subjects demonstrating incapacitating peak dose or biphasic dyskinesia on their stable dose of L-dopa.
  • Patients who present serious physical signs and symptoms other than those of the PD (e.g. cardiac/hepatic/renal disorder and haematopoietic disorder). The severity refers to Grade 3 according to "the Classification of the Severity of Adverse Experiences (Pharmaceutical affairs bureau/Safety division (PAB/SD) Notification No. 80, dated 29 June 1992).
  • Patients with symptomatic postural hypotension. (e.g. dizziness and syncope).
  • Patients with a current or history of drug abuse or alcoholism.
  • Patients who have received surgical treatment for PD in the past (e.g. pallidectomy, deep brain stimulation).
  • Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, who may be pregnant, or who plan for pregnancy during the study or within 30 days after the last dose of the study drug.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Patients with chronic hepatitis typeB and/or type C which is positive of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and/or hepatitis C antibody.
  • Patients with a history of drug allergy to ropinirole hydrochloride (HCl).
  • Patients with a current or history of cancer or malignant tumor.
  • Others whom the investigator (subinvestigator) considers ineligible for the study.
  • Exclusion criteria at the start of the non-inferiority verification phase
  • Patients with severe dementia (e.g. score 3 or 4 of the UPDRS item 1 (Intellectual Impairment))
  • Patients with current or history of major psychosis (e.g. schizophrenia or psychotic depression) core 3 or 4 of the UPDRS item 2 (thought disorder) or item 3(depression).
  • Patients who have used any dopamine agonist within 4 weeks prior to the non-inferiority verification phase
  • Patients who have been treated with the following drugs at 4 weeks or earlier before the start of the non-inferiority verification phase, and whose treatment regimen of the drug has been changed. Anticholinergic agents: trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride (e.g. Artane®), piroheptine hydrochloride (Trimol®), mazaticol hydrochloride (Pentona®), metixene hydrochloride (Cholinfall®), biperiden hydrochloride (Akineton®), profenamine (Parkin®), amantadine hydrochloride (e.g. Symmetrel®),droxidopa (Dops®), citicoline (e.g. Nicholin®), selegiline hydrochloride (FP®), entacapone, (comutan®) zonisamide, Estrogens: e.g. estriol (e.g. Estriel®), CYP1A2 inhibitors: Ciprofloxacin HCl (e.g. Ciproxan®, enoxacin and fluvoxamine).
  • Patients who have been treated with any other investigational drug within 12 weeks prior to the treatment phase.

Trial locations and contacts

54 sites in 1 country.

54 sites in 1 country

Japan54 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aichi, 454-0933

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aichi, 460-0008

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aichi, 465-8620

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aichi, 489-8642

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Akita, 010-0874

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 260-8712

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 270-1337

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 270-2251

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 279-0021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 290-0003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ehime, 791-0295

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 800-0296

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 814-0180

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 816-0864

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 819-8585

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukushima, 963-8052

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 068-0027

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hyōgo, 651-2273

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hyōgo, 670-0981

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hyōgo, 674-0081

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ibaraki, 310-0011

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 232-0066

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 247-8533

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 251-0038

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 252-0392

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 253-8558

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kyoto, 600-8811

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kyoto, 601-1495

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kyoto, 610-0113

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kyoto, 616-8255

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miyagi, 983-8520

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nagano, 399-0157

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nagano, 399-8695

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nagasaki, 859-3615

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nara, 632-8552

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Okayama, 703-8265

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 530-8480

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 543-8555

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 560-8552

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 570-8507

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 578-8588

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 590-0132

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 596-8522

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 598-0048

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saitama, 343-0032

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saitama, 359-1141

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shiga, 524-0022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shizuoka, 416-0955

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shizuoka, 420-8688

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tochigi, 329-0498

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 113-8431

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 136-0075

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 183-8524

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 202-0004

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation of Ropinirole PR/XR Tablet for Adjunctive Therapy to L-dopa in Subjects With Advanced Parkinson's Disease

To investigate the efficacy and the safety of ropinirole PR/XR tablets to ropinirole immediate release (IR) tablets with advanced Parkinson's disease in conjunction with L-dopa in a double-blind, parallel group comparison study.

Being tested
ropinirole PR/XR, ropinirole IR
Keywords
Ropinirole, advanced Parkinson's disease, L-dopa adjunctive therapy
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ropinirole PR/XRDrug

    Also called ropinirole IR-PR group

    Double-blind non-inferiority verification phase (24 weeks) At the baseline visit (Week 0), subjects who completed screening period will be randomised (1:1) to double-blind treatment with either ropinirole PR-PR group or ropinirole IR-PR group.

    The subjects'dose will be titrated according to the recommended schedule to achieve an optimal therapeutic response (ropinirolePR/XR2-15 mg/day ,ropinirolIR0.75-15 mg/day).

    Double-blind PR/XR switching phase (8 weeks) Ropinirole IR-PR subjects will be switched overnight to a similar dose of ropinirole PR/XR, while the remaining ropinirole PR-PR group will continue on the same dosage.

    Double blind long-term treatment phase (22 weeks) The same dose level at the end of PR/XR switching phase will be continued till week 54 under blind.

    Down titration phase Subjects who complete Week 54 or withdrawn will be down titrated over a 1 to 4 weeks period.

  • ropinirole IRDrug

    Double-blind non-inferiority verification phase (24 weeks) At the baseline visit (Week 0), subjects who completed screening period will be randomised (1:1) to double-blind treatment with either ropinirole PR-PR group or ropinirole IR-PR group.

    The subjects'dose will be titrated according to the recommended schedule to achieve an optimal therapeutic response (ropinirolePR/XR2-15 mg/day ,ropinirolIR0.75-15 mg/day).

    Double-blind PR/XR switching phase (8 weeks) Ropinirole IR-PR subjects will be switched overnight to a similar dose of ropinirole PR/XR, while the remaining ropinirole PR-PR group will continue on the same dosage.

    Double blind long-term treatment phase (22 weeks) The same dose level at the end of PR/XR switching phase will be continued till week 54 under blind.

    Down titration phase Subjects who complete Week 54 or withdrawn will be down titrated over a 1 to 4 weeks period.

Study groups in NCT00823836
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ropinirolePR-PR groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: ropinirole PR/XR
ropiniroleIR-PR groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: ropinirole PR/XR; Drug: ropinirole IR

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score at the Final Assessment Point (FAP) (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 0. Participants who withdrew before Week 2 and who had only one observation for the part III total score were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

Secondary outcomes (61)
  1. Percentage of Responders on the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    Thirty percent responders were defined as participants with a 30 percent or greater reduction from Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part III total score. Twenty percent responders were defined as participants with a 20 percent or greater reduction from Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part III total score. On-treatment last observations within the phase were carried forward as FAP values of the phase. FAP values do not include values of Weeks 0, 1, and 2; participants who withdrew before Week 2 and who had only one measurement for the part III total score were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: FAP (up to Week 24)

  2. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 0.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  3. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "On") Total Score at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the score at Week 0.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  4. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "Off") Total Score at Week 24 in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 0. Particpants with only one observation for the part II (at "Off") total score were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  5. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 0.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  6. Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  7. Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "On") Total Score at Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  8. Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "Off") Total Score at Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  9. Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  10. Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-inferiority Verification Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  11. Percentage of Responders on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The CGI-I assesses the participant's improvement or worsening of PD from Baseline with the following eight grades: 0 = Not Assessed, 1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Minimally Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Worse, 6 = Much Worse, and 7 = Very Much Worse. Responders are defined as those participants with scores of very much improved or much improved.

    Measured: FAP (up to Week 24)

  12. Percentage of Responders in Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "Off" at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Responders were defined as participants with a 20 percent or greater reduction on change from Week 0 in Off time (percentage).

    Measured: FAP (up to Week 24)

  13. Percentage of Responders in Percent Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "Off" at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Responders were defined as participants with a 20 percent or greater reduction in percent change from Week 0 in Off time (percentage).

    Measured: FAP (up to Week 24)

  14. Mean Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "Off" at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 0 in Off time (actual hours) was calculated as Off time (hours) at FAP minus Off time (hours) at Week 0.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  15. Mean Change From Week 0 in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "Off" time is measured as a proportion using the following formula: (Sum of two days off time [hours]/Sum of two days awake time [hours]) x 100. Change from Week 0 in Off time is measured using the following formula: Off time (proportion) at FAP minus Off time (proportion) at Week 0.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  16. Mean Percent Change From Week 0 in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "Off" time is measured as a proportion using the following formula: (Sum of two days off time [hours]/Sum of two days awake time [hours]) x 100. Percent change from Week 0 in Off time (proportion) is measured using the following formula: (Change from Week 0 in Off time [proportion]/Off time [proportion] at Week 0) x 100.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  17. Mean Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "On" at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Mean Change from Week 0 in On time (actual hours) was calculated as On time (hours) at FAP minus On time (hours) at Week 0. Participants who had only one observation for On time were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  18. Mean Change From Week 0 in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "On" at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. "On" time is measured as a proportion using the following formula: (Sum of two days On time [hours]/Sum of two days awake time [hours]) x 100. Change from Week 0 in On time is measured using the following formula: On time (proportion) at FAP minus On time (proportion) at Week 0. Participants who had only one observation for On time were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  19. Mean Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "On" With Troublesome Dyskinesias at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Troublesome dyskinesia is defined as dyskinesia that interferes with the participant's daily activity. Mean change from Week 0 in On time with troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) was calculated as On time with troublesome dyskinesias (hours) at FAP minus On time with troublesome dyskinesias (hours) at Week 0. Participants who had only one observation for On time with troublesome dyskinesias were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  20. Mean Change From Week 0 in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "On" With Troublesome Dyskinesias at FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    "On" time with troublesome dyskinesias is measured as a proportion using the following formula: (Sum of two days On time with troublesome dyskinesias [hours]/Sum of two days awake time [hours]) x 100. Change from Week 0 in On time with troublesome dyskinesias is measured using the following formula: On time with troublesome dyskinesias (proportion) at FAP minus On time with troublesome dyskinesias (proportion) at Week 0. Participants who had only one observation for On time with troublesome dyskinesias were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  21. Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Severity of Illness (at "On") at Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The Modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for disease severity: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  22. Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Severity of Illness (at "Off") at Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase

    The Modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for disease severity: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)

  23. Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days During the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 24) was the event, and participants who had completed the phase were censored.

    Measured: 0-175 days (up to Week 24)

  24. Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days During the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase in the Ropinirole IR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 24) was the event, and participants who had completed the phase were censored.

    Measured: 0-175 days (up to Week 24)

  25. Mean Change From Week 24 (Period Baseline) in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. Mean change from Week 24 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 24. Participants whose observation could not be obtained after Week 24 because of their premature withdrawal or other reasons were not included.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  26. Mean Change From Week 24 in the Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "On") Total Score at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 24 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 24.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  27. Mean Change From Week 24 in the Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "Off") Total Score at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "Off" state is where PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 0. Participants whose observation could not be obtained after Week 24 because of their premature withdrawal or other reasons were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  28. Mean Change From Week 24 in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Mean change from Week 24 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 24.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  29. Mean Change From Week 24 in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. Mean change from Week 24 was calculated as the total score at FAP minus the total score at Week 24.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  30. Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 24 and FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  31. Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "On") Total Score at Week 24 and FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  32. Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "Off") Total Score at Week 24 and FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Only participants who had "off" state were included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  33. Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 24 and FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. One participant whose observation could not be obtained at Week 24 was not included in the analysis for Week 24.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  34. Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 24 and FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. One participant whose observation could not be obtained at Week 24 was not included in the analysis for Week 24.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  35. Mean Change From Week 24 in Awake Time Spent "Off" at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 24 in Off time (actual hours) was calculated as Off time (hours) at FAP minus Off time (hours) at Week 24. Participants whose observation could not be obtained after Week 24 because of their premature withdrawal or other reasons were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  36. Mean Change From Week 24 in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "Off" time is measured as a proportion using the following formula: (Sum of two days off time [hours]/Sum of two days awake time [hours]) x 100. Change from Week 24 in Off time is measured using the following formula: Off time (proportion) at FAP minus Off time (proportion) at Week 24. Participants whose observation could not be obtained after Week 24 because of their premature withdrawal or other reasons were not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  37. Mean Change From Week 24 in Awake Time Spent "On" With Troublesome Dyskinesias at FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Troublesome dyskinesia is defined as dyskinesia that interferes with the participant's daily activity. Mean change from Week 24 on On time with troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) was calculated as On time with troublesome dyskinesias (hours) at FAP minus On time with troublesome dyskinesias (hours) at Week 24. Participants who had 0 hour as On time with troublesome dyskinesias at Week 24 were excluded from the analysis.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  38. Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Severity of Illness (at "On") at Week 24 and FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for disease severity: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  39. Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Severity of Illness (at "Off") at Week 24 and FAP (From Week 26 up to Week 32) in the PR/XR Switching Phase

    The Modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for disease severity: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Only participants who had "off" state were included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 24 and FAP (from Week 26 up to Week 32)

  40. Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days During the PR/XR Switching Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 32) was the event, and participants who had completed the phase were censored.

    Measured: 0-89 days within the PR/XR Switching Phase (between Weeks 24 and 32)

  41. Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days During the PR/XR Switching Phase in the Ropinirole IR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 32) was the event, and participants who had completed the phase were censored.

    Measured: 0-89 days within the PR/XR Switching Phase (between Weeks 24 and 32)

  42. Percentage of Responders on the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    Thirty percent responders were defined as participants with a 30 percent or greater reduction from Week 0 (Baseline) in the Japanese UPDRS Part III total score. Twenty percent responders were defined as participants with a 20 percent or greater reduction from Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part III total score.

    Measured: Week 54

  43. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at Week 54 minus the total score at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  44. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "On") Total Score at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at Week 54 minus the total score at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  45. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "Off") Total Score at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at Week 54 minus the total score at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  46. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at Week 54 minus the total score at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  47. Mean Change From Week 0 in the Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications. Mean change from Week 0 was calculated as the total score at Week 54 minus the total score at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  48. Japanese UPDRS Part I Total Score at Weeks 0 and 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part I assesses mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 16 points. A higher score indicates more severe mental symptoms.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  49. Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "On") Total Score at Weeks 0 and 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  50. Japanese UPDRS Part II (at "Off") Total Score at Weeks 0 and 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part II assesses activities of daily living on 13 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  51. Japanese UPDRS Part III Total Score at Weeks 0 and 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part III assesses motor examination on 27 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  52. Japanese UPDRS Part IV Total Score at Weeks 0 and 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD patients objectively. Part IV assesses complications of therapy on 11 items. Participants receive a score of 0-4 or 0-1 points per item depending on the item. The maximum total score is 23 points. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of complications.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  53. Percentage of Responders on the CGI-I at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The CGI-I assesses the participant's improvement or worsening of PD from baseline with the following eight grades: 0 = Not Assessed, 1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Minimally Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Worse, 6 = Much Worse, and 7 = Very Much Worse. Responders are defined as those participants with scores of very much improved or much improved.

    Measured: Week 54

  54. Percentage of Responders in Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "Off" at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Responders were defined as participants with a 20 percent or greater reduction in change from Week 0 in Off time (percentage).

    Measured: Week 54

  55. Percentage of Responders in Percent Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "Off" at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Responders were defined as participants with a 20 percent or greater reduction on percent change from Week 0 in Off time (percentage).

    Measured: Week 54

  56. Mean Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "Off" at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Mean change from Week 0 in Off time (actual hours) was calculated as Off time (hours) at Week 54 minus Off time (hours) at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  57. Mean Change From Week 0 in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "Off" time is measured as a proportion using the following formula: (Sum of two days off time [hours]/Sum of two days awake time [hours]) x 100. Change from Week 0 in Off time is measured using the following formula: Off time (proportion) at Week 54 minus Off time (proportion) at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  58. Mean Change From Week 0 in Awake Time Spent "On" With Troublesome Dyskinesias at Week 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Troublesome dyskinesia is defined as dyskinesia that interferes with the participant's daily activity. Mean change from Week 0 in On time with troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) was calculated as On time with troublesome dyskinesias (hours) at Week 54 minus On time with troublesome dyskinesias (hours) at Week 0.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  59. Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Severity of Illness (at "On") at Weeks 0 and 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for disease severity: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  60. Number of Participants at Each Stage of the Modified Hoehn & Yahr Severity of Illness (at "Off") at Weeks 0 and 54 in the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The Modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria are measured on the following 8-point scale for disease severity: 0, No signs of disease; 1, Unilateral disease; 1.5, Unilateral plus axial involvement; 2, Bilateral disease; 2.5, Mild bilateral disease; 3, Mild to moderate bilateral disease; 4, Severe disability; and 5, Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug.

    Measured: Weeks 0 and 54

  61. Percentage of Participants Remaining in the Study on the Indicated Days During the Long-term Phase in the Ropinirole PR-Ropinirole PR Group

    The percentage of participants remaining in the study was presented by Kaplan-Meier method, where premature discontinuation (i.e., withdrawal before Week 54) was the event, and participants who had completed the study were censored.

    Measured: 0-385 days (up to Week 54)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
302 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00823836
Sponsor's protocol ID
106066
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
15 Jan 2009
Last updated
18 Jan 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing ropinirole PR/XR and ropinirole IR in people with Parkinson Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 54 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 54 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Oct 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in the Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Total Score at the Final Assessment Point (FAP) (up to Week 24) in the Non-Inferiority Verification Phase (time frame: Week 0 and FAP (up to Week 24)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in