AzTrials
AzTrials

EczemaPhase 3HANDELNCT00817063

Efficacy and Safety of a Retinoid in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema

A Phase 3 study testing alitretinoin in people with Eczema, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 70 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of alitretinoin in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema that does not respond to treatment with potent topical steroids. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Eczema
What is being tested?
alitretinoin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
599 participants
Where
70 sitesUnited States
Study dates
8 Jan 2009to 26 Apr 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • all types of chronic hand eczema, lasting for at least 6 months since initial diagnosis
  • rated as severe by the physician
  • unresponsive to highly potent topical corticosteroids, such as clobetasol

Who cannot join

  • patients whose disease is adequately controlled by standard non-medicated therapy, including potent topical steroids, skin moisturizers, and avoidance of allergens and irritants
  • patients with known allergens and irritants, who have not made a reasonable effort to avoid the substances
  • patients with psoriasis lesions
  • active fungal, bacterial or viral infections of the hands
  • female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • female patients of childbearing potential who cannot use or will not commit to use two effective methods of contraception

Trial locations and contacts

70 sites in 1 country.

70 sites in 1 country

United States70 sites
  • Academy of Clinical Research

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Michael Bukhalo MD

    Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005

  • Dermassociates, Ltd

    Belleville, Illinois, 62226

  • Dermatology and Laser Center NW

    Bellingham, Washington, 98281

  • University of Alabama, Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Fletcher Allen Health Care

    Burlington, Vermont, 05401

  • University of North Carolina, Dermatology Department

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 918-843-9447

  • Bernstein Clinical Research Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242

  • Modern Research Associates

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • MAPS Applied Research Center

    Edina, Minnesota, 55435

  • Shahram Jacobs, MD, Inc.

    Encino, California, 91436

  • Deaconess Clinic, Inc.

    Evansville, Indiana, 47713

  • Hamzavi Dermatology Clinic

    Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059

  • Johnson Dermatology

    Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916

  • Minnesota Clinical Studies Research Center

    Fridley, Minnesota, 55432

  • Silverton Skin Institute

    Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University Dermatology

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 37660

  • Dermatology Associates of Kingsport

    Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660

  • University of California, San Diego Dermatology Clinical Trials Unit

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • South Lincoln Dermatology

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68502

  • Dermatology Research of Arkansas

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Longmont Clinic, P.C.

    Longmont, Colorado, 80501

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • Dermatology Specialists

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Derm Research, PLLC

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • Madison Skin & Research Inc.

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53719

  • Laser and Dermatology Center

    Marina del Rey, California, 90292

  • Saltzer Medical Group

    Nampa, Idaho, 83687

  • Tennessee Clinical Research Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37215

  • The Dermatology Center

    New Albany, Indiana, 47150

  • Tulane University Health Sciences, Dermatology Dept

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • St.Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center

    New York, New York, 10025

  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine Clinical Dermatology

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Virginia Clinical Research Inc.

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • Park Avenue Dermatology, PA

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073

  • Kansas City Dermatology, PA

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66215

  • Paddington Testing Co.Inc

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Dermatology Center of Indiana/Indiana Clinical Trials Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Rhode Island Hospital

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02903

  • Integrated Research Group

    Riverside, California, 92506

  • Helendale Dermatology and Medical Spa

    Rochester, New York, 14609

  • Hull Dermatology

    Rogers, Arkansas, 72758

  • University of California, Davis

    Sacramento, California, 95816

  • Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 77056

  • Therapeutics Clinical Research

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • East Bay Psoriasis Treatment Center

    San Ramon, California, 94583

  • Schaumburg Dermatology

    Schaumburg, Illinois, 60194

  • Premier Clinical Research

    Seattle, Washington, 99204

  • American Dermatology Association

    Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66216

  • UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, Dermatology

    Somerset, New Jersey, 08873

  • Washington University Dermatology Research

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Stanford University Dept of Dermatology

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • Derm Research Center of New York Inc.

    Stony Brook, New York, 11790

  • Toccoa Clinic Medical Associates

    Toccoa, Georgia, 30577

  • Kansas Medical Clinic

    Topeka, Kansas, 66614

  • Radiant Research Inc.

    Tucson, Arizona, 85710

  • Solano Clinical Research, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Vallejo, California, 94589

  • Grekin Skin Institute

    Warren, Michigan, 48088

  • George Washington University - Medical Faculty Associates

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Dundee Dermatology

    West Dundee, Illinois, 60118

  • Palm Beach Research Center

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

  • Western State Clinical Research Inc.

    Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033

  • Azalea Research Center

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403

  • Wake Forrest University School of Medicine

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Alitretinoin in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema Refractory to Topical Therapy

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of alitretinoin in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema that does not respond to treatment with potent topical steroids.

Read the detailed description

Chronic hand eczema (CHE)is a distressing disease that poses difficult problems for dermatologists. CHE leads to considerable work-absenteeism, disability and exclusion from labour market. Conventional treatments, including highly potent topical steroids, yield often unsatisfactory results. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin, a retinoid, in patients who have not responded to avoidance of causative factors, such as contact allergens and skin irritants, non-medicated skin care and highly potent topical steroids. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive alitretinoin or a placebo.

Conditions
Eczema
Being tested
alitretinoin, Placebo
Keywords
retinoid treatment, fingertip dermatitis, hyperkeratotic hand eczema, vesicular hand eczema, pompholyx
Medical subject headings
Eczema, Eczema, Dyshidrotic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • alitretinoinDrug

    Patients receive alitretinoin 30mg one capsule daily for up to 24 weeks

  • PlaceboDrug

    Patients receive matching placebo for up to 24 weeks

Study groups in NCT00817063
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AlitretinoinExperimentalPatients will receive alitretinoin 30mg capsule for up to 24 weeks
Receives: Drug: alitretinoin
PlaceboExperimentalPatients will receive placebo 30mg capsule for up to 24 weeks
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24

    The investigator assigned PGA grades according to a 5-point scale (clear [not detectable], almost clear [less than 10% of affected hand surface], mild disease [less than 10% of affected hand surface], moderate disease [10% to 30% of affected hand surface], severe disease [>30% of affected hand surface]). PGA ratings were based on an integrated clinical picture of signs, symptoms, and the extent of disease. Symptoms included erythema, scaling, hyperkeratosis/lichenification, vesiculation, edema, fissures, and pruritus/pain. The PGA scale ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (severe disease). Participants were considered as responders when they had a PGA of clear or almost clear.

    Measured: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) at the End-of-treatment

    A 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to grade 7 signs or symptoms of CHE. The mTLSS was calculated as sum of assigned scores for the symptoms of erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, edema, fissures and Pruritus/Pain. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 21 (worst). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) * 100. Data for Week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF) has been presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

  2. Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment

    At Week 24 or at the end-of-treatment participants were asked by the investigator to grade their overall change from Baseline by selecting one of the following descriptions, which best matched their perception of overall treatment effect: cleared or almost cleared (at least 90% clearing), marked improvement (at least 75% clearing), moderate improvement (at least 50% clearing), mild improvement (at least 25% clearing), no change and worsening. Participants were considered as responders when the PaGa was cleared or almost cleared.

    Measured: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

  3. Percentage Change From Baseline in Extent of Disease at End-of-treatment

    The extent of disease was estimated as the percentage of hand area (with 100% defined as the palmar and dorsal aspects) affected by eczema at Baseline, and at the end of treatment). Extent of disease was estimated separately for the left and right hands, and the overall extent of disease for both hands was calculated as (Left+Right)/2. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) * 100.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

  4. Response Duration for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy

    Response Duration was defined as time from the end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.

    Measured: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)

  5. Time to Relapse for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy

    Time to relapse was defined as the time from end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented. The median was based on the very last participant having a follow-up period longer than expected, those explaining the high median.

    Measured: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)

  6. Time to Response for Responding Participants at End-of-therapy

    Time to response was defined as time from start of treatment to first PGA assessment of "clear" or "almost clear". Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.

    Measured: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)

  7. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment Period

    An AE was defined as any adverse change from the participant's Baseline (pretreatment) clinical condition, including intercurrent illness, which occurred during the course of the clinical study after written informed consent had been given, whether considered related to treatment or not. A treatment-emergent AE was defined as any adverse change that occurred after treatment started and up to 7 days after last treatment. An SAE was any experience that suggested a significant hazard, contradiction, side effect or precaution. It was any adverse event that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: Up to Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

  8. Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference Range

    Blood samples were collected for the assessment of laboratory parameters hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, reticulocytes, platelets, white blood cell, lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, total bilirubin, bilirubin conjugated (direct), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein, serum albumin, glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, sodium, potassium, chloride, serum calcium, serum phosphate, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/urea, uric acid, Free thyroxin and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) at Baseline and every 4 weeks of treatment period and Week 28 of follow up period. Data for participants with values outside the marked reference range are reported.

    Measured: Up to Week 28

  9. Number of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 Weeks

    The BSI is a 53 item self-report scale used to measure nine primary symptom dimensions (somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism). Respondents rank each feeling item (e.g., "your feelings being easily hurt") on a 5-point scale where, 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, 4=extremely (0 indicates best outcome and 4 indicates worst outcome). The total score ranged from 0 (best outcome) to 212 (worse outcome). Participants with an increase above Baseline of 25% or more on any domain subscore in BSI-53, or with an increase above Baseline of >=2 points or a score >=3 on any BSI-53 item that reflects depression, suicidality, psychotic symptoms, and hostility/aggression, were to be referred to a psychiatrist within 2 weeks.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 Weeks

    The PHQ-9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly every day. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28

  11. Number of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 Weeks

    Participants meeting any of the following criteria were to be referred for specialist psychiatric evaluation within 2 weeks: PHQ-9 Score >=15, Two Subsequent Scores of >=10 and PHQ-9 Question 9 >=1. The PHQ -9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly everyday. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Only categories with data available at the indicated time points have been presented. Categories with null values for all the arms have not been presented.

    Measured: Up to 28 Weeks

  12. Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 Weeks

    HHIE-S assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 8 points); mild/moderate handicap (10 to 24 points); severe handicap (26-40 points). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 Weeks

    DHI assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 14 points); mild handicap (16 to 34 points); moderate handicap (36 to 52 points); severe handicap (54 points). Increase from Baseline of <6 points, 6 to <12 points and 12 points. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  14. Number of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 Weeks

    Participants who developed tinnitus were monitored by use of the TOMI. The numbers of participants with pre-existing tinnitus, new tinnitus, increased/decreased loudness of tinnitus, or increased/decreased duration of tinnitus, pulsing quality of tinnitus were assessed.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  15. Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 Weeks

    Bone mineral density scans of the left proximal femur (total hip) and anterior-posterior lumbar spine were obtained by use of DXA, at Baseline, at end of therapy, and 1 year (48 weeks) after end of therapy. In case of abnormality or surgery of the left hip, the right hip was to be used. If both hips were affected, the participant was not eligible for DXA. Vertebrae L1 to L4 had to be completely scanned. At least 3 vertebrae had to be free of any abnormalities potentially interfering with DXA analysis (eg, fractures, large osteophytes), otherwise the participant was not eligible for DXA. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) * 100. Least square means and 95% confidence interval has been presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 72

  16. Number of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of Bones

    X-ray evaluations was done at Baseline (Week 0), end of therapy and at follow up period (Week 72). X-ray evaluations was done for Lateral C-Spine, Lateral T-Spine and Calcaneous. The images were evaluated as optimal, readable (but not optimal) or not readable.

    Measured: Up to Week 72

  17. Number of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular Pressure

    An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy, or as a worsening from Baseline for either or both eyes. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, or abnormal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, for both eyes or one eye when the other eye was not concerned by an adverse change. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy was considered as no adverse change. Optic disc, macula, and retinal periphery were assessed by fundoscopy after pupil dilation using tropicamide.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  18. Number of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest Frequency

    An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy are considered as no adverse change. All puretone testing used a modified Hughson-Westlake procedure with 5 decibel (dB) step size.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jan 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Jan 2009
  3. Primary completion26 Apr 2012
  4. Study completion26 Apr 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
599 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00817063
Sponsor's protocol ID
117183
Other IDs
BAP01346, NCT00817063
Acronym
HANDEL
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
5 Jan 2009
Last updated
27 Apr 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Publications

  • Diepgen TL, Agner T, Aberer W, Berth-Jones J, Cambazard F, Elsner P, McFadden J, Coenraads PJ. Management of chronic hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01179.x.

    PubMed 17868211
  • Ruzicka T, Larsen FG, Galewicz D, Horvath A, Coenraads PJ, Thestrup-Pedersen K, Ortonne JP, Zouboulis CC, Harsch M, Brown TC, Zultak M. Oral alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid) therapy for chronic hand dermatitis in patients refractory to standard therapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Dec;140(12):1453-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1453.

    PubMed 15611422
  • Ruzicka T, Lynde CW, Jemec GB, Diepgen T, Berth-Jones J, Coenraads PJ, Kaszuba A, Bissonnette R, Varjonen E, Hollo P, Cambazard F, Lahfa M, Elsner P, Nyberg F, Svensson A, Brown TC, Harsch M, Maares J. Efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to topical corticosteroids: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 2008 Apr;158(4):808-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08487.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

    PubMed 18294310
  • Fowler JF, Graff O, Hamedani AG. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of alitretinoin (BAL4079) in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema refractory to potent topical corticosteroid therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1198-204.

    PubMed 25607554

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing alitretinoin in people with Eczema, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 70 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 70 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00817063, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in