AzTrials
AzTrials

SnoringNCT00806637

Vessel Sealing System Uvulopalatoplasty Versus Uvulopalatal Flap

A study testing Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) and Uvulopalatal flap (UPF) in people with Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by Chulalongkorn University at 1 site in Thailand.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) to the traditional uvulopalatal flap (UPF) in the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing with special regard to intraoperative bleeding, operative time, postoperative pain, postoperative hemorrhage and other adverse effects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Snoring, Obstructive Sleep Apnea
What is being tested?
Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) and Uvulopalatal flap (UPF)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Oct 2008to Sep 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient planned for uvulopalatoplasty for indications of snoring or obstructive sleep apnea
  • Written informed consent form is given from patient

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • History of bleeding disorders
  • Patient unable to understand evaluation method
  • Patient unable to be contacted via telephone

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

    Patumwan, Bangkok, 10330

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Vessel Sealing System Uvulopalatoplasty vs Uvulopalatal Flap: a Randomized, Control Study of Efficacy and Adverse Effects

The purpose of this study is to compare vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) to the traditional uvulopalatal flap (UPF) in the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing with special regard to intraoperative bleeding, operative time, postoperative pain, postoperative hemorrhage and other adverse effects.

Read the detailed description

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty is one of the common procedures performed by otolaryngologists to treat sleep-disordered breathing patients who have retropalatal obstruction. Intraoperative bleeding is a significant problem which requires hemostasis and causes prolonged operative time. Several different techniques are used to perform this operation, including cold knife, monopolar cautery, coblation, and radiofrequency. Efficacy in hemostasis and tissue trauma from different operative techniques may result in different operative time and different degrees of morbidity including intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, postoperative hemorrhage, and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). The vessel sealing system has been widely used in head and neck surgery because of its effectiveness and safety. It was also found quite effective and safe in tonsillectomy procedures, providing excellent hemostasis and minimal tissue trauma.

Being tested
Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU), Uvulopalatal flap (UPF)
Keywords
Vessel sealing system, uvulopalatoplasty, UPPP, uvulopalatal flap, bleeding, operative time, adverse effects
Medical subject headings
Snoring, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU)Procedure or surgery

    Also called ligasure vessel sealing system

    Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) is a new technique for uvulopalatoplasty using a special biclamp forceps for better hemostasis control. Vessel sealing system (VSS) is a bipolar vascular sealing system, with integrated active feedback control. The tissue is grasped and compressed by the handpiece. After the instrument is removed, the seal is visible as a semitransparent window, which can safely be divided. Uvular tip is grasped with an Allis clamp and retracted back toward the soft palate. Excision of the uvula and the redundant part of soft palate is performed by the VSS handpiece. VSS is also used for hemostasis.

  • Uvulopalatal flap (UPF)Procedure or surgery

    Also called uvulopalatoplasty

    Uvulopalatal flap (UPF) is a standard uvulopalatoplasty technique. Uvulopalatal flap is usually performed as described originally by Powell et al. The soft palate was injected with 5 to 10 milliliters of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine solution. The mucosa, submucosa with glands, and fat on the lingual surface of the uvula and soft palate were removed with a scalpel. Bleeding was controlled with bipolar electrocoagulation. The uvular tip was amputated, and reflected back toward the soft palate, and fixated into its new position with multiple sutures of 3-0 chromic catgut.

Study groups in NCT00806637
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalVessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) is a new technique for uvulopalatoplasty using a special biclamp forceps for better hemostasis control. Vessel sealing system (VSS) is a bipolar vascular sealing system, with integrated active feedback control. The tissue is grasped and compressed by the handpiece. After the instrument is removed, the seal is visible as a semitransparent window, which can safely be divided. Uvular tip is grasped with an Allis clamp and retracted back toward the soft palate. Excision of the uvula and the redundant part of soft palate is performed by the VSS handpiece. VSS is also used for hemostasis.
Receives: Procedure: Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU)
2Active comparatorUvulopalatal flap (UPF) is a standard uvulopalatoplasty technique. Uvulopalatal flap is usually performed as described originally by Powell et al. The soft palate was injected with 5 to 10 milliliters of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine solution. The mucosa, submucosa with glands, and fat on the lingual surface of the uvula and soft palate were removed with a scalpel. Bleeding was controlled with bipolar electrocoagulation. The uvular tip was amputated, and reflected back toward the soft palate, and fixated into its new position with multiple sutures of 3-0 chromic catgut.
Receives: Procedure: Uvulopalatal flap (UPF)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. intraoperative blood loss

    Measured: within the first 1 hour after surgery starting time

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. operative time

    Measured: within the first 1 hour after surgery starting time

  2. postoperative pain

    Measured: within the first 14 days after surgery

  3. postoperative bleeding

    Measured: within the first 14 days after surgery

  4. postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency

    Measured: within the first 3 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2009 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2009 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00806637
Sponsor's protocol ID
ENTCU_pkk2008_02
Status last verified
Oct 2008
First submitted
10 Dec 2008
Last updated
11 Dec 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Lachanas VA, Hajiioannou JK, Karatzias GT, Filios D, Koutsias S, Mourgelas C. Comparison of LigaSure vessel sealing system, harmonic scalpel, and cold knife tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Sep;137(3):385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.05.012.

    PubMed 17765762
  • Powell N, Riley R, Guilleminault C, Troell R. A reversible uvulopalatal flap for snoring and sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 1996 Sep;19(7):593-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/19.7.593.

    PubMed 8899940
  • Prokopakis EP, Lachanas VA, Helidonis ES, Velegrakis GA. The use of the Ligasure Vessel Sealing System in parotid gland surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Nov;133(5):725-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.06.030.

    PubMed 16274800
  • Bassiouny A, El Salamawy A, Abd El-Tawab M, Atef A. Bipolar radiofrequency treatment for snoring with mild to moderate sleep apnea: a comparative study between the radiofrequency assisted uvulopalatoplasty technique and the channeling technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jun;264(6):659-67. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0244-x. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

    PubMed 17294208

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) and Uvulopalatal flap (UPF) in people with Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by Chulalongkorn University at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

intraoperative blood loss (time frame: within the first 1 hour after surgery starting time). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00806637, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in