AzTrials
AzTrials

CandidiasisPhase 3NCT00805740

An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness And Safety Of Anidulafungin Compared To Caspofungin For The Treatment Of Deep Tissue Infection Due To Candida

A Phase 3 study testing Active anidulafungin and Active Caspofungin in people with Candidiasis and Fungemia, run by Pfizer at 18 sites in 9 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to gather information on the use of anidulafungin for the treatment of serious Candida infection. It is expected that anidulafungin will be at least as safe and as effective as the comparator drug, caspofungin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Candidiasis, Fungemia
What is being tested?
Active anidulafungin and Active Caspofungin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
41 participants
Where
18 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
Apr 2009to Jun 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of deep tissue Candida infection, defined as growth of Candida sp. from a culture specimen obtained from a normally sterile site accompanied by signs and symptoms of infection.
  • Male or female ≥ 16 years of age.
  • Expected hospitalization for at least fourteen (14) days.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy or breast feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Recent treatment with one of the study drugs over the last 30 days.
  • Allergy to either study drug or to this class of drugs.
  • Significant liver dysfunction.
  • Suspected Candida osteomyelitis, endocarditis, meningitis or any other infections of the central nervous system.

Trial locations and contacts

18 sites in 9 countries.

18 sites in 9 countries

United States4 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Newark, Delaware, 19713

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Newark, Delaware, 19718

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Wilmington, Delaware, 19801

Other trials in United States

Belgium4 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Antwerp, 2060

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Brussels, 1000

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Brussels, 1070

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Brussels, 1200

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Amsterdam, 1081 HZ

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Amsterdam, 1091 AC

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Nijmegen, 6532 SZ

Other trials in Netherlands

Portugal2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Coimbra, 3040-853

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lisbon, 1150-199

Other trials in Portugal

Bulgaria1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1606

Other trials in Bulgaria

Canada1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6

Other trials in Canada

Romania1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bucharest, 014461

Other trials in Romania

Russia1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    P/o Stepanovskoe, Krasnogorskiy District, Moscow Region, 143423

Other trials in Russia

Switzerland1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Geneva, CH-1211

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Efficacy And Safety Of Eraxis/Ecalta (Anidulafungin) Compared To Cancidas (Caspofungin) In Patients With Candida Deep Tissue Infection

The purpose of this study is to gather information on the use of anidulafungin for the treatment of serious Candida infection. It is expected that anidulafungin will be at least as safe and as effective as the comparator drug, caspofungin.

Being tested
Active anidulafungin, Active Caspofungin
Keywords
Candidiasis; Invasive Candidiasis; Deep Tissue Candidiasis; Candida; Candidemia; Fungal Infection
Medical subject headings
Candidiasis, Fungemia, Candidiasis, Invasive, Torulopsis, Candidemia, Mycoses

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active anidulafunginDrug

    Subjects in this arm will receive active anidulafungin and placebo caspofungin

  • Active CaspofunginDrug

    Subjects in this arm will receive active caspofungin and placebo anidulafungin

Study groups in NCT00805740
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anidulafungin armExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Active anidulafungin
Caspofungin armExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Active Caspofungin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)

    Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

    Measured: End of Treatment (Day 14 to Day 42)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit

    Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

    Measured: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after end of treatment [EOT]), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success

    A participant had a successful response if there was clinical response of cure and microbiological success (eradication or presumed eradication). Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Microbiological eradication or presumed eradication: baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture, or culture data not available for a participant with successful clinical outcome.

    Measured: EOT (Day 14 to 42), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response

    A participant had a successful clinical response if there was clinical response of cure or improvement. Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Clinical response of improvement: significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required.

    Measured: Day 10

  4. Percentage of Participants With Relapse

    Relapse was defined as any baseline Candida sp. isolated following eradication (documented or presumed) or culture data not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Prophylactic treatment with oral antifungal agents was not sufficient to document a relapse.

    Measured: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  5. Percentage of Participants With New Infection

    New Infection: participant presenting with clinical failure with the emergence of new Candida sp. at the original site of infection or at a distant site of infection. Clinical failure: no significant improvement in signs and symptoms, or death due to Candida infection. Participants must have had received at least 3 doses of study drug to be classified as a failure.

    Measured: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  6. Time to Negative Blood Culture

    Negative blood culture referred to absence of Candida sp. in the blood sample of participants who had a positive blood culture at baseline. Time to negative blood culture (days) was calculated as date of first negative blood culture minus first treatment date plus 1.

    Measured: Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  7. Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality

    All-cause mortality during study therapy and at follow-up visits reported as unique death at EOT, 2 week follow-up and 6 week follow-up.

    Measured: Baseline to EOT (Day 14 to 42), After EOT to 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), After 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  8. Time to Death

    Time to death (days) was assessed as date of death minus first treatment date plus 1.

    Measured: Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Why it stopped: The study was terminated prematurely on May 18, 2012 due to slow enrollment. The study was not terminated due to any safety issues or concerns.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00805740
Sponsor's protocol ID
A8851022
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
26 Nov 2008
Last updated
1 Aug 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • De Rosa FG, Busca A, Capparella MR, Yan JL, Aram JA. Invasive Candidiasis in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Anidulafungin: A Post Hoc Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Six Pooled Studies. Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Jun;41(6):539-548. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01024-7. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

    PubMed 33891293
  • Sganga G, Wang M, Capparella MR, Tawadrous M, Yan JL, Aram JA, Montravers P. Evaluation of anidulafungin in the treatment of intra-abdominal candidiasis: a pooled analysis of patient-level data from 5 prospective studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;38(10):1849-1856. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03617-9. Epub 2019 Jul 6.

    PubMed 31280481
  • Kontoyiannis DP, Bassetti M, Nucci M, Capparella MR, Yan JL, Aram J, Hogan PA. Anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia caused by Candida parapsilosis: Analysis of pooled data from six prospective clinical studies. Mycoses. 2017 Oct;60(10):663-667. doi: 10.1111/myc.12641. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

    PubMed 28597967
  • Kullberg BJ, Vasquez J, Mootsikapun P, Nucci M, Paiva JA, Garbino J, Yan JL, Aram J, Capparella MR, Conte U, Schlamm H, Swanson R, Herbrecht R. Efficacy of anidulafungin in 539 patients with invasive candidiasis: a patient-level pooled analysis of six clinical trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Aug 1;72(8):2368-2377. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx116.

    PubMed 28459966

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Active anidulafungin and Active Caspofungin in people with Candidiasis and Fungemia, run by Pfizer at 18 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 18 sites in United States, Belgium, Netherlands, Portugal, Bulgaria and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42) (time frame: End of Treatment (Day 14 to Day 42)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00805740, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in