Chronic RhinosinusitisNCT00799097
Determinants of Surgical Outcomes in Chronic Sinusitis
An observational study of Chronic Rhinosinusitis, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common health condition in the United States resulting in more than 200,000 surgical procedures annually. The field of rhinology has had two major advances which the investigators believe make more accurate prediction of postoperative outcome possible thereby offering the potential of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis
- How many people
- 516 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2004to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The multi-institutional study population consists of adult (>17 years) patients who have had a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis, have failed maximum medical management,and have elected for endoscopic sinus surgery as their next treatment option.
Who may be able to join
- Adult (18 years and older) (see Inclusion of Children)
- CRS by Rhinosinusitis Task Force criteria
- Symptoms persisting following standard medical management as outlined in the Research Design and Methods.
- Elect sinus surgery and give informed consent.
- Patient must be able to travel to the Institution of enrollment for evaluation, treatment, and follow up.
- Patient must be able to complete a questionnaire with the assistance of the Study Coordinator and be able to cooperate with endoscopy, olfactory and CT studies.
- Patient (if White) selected by randomized enrollment technique
Who cannot join
- Unable to complete questionnaires or cooperate with studies
- Children (<18 years)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
About this study
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common health condition in the United States resulting in more than 200,000 surgical procedures annually. The field of rhinology has had two major advances which the investigators believe make more accurate prediction of postoperative outcome possible thereby offering the potential of reducing the frequency of unsuccessful surgical procedures. The first advance is the development of validated disease-specific quality of life instruments for measuring outcome of CRS management. The major medical societies now recognize disease-specific quality of life as the gold standard for assessing outcomes in this disease and for the purposes of this study, the investigators define surgical outcome as change in disease-specific quality of life (QOL). The second advance is the better understanding of the pathological process resulting in CRS. The previous construct defined this disease as anatomic obstruction of the sinuses and their secretions. This was thought to be best measured by CT scan which has been the main method of attempting to select the best candidates for surgery.
The investigators hypothesize that utilizing this new conceptual framework, the investigators can better predict surgical outcomes. The investigators will examine several preoperative factors and their relationship to surgical outcome. The factors to be examined include measures of the pathophysiological components of inflammation and anatomic obstruction as well as preoperative extent of disease as measured by preoperative disease-specific quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that these factors provide complimentary information that may be variably expressed in individual CRS patients. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a novel integration of multiple preoperative factors will form a useful predictive model of surgical outcome. Finally this prospective study provides the opportunity to add to the field by identifying potentially novel risk factors and comorbidities as well as study secondary outcomes of sinus surgery including olfactory function and general health related quality of life in a systematic manner.
Read the detailed description
A cohort of 500+ patients with CRS undergoing sinus surgery at three centers will be prospectively enrolled. Patient demographics, comorbidity data, objective testing, and QOL evaluation will occur preoperatively and outcomes (QOL and olfactory testing) will be measured 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Determinants of change in QOL will be analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods including construction of a multivariate predictive model.
This proposal focuses on patients undergoing surgical intervention for the management of CRS. The findings can potentially be applied to the 200,000 patients annually undergoing sinus surgery and in working toward the long-term goal of developing a comprehensive system for measuring extent of disease so that disease severity and treatment response can be rigorously quantified in the 30 million patients with CRS.
- Conditions
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic Sinus Surgery | Subjects who have failed maximum medical management and have elected for endoscopic sinus surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease specific quality of life
Measured: Preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
General quality of life
Measured: Preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Olfactory function
Measured: Preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2004
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic RhinosinusitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 516 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Health and Science University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
- Investigators
- Timothy L Smith, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Oregon Health and Science University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00799097
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01 DC0005805
- Other IDs
- R01DC005805
- Status last verified
- Nov 2008
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2008
- Last updated
- 20 May 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Stewart MG, Smith TL. Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology. Am J Rhinol. 2005 Sep-Oct;19(5):529-35.
PubMed 16270610Martin TJ, Yauck JS, Smith TL. Patients undergoing sinus surgery: constructing a demographic profile. Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1185-91. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224506.42567.6e.
PubMed 16826058Chester AC, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Bhattacharyya N. Fatigue improvement following endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2008 Apr;118(4):730-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318161e57b.
PubMed 18216743Smith TL, Mendolia-Loffredo S, Loehrl TA, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Nattinger AB. Predictive factors and outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2005 Dec;115(12):2199-205. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000182825.82910.80.
PubMed 16369166Mendolia-Loffredo S, Laud PW, Sparapani R, Loehrl TA, Smith TL. Sex differences in outcomes of sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1199-203. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224575.12945.90.
PubMed 16826060Poetker DM, Mendolia-Loffredo S, Smith TL. Outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis associated with sinonasal polyposis. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):84-8. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.2978.
PubMed 17283567Reh DD, Mace J, Robinson JL, Smith TL. Impact of age on presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):207-13. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3005.
PubMed 17424882Robinson JL, Griest S, James KE, Smith TL. Impact of aspirin intolerance on outcomes of sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2007 May;117(5):825-30. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3180333121.
PubMed 17473677Litvack JR, Griest S, James KE, Smith TL. Endoscopic and quality-of-life outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2007 Dec;117(12):2233-8. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814539e8.
PubMed 17891047Mace J, Michael YL, Carlson NE, Litvack JR, Smith TL. Effects of depression on quality of life improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2008 Mar;118(3):528-34. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815d74bb.
PubMed 18043488Poetker DM, Litvack JR, Mace JC, Smith TL. Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: presentation and outcomes of sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):329-33. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3177.
PubMed 18588769Soler ZM, Mace J, Smith TL. Symptom-based presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and symptom-specific outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):297-301. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3172.
PubMed 18588763Sautter NB, Mace J, Chester AC, Smith TL. The effects of endoscopic sinus surgery on level of fatigue in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):420-6. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3196.
PubMed 18702910Soler ZM, Mace J, Smith TL. Fibromyalgia and chronic rhinosinusitis: outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):427-32. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3198.
PubMed 18702911Soler ZM, Hyer JM, Rudmik L, Ramakrishnan V, Smith TL, Schlosser RJ. Cluster analysis and prediction of treatment outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.11.019. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
PubMed 26806047
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Determinants of Surgical Outcomes in Chronic Sinusitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00799097
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01 DC0005805
- Conditions
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 516 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Health and Science UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
- Study start
- Jul 2004
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common health condition in the United States resulting in more than 200,000 surgical procedures annually. The field of rhinology has had two major advances which the investigators believe make more accurate prediction of postoperative outcome possible thereby offering the potential of reducing the frequency of unsuccessful surgical procedures. The first advance is the development of validated disease-specific quality of life instruments for measuring outcome of CRS management. The major medical societies now recognize disease-specific quality of life as the gold standard for assessing outcomes in this disease and for the purposes of this study, the investigators define surgical outcome as change in disease-specific quality of life (QOL). The second advance is the better understanding of the pathological process resulting in CRS. The previous construct defined this disease as anatomic obstruction of the sinuses and their secretions. This was thought to be best measured by CT scan which has been the main method of attempting to select the best candidates for surgery.
The investigators hypothesize that utilizing this new conceptual framework, the investigators can better predict surgical outcomes. The investigators will examine several preoperative factors and their relationship to surgical outcome. The factors to be examined include measures of the pathophysiological components of inflammation and anatomic obstruction as well as preoperative extent of disease as measured by preoperative disease-specific quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that these factors provide complimentary information that may be variably expressed in individual CRS patients. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a novel integration of multiple preoperative factors will form a useful predictive model of surgical outcome. Finally this prospective study provides the opportunity to add to the field by identifying potentially novel risk factors and comorbidities as well as study secondary outcomes of sinus surgery including olfactory function and general health related quality of life in a systematic manner.
Detailed description
A cohort of 500+ patients with CRS undergoing sinus surgery at three centers will be prospectively enrolled. Patient demographics, comorbidity data, objective testing, and QOL evaluation will occur preoperatively and outcomes (QOL and olfactory testing) will be measured 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Determinants of change in QOL will be analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods including construction of a multivariate predictive model.
This proposal focuses on patients undergoing surgical intervention for the management of CRS. The findings can potentially be applied to the 200,000 patients annually undergoing sinus surgery and in working toward the long-term goal of developing a comprehensive system for measuring extent of disease so that disease severity and treatment response can be rigorously quantified in the 30 million patients with CRS.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic Sinus Surgery | – | –Subjects who have failed maximum medical management and have elected for endoscopic sinus surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The multi-institutional study population consists of adult (>17 years) patients who have had a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis, have failed maximum medical management,and have elected for endoscopic sinus surgery as their next treatment option.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Adult (18 years and older) (see Inclusion of Children)
- CRS by Rhinosinusitis Task Force criteria
- Symptoms persisting following standard medical management as outlined in the Research Design and Methods.
- Elect sinus surgery and give informed consent.
- Patient must be able to travel to the Institution of enrollment for evaluation, treatment, and follow up.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Unable to complete questionnaires or cooperate with studies
- Children (<18 years)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Disease specific quality of life
Time frame: Preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
2 secondary outcomes
General quality of life
Time frame: Preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Olfactory function
Time frame: Preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2010.
- Background: PubMed 16270610Stewart MG, Smith TL. Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology. Am J Rhinol. 2005 Sep-Oct;19(5):529-35.
- Background: PubMed 16826058Martin TJ, Yauck JS, Smith TL. Patients undergoing sinus surgery: constructing a demographic profile. Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1185-91. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224506.42567.6e.
- Background: PubMed 18216743Chester AC, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Bhattacharyya N. Fatigue improvement following endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2008 Apr;118(4):730-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318161e57b.
- Results publication: PubMed 16369166Smith TL, Mendolia-Loffredo S, Loehrl TA, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Nattinger AB. Predictive factors and outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2005 Dec;115(12):2199-205. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000182825.82910.80.
- Results publication: PubMed 16826060Mendolia-Loffredo S, Laud PW, Sparapani R, Loehrl TA, Smith TL. Sex differences in outcomes of sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1199-203. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224575.12945.90.
- Results publication: PubMed 17283567Poetker DM, Mendolia-Loffredo S, Smith TL. Outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis associated with sinonasal polyposis. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):84-8. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.2978.
- Results publication: PubMed 17424882Reh DD, Mace J, Robinson JL, Smith TL. Impact of age on presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):207-13. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3005.
- Results publication: PubMed 17473677Robinson JL, Griest S, James KE, Smith TL. Impact of aspirin intolerance on outcomes of sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2007 May;117(5):825-30. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3180333121.
- Results publication: PubMed 17891047Litvack JR, Griest S, James KE, Smith TL. Endoscopic and quality-of-life outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2007 Dec;117(12):2233-8. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814539e8.
- Results publication: PubMed 18043488Mace J, Michael YL, Carlson NE, Litvack JR, Smith TL. Effects of depression on quality of life improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2008 Mar;118(3):528-34. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815d74bb.
- Results publication: PubMed 18588769Poetker DM, Litvack JR, Mace JC, Smith TL. Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: presentation and outcomes of sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):329-33. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3177.
- Results publication: PubMed 18588763Soler ZM, Mace J, Smith TL. Symptom-based presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and symptom-specific outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):297-301. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3172.
Related trials for Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
FESS With or Without Intranasal Desmopressin in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyposis
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective, Non-interventional Single-arm Study With Tezepelumab to Investigate the Change in Clinical and Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients With CRSwNP in Real-world (PETRICHOR)
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Itepekimab (Anti-IL-33 mAb) in Participants With Inadequately-controlled Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Itepekimab (Anti-IL-33 mAb) in Participants With Inadequately-controlled Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Timothy L Smith, MD, MPH principal investigator
Oregon Health and Science University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Rhinosinusitis, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease specific quality of life (time frame: Preoperatively, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00799097, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2010.