AzTrials
AzTrials

Lumbar Spinal StenosisNCT00786981

Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Epidural Steroid Injection and Manual Physical Therapy and Exercise in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

A study testing Epidural steroid injection plus physical therapy and Epidural steroid injection in people with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, run by Franklin Pierce University at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent and disabling condition in the rapidly growing aging population. People with LSS often have a substantial physical and psychosocial burden as well as significant healthcare costs affecting both the individual and society. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
What is being tested?
Epidural steroid injection plus physical therapy and Epidural steroid injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
54 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2009to Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Lumbar spinal stenosis unidentified by MRI or CT scan and interpreted by a radiologist independent of the study. The criteria of Boden et al will be used to define LSS on MRI: non-discogenic loss of signal in the epidural fat with compression of neural tissues.
  • Chief complaint of pain in the low back, buttock, and/or lower extremity. The patient must have LE symptoms consistent with neurogenic claudiation.
  • Patient-reported inability to walk greater than ¼ mile due to lower extremity pain and/or cramping.
  • Rates sitting as a better position with respect to symptom severity compared to standing or walking.
  • Consent of the patient to undergo education, epidural steroid injection(s), and attend specified physical therapy sessions.
  • Individuals with no language barrier, that are cooperative, have transportation to the Spine Center, and who sign an informed consent form.
  • Age greater than or equal to 50 years.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with organic brain syndrome or dementia.
  • Severe vascular, pulmonary or coronary artery disease which limits ambulation.
  • Recent myocardial infarction (within last 6 months).
  • Spondylolisthesis requiring surgical fusion (i.e., greater than 5mm of slippage).
  • Previous spinal surgery that included fusion of two or more vertebrae.
  • Severe osteoporosis as defined by multiple compression fractures or a fracture at the same level as the stenosis.
  • Metastatic cancer.
  • Excessive alcohol consumption or evidence of non-prescribed or illegal drug use.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • Colorado University

    Denver, Colorado

  • Hawkins Foundation

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29615

  • Keesler Air Force Base

    Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, 39564

  • Illinois Neurological Institute at OSF

    Peoria, Illinois, 61637

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Epidural Steroid Injection and Manual Physical Therapy and Exercise in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis; a Randomized Clinical Trial

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent and disabling condition in the rapidly growing aging population. People with LSS often have a substantial physical and psychosocial burden as well as significant healthcare costs affecting both the individual and society. It has been reported that patients with LSS over the age of 65 are more likely to undergo spinal surgery than any other condition with an estimated total annual inpatient expense of one billion. Individuals undergoing surgical treatment for LSS tend to be older, therefore operative morbidity and mortality are a particular concern. Functional benefit derived from conservative treatment may increase the health and quality of life for individuals suffering from LSS and avoid or delay the need for surgery in some subjects. As the population continues to age, identifying effective non-surgical treatment options for older patients with LSS is an important research priority. Ultimately, the information gained from this study will help fill a significant void in medical literature regarding non-surgical options for this patient population.

Being tested
Epidural steroid injection plus physical therapy, Epidural steroid injection
Medical subject headings
Spinal Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epidural steroid injection plus physical therapyOther

    Patients in the ESI+PT Group will be treated additionally with a physical therapy program emphasizing lumbar flexion exercises, aerobic and strength/ conditioning exercises, and manual physical therapy as well as receiving up to 3 epidural steroid injection(s) and educational support using The Back Book.

  • Epidural steroid injectionOther

    Patients in the ESI Group will be treated with up to 3 epidural steroid injections, educational support, and general care by the treating physician.

Study groups in NCT00786981
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epidural steroid injection and physical therapyOtherNot described
Receives: Other: Epidural steroid injection plus physical therapy
Epidural steroid injectionOtherNot described
Receives: Other: Epidural steroid injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome of interest will be change in disability as measured by the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (OSW).

    Measured: 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in patient-reported pain

    Measured: 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Change in Functional Limitations

    Measured: 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

  3. Change in psychosocial evaluation

    Measured: 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Change in patient satisfaction

    Measured: 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2018
  4. Study completionDec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
54 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00786981
Sponsor's protocol ID
FP-36472
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
5 Nov 2008
Last updated
31 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Hammerich A, Whitman J, Mintken P, Denninger T, Akuthota V, Sawyer EE, Hofmann M, Childs JD, Cleland J. Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Combined With Epidural Steroid Injection for Individuals With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Parallel-Group Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 May;100(5):797-810. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.12.035. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

    PubMed 30703349

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Epidural steroid injection plus physical therapy and Epidural steroid injection in people with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, run by Franklin Pierce University at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome of interest will be change in disability as measured by the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (OSW). (time frame: 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00786981, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in