CataractPhase 4NCT00786565
Clinical Evaluation of a New Aspheric Intraocular Lens.
A Phase 4 study testing Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye. and Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye. in people with Cataract, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the visual performance and occurrence of posterior capsular opacification after implantation of a new aspherical intraocular lens compared with a control spherical lens of otherwise identical design. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cataract
- What is being tested?
- Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye. and Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye.
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2004to Jan 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have a clinically documented diagnosis of bilateral cataract (either cortical, nuclear, subcapsular or a combination) liable to benefit from standard cataract surgery.
- Patients must be undergoing primary cataract surgery with IOL in-the-bag implantation, requiring a IOL power from 10 to 30 diopters.
Who cannot join
- Patients with corneal damage.
- Patients with any anterior segment pathology for which extracapsular phacoemulsification cataract surgery would be contraindicated.
- Patients with any ocular pathology, other than the cataract, having repercussions on visual function:
About this study
Official title: Clinical Evaluation of a New Aspheric Intraocular Lens. A Prospective, Multi-Center, Comparative Study.
This study evaluates the visual performance and occurrence of posterior capsular opacification after implantation of a new aspherical intraocular lens compared with a control spherical lens of otherwise identical design.
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Being tested
- Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye., Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye.
- Medical subject headings
- Cataract
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye.Device
Cataract surgery to implant the assigned IOL according to randomized schedule.
Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye.Device
Cataract surgery to implant the assigned IOL according to randomized schedule.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Akreos Adapt | Experimental | Advanced Akreos Adapt Aspheric Intraocular Lens (IOL). Receives: Device: Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye. |
| Akreos Adapt | Experimental | Akreos Adapt Spherical Intraocular Lens (IOL). Receives: Device: Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Low Contrast Best Corrected Visual Acuity Following Cataract Surgery
Low contrast best corrected visual acuity (ability to distinguish objects on a similarly colored or shaded background) 3 months following cataract surgery.
Measured: 3 months
Low Contrast Uncorrected Visual Acuity Following Cataract Surgery
Low contrast uncorrected visual acuity 3 months post cataract surgery
Measured: 3 months
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity
The mean photopic (day light) contrast sensitivity for each spatial frequency (cycle per degree-CPD) (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Measured: 3 months
Mesoptic Contrast Sensitivity
The mean mesoptic (low light) contrast sensitivity for each spatial frequency (cycle per degree-CPD) (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Measured: 3 Months
Posterior Capsule Opacification Score
Posterior Capsule Opacification Score (PCO), Density of opacification measured from 0-4 (1=minimal and 4=severe) and area of opacification measured from 0-1 (0=no opacification and 1=posterior capsule opacification required a treatment). Results (EPCO) were computer calculated by multiplying density by area of opacification.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
High Contrast Visual Acuity
High contrast visual acuity (ability to distinguish objects of contrasting color such as black on white) uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity.
Measured: 1 month
High Contrast Visual Acuity Uncorrected
Measured: 3 months
High Contrast Visual Acuity Best Corrected
Measured: 3 months
High Contrast Visual Acuity
Measured: 12 months
High Contrast Visual Acuity Uncorrected
Measured: 24 Months
High Contrast Visual Acuity Best Corrected
Measured: 24 Months
Low Contrast Visual Acuity
Uncorrected Low contrast visual acuity - LogMar visual acuity value
Measured: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Photopic 1.5cpd
The mean photopic (day light) contrast sensitivity were to be compared between both IOLs for each special frequency (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Measured: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Photopic
The mean photopic (day light) contrast sensitivity were to be compared between both IOLs for each special frequency (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Measured: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Mesoptic 1.5 Cpd
The mean mesopic (dim light) contrast sensitivity were to be compared between both IOLs for each special frequency (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Measured: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Mesoptic
The mean mesopic (dim light) contrast sensitivity were to be compared between both IOLs for each special frequency (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Measured: 1 month
Posterior Capsule Opacification
Posterior Capsule Opacification Score (PCO), Density of opacification measured from 0-4 (1=minimal and 4=severe) and area of opacification measured from 0-1 (0=no opacification and 1=posterior capsule opacification required a treatment). Results (EPCO) were computer calculated by multiplying density by area of opacification.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2004
- Primary completionJan 2008
- Study completionJan 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for CataractStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00786565
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 001/04
- Status last verified
- Dec 2011
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2008
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Evaluation of a New Aspheric Intraocular Lens. A Prospective, Multi-Center, Comparative Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00786565
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 001/04
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2004
- Primary completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jan 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the visual performance and occurrence of posterior capsular opacification after implantation of a new aspherical intraocular lens compared with a control spherical lens of otherwise identical design.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Akreos Adapt | Experimental | Device: Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye.Advanced Akreos Adapt Aspheric Intraocular Lens (IOL). |
| Akreos Adapt | Experimental | Device: Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye.Akreos Adapt Spherical Intraocular Lens (IOL). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients must have a clinically documented diagnosis of bilateral cataract (either cortical, nuclear, subcapsular or a combination) liable to benefit from standard cataract surgery.
- Patients must be undergoing primary cataract surgery with IOL in-the-bag implantation, requiring a IOL power from 10 to 30 diopters.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with corneal damage.
- Patients with any anterior segment pathology for which extracapsular phacoemulsification cataract surgery would be contraindicated.
- Patients with any ocular pathology, other than the cataract, having repercussions on visual function:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye.Cataract surgery to implant the assigned IOL according to randomized schedule. | Device | Advanced Akreos Adapt |
| Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye.Cataract surgery to implant the assigned IOL according to randomized schedule. | Device | Akreos Adapt |
Primary outcome
Low Contrast Best Corrected Visual Acuity Following Cataract Surgery
Time frame: 3 months
Low contrast best corrected visual acuity (ability to distinguish objects on a similarly colored or shaded background) 3 months following cataract surgery.
Low Contrast Uncorrected Visual Acuity Following Cataract Surgery
Time frame: 3 months
Low contrast uncorrected visual acuity 3 months post cataract surgery
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity
Time frame: 3 months
The mean photopic (day light) contrast sensitivity for each spatial frequency (cycle per degree-CPD) (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Mesoptic Contrast Sensitivity
Time frame: 3 Months
The mean mesoptic (low light) contrast sensitivity for each spatial frequency (cycle per degree-CPD) (1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18 cpd)
Posterior Capsule Opacification Score
Time frame: 24 months
Posterior Capsule Opacification Score (PCO), Density of opacification measured from 0-4 (1=minimal and 4=severe) and area of opacification measured from 0-1 (0=no opacification and 1=posterior capsule opacification required a treatment). Results (EPCO) were computer calculated by multiplying density by area of opacification.
12 secondary outcomes
High Contrast Visual Acuity
Time frame: 1 month
High Contrast Visual Acuity Uncorrected
Time frame: 3 months
High Contrast Visual Acuity Best Corrected
Time frame: 3 months
High Contrast Visual Acuity
Time frame: 12 months
High Contrast Visual Acuity Uncorrected
Time frame: 24 Months
High Contrast Visual Acuity Best Corrected
Time frame: 24 Months
Low Contrast Visual Acuity
Time frame: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Photopic 1.5cpd
Time frame: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Photopic
Time frame: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Mesoptic 1.5 Cpd
Time frame: 1 month
Contrast Sensitivity Mesoptic
Time frame: 1 month
Posterior Capsule Opacification
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Cataract
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Trial to Investigate the Safety and Effectiveness of the KI-362-US1 (YP2.2VM) Intraocular Lens (IOL) in Adult Participants for Correction of Aphakia Following Cataract Extraction
Aphakia, Postcataract
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Oxygen Cage Support During Cataract Surgery
Cataract
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Follow-Up
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Cataract
RecruitingObservational study
Objective Depth-of-Focus Changes During Light Adjustable Lens UV Adjustments
Light Adjustable Lens, Objective Depth of Focus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Advanced Akreos Adapt in one operated eye. and Akreos Adapt in fellow operated eye. in people with Cataract, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jan 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Low Contrast Best Corrected Visual Acuity Following Cataract Surgery (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2011.