Lupus NephritisPhase 2ACCESSNCT00774852
Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis
A Phase 2 study testing abatacept, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in people with Lupus Nephritis and Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 23 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- What is being tested?
- abatacept, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 137 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2008to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Active lupus nephritis (defined by: kidney biopsy documentation within the last 12 months using International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification- proliferative nephritis, active urinary sediment, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio > 1, low complement C3)
- Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at time of study entry
Who cannot join
- End stage renal disease
- Use of cyclophosphamide in the past year
- Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, moderately severe anemia
- Active infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C
- History of cancer, except carcinoma in situ and treated basal and squamous cell carcinomas
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 2 countries.
23 sites in 2 countries
United States21 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
UT Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92037
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Feinstein Institute
Manhasset, New York, 11030
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Seligman Center for Advanced Therapeutics (NYU)
New York, New York, 10003
Columbia University
New York, New York, 10032
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19147
University of Pittsburgh Lupus Center of Excellence
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Mexico2 sites
Unidad de investigación en enfermedades crónico - degenerativas SC
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44620
El Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INNSZ)
Mexico City
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of CTLA4Ig (Abatacept) Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Cyclophosphamide Alone in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis
This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by itself.
Read the detailed description
Lupus nephritis is an inflammation of the kidney that occurs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is caused by the immune system attacking the kidney and is among the most serious complications of SLE: left untreated it can cause long term damage to the kidneys or, in some cases, result in kidney failure.
One of the more common treatments for lupus nephritis is the "Euro-lupus" therapy. In this therapy, patients receive three different drugs - cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and prednisone - over the course of several months. However, some patients do not respond to this therapy and many only show some improvement.
In this ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis, an experimental medication known as abatacept will be added to the Euro-lupus therapy to assess if it works better than Euro-lupus therapy alone. Abatacept is a man-made protein that suppresses parts of the immune system that can cause autoimmune disease. While abatacept is experimental for lupus, it has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Abatacept is also being studied for use in other autoimmune diseases, like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes.
Participants in the ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis will receive bi-weekly intravenous infusions of cyclophosphamide for 3 months, then will take azathioprine tablets daily for at least 3 months more. Abatacept or a placebo will be administered every 2 weeks initially, then every 4 weeks for at least the first 6 months. Treatment of abatacept or placebo and azathioprine may continue for the remainder of the year. All participants will take prednisone tablets daily during the entire study.
Because the ACCESS trial is a randomized, controlled study, each participant has a 50-50 chance (like flipping a coin) of receiving abatacept. Others will receive an inactive, placebo form of the drug. Note however, that all participants will receive the Euro-lupus therapy. As a blinded (masked) study, neither participants nor study physicians will know to which group a person has been assigned.
All participants will undergo regular physical examinations, medical history and various blood and urine tests. Many of these tests will be repeated throughout the study. Participants will be asked to attend 18 study visits in the first year, and one study visit at the end of the second year.
The study will reimburse participants for certain expenses incurred as part of the study.
- Conditions
- Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Being tested
- abatacept, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, prednisone, abatacept placebo
- Keywords
- lupus, systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, SLE, abatacept, CTLA4, CTLA4Ig, glomerulonephritis
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Glomerulonephritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
abataceptDrug
Also called CTLA4Ig, Orencia
Intravenous infusion (500-1000 mg, dep on weight) at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks
cyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Cytoxan, Neosar
500 mg intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for 12 weeks
azathioprineDrug
Also called Imuran, Azasan
2 mg/kg/day orally from weeks 12-28; continue until week 52 if only partial response observed at week 24
prednisoneDrug
Also called Sterapred
60 mg/day for 2 weeks, then taper to 10 mg/day by 12 weeks, then continue on stable dose
abatacept placeboDrug
Intravenous infusion at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks
azathioprine placeboDrug
Oral capsule, daily from weeks 28 to 52, only if complete response observed at week 24
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen Receives: Drug: abatacept; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: azathioprine; Drug: prednisone; Drug: azathioprine placebo |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Abatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen Receives: Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: azathioprine; Drug: prednisone; Drug: abatacept placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Complete Response
Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (17)
Number of Participants With Partial Response
Outcome measure description: Partial response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as complete response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response
Complete response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder.
Partial response: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol.
Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis. Partial responders showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52
Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and had minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response
A complete proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5 and prednisone dose tapered to <= 10mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Complete responders are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response
A partial proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as an improvement (reduction) of >=50% in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at either visit -1 or 0, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study
A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response or a partial response at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the site investigator judged that the participant could benefit from continued participation. Non responders did not respond to treatment and lupus activity is moderate to severe.
Measured: Week 104
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial Response
A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the investigator judged that the participant may benefit from continued participation. CR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a CR. PR definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline, and improvement (reduction) >= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day.
Measured: Week 52
Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. One measure used to assess disease activity is the number of participants who were anti-dsDNA positive at baseline but negative at Week 104. Going from positive to negative is indicative of lowered lupus activity.
Measured: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. This measure was the number of participants who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Having a negative score is indicative of low lupus disease activity.
Measured: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of Hypocomplementemia
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Participants were categorized as having hypocomplementemia if their serum complement test results (C3, and C4) were below the normal range at the site. Below normal complement test results are indicative of active lupus erythematosus.
Measured: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of Flares
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Flares can be renal or non-renal. A renal flare is defined as two successive evaluations at least 1 week apart as proteinuria >1 gm/24h for participants who attain a complete response at Week 12 and for all other participants either 1) Increasing serum creatinine and persistent proteinuria, or 2) Worsening proteinuria. A non-renal flare is defined as any new post-baseline BILAG A in a non-renal organ system using BILAG-2004. This outcome measures the number of participants with the presence of renal and non-renal flares from Week 24 through Week 52 by response status. Having flares is indicative of more lupus disease activity.
Measured: Week 52
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Measured: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.
Measured: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Measured: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From Baseline
Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.
Measured: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004
BILAG-2004 has 5 categories of scoring.Category A:defined by severe disease activity requiring any of the following treatments: 1) systemic high dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) IV pulse glucocorticoids, 3) systemic immunomodulators, or 4)therapeutic high dose anticoagulation in the presence of high dose steroids or immunomodulators. Category B:defined by moderate disease activity requiring any of the following treatments:1) systemic low dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection,3) topical glucocorticoids, 4) topical immunomodulators,5) antimalarials or thalidomide or prasterone or acitretin, or 6) symptomatic therapy.Category C:defined by mild disease.Category D is defined by inactive disease, previously affected.Category E is defined as the system never being involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity.
Measured: Week 52
Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune Response
Among participants who are vaccinated, the number of who have a competent immune response at Week 52 as defined as having met both of the following criteria:
- Pneumococcal vaccination response - absolute value >= 0.35 ug/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a >=2-fold increase from baseline in serotype-specific antibody titer for at least 50% of the serotypes tested.
- Tetanus toxoid vaccination response - absolute value >=0.015 IU/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a 2-fold increase from baseline in antigen-specific antibody titer
Competent immune response is indicative of low disease activity.
Measured: Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2008
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lupus NephritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Wofsy, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, San FranciscoBetty Diamond, MD, Principal investigator, Feinstein Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00774852
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DAIT ITN034AI
- Acronym
- ACCESS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
ACCESS Trial Group. Treatment of lupus nephritis with abatacept: the Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):3096-104. doi: 10.1002/art.38790.
PubMed 25403681Wofsy D, Diamond B, Houssiau FA. Crossing the Atlantic: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis regimen in North America. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(5):1144-6. doi: 10.1002/art.39067. No abstract available.
PubMed 25779381
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of CTLA4Ig (Abatacept) Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Cyclophosphamide Alone in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00774852
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACCESS / DAIT ITN034AI
- Conditions
- Lupus Nephritis, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Keywords
- lupus, systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, SLE, abatacept, CTLA4, CTLA4Ig, glomerulonephritis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)
- Study start
- Nov 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by itself.
Detailed description
Lupus nephritis is an inflammation of the kidney that occurs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is caused by the immune system attacking the kidney and is among the most serious complications of SLE: left untreated it can cause long term damage to the kidneys or, in some cases, result in kidney failure.
One of the more common treatments for lupus nephritis is the "Euro-lupus" therapy. In this therapy, patients receive three different drugs - cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and prednisone - over the course of several months. However, some patients do not respond to this therapy and many only show some improvement.
In this ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis, an experimental medication known as abatacept will be added to the Euro-lupus therapy to assess if it works better than Euro-lupus therapy alone. Abatacept is a man-made protein that suppresses parts of the immune system that can cause autoimmune disease. While abatacept is experimental for lupus, it has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Abatacept is also being studied for use in other autoimmune diseases, like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes.
Participants in the ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis will receive bi-weekly intravenous infusions of cyclophosphamide for 3 months, then will take azathioprine tablets daily for at least 3 months more. Abatacept or a placebo will be administered every 2 weeks initially, then every 4 weeks for at least the first 6 months. Treatment of abatacept or placebo and azathioprine may continue for the remainder of the year. All participants will take prednisone tablets daily during the entire study.
Because the ACCESS trial is a randomized, controlled study, each participant has a 50-50 chance (like flipping a coin) of receiving abatacept. Others will receive an inactive, placebo form of the drug. Note however, that all participants will receive the Euro-lupus therapy. As a blinded (masked) study, neither participants nor study physicians will know to which group a person has been assigned.
All participants will undergo regular physical examinations, medical history and various blood and urine tests. Many of these tests will be repeated throughout the study. Participants will be asked to attend 18 study visits in the first year, and one study visit at the end of the second year.
The study will reimburse participants for certain expenses incurred as part of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Drug: abatacept, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: azathioprine, Drug: prednisone, Drug: azathioprine placeboAbatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: azathioprine, Drug: prednisone, Drug: abatacept placeboAbatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Active lupus nephritis (defined by: kidney biopsy documentation within the last 12 months using International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification- proliferative nephritis, active urinary sediment, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio > 1, low complement C3)
- Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at time of study entry
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- End stage renal disease
- Use of cyclophosphamide in the past year
- Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, moderately severe anemia
- Active infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C
- History of cancer, except carcinoma in situ and treated basal and squamous cell carcinomas
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| abataceptAlso: CTLA4Ig, OrenciaIntravenous infusion (500-1000 mg, dep on weight) at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks | Drug | Treatment |
| cyclophosphamideAlso: Cytoxan, Neosar500 mg intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for 12 weeks | Drug | Control, Treatment |
| azathioprineAlso: Imuran, Azasan2 mg/kg/day orally from weeks 12-28; continue until week 52 if only partial response observed at week 24 | Drug | Control, Treatment |
| prednisoneAlso: Sterapred60 mg/day for 2 weeks, then taper to 10 mg/day by 12 weeks, then continue on stable dose | Drug | Control, Treatment |
| abatacept placeboIntravenous infusion at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks until week 24; continue to week 48 only if partial response at 24 weeks | Drug | Control |
| azathioprine placeboOral capsule, daily from weeks 28 to 52, only if complete response observed at week 24 | Drug | Treatment |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Complete Response
Time frame: Week 24
Complete response definition: a serum creatinine <= 1.2 mg/dL or <=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to <=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
17 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Partial Response
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study
Time frame: Week 104
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial Response
Time frame: Week 52
Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104
Time frame: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA
Time frame: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of Hypocomplementemia
Time frame: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of Flares
Time frame: Week 52
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment
Time frame: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline
Time frame: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores
Time frame: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From Baseline
Time frame: Week 104
Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004
Time frame: Week 52
Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune Response
Time frame: Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 25403681ACCESS Trial Group. Treatment of lupus nephritis with abatacept: the Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):3096-104. doi: 10.1002/art.38790.
- Results publication: PubMed 25779381Wofsy D, Diamond B, Houssiau FA. Crossing the Atlantic: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis regimen in North America. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(5):1144-6. doi: 10.1002/art.39067. No abstract available.
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Immune Tolerance Network websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Lupus Nephritis Trials Network ResearchLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Lupus Nephritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingPhase 1
To Evaluate the Effects of Cevostamab in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With or Without Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Obinutuzumab in Adolescents With Active Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis and the Safety and PK of Obinutuzumab in Pediatric Participants
Lupus Nephritis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of AD-PluReceptor Plus Tafasitamab-cxix and Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders
Autoimmune Disorders, Systemic Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Wofsy, MD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
Betty Diamond, MD principal investigator
Feinstein Institute
23 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing abatacept, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in people with Lupus Nephritis and Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 23 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in United States, Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Complete Response (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00774852, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2016.