Immune Thrombocytopenic PurpuraPhase 2/3NCT00774202
Higher Dose of Rituxan Versus Standard Doses of Rituxan With Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Subjects With Chronic ITP
A Phase 2/3 study testing Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone and Higher Dose of Rituximab in people with Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of higher doses of Rituxan with a regimen combining standard doses of Rituxan + CVP in patients with chronic ITP who did not respond to or relapsed after standard doses of Rituxan. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
- What is being tested?
- Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone and Higher Dose of Rituximab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2003to Feb 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients will be eligible to participate in the study if they:
- Have chronic ITP19 (> 6 months duration)
- Have received Rituximab a minimum of 3 months prior to entry
- Have received no more than 2 courses of Rituximab at standard dose separated by a minimum of 12 weeks
- Have not achieved a durable response to Rituximab, with platelet counts < 30,000/ml when not supported by other treatment
- Have a platelet count of < 30,000/ul on two separate occasions 1-2 weeks apart within the past month prior to the inclusion
Show all 13Show fewer
- We will allow patients who do not have 2 platelet counts < 30,000 on two separate occasions 1-2 weeks apart in the past month, as long as they have either Evan's Syndrome or autoimmune neutropenia (have hemoglobin < 10 g/dL and reticulocytes > 4%, or an absolute neutrophil count < 1.0 K/uL twice within 1 month)
- Are age ≥ 10 years old
- Male and Female
- Had a splenectomy at least 60 days prior to study entry, or a contraindication to splenectomy
- Give written informed consent
- Use an effective means of contraception during treatment and for six months after completion of treatment
- Have negative serum pregnancy test, for all women who are able to have children, within 14 days prior to study entry
Who cannot join
- Male and female subjects will be ineligible to participate if they:
- Received prior treatment with cyclophosphamide within the last 3 months
- Received prior treatment with > 4 infusions of vinca alkaloids within the 6 months
- Had previous or concomitant malignancy other than basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix, or other malignancy for which the patient had not been disease-free for at least 5 years
- Have a HIV infection
- Have hepatitis Bs antigen positivity or active hepatitis C infection
Show all 15Show fewer
- Have an absolute neutrophil count < 1.000/mm3 at study entry (unless related to autoimmune neutropenia)
- Have a Hemoglobin level < 10 g/dl other than caused by thalassemia trait, iron deficiency or autoimmune hemolytic anemia (patients with Evan's syndrome will not be excluded)
- Have an impaired renal function as indicated by a serum creatinine level > 2.0 mg/dL
- Have an inadequate liver function as indicated by a total bilirubin level > 2.0 mg/dL and/or an AST or ALT level > 3x upper limit of normal
- Have active infection requiring antibiotic therapy within 7 days prior to study entry
- Are pregnant or lactating women, or plan to become pregnant or impregnated within 12 months of receiving study drug
- Have had a prior severe reaction to Rituximab, leading to discontinuation of treatment
- Have a New York Heart Classification III or IV heart disease
- Have a history of severe psychiatric disorder or are unable to comply with study and follow-up procedures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Rand. Trial Comp Higher Doses of Rituximab (Rituxan) With Standard Doses of Rituxan in Combination With CVP (Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone) in Patients With Chronic ITP Who Have Failed/Relapsed After Rituxan Treatment
This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of higher doses of Rituxan with a regimen combining standard doses of Rituxan + CVP in patients with chronic ITP who did not respond to or relapsed after standard doses of Rituxan. Patients eligible for this protocol will be stratified into two subgroups according to their initial response to Rituxan.
Read the detailed description
The rationale for using chemotherapy in combination with Rituximab:
Since Rituximab is an anti-B cell therapy, in order to improve the rate of durable responses beyond the 32% (18 of 57) seen with Rituximab alone, it seems appropriate to combine it with a therapy that would also target T cells and/or macrophages. Our plan is therefore to combine Rituximab with a standard chemotherapy (CHOP)-like regimen as previously successfully tested in patients with follicular or diffuse large-B-cell lymphomas 13-15. The "CHOP" chemotherapy regimen is a combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (or prednisolone) that has been considered the "gold standard" for treating lymphomas for more than 20 years.
This combination of medications was used in a Hodgkin's patient with refractory ITP and became the template for developing the use of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone for ITP as initially reported in 1993. Since reports on doxorubicin efficacy by itself in ITP are only anecdotal 16 and this drug has a potential cardiac toxicity, a CVP regimen (namely a combination of cyclophosphamide + vincristine and prednisone) should be similar in efficacy to CHOP in patients with ITP and have less toxicity. Indeed, the efficacy of such a chemotherapy12 as well as pulses cyclophosphamide therapy alone11 have already been reported in patients with refractory ITP.
Since attempts to increase the efficacy of CHOP by increasing the doses or adding other cytotoxic drugs have failed, a new therapeutic strategy combining CHOP with Rituxan has been successfully developed in the last few years in various types of B-cell lymphomas 13-15. In elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma, the addition of Rituxan to standard CHOP chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure and deaths without increasing toxicity 13. Moreover, in autoimmune disorders, there are few preliminary data suggesting that Rituxan and cyclophopshamide given in combination could be effective and relatively safe in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis 17.
Therefore, the rationale for combining Rituxan with a CHOP-like regimen in ITP is threefold:
Both Rituxan and CHOP or IV cyclophosphamide have efficacy in ITP The treatments have different mechanisms of action. They have minimally-overlapping toxicities.
The rationale for using higher doses of Rituxan in patients who had no response, or relapsed, to the drug at the standard dose:
The standard dose of Rituxan is arbitrary in that one dose of Rituxan has been used in the great majority of the clinical trials and virtually all patients since the FDA approval of Rituxan in 1997: 375 mg/m2 weekly x 4 weeks. To date, because Rituxan is a monoclonal antibody rather than a chemotherapeutic agent, it was recognized that a true maximum tolerated dose (MTD) might not be achieved. Among other factors that could influence the tolerance of higher doses of Rituxan are the rate of CD20 surface expression and the serum level of the antibody11. Limited trials of higher doses have been pursued in CLL18 (up to 2,250 mg/m2 per dose), but not in other types of lymphoma or in autoimmune diseases. In CLL, mild to severe toxicity was exclusively observed with the first dose (375 mg/m2) while toxicity on subsequent higher doses was minimal. In ITP, some of the few patients that have been retreated responded better to the second dose of rituximab than to the initial treatment (although the opposite is also true). Full depletion of the marrow and especially the lymph nodes is not achieved by the current dose regimen and B cells return in substantial number to the peripheral blood within 3-6 months in patients with ITP treated at the conventional dose. We therefore anticipate that in ITP patients who relapsed or did not respond after a previous course of rituximab, doubling the dose could lead to a deeper and more prolonged B cell depletion and to a better increase in the platelet count without enhancing toxicity.
- Conditions
- Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
- Being tested
- Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone, Higher Dose of Rituximab
- Keywords
- Pts w/ Chronic ITP who have fail/relap after Rituxan rx
- Medical subject headings
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, PrednisoneDrug
Also called Rituximab
'Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone interventions are as follows: Rituximab will be administered as an IV infusion at the standard dose of 375 mg/m2 for 4 doses. However, the schedule of the infusions will be different than the usual one: Rather than administrating the 4 doses once weekly, the first infusion will be given 5 days (± 3 days) prior to the first infusions of C and V and oral P, and the following 3 rituximab infusions will be given on the same day as the 3 cycles of C, V, and P.
Higher Dose of RituximabDrug
rituximab 750mg/m2 (twice the standard dose of 375mg/m2) will be given weekly for 4 weeks. Premedication and infusion rate escalation will be exactly the same as for standard dose rituximab. The additional dose will thus run at 400ml/hr.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone | Active comparator | 'Standard Dose of Rituximab administered with C, V, P (CVP)'
Interventions: Rituximab will be administered as an IV infusion at the standard dose of 375 mg/m2 for 4 doses at standard rates and use of premedication. The schedule will be to give the first rituximab infusion 5 days (± 3 days) prior to first administration of CVP, and the following 3 infusions will be given on the same day as the 3 cycles of C, V, P. On those days, the IV Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine will be given first so that the administration of fluids with the rituximab can be used as post-cyclophosphamide hydration, Cyclophosphamide dosing will be 750mg/m2 (maximum 2000mg), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (up to 1.6 mg), prednisone 100mg po daily for 5 days. Receives: Drug: Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone |
| Higher Dose of Rituximab | Active comparator | In this arm, Rituximab will be administered at a dose of 750 mg/m2 once a week x 4 consecutive weeks (4 infusions in total). We will perform EKG monitor tracings before, during and after Rituxan infusions. This will be a single-lead tracing that will allow us to look at the Q-T interval. Receives: Drug: Higher Dose of Rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of Higher Double Doses of Rituxan and of Standard Dose of Rituxan + Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone
Outcome measure was determined by comparing the study participants' historical responses to their initial treatment of rituximab at standard dose/regimen without "enhancement" (based on duration of response and type of response) to the participants response to their study treatment responses. Thus each patient was his or her own control although all study treatments included standard dose rituximab treatments (one at double the dose and one with additional treatments).
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With SAEs
How many participants had SAEs among those receiving R-CVP or among those receiving double dose rituximab and did participants in one arm have substantially more SAEs than those in the other arm
Measured: 2 years
Relative Efficacy of the 2 Groups
The goal is to see if there are major differences between the two arms for each group in term of efficacy and of toxicity both overall and in comparison to the previous responses to rituximab alone. The comparisons are for level of response eg CR (>100k) vs PR (230-100k) vs NR (<30k) and for duration of response-----duration of response is controlled by comparison to duration of response from initial rituximab infusions
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2003
- Primary completionFeb 2008
- Study completionFeb 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Immune Thrombocytopenic PurpuraStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biogen, Genentech, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- James B Bussel, M.D., Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00774202
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0301005964
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: publication of data in American journal of hematology
Publications
Hasan A, Michel M, Patel V, Stasi R, Cunningham-Rundles S, Leonard JP, Bussel J. Repeated courses of rituximab in chronic ITP: Three different regimens. Am J Hematol. 2009 Oct;84(10):661-5. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21512.
PubMed 19731307
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Rand. Trial Comp Higher Doses of Rituximab (Rituxan) With Standard Doses of Rituxan in Combination With CVP (Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone) in Patients With Chronic ITP Who Have Failed/Relapsed After Rituxan Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00774202
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0301005964
- Conditions
- Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
- Keywords
- Pts w/ Chronic ITP who have fail/relap after Rituxan rx
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biogen, Genentech, Inc.
- Study start
- Nov 2003
- Primary completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Nov 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of higher doses of Rituxan with a regimen combining standard doses of Rituxan + CVP in patients with chronic ITP who did not respond to or relapsed after standard doses of Rituxan. Patients eligible for this protocol will be stratified into two subgroups according to their initial response to Rituxan.
Detailed description
The rationale for using chemotherapy in combination with Rituximab:
Since Rituximab is an anti-B cell therapy, in order to improve the rate of durable responses beyond the 32% (18 of 57) seen with Rituximab alone, it seems appropriate to combine it with a therapy that would also target T cells and/or macrophages. Our plan is therefore to combine Rituximab with a standard chemotherapy (CHOP)-like regimen as previously successfully tested in patients with follicular or diffuse large-B-cell lymphomas 13-15. The "CHOP" chemotherapy regimen is a combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (or prednisolone) that has been considered the "gold standard" for treating lymphomas for more than 20 years.
This combination of medications was used in a Hodgkin's patient with refractory ITP and became the template for developing the use of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone for ITP as initially reported in 1993. Since reports on doxorubicin efficacy by itself in ITP are only anecdotal 16 and this drug has a potential cardiac toxicity, a CVP regimen (namely a combination of cyclophosphamide + vincristine and prednisone) should be similar in efficacy to CHOP in patients with ITP and have less toxicity. Indeed, the efficacy of such a chemotherapy12 as well as pulses cyclophosphamide therapy alone11 have already been reported in patients with refractory ITP.
Since attempts to increase the efficacy of CHOP by increasing the doses or adding other cytotoxic drugs have failed, a new therapeutic strategy combining CHOP with Rituxan has been successfully developed in the last few years in various types of B-cell lymphomas 13-15. In elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma, the addition of Rituxan to standard CHOP chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure and deaths without increasing toxicity 13. Moreover, in autoimmune disorders, there are few preliminary data suggesting that Rituxan and cyclophopshamide given in combination could be effective and relatively safe in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis 17.
Therefore, the rationale for combining Rituxan with a CHOP-like regimen in ITP is threefold:
Both Rituxan and CHOP or IV cyclophosphamide have efficacy in ITP The treatments have different mechanisms of action. They have minimally-overlapping toxicities.
The rationale for using higher doses of Rituxan in patients who had no response, or relapsed, to the drug at the standard dose:
The standard dose of Rituxan is arbitrary in that one dose of Rituxan has been used in the great majority of the clinical trials and virtually all patients since the FDA approval of Rituxan in 1997: 375 mg/m2 weekly x 4 weeks. To date, because Rituxan is a monoclonal antibody rather than a chemotherapeutic agent, it was recognized that a true maximum tolerated dose (MTD) might not be achieved. Among other factors that could influence the tolerance of higher doses of Rituxan are the rate of CD20 surface expression and the serum level of the antibody11. Limited trials of higher doses have been pursued in CLL18 (up to 2,250 mg/m2 per dose), but not in other types of lymphoma or in autoimmune diseases. In CLL, mild to severe toxicity was exclusively observed with the first dose (375 mg/m2) while toxicity on subsequent higher doses was minimal. In ITP, some of the few patients that have been retreated responded better to the second dose of rituximab than to the initial treatment (although the opposite is also true). Full depletion of the marrow and especially the lymph nodes is not achieved by the current dose regimen and B cells return in substantial number to the peripheral blood within 3-6 months in patients with ITP treated at the conventional dose. We therefore anticipate that in ITP patients who relapsed or did not respond after a previous course of rituximab, doubling the dose could lead to a deeper and more prolonged B cell depletion and to a better increase in the platelet count without enhancing toxicity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone | Active comparator | Drug: Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone'Standard Dose of Rituximab administered with C, V, P (CVP)' Interventions: Rituximab will be administered as an IV infusion at the standard dose of 375 mg/m2 for 4 doses at standard rates and use of premedication. The schedule will be to give the first rituximab infusion 5 days (± 3 days) prior to first administration of CVP, and the following 3 infusions will be given on the same day as the 3 cycles of C, V, P. On those days, the IV Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine will be given first so that the administration of fluids with the rituximab can be used as post-cyclophosphamide hydration, Cyclophosphamide dosing will be 750mg/m2 (maximum 2000mg), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (up to 1.6 mg), prednisone 100mg po daily for 5 days. |
| Higher Dose of Rituximab | Active comparator | Drug: Higher Dose of RituximabIn this arm, Rituximab will be administered at a dose of 750 mg/m2 once a week x 4 consecutive weeks (4 infusions in total). We will perform EKG monitor tracings before, during and after Rituxan infusions. This will be a single-lead tracing that will allow us to look at the Q-T interval. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Have chronic ITP19 (> 6 months duration)
- Have received Rituximab a minimum of 3 months prior to entry
- Have received no more than 2 courses of Rituximab at standard dose separated by a minimum of 12 weeks
- Have not achieved a durable response to Rituximab, with platelet counts < 30,000/ml when not supported by other treatment
- Have a platelet count of < 30,000/ul on two separate occasions 1-2 weeks apart within the past month prior to the inclusion
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Received prior treatment with cyclophosphamide within the last 3 months
- Received prior treatment with > 4 infusions of vinca alkaloids within the 6 months
- Had previous or concomitant malignancy other than basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix, or other malignancy for which the patient had not been disease-free for at least 5 years
- Have a HIV infection
- Have hepatitis Bs antigen positivity or active hepatitis C infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, PrednisoneAlso: Rituximab'Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone interventions are as follows: Rituximab will be administered as an IV infusion at the standard dose of 375 mg/m2 for 4 doses. However, the schedule of the infusions will be different than the usual one: Rather than administrating the 4 doses once weekly, the first infusion will be given 5 days (± 3 days) prior to the first infusions of C and V and oral P, and the following 3 rituximab infusions will be given on the same day as the 3 cycles of C, V, and P. | Drug | Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone |
| Higher Dose of Rituximabrituximab 750mg/m2 (twice the standard dose of 375mg/m2) will be given weekly for 4 weeks. Premedication and infusion rate escalation will be exactly the same as for standard dose rituximab. The additional dose will thus run at 400ml/hr. | Drug | Higher Dose of Rituximab |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of Higher Double Doses of Rituxan and of Standard Dose of Rituxan + Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone
Time frame: 2 years
Outcome measure was determined by comparing the study participants' historical responses to their initial treatment of rituximab at standard dose/regimen without "enhancement" (based on duration of response and type of response) to the participants response to their study treatment responses. Thus each patient was his or her own control although all study treatments included standard dose rituximab treatments (one at double the dose and one with additional treatments).
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With SAEs
Time frame: 2 years
Relative Efficacy of the 2 Groups
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 19731307Hasan A, Michel M, Patel V, Stasi R, Cunningham-Rundles S, Leonard JP, Bussel J. Repeated courses of rituximab in chronic ITP: Three different regimens. Am J Hematol. 2009 Oct;84(10):661-5. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21512.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. publication of data in American journal of hematology
Related trials for Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Tolerability of Ianalumab (VAY736) With Investigator's Choice Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist (IC TPO-RA) in Patients With Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), Primary Evans Syndrome (ES)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Pirtobrutinib in Participants With Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Tafasitamab in Adult Participants With Primary Autoimmune Blood Cell Disorders
Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Follow-up Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James B Bussel, M.D. principal investigator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone and Higher Dose of Rituximab in people with Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Nov 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of Higher Double Doses of Rituxan and of Standard Dose of Rituxan + Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00774202, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2019.