PsoriasisPhase 2NCT00773734
Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis (Core Study)
A Phase 2 study testing Apremilast 10mg, Apremilast 20mg and Apremilast 30 mg in people with Psoriasis and Plaque-type Psoriasis, run by Amgen at 35 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to test if the drug apremilast was safe, if it helped improve psoriasis, and how well the participants tolerated it. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis, Plaque-type Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Apremilast 10mg, Apremilast 20mg and Apremilast 30 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 352 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2008to 20 May 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
- ≥18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Diagnosis of chronic, stable plaque psoriasis at least 6 months prior to screening as defined by:
- PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score ≥ 12
- Body Surface Area (BSA) ≥ 10%
Show all 11Show fewer
- Candidate for photo/systemic therapy
- In good health as judged by the investigator, based on medical history, physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), serum chemistry, hematology, immunology, and urinalysis
- Meet all laboratory criteria as defined per protocol
- Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening (Visit 1). In addition, sexually active FCBP must agree to use TWO of the following adequate forms of contraception methods. A FCBP must agree to have pregnancy tests every 4 weeks while on study medication
- Males (including those who have had a vasectomy) must agree to use barrier contraception (latex condoms) when engaging in reproductive sexual activity with FCBP while on study medication and for 84 days after taking the last dose of study medication
Who cannot join
- History of clinically significant disease (as determined by the investigator)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- History of active mycobacterial infection within 3 years
- History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection
- Congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies
- Hepatitis B surface antigen positive or Hepatitis B core antibody positive at screening
Show all 17Show fewer
- Antibodies to Hepatitis C at screening
- Malignancy or history of malignancy except for treated [i.e., cured] basal-cell skin carcinomas
- Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, that places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study
- Psoriasis flare within 4 weeks of screening
- Topical therapy within 2 weeks of randomization
- Systemic therapy for psoriasis within 4 weeks of randomization
- Use of phototherapy within 4 weeks of randomization [(i.e., Ultraviolet (UVB), Psoralens and long-wave ultraviolet radiation (PUVA)]
- Adalimumab, etanercept, efalizumab or infliximab within 12 weeks of randomization
- Alefacept within 24 weeks of randomization
- Investigational drug within 4 weeks of randomization, or 5 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic half lives, if known (whichever is longer)
- Prolonged sun exposure or use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet light sources
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 2 countries.
35 sites in 2 countries
United States20 sites
Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center
Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022
Modern Research Associates
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio, 45408
Associates In Research Inc
Fresno, California, 93720
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
Rivergate Dermatology Clinical Research
Goodlettsville, Tennessee, 37072
Dawes/Fretzin Dermatology Group Inc
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
Dermatology & Advanced Aesthetics
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605
Allergy, Asthma and Dermatology Research Center
Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035
Dermatology Associates
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Aurora Advanced Healthcare, Inc
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209
UMDNJ Robert Wood Johnson
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
Renstar Medical Research
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Northwest Cutaneous Research Specialists
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Oregon Med. Research Center, PC
Portland, Oregon, 97223
Stanford University School of Medicine
Redwood City, California, 94063
Dermatology Associates of Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98101
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Skokie, Illinois, 60077
Central Dermatology
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Atlantic Skin & Cosmetic Surgery Group, PC
Wilmington, Delaware, 19810
Canada15 sites
Ultranova Skincare
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6L2
Stratica Medical
Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 1X3
Eastern Canada Cutaneous Research Associates
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1Z4
Dermatrials Research Division
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1V6
Innovaderm Research Laval Inc.
Laval, Quebec, H7S 2C6
Guenther Dermatology Research Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 3H7
Centre De Recherche Dermatologique du Qu
MetSte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4X7
Innovaderm Research Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4L5
International Dermatology Research, Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1V4
North Bay Dermatology Centre
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 3Z7
Dr. Michael Robern
Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 6E2
Alpha Clinical Research Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 4S8
Dr. Lorne E. Albrecht
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
K. Papp Clinical Research Inc.
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
XLR8 Research
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 1E6
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis (Core Study)
The purpose of this study was to test if the drug apremilast was safe, if it helped improve psoriasis, and how well the participants tolerated it.
Read the detailed description
This study fully explored the extent of treatment benefit achieved with doses of apremilast up to 30 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID) with treatment duration for up to 6 months. In addition, it was important to determine the minimally effective dose for apremilast and more fully elucidate the dose response curve in this patient population. The results from this study helped guide the selection of the dose in the phase 3 trials.
Participants meeting eligibility criteria at the Baseline Visit (Week 0) were centrally randomized with the use of a permuted-block randomization list, with equal allocation to each of the four treatment arms: 10 mg, 20 mg or 30 mg PO BID of apremilast or placebo. In an effort to mitigate the dose-dependent adverse effects of apremilast (e.g., headache or gastrointestinal disturbances), participants had their dose titrated over a 7-day period (Days 1 through7). Participants received 10 mg PO BID of apremilast or identically-appearing placebo during Days 1 to 2. Participants randomized to the 10 mg BID dose continued taking this dose throughout the treatment phase of the study. Those participants randomized to the 20 mg BID dose were dose titrated to 20 mg PO BID of apremilast or identically-appearing placebo during Days 3 to 4 of dosing. Participants randomized to the 20 mg BID dose continued taking this dose throughout the treatment phase of the study. Those participants randomized to the 30 mg BID dose were dose titrated to 30 mg PO BID of apremilast or identically-appearing placebo during Days 5 to 7 and continued taking this dose throughout the treatment phase of the study. At Week 16, all participants originally randomized to the placebo arm were re-randomized to 20 mg BID or 30 mg BID of apremilast. All participants (i.e., those that were continuing their Apremilast dosing regimen, as well as those that were switched from placebo to apremilast) received drug at Week 16 in a treatment arm in a blinded fashion. In addition, participants who transitioned from placebo to active medication at Week 16 completed a dose titration schedule to help mitigate any potential GI side effects that may have jeopardized the blinding of the treatment arms.
At Week 24 (end of core study and beginning of an extension study), participants were given the option to enroll into an extension study (PSOR-005E NCT00953875) and continue on the same apremilast dosage they had received at the end of the core study, during Weeks 24-52, a total of 28 weeks. Participants who elected not to enter into the treatment extension study, completed a 4-week observational follow-up phase of the core study. At Week 52 (end of extension study and beginning of a long-term extension study), participants were given the option to enroll into a long term extension study (PSOR-005LTE NCT01130116), for 4 additional years. Participants who were treated with apremilast 10 mg BID in the extension study were randomly assigned and dose titrated to either apremilast 20 mg BID or 30 mg BID. Participants who were dosed with 20mg or 30 mg BID in the extension study continued to receive the same dose in the long-term extension study. The long-term extension study is anticipated to complete in May 2016.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis, Plaque-type Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Apremilast 10mg, Apremilast 20mg, Apremilast 30 mg, Placebo, Apremilast 30mg
- Keywords
- moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Apremilast 10mgDrug
Also called Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla
Apremilast 20mgDrug
Also called Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla
Apremilast 30 mgDrug
Also called Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla
PlaceboDrug
Apremilast 30mgDrug
Also called Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla
Apremilast 20mgDrug
Also called Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 10mg | Experimental | Apremilast 10 mg administered orally twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 10 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for 8 weeks in the active treatment phase Receives: Drug: Apremilast 10mg |
| Apremilast 20mg | Experimental | Apremilast 20 mg administered orally twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for 8 weeks in the active treatment phase Receives: Drug: Apremilast 20mg |
| Apremilast 30 mg | Experimental | Apremilast 30 mg administered orally twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for 8 weeks in the active treatment phase Receives: Drug: Apremilast 30 mg |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Oral Placebo tablets administered twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo/Apremilast 20 mg | Experimental | Participants initially randomized to receive placebo twice daily during the 16 week placebo controlled phase are re-randomized to 20 mg apremilast BID during the 8 week active treatment phase Receives: Drug: Apremilast 20mg |
| Placebo/Apremilast 30mg | Experimental | Participants initially randomized to receive placebo twice daily during the 16 week placebo controlled phase are re-randomized to 30 mg apremilast BID during the 8 week active treatment phase Receives: Drug: Apremilast 30mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 16
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 and Week 16
Secondary outcomes (107)
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in PASI Score at Week 24
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 24. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy.The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head,trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in PASI Score at Week 16
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 24. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) From Baseline in the PASI Score at Week 16
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 24. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy..The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 16
A participant was classified as having achieved a PASI-100 response if the PASI score was reduced by at least 100% from baseline. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24
A participant was classified as having achieved a PASI-100 response if the PASI score was reduced by at least 100% from baseline. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Time to Achieve a PASI-100 Response During the Placebo Controlled Phase
For PASI-100 responders in the placebo-controlled period weeks 0-16, time to achieve PASI-100 was the time interval, inclusive, between the date of randomization (day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-90 was achieved.
Measured: Weeks 0 to 16
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16
The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 24
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 16
Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24
Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) During the Placebo Controlled Phase
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) During the Active Treatment Phase at Week 24
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 24
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 16
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at Week 16
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to week 16
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 24
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 24
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-8)
Area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) to 8 hours, calculated using the linear trapezoid rule.
Measured: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast
Core Study: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-8)
Area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) to 8 hours, calculate using the linear trapezoid rule.
Measured: Week 24
Core Study: Peak; (Maximum) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apremilast
The maximum observed plasma concentration of apremilast observed at Week 14 (steady-state Cmax)
Measured: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast
Core Study: Peak; (Maximum) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apremilast
The maximum observed plasma concentration of apremilast observed at Week 24 (steady-state Cmax)
Measured: Week 24
Core Study: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug (Tmax)
Time to achieve maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) observed at Week 14 (Time to achieve steady-state Tmax)
Measured: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast
Core Study: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug (Tmax)
Time to achieve maximum plasma concentration (tmax) observed at Week 24 (Time to achieve steady-state Tmax)
Measured: Week 24
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 52. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 32 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 40 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 32 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 52 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 32 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 40 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 52 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
A participant was classified as having achieved a PASI-100 response if the PASI score was reduced by at least 100% from baseline. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
A participant was classified as having achieved a PASI-100 response if the PASI score was reduced by at least 100% from baseline. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
A participant was classified as having achieved a PASI-100 response if the PASI score was reduced by at least 100% from baseline. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Time to Achieve PASI-75 During the Extension Study
For PASI-75 responders in the extension study, time to achieve PASI-75 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (Day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-75 was achieved.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Time to Achieve PASI-50 During the Extension Study
For PASI-50 responders in the extension study, time to achieve PASI-50 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (Day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-50 was achieved.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Time to Achieve PASI-90 During the Extension Study
For PASI-90 responders in the extension study, time to achieve PASI-90 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (Day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-90 was achieved.
Measured: Week 0 to Extension study
Extension Study: Time to Achieve PASI-100 During the Extension Study
For PASI-100 responders in the extension study, time to achieve PASI-100 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (Day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-100 was achieved.
Measured: Week 0 to Extension Study
Extension Study: Percent Change in PASI Score at Week 32
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percent Change in PASI Score at Week 40
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percent Change in PASI Score at Week 52
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 32
Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the subject and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 40
Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the subject and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 52
Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the subject and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected BSA at Week 32
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected BSA at Week 40
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected BSA at Week 52
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 32
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 40
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 52
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 32
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) at Week 32
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 40
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at Week 40
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 52
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at Week 52
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value..
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Dose-response Relationship Using the Percent Reduction of PASI Scores at Week 52
Dose response relationship using percent reduction in PASI scores across dose groups at Week 52 compared to Week 0
Measured: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Time to Loss of Response During the Treatment Phase of the Extension Study.
Time to 50% loss of the maximal improvement (achieved in either the core study or the extension study) during the treatment phase of the extension study, in participants who achieved ≥ PASI-50 in either the core study or during the treatment phase of the extension study
Measured: Week 0 to 52
Time to Loss of 50% of the PASI Response During the Observational Follow-up Phase Relative to the End of Treatment (Participants Who Had at Least a PASI-50 Response at the End of Treatment Phase)
Time to loss of response was modified to be 50% loss in the PASI response observed at the end of treatment for participants who achieved at least a PASI-50 at the end of treatment. This definition was changed since participants may have already lost their maximal PASI response prior to enrollment into the Observation Follow-up Phase. Included all participants that enrolled into the observational follow-up phase after the treatment phase.
Measured: Up to 4 weeks after the last dose
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) in the Placebo Controlled Phase
An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose.
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16; up to data cut off of 21 July 2011
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) in the Apremilast Exposure Period
An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose.
Measured: Week 0-88; up to data cut off of 21 July 2011
Core Study: Time to Achieve a PASI-50 Response During the Placebo Controlled Phase
For PASI-50 responders in the placebo-controlled period weeks 0-16, time to achieve PASI-50 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-50 was achieved.
Measured: Week 0 to 16
Core Study: Time to Achieve a PASI-75 Response During the Placebo Controlled Phase
For PASI-75 responders in the placebo-controlled period Weeks 0-16, time to achieve PASI-75 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-75 is achieved.
Measured: Weeks 0 to 16
Core Study: Time to Achieve a PASI-90 Response During the Placebo Controlled Phase
For PASI-90 responders in the placebo-controlled period weeks 0-16, time to achieve PASI-90 was the time interval, inclusive, between the date of randomization (day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-90 was achieved.
Measured: Weeks 0 to 16
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) in the Apremilast Exposure Period
An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose.
Measured: Week 0 to 6 years of study treatment; maximum duration of exposure was 314.6 weeks
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 18 Months
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 2 Years
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 3 Years
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 4 Years
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 18 Months
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 2 Years
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 3 Years
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 4 Years
PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 18 Months
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 76 of the long-term extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 2 Years
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 100 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 3 Years
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 148 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 4 Years
PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 196 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 18 Months, 2 Years, 3 Years and 4 Years
PASI-100 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at a 100% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score of the long-term extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 18 Months
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 2 Years
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 3 Years
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 4 Years
The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
Core Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Month 18, and Years 2, 3 and 4
Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3).
Measured: Week 0 to Week 196
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 18 Months
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 2 Years
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 3 Years
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 4 Years
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 18 Months
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 2 Years
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 3 Years
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 4 Years
The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint"), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 18 Months
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 2 Years
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 3 Years
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 4 Years
The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 18 Months
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 2 Years
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 3 Years
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 4 Years
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 18 Months
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 18
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 2 Years
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 24
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 3 Years
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 36
LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 4 Years
The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Measured: Week 0 to Month 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study start1 Sep 2008
- Primary completion1 Aug 2009
- Study completion20 May 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 352 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00773734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CC-10004-PSOR-005
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 7 May 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Papp K, Cather JC, Rosoph L, Sofen H, Langley RG, Matheson RT, Hu C, Day RM. Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Aug 25;380(9843):738-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60642-4. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
PubMed 22748702Ohtsuki M, Kubo H, Morishima H, Goto R, Zheng R, Nakagawa H. Guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis in Japanese patients: Efficacy and safety results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Dermatol. 2018 Sep;45(9):1053-1062. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14504. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
PubMed 29905383Knuckles MLF, Levi E, Soung J. Defining and treating moderate plaque psoriasis: a dermatologist survey. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018 Nov;29(7):658-663. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1443200. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
PubMed 29502473Knuckles MLF, Levi E, Soung J. Treating moderate plaque psoriasis: prospective 6-month chart review of patients treated with apremilast. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Aug;30(5):430-434. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1528326. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
PubMed 30339049Wu JJ, Pelletier C, Ung B, Tian M. Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for the treatment of psoriasis. J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):365-371. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1571500. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
PubMed 30652520Wang Y, Coyne K, Sofen H, Santanello N, Currie B, Zhang Z, Nograles K. Qualitative analysis and reproducibility assessment of the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Dec;30(8):775-783. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1577546. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
PubMed 30747550Strand V, Fiorentino D, Hu C, Day RM, Stevens RM, Papp KA. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from a phase IIb randomized, controlled study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 May 10;11:82. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-82.
PubMed 23663752Mease PJ, Hatemi G, Paris M, Cheng S, Maes P, Zhang W, Shi R, Flower A, Picard H, Stein Gold L. Apremilast Long-Term Safety Up to 5 Years from 15 Pooled Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Behcet's Syndrome. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Sep;24(5):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00783-7. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
PubMed 37316690
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis (Core Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00773734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CC-10004-PSOR-005
- Conditions
- Psoriasis, Plaque-type Psoriasis
- Keywords
- moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 352 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Nov 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to test if the drug apremilast was safe, if it helped improve psoriasis, and how well the participants tolerated it.
Detailed description
This study fully explored the extent of treatment benefit achieved with doses of apremilast up to 30 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID) with treatment duration for up to 6 months. In addition, it was important to determine the minimally effective dose for apremilast and more fully elucidate the dose response curve in this patient population. The results from this study helped guide the selection of the dose in the phase 3 trials.
Participants meeting eligibility criteria at the Baseline Visit (Week 0) were centrally randomized with the use of a permuted-block randomization list, with equal allocation to each of the four treatment arms: 10 mg, 20 mg or 30 mg PO BID of apremilast or placebo. In an effort to mitigate the dose-dependent adverse effects of apremilast (e.g., headache or gastrointestinal disturbances), participants had their dose titrated over a 7-day period (Days 1 through7). Participants received 10 mg PO BID of apremilast or identically-appearing placebo during Days 1 to 2. Participants randomized to the 10 mg BID dose continued taking this dose throughout the treatment phase of the study. Those participants randomized to the 20 mg BID dose were dose titrated to 20 mg PO BID of apremilast or identically-appearing placebo during Days 3 to 4 of dosing. Participants randomized to the 20 mg BID dose continued taking this dose throughout the treatment phase of the study. Those participants randomized to the 30 mg BID dose were dose titrated to 30 mg PO BID of apremilast or identically-appearing placebo during Days 5 to 7 and continued taking this dose throughout the treatment phase of the study. At Week 16, all participants originally randomized to the placebo arm were re-randomized to 20 mg BID or 30 mg BID of apremilast. All participants (i.e., those that were continuing their Apremilast dosing regimen, as well as those that were switched from placebo to apremilast) received drug at Week 16 in a treatment arm in a blinded fashion. In addition, participants who transitioned from placebo to active medication at Week 16 completed a dose titration schedule to help mitigate any potential GI side effects that may have jeopardized the blinding of the treatment arms.
At Week 24 (end of core study and beginning of an extension study), participants were given the option to enroll into an extension study (PSOR-005E NCT00953875) and continue on the same apremilast dosage they had received at the end of the core study, during Weeks 24-52, a total of 28 weeks. Participants who elected not to enter into the treatment extension study, completed a 4-week observational follow-up phase of the core study. At Week 52 (end of extension study and beginning of a long-term extension study), participants were given the option to enroll into a long term extension study (PSOR-005LTE NCT01130116), for 4 additional years. Participants who were treated with apremilast 10 mg BID in the extension study were randomly assigned and dose titrated to either apremilast 20 mg BID or 30 mg BID. Participants who were dosed with 20mg or 30 mg BID in the extension study continued to receive the same dose in the long-term extension study. The long-term extension study is anticipated to complete in May 2016.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 10mg | Experimental | Drug: Apremilast 10mgApremilast 10 mg administered orally twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 10 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for 8 weeks in the active treatment phase |
| Apremilast 20mg | Experimental | Drug: Apremilast 20mgApremilast 20 mg administered orally twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for 8 weeks in the active treatment phase |
| Apremilast 30 mg | Experimental | Drug: Apremilast 30 mgApremilast 30 mg administered orally twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks (following dose titration) during the placebo controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets orally administered BID for 8 weeks in the active treatment phase |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboOral Placebo tablets administered twice daily (BID) for 16 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase. |
| Placebo/Apremilast 20 mg | Experimental | Drug: Apremilast 20mgParticipants initially randomized to receive placebo twice daily during the 16 week placebo controlled phase are re-randomized to 20 mg apremilast BID during the 8 week active treatment phase |
| Placebo/Apremilast 30mg | Experimental | Drug: Apremilast 30mgParticipants initially randomized to receive placebo twice daily during the 16 week placebo controlled phase are re-randomized to 30 mg apremilast BID during the 8 week active treatment phase |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
- ≥18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Diagnosis of chronic, stable plaque psoriasis at least 6 months prior to screening as defined by:
- Candidate for photo/systemic therapy
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- History of clinically significant disease (as determined by the investigator)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- History of active mycobacterial infection within 3 years
- History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection
- Congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 10mgAlso: Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla | Drug | Apremilast 10mg |
| Apremilast 20mgAlso: Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla | Drug | Apremilast 20mg |
| Apremilast 30 mgAlso: Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla | Drug | Apremilast 30 mg |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
| Apremilast 30mgAlso: Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla | Drug | Placebo/Apremilast 30mg |
| Apremilast 20mgAlso: Apremilast tablets, CC-10004, Otezla | Drug | Placebo/Apremilast 20 mg |
Primary outcome
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 16
PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement).
107 secondary outcomes
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in PASI Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in PASI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) From Baseline in the PASI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Time to Achieve a PASI-100 Response During the Placebo Controlled Phase
Time frame: Weeks 0 to 16
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Shift Change (1 or More Points on a 0 to 5 Point Scale) in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) During the Placebo Controlled Phase
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) During the Active Treatment Phase at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0 to week 16
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 24
Core Study: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-8)
Time frame: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast
Core Study: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-8)
Time frame: Week 24
Core Study: Peak; (Maximum) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apremilast
Time frame: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast
Core Study: Peak; (Maximum) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apremilast
Time frame: Week 24
Core Study: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug (Tmax)
Time frame: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast
Core Study: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug (Tmax)
Time frame: Week 24
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 32
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 40
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Time to Achieve PASI-75 During the Extension Study
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52
Extension Study: Time to Achieve PASI-50 During the Extension Study
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22748702Papp K, Cather JC, Rosoph L, Sofen H, Langley RG, Matheson RT, Hu C, Day RM. Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Aug 25;380(9843):738-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60642-4. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
- Background: PubMed 29905383Ohtsuki M, Kubo H, Morishima H, Goto R, Zheng R, Nakagawa H. Guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis in Japanese patients: Efficacy and safety results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Dermatol. 2018 Sep;45(9):1053-1062. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14504. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
- Background: PubMed 29502473Knuckles MLF, Levi E, Soung J. Defining and treating moderate plaque psoriasis: a dermatologist survey. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018 Nov;29(7):658-663. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1443200. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
- Background: PubMed 30339049Knuckles MLF, Levi E, Soung J. Treating moderate plaque psoriasis: prospective 6-month chart review of patients treated with apremilast. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Aug;30(5):430-434. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1528326. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 30652520Wu JJ, Pelletier C, Ung B, Tian M. Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for the treatment of psoriasis. J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):365-371. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1571500. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 30747550Wang Y, Coyne K, Sofen H, Santanello N, Currie B, Zhang Z, Nograles K. Qualitative analysis and reproducibility assessment of the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Dec;30(8):775-783. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1577546. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 23663752Strand V, Fiorentino D, Hu C, Day RM, Stevens RM, Papp KA. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from a phase IIb randomized, controlled study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 May 10;11:82. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-82.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37316690Mease PJ, Hatemi G, Paris M, Cheng S, Maes P, Zhang W, Shi R, Flower A, Picard H, Stein Gold L. Apremilast Long-Term Safety Up to 5 Years from 15 Pooled Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Behcet's Syndrome. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Sep;24(5):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00783-7. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
Related trials for Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
35 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Apremilast 10mg, Apremilast 20mg and Apremilast 30 mg in people with Psoriasis and Plaque-type Psoriasis, run by Amgen at 35 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 0 and Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00773734, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2020.