AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT00773461

A Study of Tocilizumab in Combination With DMARD Therapy in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 9 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 2 arm study will compare the safety and efficacy, with regard to reduction of signs and symptoms, of tocilizumab versus placebo, both in combination with DMARDs, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who currently have an inadequate response to DMARD therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
209 participants
Where
9 sitesChina
Study dates
31 Oct 2008to 22 Jul 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients, 18-70 years of age;
  • rheumatoid arthritis for >= 6 months;
  • receiving permitted DMARDs, at a stable dose, for >= 8 weeks prior to baseline;
  • current inadequate clinical response to DMARDs.

Who cannot join

  • major surgery, including joint surgery, within 8 weeks before entering study, or planned major surgery within 6 months following randomization;
  • rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis;
  • unsuccessful treatment with an anti-TNF agent;
  • previous treatment with tocilizumab.

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country.

9 sites in 1 country

China9 sites
  • Peking University People's Hospital

    Beijing, 100044

  • Beijing Union Hospital

    Beijing, 100730

  • General Hospital of Chinese PLA; Department of Hematology

    Beijing, 100853

  • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

    Guangzhou, 510630

  • The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

    Harbin, 150001

  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

    Jinan, 250012

  • Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, 200127

  • Changhai Hospital of Shanghai

    Shanghai, 200433

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University (Xijing Hospital)

    Xi'an, 710032

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double Blind Study of Safety and Reduction in Signs and Symptoms During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Placebo, in Combination With DMARD Therapy, in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Current DMARD Therapy

This 2 arm study will compare the safety and efficacy, with regard to reduction of signs and symptoms, of tocilizumab versus placebo, both in combination with DMARDs, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who currently have an inadequate response to DMARD therapy. Patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv or placebo iv every 4 weeks, in conjunction with stable DMARD therapy. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Being tested
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], Placebo
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug

    8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

  • PlaceboDrug

    iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

Study groups in NCT00773461
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
2Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 Response at Week 24

    To achieve an ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement, compared with baseline, in both (tender joints count)TJC and (swollen joints count) SJC, as well as in 3 out of 5 additional ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain, health assessment questionnaire disease index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP was used primarily for the calculation of the ACR response; if missing, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was substituted. ITT sensitivity analysis was carried out using an alternative imputation method (last observation carried forward [LOCF]).

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Percentage of Participants With ACR50 and ACR70 Responses at Week 24

    To achieve an ACR50 or ACR 70 response required at least a 50% or 70% improvement, compared with baseline in both TJC and SJC, as well as in 3 out of 5 additional ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. CRP was used primarily for the calculation of the ACR response; if missing, ESR was substituted.

    Measured: Week 24

  2. Number of Participants Who Received Escape Therapy

    Participants who did not achieve a 20% improvement from baseline in both SJC and TJC at week 16 could, if requested and deemed necessary by the investigator, receive escape therapy, comprising adjustment of the background DMARD dose and/or treatment with a different traditional DMARD.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

  3. Change in Tender and Swollen Joint Counts From Baseline to Week 24

    68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68.

    66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  4. Change in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 24

    The participant's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  5. Change in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 24

    The physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  6. Change in Participant's Global Assessment of Pain From Baseline to Week 24

    The participants assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  7. Change in C-Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 24

    The serum concentration of CRP an acute phase inflammatory marker, is measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  8. Change in ESR From Baseline to Week 24

    The ESR was measured in mm/hour. A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  9. Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity and in Clinical Remission

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, ESR and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score

    FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in health status.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  11. Mean Rheumatoid Factor at Baseline and Week 24

    Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a disease characteristic and more than 85% of the participants studied were positive for the factor. These data are from patients who were RF positive. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL.

    Measured: Baseline and 24 Weeks

  12. Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24

    Levels of hemoglobin were determined in grams/liter (g/L)as a measure of anemia in participants

    Measured: Baseline and 24 Weeks

  13. Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24

    HAQ-DI is a self-completed participant questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and 24 Weeks

  14. Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response by First Week of Onset

    ACR 20 responses are summarized by first onset as a percentage of the total number of responders at week 24. The number of participants first achieving an ACR20 response at each time point is represented by treatment arm as a proportion of the total number of participants that had an ACR20 response at Week 24 using n as the denominator.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  15. Time to First Low Disease Activity

    Time to Low disease activity was calculated as the number of days from the first dose of drug administration to the date of first achievement of DAS28≤3.2.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  16. Time to First Remission

    Time to first Remission was calculated as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug administration to the date of first achievement of DAS<2.6

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start31 Oct 2008
  3. Primary completion22 Jul 2010
  4. Study completion22 Jul 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
209 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00773461
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML21753
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
15 Oct 2008
Last updated
1 Aug 2017

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 9 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jul 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in