AzTrials
AzTrials

HTLV I Associated MyelopathyPhase 2/3HAM05NCT00773292

Ciclosporin in HTLV-1 Associated Myelopathy/ Tropical Spastic Paraparesis (HAM/TSP)

A Phase 2/3 study testing ciclosporin in people with HTLV I Associated Myelopathy, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

HAM/TSP is a chronic disease of the spinal cord, caused by a virus called HTLV-I. Worldwide approximately 20 million persons are infected.Infection with HTLV-I is lifelong, and about 3% of infected persons will develop this chronic debilitating disease, of which half will become wheelchair dependent. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
HTLV I Associated Myelopathy
What is being tested?
ciclosporin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
7 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Aug 2006to Jan 2010
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Early (less than 2 years) HAM
  • Progressing (within past 3 months) HAM
  • Important to study the effect of therapy on disease that is most active as most likely to detect and measure improvement

Who cannot join

  • HIV infection
  • Tuberculosis, strongyloidiasis or other infection related to immune compromise
  • Hepatitis B \& C viral infections
  • Malignancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • National Centre for Human Retrovirology

    London, W2 1NY

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: The HAM Ciclosporin Study : an Observational Trial of Therapy in Early or Progressing HAM/TSP

HAM/TSP is a chronic disease of the spinal cord, caused by a virus called HTLV-I. Worldwide approximately 20 million persons are infected.Infection with HTLV-I is lifelong, and about 3% of infected persons will develop this chronic debilitating disease, of which half will become wheelchair dependent. We, and others, have shown a strong and persistent immune response to HTLV-I in carriers and patients with HAM/TSP, but this fails to clear the virus. However, carriers with a low burden of virus in the blood have a low risk of developing disease. The immune response in these carriers seems better able to kill infected cells. A less efficient response is associated with a higher viral burden that drives the immune response with a resultant release of chemicals by the immune cells that inadvertently cause harm, most especially to cells in the spinal cord. Our understanding of HAM/TSP suggests that targeting the immune response should improve the health of our patients especially if the disease is diagnosed early. To identify the best type of treatment we are planning a series of studies of drugs that target the immune response in different ways. Each has been used in other inflammatory conditions but never before studied in HAM/TSP. We aim to study the extent and duration of the clinical response and to associate this with the different effects that the therapies have on the immune response and on the number of HTLV-I infected cells in the blood. This in turn will improve our knowledge and understanding of the disease and should lead to better therapy. This application is in relation to the first study - to explore that therapeutic benefit of ciclosporin in patients with HAM/TSP.

Read the detailed description

This is a proof of concept, open, observational study of Ciclosporin for the treatment of HTLV-I-associated myelopathy in patients with less than 2 years disease or new evidence of progression. After two baseline assessments patients will be commenced on ciclosporin in a weight dependent dose (2.5 - 5mg/kg/day) and the dose adjusted according to plasma drug concentrations. Participants will be monitored on a further 11 occasion as per the schedule every 2 - 8 weeks (less frequent with time) by self-administered questionnaires relating to quality of life and spasticity, by regular assessment of pain, timed walk, spasticity, bladder and bowel function and by blood tests to ensure the safety of the therapy. Blood samples will also be collected, at the same time points, for investigation of the immune response to HTLV-I and the quantity and activity of the virus. At 5 key time points the participants will undergo a more detailed neurological examination, the spinal cord will be imaged by MRI before, once during (12 weeks) and at the completion of the study and the fluid that bathes the brain (CSF) will be examined before and after 12 weeks of therapy. Therapy is planned for 12 months with 6 months further follow-up but therapy will be continued or discontinued according to clinical response.

Being tested
ciclosporin
Keywords
HAM/TSP
Medical subject headings
Paraparesis, Tropical Spastic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ciclosporinDrug

    Ciclosporin 2.5 - 5mg/kg/day in two equally divided doses. dose adjusted according to trough ciclosporin concentration

Study groups in NCT00773292
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ciclosporinExperimental48 weeks treatment with ciclosporin
Receives: Drug: ciclosporin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Patient With Lack of Objective Clinical Improvement

    Lack of objective clinical improvement after three months of therapy. Objective improvement was defined as any of the following comparing baseline measurements to 12, 24 and 48 weeks: i) one point decrease in the IPEC 1 scale (Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas), ii) >30% improvement in 10 m timed walk, iii) visual analogue pain score reduced by >2 points, iv) reduction of frequency or nocturia by greater than one or reduction of residual volume by more than 10% at two consecutive visits.

    Proof of concept study and therefore outcomes report is descriptive only. No statistical test appropriate.

    Measured: up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in Timed Walk Rank Between Baseline and 12 Weeks

    Change in the time taken to walk 10 meters 0 - 12 weeks compared with baseline. A timed walk rank was created to take into account the use of walking aids.

    Timed walk rank was calculated by ranking the time to walk 10 meters over all patients and visits, in the following order (highest/worst score to lowest/best score): unable to walk; able to walk, but not able to complete 10 meters (ranked on distance walked and time taken); able to walk 10 meters with a bilateral aid; able to walk 10 meters with a unilateral aid; able to walk 10 meters unaided (all ranked on time taken).

    Decrease in score means improvement. All evaluable patients were ranked on the time taken. There is no specific range for the rank scores. Upper and lower limits vary with the number of participants evaluated

    Measured: 0, 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2006
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
7 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00773292
Sponsor's protocol ID
Cro423
Acronym
HAM05
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
15 Oct 2008
Last updated
9 Sep 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Martin F, Castro H, Gabriel C, Adonis A, Fedina A, Harrison L, Brodnicki L, Demontis MA, Babiker AG, Weber JN, Bangham CR, Taylor GP. Ciclosporin A proof of concept study in patients with active, progressive HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001675. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

    PubMed 22720101

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing ciclosporin in people with HTLV I Associated Myelopathy, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Patient With Lack of Objective Clinical Improvement (time frame: up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00773292, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in