MyopiaNCT00769808
Technolas 217z Laser With Zyoptix Aspheric Algorithm Used for the LASIK Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.
A study testing Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer Laser in people with Myopia and Astigmatism, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Bausch \& Lomb Technolas 217z laser with the investigational Zyoptix Aspheric Algorithm when used for LASIK treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myopia, Astigmatism
- What is being tested?
- Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer Laser
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Aug 2008to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects who were of legal age (at least 18) and had full legal capacity to volunteer.
- Subjects must be willing to have both eyes treated with the laser.
- Subjects must have up to -12.00D of absolute spherical myopia (not spherical equivalent) with up to -6.00D of refractive astigmatism, with a spherical equivalent up to -15.00D as measured by manifest subjective refraction.
- Subjects who had less than 0.75 D of difference in the preoperative manifest spherical equivalent and cycloplegic spherical equivalent subjective refractions.
- (Manifest subjective refractions adjusted for optical infinity were used.)
- High contrast, manifest best spectacle-corrected distance logMAR visual acuity correctable to at least 0.3 in both eyes, and must not differ between eyes by more than 1 line (5 letters).
- Contact lens wearers must have 2 Orbscan measurements and 2 manifest subjective refractions taken preoperatively at least 1 week apart.
- Contact lens wearers must have gas permeable lenses discontinued for at least 3 weeks and soft lenses discontinued for at least 2 weeks prior to the preoperative evaluation.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with uncorrected visual acuity better than 20/40 (Snellen) or 0.3 logMAR
- Subjects who were immuno-compromised or had a diagnosis of connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases and other acute or chronic illnesses that increased the risk to the subject or could have confounded the outcomes of this study.
- Subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma or glaucoma who were under treatment in the study eye or with ocular hypertension.
- Subjects who demonstrated evidence of retinal vascular disease.
- Subjects who have an ocular muscle disorder including strabismus or nystagmus, or other disorders that affected fixation.
- Subjects who were at risk for angle closure or who had a potentially occludable angle, as evidenced by a shallow anterior chamber on slit lamp exam, confirmed by gonioscopy as deemed necessary by the study Investigator.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Subjects who had undergone previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind, including any type of excimer laser surgery for either refractive or therapeutic purposes.
- Subjects who were taking systemic medications likely to affect wound healing such as corticosteroids or anti-metabolites or any other medications that may increase the risk to the subject or confound the outcomes of this study.
- Subjects for whom the combination of their preoperative corneal thickness and the planned operative parameters for the LASIK procedure could have resulted in less than 250 microns of remaining posterior corneal thickness below the flap postoperatively.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Bausch & Lomb Technolas® 217z Laser With Zyoptix® Aspheric Algorithm When Used for the LASIK Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Bausch \& Lomb Technolas 217z laser with the investigational Zyoptix Aspheric Algorithm when used for LASIK treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
- Conditions
- Myopia, Astigmatism
- Being tested
- Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer Laser
- Medical subject headings
- Myopia, Astigmatism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer LaserDevice
LASIK correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Technolas 217z Excimer Laser | Experimental | Bausch \& Lomb Zyoptix Aspheric Algorithm for LASIK correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Receives: Device: Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer Laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity of 20/40 or Better
Measured: 3 months
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Subjective Refraction (MRSE) Within ± 1.00 Diopter (D) and 0.50 D of Emmetropia
Manifest refractions (eyeglass prescriptions) have three components: sphere, cylinder, and axis. Sphere and cylinder are both expressed in diopters, which is a continuous measure of the focusing power needed to make the image sharp on the retina. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is equal to sphere + ½ x cylinder. It is expressed in diopters (D).
Measured: 3 months
Preservation of Manifest Best Corrected High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity
Mean change in best-corrected high contrast distance visual acuity. Corrected means spectacle corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity. Acuity was averaged across visits.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Best-corrected Distance Photopic Visual Acuity Decrease of 2 or More Lines
Measured: 3 months
Percentage of Eyes With > 2.00 Diopter of Induced Postoperative Refractive Cylinder
Manifest refractions (eyeglass prescriptions) have three components: sphere, cylinder, and axis. Sphere and cylinder are both expressed in diopters, which is a continuous measure of the focusing power needed to make the image sharp on the retina. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is equal to sphere + ½ x cylinder. It is expressed in diopters (D).
Measured: 3 months
Percentage of Eyes That Had High Contrast Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (HCBSCVA) of 20/20 or Better at Baseline Had a Visual Outcome Worse Than 20/40 at 3 Months
Corrected means spectacle corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity. Acuity was averaged across visits.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Higher Order Aberrations.
The aberrations in the eye's optical system were measured over the entire pupil by the Bausch \& Lomb Zywave II WaveFront Aberrometer, a Hartmann-Shack type device. The pupil should have been at least 6 mm in diameter using 2.5% phenylephrine as a dilating agent to maximize the pupil diameter and hence the amount of wavefront information collected by the Zywave II. The wavefront data was then fitted with Zernike polynomials representing the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th order Zernike terms. These terms represent the wavefront aberration of the eye.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2008
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for MyopiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This was a medical device study with only one intervention used for lasik correction surgery
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark Cohen, MD, Principal investigator, Lasik MD
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00769808
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 564
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2008
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Bausch & Lomb Technolas® 217z Laser With Zyoptix® Aspheric Algorithm When Used for the LASIK Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00769808
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 564
- Conditions
- Myopia, Astigmatism
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2008
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Bausch \& Lomb Technolas 217z laser with the investigational Zyoptix Aspheric Algorithm when used for LASIK treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This was a medical device study with only one intervention used for lasik correction surgery
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Technolas 217z Excimer Laser | Experimental | Device: Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer LaserBausch \& Lomb Zyoptix Aspheric Algorithm for LASIK correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Subjects who were of legal age (at least 18) and had full legal capacity to volunteer.
- Subjects must be willing to have both eyes treated with the laser.
- Subjects must have up to -12.00D of absolute spherical myopia (not spherical equivalent) with up to -6.00D of refractive astigmatism, with a spherical equivalent up to -15.00D as measured by manifest subjective refraction.
- Subjects who had less than 0.75 D of difference in the preoperative manifest spherical equivalent and cycloplegic spherical equivalent subjective refractions.
- (Manifest subjective refractions adjusted for optical infinity were used.)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Subjects with uncorrected visual acuity better than 20/40 (Snellen) or 0.3 logMAR
- Subjects who were immuno-compromised or had a diagnosis of connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases and other acute or chronic illnesses that increased the risk to the subject or could have confounded the outcomes of this study.
- Subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma or glaucoma who were under treatment in the study eye or with ocular hypertension.
- Subjects who demonstrated evidence of retinal vascular disease.
- Subjects who have an ocular muscle disorder including strabismus or nystagmus, or other disorders that affected fixation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer LaserLASIK correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism | Device | Technolas 217z Excimer Laser |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity of 20/40 or Better
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Subjective Refraction (MRSE) Within ± 1.00 Diopter (D) and 0.50 D of Emmetropia
Time frame: 3 months
Manifest refractions (eyeglass prescriptions) have three components: sphere, cylinder, and axis. Sphere and cylinder are both expressed in diopters, which is a continuous measure of the focusing power needed to make the image sharp on the retina. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is equal to sphere + ½ x cylinder. It is expressed in diopters (D).
Preservation of Manifest Best Corrected High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
Mean change in best-corrected high contrast distance visual acuity. Corrected means spectacle corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity. Acuity was averaged across visits.
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Best-corrected Distance Photopic Visual Acuity Decrease of 2 or More Lines
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of Eyes With > 2.00 Diopter of Induced Postoperative Refractive Cylinder
Time frame: 3 months
Manifest refractions (eyeglass prescriptions) have three components: sphere, cylinder, and axis. Sphere and cylinder are both expressed in diopters, which is a continuous measure of the focusing power needed to make the image sharp on the retina. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is equal to sphere + ½ x cylinder. It is expressed in diopters (D).
Percentage of Eyes That Had High Contrast Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (HCBSCVA) of 20/20 or Better at Baseline Had a Visual Outcome Worse Than 20/40 at 3 Months
Time frame: 3 months
Corrected means spectacle corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity. Acuity was averaged across visits.
1 secondary outcome
Percentage Change From Baseline in Higher Order Aberrations.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Myopia
RecruitingPhase 3
A RCT of Spectacles With Aspherical Lenslets or 0.05% Atropine for Myopia Control
Myopia
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Odyssey Evaluation in Post LASIK Patients
Cataract
Recruiting
Evaluation of Orthokeratology Lenses With a 5MM Optic Zone Diameter
Myopia, Astigmatism
Recruiting
Wavelength Intervention for Nearsighted Kids
Myopia
Not yet recruiting
SmoothCore Orthokeratology Plus M.O.V.E. Lenses vs. M.O.V.E. Lenses Alone for Myopia Control in Children With High Myopia
High Myopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Cohen, MD principal investigator
Lasik MD
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bausch & Lomb 217z Excimer Laser in people with Myopia and Astigmatism, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity of 20/40 or Better (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2020.