Rotator Cuff TearMOONNCT00762580
Features to Predict Success With Nonoperative Treatment of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears
An observational study of Rotator Cuff Tear, run by Vanderbilt University at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to find which patients will improve with the nonsurgical treatment of physical therapy for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- How many people
- 452 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2006to 11 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults between the ages of 18-100 with full thickness rotator cuff tears.
Who may be able to join
- Patients (18-100 years of age) with MRI findings of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear
- Note: Criteria to obtain a shoulder MRI to evaluate for rotator cuff tear [Appendix D]:
- Significant weakness (≥ 2 points per guidelines above.)
- ADL pain or night pain >/= 7 on VAS
- Significant impingement (per guidelines above) + with significant symptoms for ≥ 3 months.
Who cannot join
- Acute rotator cuff tears (generally due to a high velocity injury and symptoms of less than one month)
- Associated dislocations
- Associated fractures
- Systemic Rheumatologic disease, i.e. Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosis
- Patients being treated for bilateral rotator cuff tears simultaneously
- Patients unable to complete the forms
Show all 13Show fewer
- Pain from neck or scapula
- Previous shoulder surgery
- Glenohumeral arthritis (meets ≥ 1 of below criteria)
- osteophytes >2mm on humeral head or glenoid
- Joint space narrowing with sclerosis or cyst formation seen on true AP or axillary radiographs;
- humeral head contacting acromion
- Adhesive capsulitis
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
Colorado University Sports Medicine
Boulder, Colorado, 80304
Ohio State
Columbus, Ohio, 43221-3502
Universtiy Of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1088
Shoulder and Elbow Institute, Knoxville Orthopaedic Clinic
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922
Vanderbilt Universtiy Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Sports Medicine & Shoulder Surgery, Orthopedic Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington Universtiy School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
The goal of this study is to find which patients will improve with the nonsurgical treatment of physical therapy for the treatment of rotator cuff tears.
Read the detailed description
Rotator cuff tears are found in up to 40% of people over the age of 50 with the prevalence increasing with age. While most people remain asymptomatic, it is unknown why some develop symptoms. In symptomatic patients, surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff fails in 30-50% of patients, yet the majority of patients have a significant reduction pain despite failure of the repair. Nonoperative treatment has reported successful outcomes in 25-82% of patients yet it is not known which patient-related features predict success with nonoperative treatment. The general aim of this research effort is to identify patient features (historical information, physical examination findings, and MRI-based pathology) that would predict success (defined by reduction in visual analog pain scale, and patient satisfaction) with the nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears. The proposed study design is a prospective cohort study of patients with rotator cuff tears who will follow a standard physical therapy program derived from an evidence based medicine (EBM) systematic review of Level 1 and Level 2 studies.
Study the effect of historical information on predicting success (as determined by pain relief and patient satisfaction) of nonoperative treatment using the EBM based physical therapy program in treating patients with rotator cuff tears.
Study the effect of physical examination findings on predicting success of a nonoperative treatment using the EBM-based physical therapy program in treating patients with rotator cuff tears.
Study the effect of the severity of the rotator cuff pathology (using standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols) on predicting success of nonoperative treatment for patients with rotator cuff tears using the EBM-based physical therapy program.
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- Keywords
- rotator cuff, rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Rotator Cuff Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective | Patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears being treated with physical therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predict successful outcome with an evidence-based, non-operative treatment program by collecting VAS Pain Scale and SANE score.
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Predict success of non-operative treatment outcomes with other patient related validated instruments (SF-12, ASES, WORC, Marx Activity Scale)
Measured: One Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2006
- Primary completion11 Jan 2024
- Study completion11 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (51)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rotator Cuff TearStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 452 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver, Ohio State University, University of Iowa, University of California, San Francisco, Arthrex, Inc., Knoxville Orthopedic Clinic, Washington University School of Medicine, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery Orthopedic Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rosemary A. Sanders, Vanderbilt University
- Investigators
- John E. Kuhn, MD, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00762580
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 060109
- Acronym
- MOON
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2008
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De Identified data from this cohort is only available to members of the MOON Shoulder Consortium. The member must provide a description of the use of the data to the research coordinator. The data request is then presented to the MOON consortium. A unanimous agreement of the plan by the consortium must be received prior to receiving the data.
Publications
Bartolozzi A, Andreychik D, Ahmad S. Determinants of outcome in the treatment of rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Nov;(308):90-7.
PubMed 7955708Bokor DJ, Hawkins RJ, Huckell GH, Angelo RL, Schickendantz MS. Results of nonoperative management of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Sep;(294):103-10.
PubMed 8358901Chard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB. Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;34(6):766-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340619.
PubMed 2053923Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245-51. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.
PubMed 7722560Djurasovic M, Marra G, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Dec;83(12):1849-55. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200112000-00013.
PubMed 11741065Ejnisman B, Andreoli CV, Soares BG, Fallopa F, Peccin MS, Abdalla RJ, Cohen M. Interventions for tears of the rotator cuff in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002758.pub2.
PubMed 14973989Feng S, Guo S, Nobuhara K, Hashimoto J, Mimori K. Prognostic indicators for outcome following rotator cuff tear repair. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2003 Dec;11(2):110-6. doi: 10.1177/230949900301100202.
PubMed 14676334Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):219-24. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00002.
PubMed 14960664Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Apr;82(4):505-15. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00006.
PubMed 10761941Habernek H, Schmid L, Frauenschuh E. Five year results of rotator cuff repair. Br J Sports Med. 1999 Dec;33(6):430-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.6.430.
PubMed 10597856Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Aug;73(7):982-9.
PubMed 1874784Hattrup SJ. Rotator cuff repair: relevance of patient age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Mar-Apr;4(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80061-8.
PubMed 7600171Itoi E, Tabata S. Conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):165-73.
PubMed 1735208Itoi E, Tabata S. Incomplete rotator cuff tears. Results of operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):128-35.
PubMed 1395281Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep;19(7):746-54. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00395-5.
PubMed 12966383
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Features to Predict Success With Nonoperative Treatment of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00762580
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MOON / 060109
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- Keywords
- rotator cuff, rehabilitation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 452 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver, Ohio State University, University of Iowa, University of California, San Francisco, Arthrex, Inc., Knoxville Orthopedic Clinic, Washington University School of Medicine, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery Orthopedic Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Study start
- Jan 2006 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to find which patients will improve with the nonsurgical treatment of physical therapy for the treatment of rotator cuff tears.
Detailed description
Rotator cuff tears are found in up to 40% of people over the age of 50 with the prevalence increasing with age. While most people remain asymptomatic, it is unknown why some develop symptoms. In symptomatic patients, surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff fails in 30-50% of patients, yet the majority of patients have a significant reduction pain despite failure of the repair. Nonoperative treatment has reported successful outcomes in 25-82% of patients yet it is not known which patient-related features predict success with nonoperative treatment. The general aim of this research effort is to identify patient features (historical information, physical examination findings, and MRI-based pathology) that would predict success (defined by reduction in visual analog pain scale, and patient satisfaction) with the nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears. The proposed study design is a prospective cohort study of patients with rotator cuff tears who will follow a standard physical therapy program derived from an evidence based medicine (EBM) systematic review of Level 1 and Level 2 studies.
Study the effect of historical information on predicting success (as determined by pain relief and patient satisfaction) of nonoperative treatment using the EBM based physical therapy program in treating patients with rotator cuff tears.
Study the effect of physical examination findings on predicting success of a nonoperative treatment using the EBM-based physical therapy program in treating patients with rotator cuff tears.
Study the effect of the severity of the rotator cuff pathology (using standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols) on predicting success of nonoperative treatment for patients with rotator cuff tears using the EBM-based physical therapy program.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective | – | –Patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears being treated with physical therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults between the ages of 18-100 with full thickness rotator cuff tears.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients (18-100 years of age) with MRI findings of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear
- Significant weakness (≥ 2 points per guidelines above.)
- ADL pain or night pain >/= 7 on VAS
- Significant impingement (per guidelines above) + with significant symptoms for ≥ 3 months.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Acute rotator cuff tears (generally due to a high velocity injury and symptoms of less than one month)
- Associated dislocations
- Associated fractures
- Systemic Rheumatologic disease, i.e. Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosis
- Patients being treated for bilateral rotator cuff tears simultaneously
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Predict successful outcome with an evidence-based, non-operative treatment program by collecting VAS Pain Scale and SANE score.
Time frame: One year
1 secondary outcome
Predict success of non-operative treatment outcomes with other patient related validated instruments (SF-12, ASES, WORC, Marx Activity Scale)
Time frame: One Year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 7955708Bartolozzi A, Andreychik D, Ahmad S. Determinants of outcome in the treatment of rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Nov;(308):90-7.
- Background: PubMed 8358901Bokor DJ, Hawkins RJ, Huckell GH, Angelo RL, Schickendantz MS. Results of nonoperative management of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Sep;(294):103-10.
- Background: PubMed 2053923Chard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB. Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;34(6):766-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340619.
- Background: PubMed 7722560Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245-51. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.
- Background: PubMed 11741065Djurasovic M, Marra G, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Dec;83(12):1849-55. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200112000-00013.
- Background: PubMed 14973989Ejnisman B, Andreoli CV, Soares BG, Fallopa F, Peccin MS, Abdalla RJ, Cohen M. Interventions for tears of the rotator cuff in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002758.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 14676334Feng S, Guo S, Nobuhara K, Hashimoto J, Mimori K. Prognostic indicators for outcome following rotator cuff tear repair. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2003 Dec;11(2):110-6. doi: 10.1177/230949900301100202.
- Background: PubMed 14960664Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):219-24. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00002.
- Background: PubMed 10761941Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Apr;82(4):505-15. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 10597856Habernek H, Schmid L, Frauenschuh E. Five year results of rotator cuff repair. Br J Sports Med. 1999 Dec;33(6):430-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.6.430.
- Background: PubMed 1874784Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Aug;73(7):982-9.
- Background: PubMed 7600171Hattrup SJ. Rotator cuff repair: relevance of patient age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Mar-Apr;4(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80061-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De Identified data from this cohort is only available to members of the MOON Shoulder Consortium. The member must provide a description of the use of the data to the research coordinator. The data request is then presented to the MOON consortium. A unanimous agreement of the plan by the consortium must be received prior to receiving the data.
Related trials for Rotator Cuff Tear
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
E-CEL UVEC Cells as an Adjunct Cell Therapy for the Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Adults
Rotator Cuff Tears, Muscle Atrophy or Weakness
Not yet recruiting
Voll Non-Degradable Shoulder Spacer FIH Study
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears, Massive Rotator Cuff Tear
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Influence of an Anti-osteoporotic Drug on Healing After Surgical Repair of Chronic Rotator Cuff Lesions of the Shoulder
Orthopedics, Traumatology
Recruiting
SMR Stemless Reverse vs SMR Reverse Shoulder System
Arthroplasty, Replacement
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John E. Kuhn, MD principal investigator
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rotator Cuff Tear, run by Vanderbilt University at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predict successful outcome with an evidence-based, non-operative treatment program by collecting VAS Pain Scale and SANE score. (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00762580, which also lists 51 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2024.