Osteoporotic Vertebral FractureOSTEO-6NCT00749060
Comparison of Balloon Kyphoplasty, Vertebroplasty and Conservative Management in Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
A study testing conventional treatment, kyphoplasty with balloons and vertebroplasty in people with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture and Between T5 and L5, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare three treatments in recent (less than 6 week duration) non-traumatic ( usually osteoporotic) vertebral fractures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture, Between T5 and L5, of Less Than 6 Weeks Duration
- What is being tested?
- conventional treatment, kyphoplasty with balloons and vertebroplasty
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is able to undergo the vertebroplasty or Balloon kyphoplasty procedure
- Patient must have signed the consent form (ZELEN Randomization protocol)
- Male or female, 50 years or older
- One or two non-traumatic vertebral fracture(s):
- Of osteoporotic origin (low speed trauma such as fall from his own height or less than 80 cm)
- Fracture(s) of less than 6 weeks duration after the onset of pain related to the fracture The fracture(s) exhibit(s) high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and a benign appearance at MRI
- The patient will be able to receive the selected protocol treatment within 6 weeks after onset of fracture-related symptoms and within 15 days after treatment randomization.
- The benign nature of the vertebral fracture has to be confirmed by the results of the biopsy performed during vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty or by one year follow-up in the conservative treatment group.
Who cannot join
- Patient with a vertebral fracture of more than 6 week duration after onset of fracture-related symptoms.
- Neurological signs related to the vertebral fracture to treat
- History of surgical or percutaneous spine treatment except simple discectomy at a single or multiple vertebral levels with no residual pain.
- More than two recent vertebral fractures
- Current infection
- Impossibility to perform the percutaneous approach of the vertebra to treat.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Reduction by more than 50% of the anteroposterior width of the bony spinal canal due to the vertebral fracture to treat.
- Known allergy to a contrast media or to one of the cement components used for kyphoplasty.
- Vertebral fracture with loss of 90%or more of the vertebral body height
- Neurological signs or symptoms related to the vertebral fracture
- Malignant and traumatic vertebral fractures
- Contraindication to MRI :
- Metallic implant : pace-maker, non movable auditive implant, metallic vascular or cardiac device
- Metallic surgical clips
- Claustrophobia
- Evolutive cardiac disease nonreactive to medical treatment
- Patient presenting a non correctable spontaneous or therapeutic coagulation disorder.
- Presence of an unexplained biological inflammatory syndrome with NFS≥20
- Non compliant patient: Impossibility to participate to the study and to be followed up for 1 year.
- Pregnant or breast feeding women
- Patient not affiliated to social security
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Hopital LARIBOISIERE Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire
Paris, 75010
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Balloon Kyphoplasty,Vertebroplasty and Conservative Management in Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of Less Than 6 Weeks
This study aims to compare three treatments in recent (less than 6 week duration) non-traumatic ( usually osteoporotic) vertebral fractures.
Read the detailed description
The three treatments are the following: 1/Conventional medical treatment including rest and pain medications2/Vertebroplasty consisting in the percutaneous injection into the fractured vertebra of polymethylmetacrylate cement (the cement used to fix prosthesis in joint replacement) through a posterior route through the vertebral pedicles under radiological guidance.3/Balloon Kyphoplasty which consists of placing through a percutaneous posterior approach under radiological guidance, into the fractured vertebra a balloon which is inflated with fluid and creates a cavity. This may restore part of the vertebral height loss due to the fracture. In addition, after balloon deflation, polymethylmetacrylate cement may be injected with low pressure into the created cavity. The study will indicate if balloon kyphoplasty is able to restore vertebral height of the fractured vertebra better than medical treatment and vertebroplasty.
- Being tested
- conventional treatment, kyphoplasty with balloons, vertebroplasty
- Keywords
- osteoporosis, non-traumatic vertebral fracture, vertebral compression, Balloon kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional treatmentOther
Also called antalgic drugs
with our without brace
kyphoplasty with balloonsProcedure or surgery
Balloon Kyphoplasty which consists of placing through a percutaneous posterior approach under radiological guidance, into the fractured vertebra a balloon which is inflated with fluid and creates a cavity. This may restore part of the vertebral height loss due to the fracture. In addition, after balloon deflation, polymethylmetacrylate cement is injected with low pressure into the created cavity.
vertebroplastyProcedure or surgery
Vertebroplasty consisting in the percutaneous injection into the fractured vertebra of polymethylmetacrylate cement (the cement used to fix prosthesis in joint replacement) through a posterior route through the vertebral pedicles under radiological guidance
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | conventional treatment Receives: Other: conventional treatment |
| 2 | Other | kyphoplasty by balloons Receives: Procedure: kyphoplasty with balloons |
| 3 | Other | vertebroplasty Receives: Procedure: vertebroplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Vertebral Kyphotic angle between preoperative and one-year follow-up measurements.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (11)
1° - Pain evaluation using a visual analogic scale
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
questionnaire (Eifel) for back pain evaluation
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Quality of life evaluation (QUALEFFO - Short-Form SF12).
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Analgesics intake according to the WHO classification (Classes 1, 2 and 3).
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Regional spine Kyphosis angle and global thoracic and lumbar Kyphosis angle
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Changes in anterior, mid and posterior vertebral heights of the treated vertebral body
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Changes in height of the intervertebral disc spaces adjacent to the treated vertebra
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Number of new vertebral fractures occurring during the one year follow-up period
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Cost evaluation in a sample of 10% of patients randomly selected including the following costs : o Intervention cost. o Medical treatment costs o Consultation costs. o Hospitalization cost o Complication costs
Measured: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Follow-up of anterior, median and posterior height of the treated vertebral body, obtained by making an average of all measurements, on 3 cuts tomodensitometry (tdm) on the sagittal level : lateral right, median and lateral left
Measured: preoperative, at J6 and at J360
Intensity of signal with T2 sequence
Measured: preoperative and at J360
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionJun 2012
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Osteoporotic Vertebral FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Denis LAREDO, MD,Pr, Principal investigator, AP-HP Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00749060
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P060107
- Acronym
- OSTEO-6
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2008
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Balloon Kyphoplasty,Vertebroplasty and Conservative Management in Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of Less Than 6 Weeks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00749060
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OSTEO-6 / P060107
- Keywords
- osteoporosis, non-traumatic vertebral fracture, vertebral compression, Balloon kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare three treatments in recent (less than 6 week duration) non-traumatic ( usually osteoporotic) vertebral fractures.
Detailed description
The three treatments are the following: 1/Conventional medical treatment including rest and pain medications2/Vertebroplasty consisting in the percutaneous injection into the fractured vertebra of polymethylmetacrylate cement (the cement used to fix prosthesis in joint replacement) through a posterior route through the vertebral pedicles under radiological guidance.3/Balloon Kyphoplasty which consists of placing through a percutaneous posterior approach under radiological guidance, into the fractured vertebra a balloon which is inflated with fluid and creates a cavity. This may restore part of the vertebral height loss due to the fracture. In addition, after balloon deflation, polymethylmetacrylate cement may be injected with low pressure into the created cavity. The study will indicate if balloon kyphoplasty is able to restore vertebral height of the fractured vertebra better than medical treatment and vertebroplasty.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | Other: conventional treatmentconventional treatment |
| 2 | Other | Procedure: kyphoplasty with balloonskyphoplasty by balloons |
| 3 | Other | Procedure: vertebroplastyvertebroplasty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient is able to undergo the vertebroplasty or Balloon kyphoplasty procedure
- Patient must have signed the consent form (ZELEN Randomization protocol)
- Male or female, 50 years or older
- One or two non-traumatic vertebral fracture(s):
- The patient will be able to receive the selected protocol treatment within 6 weeks after onset of fracture-related symptoms and within 15 days after treatment randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Patient with a vertebral fracture of more than 6 week duration after onset of fracture-related symptoms.
- Neurological signs related to the vertebral fracture to treat
- History of surgical or percutaneous spine treatment except simple discectomy at a single or multiple vertebral levels with no residual pain.
- More than two recent vertebral fractures
- Current infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional treatmentAlso: antalgic drugswith our without brace | Other | 1 |
| kyphoplasty with balloonsBalloon Kyphoplasty which consists of placing through a percutaneous posterior approach under radiological guidance, into the fractured vertebra a balloon which is inflated with fluid and creates a cavity. This may restore part of the vertebral height loss due to the fracture. In addition, after balloon deflation, polymethylmetacrylate cement is injected with low pressure into the created cavity. | Procedure or surgery | 2 |
| vertebroplastyVertebroplasty consisting in the percutaneous injection into the fractured vertebra of polymethylmetacrylate cement (the cement used to fix prosthesis in joint replacement) through a posterior route through the vertebral pedicles under radiological guidance | Procedure or surgery | 3 |
Primary outcome
Change in Vertebral Kyphotic angle between preoperative and one-year follow-up measurements.
Time frame: 1 year
11 secondary outcomes
1° - Pain evaluation using a visual analogic scale
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
questionnaire (Eifel) for back pain evaluation
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Quality of life evaluation (QUALEFFO - Short-Form SF12).
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Analgesics intake according to the WHO classification (Classes 1, 2 and 3).
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Regional spine Kyphosis angle and global thoracic and lumbar Kyphosis angle
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Changes in anterior, mid and posterior vertebral heights of the treated vertebral body
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Changes in height of the intervertebral disc spaces adjacent to the treated vertebra
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Number of new vertebral fractures occurring during the one year follow-up period
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Cost evaluation in a sample of 10% of patients randomly selected including the following costs : o Intervention cost. o Medical treatment costs o Consultation costs. o Hospitalization cost o Complication costs
Time frame: J-20 à J-7 / J6 / J45 /J90 /J180 / J360
Follow-up of anterior, median and posterior height of the treated vertebral body, obtained by making an average of all measurements, on 3 cuts tomodensitometry (tdm) on the sagittal level : lateral right, median and lateral left
Time frame: preoperative, at J6 and at J360
Intensity of signal with T2 sequence
Time frame: preoperative and at J360
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2014.
Related trials for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Osteoporotic Fracture and Lidocaine Plaster 5% for Neuropathic Pain preventioN
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture, Neuropathic Pain
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy Clinical Trial of the Vessel-X® Bone Filling Container System
Osteoporosis, Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study to Predict the Risk of Bone Fractures With the POROUS Ultrasound Device
Healthy, Osteopenia
Recruiting
Development and Application of a Clinical Decision Support System for Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Clinical Decision Support System
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Denis LAREDO, MD,Pr principal investigator
AP-HP Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conventional treatment, kyphoplasty with balloons and vertebroplasty in people with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture and Between T5 and L5, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Vertebral Kyphotic angle between preoperative and one-year follow-up measurements. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2014.