CholecystitisHACNCT00746850
Harmonic in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
A study testing early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic) and early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy) in people with Cholecystitis, run by University of Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
In the developmental stage of laparoscopic cholecystectomy it was considered 'unsafe' or 'technically difficult' to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. With increasing experience in laparoscopic surgery, a number of centers have reported on the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cholecystitis
- What is being tested?
- early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic) and early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Clinical (pain, fever > 37.5 °C, WBC > 10.000 / microL), and ultrasound evidence of cholecystitis
- ASA I-III patients
- Informed consent
- Less than 72h from the onset
Who cannot join
- Informed consent refusal
- Choledocholithiasis
- Generalized peritonitis
- Previous abdominal surgical procedures
- Patients with an intra-operative findings of different pathology will be excluded from the study
- Apache II score > 10
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of Bologna
Bologna, 40138
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial of Harmonic(H) Versus Monopolar Diathermy (M) for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) for Acute Cholecystitis (AC) in Adults.
In the developmental stage of laparoscopic cholecystectomy it was considered 'unsafe' or 'technically difficult' to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. With increasing experience in laparoscopic surgery, a number of centers have reported on the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, suggesting that it is technically feasible but at the expense of a high conversion rate, which can be up to 35 per cent and common bile duct lesions.
The HARMONIC SCALPEL® (H) is the leading ultrasonic cutting and coagulating surgical device, offering surgeons important benefits including: minimal lateral thermal tissue damage, minimal charring and desiccation.
Read more
H technology reduces the need for ligatures with simultaneous cutting and coagulation: moreover there is not electricity to or through the patient H has a greater precision near vital structures and it produces minimal smoke with improved visibility in the surgical field.
In retrospective series LC performed with H was demonstrated feasible and effective with minimal operating time and blood loss: it was reported also a low conversion rate (3.9%).
However there are not prospective randomized controlled trials showing the advantages of H compared to MD (the commonly used electrical scalpel) in LC.
Aim of this RCT is to demonstrate that H can reduce conversion rate compared to MD in LC for AC.
Read the detailed description
DESIGN
The study project is a prospective, randomized investigation. The study will be performed in the Department of Emergency Surgery St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), a large teaching institutions, with the participation of all surgeons who accept to be involved in.
The patients will be divided in two groups: in the first group the patient will be submitted to early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H while in the second group will be submitted to early LC within 72 hours with MD.
HOW RANDOMIZED
The randomization will be obtained through computer-generated schedule. The result of this randomization will be sealed in numbered envelopes. After cholecystitis diagnosis if the patient fulfils the inclusion criteria the responsible surgeon will ask the patient to participate to the study. If the patient agree, he/ she will sign the informed consent. After patient's consent the randomization will be carried out. The responsible surgeon will record the patient name (and number).
All eligible patients will be recorded.
STATISTICS
POWER CALCULATIONS:
Sample size has been calculated to reach a confidence level of 95% with a power of 80%.A sample size of 42 patients is calculated supposing that the hospital stay for LC with H the conversion rate can be reduced from 35% to 3%. The sample size will be 21 patients for each group (42 patients for the whole study).For comparison of the two groups, chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test are used when appropriate for qualitative data, and the Student t-test (for normal variables) or the Mann Whitney U-test (for nonnormal variables) for quantitative data. For multivariate analysis the stepwise logistic regression is applied. A probability of 0.05 or less is accepted as statistically significant.
INTERVENTION
Preoperative data collected will include patient demographics and comorbid conditions (genitourinary, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, or rheumatologic) and a detailed history of symptom onset.
The procedure was performed by a surgeon that had performed at least 50 LCs. On admission, the patients were started on cefotaxime, 2 g IV every 12h, which was continued postoperatively according to NNISS score.
The standard four-trocar operative technique is used for LC for acute cholecystitis.
When the gallbladder is distended it will be first aspirated. To allow a good hold on the gallbladder larger graspers will be inserted through a 5 mm right lower port. The cystic artery and duct are clip-ligated in the MD group whereas in the H group cystic artery and duct are closed by H. In the H group the surgeon will use only H, whereas in the MD group the surgeon will use only MD. The gallbladder and intraperitoneal "dropped" stones are collected in an endoscopic bag and extracted through the umbilical cannula site, which can be extended. A closed system suction drain is left. Fascial closure is attempted only at the umbilical cannula site. The skin at all the cannula sites are closed with staples. Conversion to laparotomy will be decided by the operating surgeon and each conversion will be motivated.
Data Collection Patients' data sheets are generated containing demographic data and preoperative, operative, and postoperative information.
Pre-operative notes concern the history of gallbladder stones, the presence of associated diseases (cardiac, hypertension, diabetes, malignancy), duration of gallbladder complaints (as an indication for the onset of the disease), finding of a palpable gallbladder, temperature, and laboratory results of WBC count, serum bilirubin, gamma GT, PCR, IL-6 and alkaline phosphatase.
Ultrasound findings are also reported. Operative data of concern are macroscopic findings (of acute cholecystitis, gangrenous cholecystitis, hydrops, and empyema of the gallbladder), the presence of small stones (< 1 cm diameter) or large bile stones (> 1 cm diameter), information regarding perforation of the gallbladder and intraperitoneally "lost" stones, reasons for con¬version, and duration of surgery. Postoperative notes of interest included the use of nasogastric tubes and drains, the amount of analgesics used, (evaluation of pain with VAS score), complications, and length of hospital stay.
Complications are classified as surgical infections (wound infection, subphrenic or subhepatic abscess); noninfectious surgi¬cal problems (e.g., bile duct injury, hemorrhage); remote infec¬tions (urinary or respiratory); and miscellaneous problems (e.g., atelectasis, deep vein thrombosis, AMI, CVA, etc). The collected information are entered into a database as either continuous or categorical variables for statistical analysis. Following the operative procedure, a normal sterile dressing will be applied to cover the abdomen.
A second surgical team, aware of the operative findings but not the surgical dissection instrument, then will assume the care of the patient. Postoperative care and ability to be discharged from the hospital will be determined by the second surgical team. The primary operative team will be in every moment available for emergent consultation.
Patient discharge will be base on good medical practice criteria: 1) apyrexia 2) absence of diseases requiring hospitalisation 3) return of bowel function 4) patient's compliance.
- IS THERE A PLACEBO? No
- INFORMED CONSENT TO BE SOUGHT? Yes (see: Case Report Form)
- INFORMED CONSENT FORM OR INFORMATION SHEET? Yes (see: Case Report Form).
In the informed consent form, patients will receive all the information about the study protocol, the confidential nature of personal data and will fill up a questionnaire before signing or refuse.
There will be not inconveniences caused to the patients. No incentives are planned for the patients regarding the operation or the follow-up.
All the medical informations obtained from the patients will be kept confidentially among the research scientists conducting the study.
The patients will be free to withdraw from the study, whenever they want without any obligation.
STOPPING RULES
In case of newly discovered statistically significant advantages in one group.
PRIMARY ENDPOINTS
The aim of the study is to demonstrate that H can reduce conversion rate compared to MD in LC for AC but also differences in terms of morbidity, mortality, operation time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal activity will be evaluated.
The primary endpoints of our study will be:
- To evaluate the conversion rate
- To evaluate morbidity, mortality, operation time
- To evaluate hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal activity
The onset of any other complications will be recorded intraoperatively, postoperatively, at discharge, at 7-days, 1-month and 6-months.
- PLANNED SUBGROUP ANALYSES? No.
- SIDE EFFECTS QUANTIFICATION? Yes There are not different side effects
- IS THERE AN ANALYSIS PLAN? Yes All the above mentioned data will be recorded in the Case Report Form (annexed to this proposal) and later stored in computer database. At the end of the study the final statistical examination will be carried out.
- ARE THERE PLANS FOR INTERIM ANALYSIS? Yes An interim statistical examination of the data will be done every 3 months during the period of patients' inclusion in the study. Then at the end of every completed follow-up period (1-month, 6-months).
- ARE THERE AN INDEPENDENT DATA-MONITORING COMITTEE? No
TYPE OF ANALYSIS
The statistical analysis will be carried out using Epi Info 2000, Version 1.1 software package (Dean AG, Arner TG, Sangam S, Sunki GG, Friedman R, Lantinga M, Zubieta JC, Sullivan KM, Smith DC. Epi Info 2000, a database and statistics program for public health professionals for use on Windows 95, 98, NT, and 2000 computers; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2000).
INDEMNITIES SPECIFIED
No incentives are planned for the patients regarding the operation or the follow-up.
FINISHING DATE
The study will take approximately 6 months - 1 year for the inclusion period. According to the number of AC managed monthly, the duration of the inclusion period can be approximately of 1 year to reach the number of about 42 enrolled patients.
REPORTING DATE
An interim report is planned at the end of any completed follow-up period.
- IS THE STUDY CLINICALLY NECESSARY? Yes
AC is a common disease. Any improvement in this field will benefit many patients reducing morbidity, mortality, conversion rate, operation time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal activity and aesthetic result. All our patients will be informed about the study and an informed consent will be obtained. There will not be inconveniences caused to the patients. All the medical informations obtained from the patients will be kept confidentially among the research scientists conducting the study. The patients will be free to withdrawn from the study, whenever they want without any obligation.
- Conditions
- Cholecystitis
- Being tested
- early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic), early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy)
- Keywords
- acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, conversion rate, morbidity, mortality, postoperative pain, hospital stay
- Medical subject headings
- Cholecystitis, Cholecystitis, Acute, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic)Procedure or surgery
early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours after the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with H (Harmonic scalpel)
early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy)Procedure or surgery
early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours after the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| H | Experimental | early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic) Receives: Procedure: early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic) |
| MD | Active comparator | early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy) Receives: Procedure: early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
conversion rate
Measured: 1 day
operative time
Measured: 1 day
mortality
Measured: 6-months
morbidity
Measured: 6-months
hospital stay
Measured: at discharge
postoperative pain
Measured: postoperatively
return to daily activities
Measured: 6-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionNov 2009
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CholecystitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bologna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Fausto Catena, M.D. PhD, Study director, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of BolognaLuca Ansaloni, M.D., Principal investigator, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of BolognaSalomone Di Saverio, M.D., Principal investigator, S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital - Maggiore Hospital, Bologna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00746850
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HAC Trial
- Acronym
- HAC
- Status last verified
- Sep 2008
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2008
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2005 Jan;92(1):44-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4836.
PubMed 15584058Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Persiani R. [The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. J Chir (Paris). 2004 Nov;141(6):343-53. doi: 10.1016/s0021-7697(04)95358-6. French.
PubMed 15738842Rai R, Sinha A, Rai S. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 44-49). Br J Surg. 2005 Apr;92(4):494. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5042. No abstract available.
PubMed 15782391Asoglu O, Ozmen V, Karanlik H, Igci A, Kecer M, Parlak M, Unal ES. Does the complication rate increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Apr;14(2):81-6. doi: 10.1089/109264204322973844.
PubMed 15107216Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;7(5):642-5. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(03)00065-9.
PubMed 12850677Huscher CG, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc. 2003 Mar;17(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
PubMed 12399846Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Gazzotti F, Coccolini F, Pinna AD. The HAC Trial (Harmonic for Acute Cholecystitis) Study. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of Harmonic(H) versus Monopolar Diathermy (M) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in adults. Trials. 2009 May 26;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-34.
PubMed 19470152
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial of Harmonic(H) Versus Monopolar Diathermy (M) for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) for Acute Cholecystitis (AC) in Adults.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00746850
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HAC / HAC Trial
- Conditions
- Cholecystitis
- Keywords
- acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, conversion rate, morbidity, mortality, postoperative pain, hospital stay
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BolognaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the developmental stage of laparoscopic cholecystectomy it was considered 'unsafe' or 'technically difficult' to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. With increasing experience in laparoscopic surgery, a number of centers have reported on the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, suggesting that it is technically feasible but at the expense of a high conversion rate, which can be up to 35 per cent and common bile duct lesions.
The HARMONIC SCALPEL® (H) is the leading ultrasonic cutting and coagulating surgical device, offering surgeons important benefits including: minimal lateral thermal tissue damage, minimal charring and desiccation.
H technology reduces the need for ligatures with simultaneous cutting and coagulation: moreover there is not electricity to or through the patient H has a greater precision near vital structures and it produces minimal smoke with improved visibility in the surgical field.
In retrospective series LC performed with H was demonstrated feasible and effective with minimal operating time and blood loss: it was reported also a low conversion rate (3.9%).
However there are not prospective randomized controlled trials showing the advantages of H compared to MD (the commonly used electrical scalpel) in LC.
Aim of this RCT is to demonstrate that H can reduce conversion rate compared to MD in LC for AC.
Detailed description
DESIGN
The study project is a prospective, randomized investigation. The study will be performed in the Department of Emergency Surgery St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital (Bologna, Italy), a large teaching institutions, with the participation of all surgeons who accept to be involved in.
The patients will be divided in two groups: in the first group the patient will be submitted to early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H while in the second group will be submitted to early LC within 72 hours with MD.
HOW RANDOMIZED
The randomization will be obtained through computer-generated schedule. The result of this randomization will be sealed in numbered envelopes. After cholecystitis diagnosis if the patient fulfils the inclusion criteria the responsible surgeon will ask the patient to participate to the study. If the patient agree, he/ she will sign the informed consent. After patient's consent the randomization will be carried out. The responsible surgeon will record the patient name (and number).
All eligible patients will be recorded.
STATISTICS
POWER CALCULATIONS:
Sample size has been calculated to reach a confidence level of 95% with a power of 80%.A sample size of 42 patients is calculated supposing that the hospital stay for LC with H the conversion rate can be reduced from 35% to 3%. The sample size will be 21 patients for each group (42 patients for the whole study).For comparison of the two groups, chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test are used when appropriate for qualitative data, and the Student t-test (for normal variables) or the Mann Whitney U-test (for nonnormal variables) for quantitative data. For multivariate analysis the stepwise logistic regression is applied. A probability of 0.05 or less is accepted as statistically significant.
INTERVENTION
Preoperative data collected will include patient demographics and comorbid conditions (genitourinary, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, or rheumatologic) and a detailed history of symptom onset.
The procedure was performed by a surgeon that had performed at least 50 LCs. On admission, the patients were started on cefotaxime, 2 g IV every 12h, which was continued postoperatively according to NNISS score.
The standard four-trocar operative technique is used for LC for acute cholecystitis.
When the gallbladder is distended it will be first aspirated. To allow a good hold on the gallbladder larger graspers will be inserted through a 5 mm right lower port. The cystic artery and duct are clip-ligated in the MD group whereas in the H group cystic artery and duct are closed by H. In the H group the surgeon will use only H, whereas in the MD group the surgeon will use only MD. The gallbladder and intraperitoneal "dropped" stones are collected in an endoscopic bag and extracted through the umbilical cannula site, which can be extended. A closed system suction drain is left. Fascial closure is attempted only at the umbilical cannula site. The skin at all the cannula sites are closed with staples. Conversion to laparotomy will be decided by the operating surgeon and each conversion will be motivated.
Data Collection Patients' data sheets are generated containing demographic data and preoperative, operative, and postoperative information.
Pre-operative notes concern the history of gallbladder stones, the presence of associated diseases (cardiac, hypertension, diabetes, malignancy), duration of gallbladder complaints (as an indication for the onset of the disease), finding of a palpable gallbladder, temperature, and laboratory results of WBC count, serum bilirubin, gamma GT, PCR, IL-6 and alkaline phosphatase.
Ultrasound findings are also reported. Operative data of concern are macroscopic findings (of acute cholecystitis, gangrenous cholecystitis, hydrops, and empyema of the gallbladder), the presence of small stones (< 1 cm diameter) or large bile stones (> 1 cm diameter), information regarding perforation of the gallbladder and intraperitoneally "lost" stones, reasons for con¬version, and duration of surgery. Postoperative notes of interest included the use of nasogastric tubes and drains, the amount of analgesics used, (evaluation of pain with VAS score), complications, and length of hospital stay.
Complications are classified as surgical infections (wound infection, subphrenic or subhepatic abscess); noninfectious surgi¬cal problems (e.g., bile duct injury, hemorrhage); remote infec¬tions (urinary or respiratory); and miscellaneous problems (e.g., atelectasis, deep vein thrombosis, AMI, CVA, etc). The collected information are entered into a database as either continuous or categorical variables for statistical analysis. Following the operative procedure, a normal sterile dressing will be applied to cover the abdomen.
A second surgical team, aware of the operative findings but not the surgical dissection instrument, then will assume the care of the patient. Postoperative care and ability to be discharged from the hospital will be determined by the second surgical team. The primary operative team will be in every moment available for emergent consultation.
Patient discharge will be base on good medical practice criteria: 1) apyrexia 2) absence of diseases requiring hospitalisation 3) return of bowel function 4) patient's compliance.
- IS THERE A PLACEBO? No
- INFORMED CONSENT TO BE SOUGHT? Yes (see: Case Report Form)
- INFORMED CONSENT FORM OR INFORMATION SHEET? Yes (see: Case Report Form).
In the informed consent form, patients will receive all the information about the study protocol, the confidential nature of personal data and will fill up a questionnaire before signing or refuse.
There will be not inconveniences caused to the patients. No incentives are planned for the patients regarding the operation or the follow-up.
All the medical informations obtained from the patients will be kept confidentially among the research scientists conducting the study.
The patients will be free to withdraw from the study, whenever they want without any obligation.
STOPPING RULES
In case of newly discovered statistically significant advantages in one group.
PRIMARY ENDPOINTS
The aim of the study is to demonstrate that H can reduce conversion rate compared to MD in LC for AC but also differences in terms of morbidity, mortality, operation time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal activity will be evaluated.
The primary endpoints of our study will be:
- To evaluate the conversion rate
- To evaluate morbidity, mortality, operation time
- To evaluate hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal activity
The onset of any other complications will be recorded intraoperatively, postoperatively, at discharge, at 7-days, 1-month and 6-months.
- PLANNED SUBGROUP ANALYSES? No.
- SIDE EFFECTS QUANTIFICATION? Yes There are not different side effects
- IS THERE AN ANALYSIS PLAN? Yes All the above mentioned data will be recorded in the Case Report Form (annexed to this proposal) and later stored in computer database. At the end of the study the final statistical examination will be carried out.
- ARE THERE PLANS FOR INTERIM ANALYSIS? Yes An interim statistical examination of the data will be done every 3 months during the period of patients' inclusion in the study. Then at the end of every completed follow-up period (1-month, 6-months).
- ARE THERE AN INDEPENDENT DATA-MONITORING COMITTEE? No
TYPE OF ANALYSIS
The statistical analysis will be carried out using Epi Info 2000, Version 1.1 software package (Dean AG, Arner TG, Sangam S, Sunki GG, Friedman R, Lantinga M, Zubieta JC, Sullivan KM, Smith DC. Epi Info 2000, a database and statistics program for public health professionals for use on Windows 95, 98, NT, and 2000 computers; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2000).
INDEMNITIES SPECIFIED
No incentives are planned for the patients regarding the operation or the follow-up.
FINISHING DATE
The study will take approximately 6 months - 1 year for the inclusion period. According to the number of AC managed monthly, the duration of the inclusion period can be approximately of 1 year to reach the number of about 42 enrolled patients.
REPORTING DATE
An interim report is planned at the end of any completed follow-up period.
- IS THE STUDY CLINICALLY NECESSARY? Yes
AC is a common disease. Any improvement in this field will benefit many patients reducing morbidity, mortality, conversion rate, operation time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal activity and aesthetic result. All our patients will be informed about the study and an informed consent will be obtained. There will not be inconveniences caused to the patients. All the medical informations obtained from the patients will be kept confidentially among the research scientists conducting the study. The patients will be free to withdrawn from the study, whenever they want without any obligation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| H | Experimental | Procedure: early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic)early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic) |
| MD | Active comparator | Procedure: early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy)early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Clinical (pain, fever > 37.5 °C, WBC > 10.000 / microL), and ultrasound evidence of cholecystitis
- ASA I-III patients
- Informed consent
- Less than 72h from the onset
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Informed consent refusal
- Choledocholithiasis
- Generalized peritonitis
- Previous abdominal surgical procedures
- Patients with an intra-operative findings of different pathology will be excluded from the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic)early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours after the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with H (Harmonic scalpel) | Procedure or surgery | H |
| early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy)early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours after the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy) | Procedure or surgery | MD |
Primary outcome
conversion rate
Time frame: 1 day
operative time
Time frame: 1 day
mortality
Time frame: 6-months
morbidity
Time frame: 6-months
hospital stay
Time frame: at discharge
postoperative pain
Time frame: postoperatively
return to daily activities
Time frame: 6-months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2011.
- Background: PubMed 15584058Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2005 Jan;92(1):44-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4836.
- Background: PubMed 15738842Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Persiani R. [The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. J Chir (Paris). 2004 Nov;141(6):343-53. doi: 10.1016/s0021-7697(04)95358-6. French.
- Background: PubMed 15782391Rai R, Sinha A, Rai S. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 44-49). Br J Surg. 2005 Apr;92(4):494. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5042. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15107216Asoglu O, Ozmen V, Karanlik H, Igci A, Kecer M, Parlak M, Unal ES. Does the complication rate increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Apr;14(2):81-6. doi: 10.1089/109264204322973844.
- Background: PubMed 12850677Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;7(5):642-5. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(03)00065-9.
- Background: PubMed 12399846Huscher CG, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc. 2003 Mar;17(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19470152Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Gazzotti F, Coccolini F, Pinna AD. The HAC Trial (Harmonic for Acute Cholecystitis) Study. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of Harmonic(H) versus Monopolar Diathermy (M) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in adults. Trials. 2009 May 26;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-34.
Related trials for Cholecystitis
Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block Versus Local Infiltration
Cholelithiases, Cholecystitis
Recruiting
STALL vs Sole Local Wound Infiltration in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis, Cholecystitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SnapChole: An International, Time-Bound Prospective Platform Study of Management Strategies and Outcomes in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Percutaneous Drainage Versus EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage in Poor Surgical Patients With Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Supraglottic Oxygenation Via Oral Transtracheal Catheter for Reducing the Incidence of Hypoxemia During ERCP Under Sedation
Choledocholithiasis With Cholecystitis With Obstruction, Obstructive Jaundice
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fausto Catena, M.D. PhD study director
S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of Bologna
Luca Ansaloni, M.D. principal investigator
S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital - University of Bologna
Salomone Di Saverio, M.D. principal investigator
S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital - Maggiore Hospital, Bologna
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with H (Harmonic) and early LC within 72 hours after the diagnosis with MD (Monopolar Diathermy) in people with Cholecystitis, run by University of Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
conversion rate (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00746850, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2011.