HypertensionPhase 4NCT00744237
Study of the Glycemic Effects of Nebivolol Compared With Metoprolol and HCTZ in Diabetic Hypertensive Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Nebivolol, Metoprolol ER and HCTZ in people with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Forest Laboratories at 65 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the effects of nebivolol on glycemic control compared with metoprolol and HCTZ in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Nebivolol, Metoprolol ER and HCTZ
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 231 participants
- Where
- 65 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2008to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, 18-85 years of age
- Blood pressure in the range of 130 to 179/80 to 109 mmHg
- Currently using either an ACE inhibitor or an ARB alone or (an ACE inhibitor or an ARB and up to two other drugs for treatment of high blood pressure). (Patients may be on both an ACE inhibitor and ARB, but would need to be taken off one.)
- Stable medication regimen for high blood pressure for at least one month prior to screening
- Stable type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 3 months prior to screening that is controlled by any or all of the following: diet and antidiabetic medications that may include fixed-dose insulin
- HgbA1c 6.5 to 8.5% (This is measured at the screening visit)
Who cannot join
- Use of any beta blocker within one month prior to screening
- Use of clonidine within 3 months prior to screening
- Diagnosis of hyperthyroidism as evidenced by abnormal lab markers
- Any disorder requiring the intermittent or chronic use of systemic corticosteroids
- Diagnosis of hyperthyroidism as determined by lab markers done at screening
- Active liver disease as determined by lab markers
Show all 12Show fewer
- Kidney impairment; estimated GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2
- History of heart attack, clinically significant arrhythmia, unstable angina, coronary angioplasty/bypass surgery, stroke, or TIA in 3 months prior to screening
- Chronic heart failure
- Drug or alcohol abuse within 2 years prior to screening
- History of sensitivity to any beta blocker, HCTZ, sulfa drug, or calcium channel blocker
- Participation in another research study within 30 days prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 2 countries.
65 sites in 2 countries
United States62 sites
Forest Investigative Site 15
Athens, Alabama, 35611
Forest Investigative Site 44
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
Forest Investigative Site 5
Augusta, Georgia, 30904
Forest Investigative Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204
Forest Investigative Site 20
Baltimore, Maryland, 21209
Forest Investigative Site 35
Bell Gardens, California, 90201
Forest Investigative Site
Buena Park, California, 90620
Forest Investigative Site 51
Centerville, Ohio, 45459
Forest Investigative Site 17
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
Forest Investigative Site 7
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28211
Forest Investigative Site 45
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28262
Forest Investigative Site 39
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
Forest Investigative Site 54
Chino, California, 91710
Forest Investigative Site 48
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Forest Investigative Site 46
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
Forest Investigative Site 52
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Forest Investigative Site 28
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Forest Investigative Site 3
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Forest Investigative Site 33
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Forest Investigative Site 40
Fremont, California, 94538
Forest Investigative Site 61
Golden, Colorado, 80401
Forest Investigative Site 36
Hollywood, Florida, 33023
Forest Investigative Site 56
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814
Forest Investigative Site 16
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Forest Investigative Site 38
Hurst, Texas, 76054
Forest Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Forest Investigative Site 57
Meridian, Idaho, 83646
Forest Investigative Site 62
Miami, Florida, 33135
Forest Investigative Site 080
Miami, Florida, 33169
Forest Investigative Site 59
Miami, Florida, 33183
Forest Investigative Site 24
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Forest Investigative Site
New Hyde Park, New York, 11042
Forest Investigative Site 10
New Tazewell, Tennessee, 37825
Forest Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10032
Forest Investigative Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Forest Investigative Site
North Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Forest Investigative Site 50
Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745
Forest Investigative Site
Palm Springs, California, 92262
Forest Investigative Site 32
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024
Forest Investigative Site 081
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
Forest Investigative Site
Pomona, California, 91767
Forest Investigative Site 55
Sacramento, California, 95821
Forest Investigative Site 21
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081
Forest Investigative Site 26
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Forest Investigative Site 34
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
Forest Investigative Site 11
San Diego, California, 92128
Forest Investigative Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Forest Investigative Site
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Forest Investigative Site 4
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
Forest Investigative Site
Spring Valley, California, 91978
Forest Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Forest Investigative Site
St. George, Utah, 84790
Forest Investigative Site 2
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
Forest Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Forest Investigative Site 49
Tustin, California, 92780
Forest Investigative Site 31
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23452
Forest Investigative Site 12
Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281
Forest Investigative Site 47
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Forest Investigative Site 19
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Forest Investigative Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Forest Investigative Site 37
Wichita, Kansas, 67203
Forest Investigative Site 18
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Puerto Rico3 sites
Forest Investigative Site 41
Ponce, 00717
Forest Investigative Site 60
Salinas, 00751
Forest Investigative Site 29
Santurce, 00909
About this study
Official title: Glycemic Effects of Nebivolol Compared With Metoprolol Extended Release and Compared With Hydrochlorothiazide In Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study
This study will evaluate the effects of nebivolol on glycemic control compared with metoprolol and HCTZ in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Nebivolol, Metoprolol ER, HCTZ
- Keywords
- nebivolol, Bystolic ™, Hypertension, Diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NebivololDrug
Also called Bystolic (TM)
- Nebivolol 5 mg (overencapsulated 5-mg marketed tablet), oral administration
- Nebivolol 10 mg (overencapsulated 10-mg marketed tablet), oral administration
- Nebivolol 20 mg (overencapsulated 20-mg marketed tablet) oral administration
- Nebivolol 40 mg (two overencapsulated 20-mg tablets) oral administration
Metoprolol ERDrug
- Metoprolol ER 50 mg (overencapsulated 50-mg tablet) oral administration
- Metoprolol ER 100 mg (two overencapsulated 50-mg tablets) oral administration
- Metoprolol ER 200 mg (overencapsulated 200-mg tablet) oral administration
- Metoprolol ER 400 mg (two overencapsulated 200-mg tablets) oral administration
HCTZDrug
Also called Hydrochlorothorazide
- HCTZ 12.5 mg (overencapsulated 12.5 capsule), oral administration
- HCTZ 25 mg (two capsules, overencapsulated 12.5-mg capsules), oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | * Nebivolol 5 mg (overencapsulated 5-mg marketed tablet), oral administration
* Nebivolol 10 mg (overencapsulated 10-mg marketed tablet), oral administration
* Nebivolol 20 mg (overencapsulated 20-mg marketed tablet) oral administration
* Nebivolol 40 mg (two overencapsulated 20-mg tablets) oral administration
* Open-label amlodipine may be given Receives: Drug: Nebivolol |
| 2 | Active comparator | * Metoprolol ER 50 mg (overencapsulated 50-mg tablet) oral administration
* Metoprolol ER 100 mg (two overencapsulated 50-mg tablets) oral administration
* Metoprolol ER 200 mg (overencapsulated 200-mg tablet) oral administration
* Metoprolol ER 400 mg (two overencapsulated 200-mg tablets) oral administration
* Open-label amlodipine may be given Receives: Drug: Metoprolol ER |
| 3 | Active comparator | * HCTZ 12.5 mg (overencapsulated 12.5 capsule), oral administration
* HCTZ 25 mg (two capsules, overencapsulated 12.5-mg capsules), oral administration
* Open-label amlodipine may be given Receives: Drug: HCTZ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26
Change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) over 26 weeks, Last Observation Carried Forward.
Measured: visit 5(week 0) and visit 14(week 26)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Based on Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
Change from Baseline in Insulin Resistance based on homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at week 26, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). The HOMA-IR is the the product of the blood Glucose and Insulin levels, divided by a constant. HOMA-IR is expressed as the following: HOMA-IR = fasting serum insulin (μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) / 22.5
Measured: [visit 5(week 0) and visit 14(week 26)]
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2008
- Primary completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 231 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Forest Laboratories
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- John Shea, MS, Study director, Forest Research Institute, a Subsidiary of Forest Laboratories, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00744237
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEB-MD-19
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2008
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Glycemic Effects of Nebivolol Compared With Metoprolol Extended Release and Compared With Hydrochlorothiazide In Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00744237
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEB-MD-19
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- nebivolol, Bystolic ™, Hypertension, Diabetes
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 231 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Forest LaboratoriesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jul 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the effects of nebivolol on glycemic control compared with metoprolol and HCTZ in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Nebivolol* Nebivolol 5 mg (overencapsulated 5-mg marketed tablet), oral administration * Nebivolol 10 mg (overencapsulated 10-mg marketed tablet), oral administration * Nebivolol 20 mg (overencapsulated 20-mg marketed tablet) oral administration * Nebivolol 40 mg (two overencapsulated 20-mg tablets) oral administration * Open-label amlodipine may be given |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Metoprolol ER* Metoprolol ER 50 mg (overencapsulated 50-mg tablet) oral administration * Metoprolol ER 100 mg (two overencapsulated 50-mg tablets) oral administration * Metoprolol ER 200 mg (overencapsulated 200-mg tablet) oral administration * Metoprolol ER 400 mg (two overencapsulated 200-mg tablets) oral administration * Open-label amlodipine may be given |
| 3 | Active comparator | Drug: HCTZ* HCTZ 12.5 mg (overencapsulated 12.5 capsule), oral administration * HCTZ 25 mg (two capsules, overencapsulated 12.5-mg capsules), oral administration * Open-label amlodipine may be given |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female, 18-85 years of age
- Blood pressure in the range of 130 to 179/80 to 109 mmHg
- Currently using either an ACE inhibitor or an ARB alone or (an ACE inhibitor or an ARB and up to two other drugs for treatment of high blood pressure). (Patients may be on both an ACE inhibitor and ARB, but would need to be taken off one.)
- Stable medication regimen for high blood pressure for at least one month prior to screening
- Stable type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 3 months prior to screening that is controlled by any or all of the following: diet and antidiabetic medications that may include fixed-dose insulin
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Use of any beta blocker within one month prior to screening
- Use of clonidine within 3 months prior to screening
- Diagnosis of hyperthyroidism as evidenced by abnormal lab markers
- Any disorder requiring the intermittent or chronic use of systemic corticosteroids
- Diagnosis of hyperthyroidism as determined by lab markers done at screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NebivololAlso: Bystolic (TM)* Nebivolol 5 mg (overencapsulated 5-mg marketed tablet), oral administration * Nebivolol 10 mg (overencapsulated 10-mg marketed tablet), oral administration * Nebivolol 20 mg (overencapsulated 20-mg marketed tablet) oral administration * Nebivolol 40 mg (two overencapsulated 20-mg tablets) oral administration | Drug | 1 |
| Metoprolol ER* Metoprolol ER 50 mg (overencapsulated 50-mg tablet) oral administration * Metoprolol ER 100 mg (two overencapsulated 50-mg tablets) oral administration * Metoprolol ER 200 mg (overencapsulated 200-mg tablet) oral administration * Metoprolol ER 400 mg (two overencapsulated 200-mg tablets) oral administration | Drug | 2 |
| HCTZAlso: Hydrochlorothorazide* HCTZ 12.5 mg (overencapsulated 12.5 capsule), oral administration * HCTZ 25 mg (two capsules, overencapsulated 12.5-mg capsules), oral administration | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26
Time frame: visit 5(week 0) and visit 14(week 26)
Change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) over 26 weeks, Last Observation Carried Forward.
1 secondary outcome
Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Based on Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time frame: [visit 5(week 0) and visit 14(week 26)]
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Shea, MS study director
Forest Research Institute, a Subsidiary of Forest Laboratories, Inc.
65 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Nebivolol, Metoprolol ER and HCTZ in people with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Forest Laboratories at 65 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jul 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26 (time frame: visit 5(week 0) and visit 14(week 26)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2011.