AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal Cell CancerPhase 3NCT00738530

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) Added to Interferon Alfa-2a (Roferon) Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer With Nephrectomy

A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab [Avastin] and Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon] in people with Renal Cell Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 104 sites in 18 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 2-arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin versus placebo in combination with Roferon as first-line treatment in participants with metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type) who have had nephrectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Renal Cell Cancer
What is being tested?
Bevacizumab [Avastin] and Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
649 participants
Where
104 sitesin 18 countries
Study dates
Jun 2004to Sep 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type);
  • nephrectomy;
  • absence of proteinuria.

Who cannot join

  • prior systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer;
  • major surgical procedure, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to study treatment start;
  • presence of brain metastases or spinal cord compression;
  • ongoing need for full dose anticoagulants;
  • uncontrolled hypertension;
  • clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

Trial locations and contacts

104 sites in 18 countries.

104 sites in 18 countries

France16 sites
  • Study site

    Angers, 49933

  • Study site

    Bordeaux, 33075

  • Study site

    Caen, 14076

  • Study site

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63011

  • Study site

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Study site

    Lille, 59020

  • Study site

    Limoges, 87042

  • Study site

    Lyon, 69373

  • Study site

    Marseille, 13273

  • Study site

    Nice, 06189

  • Study site

    Poitiers, 86021

  • Study site

    Saint-Herblain, 44805

  • Study site

    Strasbourg, 67091

  • Study site

    Suresnes, 92151

  • Study site

    Toulouse, 31052

  • Study site

    Villejuif, 94805

Other trials in France

Spain11 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Study site

    Granada, 18014

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Study site

    Málaga, 29010

  • Study site

    Pontevedra, 36002

  • Study site

    Santander, 39008

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46009

  • Study site

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Australia10 sites
  • Study site

    Adelaide, 5011

  • Study site

    Adelaide, 5041

  • Study site

    Brisbane, 4006

  • Study site

    Canberra, 2606

  • Study site

    Frankston, 3199

  • Study site

    Kurralta Park, 5037

  • Study site

    Melbourne, 3128

  • Study site

    Perth, 6009

  • Study site

    Sydney, 2031

  • Study site

    Sydney, 2139

Other trials in Australia

Italy9 sites
  • Study site

    Livorno, 57100

  • Study site

    Milan, 20133

  • Study site

    Milan, 20162

  • Study site

    Modena, 41100

  • Study site

    Naples, 80131

  • Study site

    Perugia, 06122

  • Study site

    Roma, 00144

  • Study site

    Rozzano, 20089

  • Study site

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Russia9 sites
  • Study site

    Moscow, 105229

  • Study site

    Moscow, 107005

  • Study site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Study site

    Moscow, 125284

  • Study site

    Moscow, 129128

  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Obninsk, 249020

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Germany8 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin

  • Study site

    Darmstadt, 64283

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Hanover, 30449

  • Study site

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Study site

    Marburg, 35043

  • Study site

    München, 81377

  • Study site

    Planegg

Other trials in Germany

Poland6 sites
  • Study site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-796

  • Study site

    Krakow, 31-826

  • Study site

    Lodz, 94-306

  • Study site

    Olsztyn, 10-228

  • Study site

    Tarnów, 33-100

  • Study site

    Warsaw, 00-909

Other trials in Poland

Israel5 sites
  • Study site

    Holon, 58100

  • Study site

    Ramat Gan, 52621

  • Study site

    Rehovot, 76100

  • Study site

    Tel Aviv, 6423906

  • Study site

    Tsrifin, 70300

Other trials in Israel

Belgium4 sites
  • Study site

    Antwerp, 2020

  • Study site

    Brussels, 1000

  • Study site

    Brussels, 1200

  • Study site

    Wilrijk, 2610

Other trials in Belgium

Czechia4 sites
  • Study site

    České Budějovice, 370 87

  • Study site

    Chomutov, 430 12

  • Study site

    Hradec Králové, 500 05

  • Study site

    Pilsen, 305 99

Other trials in Czechia

Norway4 sites
  • Study site

    Ålesund, 6026

  • Study site

    Oslo, 0310

  • Study site

    Stavanger, 4068

  • Study site

    Trondheim, 7000

Other trials in Norway

Taiwan4 sites
  • Study site

    Chang Gung

  • Study site

    Kaohsiung City, 807

  • Study site

    Taichung, 407

  • Study site

    Taipei, 00112

Other trials in Taiwan

Switzerland3 sites
  • Study site

    Basel, 4031

  • Study site

    Bern, 3010

  • Study site

    Geneva, 1205

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Study site

    London, NW3 2QG

  • Study site

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Study site

    Manchester, M2O 4BX

Other trials in United Kingdom

Finland2 sites
  • Study site

    Tampere, 33520

  • Study site

    Turku, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Hungary2 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest, 1122

  • Study site

    Szombathely, 9700

Other trials in Hungary

Netherlands2 sites
  • Study site

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

  • Study site

    Nijmegen, 6525 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

Singapore2 sites
  • Study site

    Singapore, 119074

  • Study site

    Singapore, 169610

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Avastin Plus Roferon Compared With Placebo Plus Roferon on Overall Survival and Tumor Assessment in Nephrectomised Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

This 2-arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin versus placebo in combination with Roferon as first-line treatment in participants with metastatic renal cell cancer (clear cell type) who have had nephrectomy. The anticipated time of study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is greater than (>)500 individuals.

Being tested
Bevacizumab [Avastin], Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon], Placebo
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bevacizumab [Avastin]Drug

    10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks

  • Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]Drug

    9 MIU SC 3 times/week

  • PlaceboDrug

    IV every 2 weeks

Study groups in NCT00738530
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bevacizumab + IFN-Alfa-2AExperimentalBevacizumab infusions will be administered every 2 weeks at a dose of 10 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) for 52 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Interferon alfa-2a (IFN-Alfa-2A) will be administered 3 times per week as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of 9 million international units (MIU) for 52 weeks or until disease progression or major toxicity.
Receives: Drug: Bevacizumab [Avastin]; Drug: Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]
Placebo + IFN-Alfa-2APlacebo comparatorPlacebo matched with Bevacizumab infusions will be administered every 2 weeks for 52 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. IFN-Alfa-2A will be administered 3 times per week as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of 9 MIU for 52 weeks or until disease progression or major toxicity.
Receives: Drug: Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon]; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Died

    Measured: Baseline up to 4.25 years

  2. Overall Survival (OS) Duration

    Duration of survival was defined as the time between the date of randomization and date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline until death (up to 4.25 years)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

    Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

  2. Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first date of documented progression or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor assessment was performed using modified RECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20 percentage(%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event were censored at the date of last follow-up for progression or date of last available tumor measurement if no follow-up assessment for progression was performed. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

  3. Time to Progression (TTP) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

    Time to progression was defined as the time between date of randomization and date of documented progression. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event (including participants who died before progressive disease) were censored at the date of last follow-up for progression or date of last available tumor measurement if no follow-up assessment for progression was performed. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure

    Treatment failure is defined as insufficient therapeutic response (including disease progression), death, withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events or laboratory abnormality, or withdrawal of informed consent. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

  5. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

    Time to treatment failure was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of insufficient therapeutic response (including disease progression), death, withdrawal of treatment due to adverse events or laboratory abnormality, or withdrawal of informed consent. Tumor assessment was performed using mRECIST. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants without an event were censored at the date of last tumor assessment or last treatment administration, whichever occurred last. Participants who were randomized but not exposed to study drug and had no further follow-up were censored on the day of randomization.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to mRECIST

    Objective response referred to participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: greater than or equal to (>=) 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions taking as reference the screening sum LD. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumor measurements had to be confirmed by repeat assessments that should have been performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Longer intervals as determined by the study protocol were also appropriate.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)

    Best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression. Based on assessment of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD), according to mRECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of the LD of all target lesions. CR and PR persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Reference is the smallest sum LD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 44, 56, 68 thereafter every 12 weeks up to week 104 and then every 6 months up to 4.25 years)

  8. Change From Baseline in Karnofsky Performance Status

    Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 11 level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 7, 15, 23, 31, 43

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2004
  3. Primary completionSep 2008
  4. Study completionSep 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
649 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00738530
Sponsor's protocol ID
BO17705
Other IDs
2004-000282-35, 2004
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
19 Aug 2008
Last updated
23 Jun 2016

Publications

  • Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.

    PubMed 37146227

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab [Avastin] and Interferon alfa 2a [Roferon] in people with Renal Cell Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 104 sites in 18 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 104 sites in France, Spain, Australia, Italy, Russia and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Died (time frame: Baseline up to 4.25 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00738530, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in