AzTrials
AzTrials

Operative TimeADTPDNCT00738127

Safety Study of Surgical Technique to Treat Acute Dorsal Trans-Scaphoid Perilunate Dislocations

A study testing Open reduction and internal fixation in people with Operative Time and Grip Strength, run by The Second Hospital of Qinhuangdao at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine a surgical technique is effective in the treatment of acute dorsal trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Operative Time, Grip Strength, Pain
What is being tested?
Open reduction and internal fixation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
801 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Oct 1992to Oct 2004
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical treatment of acute trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations
  • Must have open reduction and internal fixation

Who cannot join

  • Patients whose age under 18 years
  • Associated with severe crush, avulsion, or opened injury

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The Second Hospital of Qinhuangdao

    Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066600

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Surgical Techniques for Acute Dorsal Trans-Scaphoid Perilunate Dislocations

The purpose of this study is to determine a surgical technique is effective in the treatment of acute dorsal trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations.

Read the detailed description

Open reduction and internal fixation is an effective method of treating acute trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations. We study a new surgical technique that allows for early wrist excises postoperatively. We compare this technique to Inoue et al. 's techniques affect the objective and subjective outcomes. We also compared the long-term outcomes of these two procedures performed in similar patient groups.Although both groups had satisfactory results with regard to their pain relief, sufficient grip strength and union of scaphoid fracture, the technique using in group I was more easily and quickly to perform. It allows early postoperative excises and results better functional wrist range of motion.

Being tested
Open reduction and internal fixation
Keywords
Acute trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations, Open reduction and internal fixation, Kirschner-wire, Range of motion
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Open reduction and internal fixationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Techniques for Perilunate Dislocations

    Inoue et al.'s technique is most commonly used which required placing three K-wires to immobilize both midcarpal joint and radiocarpal joint. This technique is effective, however, it has some problems. In the study, we improve the surgical technique.

Study groups in NCT00738127
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalGroup I (treatment with our technique) Eighteen patients (18 wrists) were available for long-term follow-up at an average of 47.8 months after surgery. There were 11 men and seven women. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 35.4 years (range, 22 to 56 years). The dominant hand was involved in 12 patients and the nondominant hand, in six.
Receives: Procedure: Open reduction and internal fixation
2ExperimentalGroup II (treatment with Inoue et al.'s technique) Fifteen patients (15 wrists) were evaluated at an average of 51 months. Nine patients were men and 6 were women. The mean age of the group at the time of surgery was 37.5 years (range, 24 to 58 years). The dominant hand was involved in 10 and nondominant hand, in seven.
Receives: Procedure: Open reduction and internal fixation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. In group I was more easily and quickly to perform. It allows early postoperative excises and results better functional wrist range of motion.

    Measured: 1992-2004

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Both groups had satisfactory results with regard to their pain relief, sufficient grip strength and union of scaphoid fracture.

    Measured: 1992-2004

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 1992
  3. Primary completionJun 2004
  4. Study completionOct 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
801 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00738127
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHQ-0808-A
Acronym
ADTPD
Status last verified
Aug 2008
First submitted
15 Aug 2008
Last updated
20 Aug 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Moneim MS, Hofammann KE 3rd, Omer GE. Transscaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocation. Result of open reduction and pin fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Nov;(190):227-35.

    PubMed 6386257

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Open reduction and internal fixation in people with Operative Time and Grip Strength, run by The Second Hospital of Qinhuangdao at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

In group I was more easily and quickly to perform. It allows early postoperative excises and results better functional wrist range of motion. (time frame: 1992-2004). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00738127, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in