AzTrials
AzTrials

Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Femoral CondylePhase 2NCT00729716

Comparison of BioCart™II With Microfracture for Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Femoral Condyle

A Phase 2 study testing BioCart™II and Microfracture in people with Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Femoral Condyle, run by ProChon Biotech Ltd at 8 sites in 2 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BioCart™II is a novel scaffold seeded with autologous chondrocytes to be used to repair cartilage lesions of the knee. This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of BioCart™II treatment compared to microfracture which is the classical method of treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 60 years
What is being tested?
BioCart™II and Microfracture
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
8 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
May 2008to May 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 16 to 60 years
  • Femoral condyle lesion (medial, lateral or trochlea)
  • Single contained lesion
  • Symptomatic (moderate to severe pain on VAS)
  • Caused by trauma or OCD
  • Depth of lesion up to 6 mm
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Size of lesion 1.5-7.5 cm2
  • No general bone or cartilage pathology
  • No limb mal-alignment (long leg standing X-ray)
  • Mechanically stable knee
  • Accompanying pathology menisectomy up to 50%
  • Willing and able to comply with protocol and undergo vigorous rehabilitation
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Multiple cartilage lesions of the knee, other location than femoral condyle (medial, lateral or trochlear), deeper than 6 mm, smaller than 1.5cm2 or greater than 7.5cm2, mild symptoms, caused by reason other than trauma or OCD, unstable knee, accompanying pathology other than 50% menisectomy.
  • Hyaluronic acid knee injections in the past 3 months,
  • History of chronic bone or cartilage disorder, bilateral knee pain and/or cartilage lesion
  • History of any neoplastic disease, or chemotherapy treatment
  • Chronic steroid intake, chronic pain medication use for conditions other than the involved knee, use of blood thinners (during the past 10 days prior to enrollment)
  • History of allergy or atopic disease, sensitivity to blood products
Show all 31Show fewer
  • Evidence of any significant systemic disease, known coagulopathies or acute injury that might compromise the patient's welfare
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Substance or alcohol abuse
  • Microfracture to the affected knee within the previous 2 years
  • Participation in concurrent trials
  • Participation in previous trials within 3 months
  • Malignancy
  • Taking specific drugs for osteoarthritis, such as chondroitin sulfate, diacerein, n-glucosamine, piaseledine, or capsaicin within 2 weeks of the baseline visit
  • Chronic use of anticoagulants
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Active joint infection
  • Other unstable cardiac and pulmonary disorder
  • Liver enzymes (SGOT, SGPT, alkaline phosphatase) of more then two times the upper limit of normal or any other results that in the clinical investigator's mind is important clinically
  • Clinical and/or radiographic disease in the indexed affected joint that includes:
  • Osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis or a history of septic or reactive arthritis
  • Gout or a history of gout or pseudogout in the affected knee
  • Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with significant bone loss
  • Bipolar articular cartilage involvement (or kissing lesions) of the ipsilateral compartment (i.e >than ICRS grade 2 on the opposing articular surface)
  • Associated damage to the underlying subchondral bone requiring an osteochondral graft
  • History of secondary arthropathies (i.e. sickle cell disease, Hemochromatosis, or autoimmune disease)
  • Receiving prescription pain medication other than NSAIDs or acetaminophen for conditions unrelated to the index knee conditions
  • BMI >40 kg/m2
  • Unable to undergo MRI
  • Any reasons making the patient a poor candidate in the eyes of the investigator

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 2 countries.

8 sites in 2 countries

United States5 sites
  • University Orthopedics Center

    Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602

  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21215

  • Mount Sinai Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10029-6754

  • Southeastern Orthopedic Center

    Savannah, Georgia, 31405

  • Tucson Orthopaedic Institute

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

Other trials in United States

Israel3 sites
  • Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

    Ramat Gan, 52662

  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    Tel Aviv, 64239

  • Assaf Harofeh Medical Center

    Tsrifin, 70300

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Phase II Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of BioCart™II in the Treatment of Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Femoral Condyle in Comparison With Microfracture

BioCart™II is a novel scaffold seeded with autologous chondrocytes to be used to repair cartilage lesions of the knee. This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of BioCart™II treatment compared to microfracture which is the classical method of treatment.

Read the detailed description

Full thickness cartilage lesions are typically incapable of self repair, are a source of pain and morbidity and lead to early onset osteoarthritis. A classical method of treatment has been microfracture where holes are drilled in the subchondral bone to allow influx of bone marrow cells which fill and repair the lesion. The resulting repair has been reported to be mixed fibrocartilage which is recognized to be less efficient and durable than hyaline cartilage, the physiological material making up the joint. In autologous chondrocyte implantation, a sample of cartilage is removed from a non-weight bearing region of the joint and the cells are grown and expanded in culture and then returned to the knee to repair the damaged cartilage. For implantation with BioCart™II, the chondrocytes are grown in the presence of proprietary growth factors which maintain the chondrocytes in optimal condition for subsequent repair. For implantation, the cells are seeded on a completely human three dimensional spongelike scaffold which holds the cells in the correct topology to allow for a rapid repair of the damaged joint with true physiological cartilage. BioCart™II is user friendly for the surgeon and patient alike giving it an advantage over other methods for autologous chondrocyte implantation that are in clinical use.

Being tested
BioCart™II, Microfracture
Keywords
Microfracture, Cartilage repair, Autologous chondrocyte implantation
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Stress

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BioCart™IIBiological

    Also called Autologous chondrocyte implantation, ACI

    A cartilage biopsy will be harvested from patients during arthroscopy and used for chondrocyte isolation, culture and future implantation. Subjects will also have about 80 ml venous blood drawn for autologous cell culture medium. Two-four weeks following biopsy harvest, BioCart™II will be implanted into the cartilage defect after careful debridement via miniarthrotomy.

  • MicrofractureProcedure or surgery

    Also called MF

    MF procedure will be carried out according to accepted practice. After careful debridement multiple perforations, or microfractures, are made in the subchondral bone using an awl. The released bone marrow forms a clot at the lesion site which is an enriched environment for new tissue formation. With the subject's consent a cartilage biopsy will be taken (at least 150 mg) and about 80 ml venous blood withdrawn. This will be used for chondrocyte culture and cryopreservation in case a later BioCart™II implantation is required after failure of the microfracture procedure.

Study groups in NCT00729716
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AExperimentalBioCart™II treatment
Receives: Biological: BioCart™II
BActive comparatorMicrofracture procedure
Receives: Procedure: Microfracture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement in the Lysholm joint function score of subjects in the BioCart™II study group compared with the MF study group

    Measured: 12 months with optional follow up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Improvement in clinical function post implantation/surgery compared to baseline in the study group and compared with the control group, of the following:

    Measured: 12 months with optional follow up to 5 years

  2. IKDC knee score

    Measured: 12 months with optional follow up to 5 years

  3. KOOS questionnaire

    Measured: 12 months with optional follow up to 5 years

  4. ICRS functional status

    Measured: 12 months with optional follow up to 5 years

  5. VAS pain score

    Measured: 12 months with optional follow up to 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2012 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00729716
Sponsor's protocol ID
BioCart™II 005-06
Status last verified
Mar 2012
First submitted
4 Aug 2008
Last updated
17 Apr 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Nehrer S, Chiari C, Domayer S, Barkay H, Yayon A. Results of chondrocyte implantation with a fibrin-hyaluronan matrix: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Aug;466(8):1849-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0322-4. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

    PubMed 18528742
  • Domayer SE, Welsch GH, Nehrer S, Chiari C, Dorotka R, Szomolanyi P, Mamisch TC, Yayon A, Trattnig S. T2 mapping and dGEMRIC after autologous chondrocyte implantation with a fibrin-based scaffold in the knee: preliminary results. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Mar;73(3):636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jan 20.

    PubMed 19157740

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing BioCart™II and Microfracture in people with Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Femoral Condyle, run by ProChon Biotech Ltd at 8 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States, Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement in the Lysholm joint function score of subjects in the BioCart™II study group compared with the MF study group (time frame: 12 months with optional follow up to 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00729716, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in