AzTrials
AzTrials

Myasthenia GravisPhase 2NCT00727194

Safety and Efficacy Study of Eculizumab in Patients With Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

A Phase 2 study testing eculizumab in people with Myasthenia Gravis, run by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 25 sites in 3 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether eculizumab is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis despite treatment with various immunosuppressants, such as prednisone, methotrexate, Cellcept, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide, that are currently available. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Myasthenia Gravis
What is being tested?
eculizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
14 participants
Where
25 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Oct 2008to Jul 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Generalized MG
  • MGFA Clinical Classification Class II, III or IVa.
  • QMG total score ≥12
  • Minimum score of two (2) in four (4) or more test items in the QMG
  • Able to give informed consent.
  • Have failed at least two immunosuppressants after one year of treatment
  • A positive serologic test for binding anti-acetylcholine receptor Abs at Screening and one of the following a) history of abnormal neuromuscular transmission test demonstrated by single-fiber electromyography or repetitive nerve stimulation, or b) history of positive anticholinesterase test, eg, edrophonium chloride test, or c) patient has demonstrated improvement in MG signs on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors as assessed by treating physician.

Who cannot join

  • History of thymoma or other neoplasms of the thymus.
  • History of thymectomy within 12 months prior to screening.
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Current or chronic use of plasmapheresis/plasma exchange
  • IVIG treatment within 8 weeks prior to screening.
  • Use of etanercept within 2 months prior to screening.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Use of rituximab (RITUXAN®) within 6 months prior to screening.
  • MGFA Class I, IVb, and V
  • Crisis or impending crisis

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 3 countries.

25 sites in 3 countries

United States21 sites
  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Caritas St. Elizabeths' Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02135

  • The University of Vermont College of Medicine

    Burlington, Vermont, 05405

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-1651

  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908-0394

  • University Hospitals - Case Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5098

  • The Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical School

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Wayne State University

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Wishard Hospital

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • University of Florida & Shands Neuroscience Institute

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32209

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10029-6574

  • University of California, Irvine

    Orange, California, 92868

  • The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02905

  • University of California - Davis

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Institute of Neurological Sciences, Department of Neurology, Southern General Hospital,

    Glasgow

  • Institute of Neurology

    London

  • Department of Clinical Neurology, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital

    Oxford

Other trials in United Kingdom

Canada1 site
  • The Northern Alberta Clinical trials and Research Centre

    Edmonton, Alberta

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over, Multi-Center Study of Eculizumab in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG) Who Have Moderate to Severe Muscle Weakness Despite Treatment With Immunosuppressants

The purpose of this study is to determine whether eculizumab is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis despite treatment with various immunosuppressants, such as prednisone, methotrexate, Cellcept, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide, that are currently available.

Being tested
eculizumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Myasthenia Gravis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • eculizumabDrug

    Also called Soliris

    eculizumab 600 mg IV weekly for 4 doses followed by eculizumab 900 mg IV every two weeks for 7 doses

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo IV weekly for 4 doses then every two weeks for 7 doses

Study groups in NCT00727194
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Experimentaleculizumab
Receives: Drug: eculizumab
2Placebo comparatorPlacebo
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG): The Primary Efficacy Endpoint in This Study Was the Percentage of Patients With a 3-point Reduction From Baseline in the QMG Total Score for Disease Severity.

    The QMG scoring system is considered to be an objective evaluation of muscle strength based on quantitative testing of sentinel muscle groups. The MGFA task force has recommended that the QMG score be used in prospective studies of therapy for MG.

    Measured: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in QMG Total Score

    The QMG scoring system is considered to be an objective evaluation of muscle strength based on quantitative testing of sentinel muscle groups. The Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America task force has recommended that the QMG score be used in prospective studies of therapy for MG. The QMG scoring system consists of 13 items. Each item is graded 0 to 3, with 3 being the most severe. The range of total QMG score is 0-39.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline in the MGFA Post-Intervention Status (PIS)

    The MGFA PIS is designed to assess the clinical state of MG patients at any time after treatment of MG is initiated. Change in status categories of Improved, Unchanged, Worse, Exacerbation, and Died of MG was to be assessed and recorded at every visit from Visits 3 to 24 (Weeks 1 to 16). Minimal manifestations were to be assessed at these visits.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline in the MG-Activity of Daily Living Profile (MG-ADL)

    The MG-ADL is an 8-point questionnaire that focuses on relevant symptoms and functional performance of activities of daily living (ADL) in MG patients. The 8 items of the MG-ADL were derived from symptom-based components of the original 13-item QMG to assess disability secondary to ocular (2 items), bulbar (3 items), respiratory (1 item), and gross motor or limb (2 items) impairment related to effects from MG. In this functional status instrument, each response is graded 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The range of total MG-ADL score is 0 - 24. MG-ADL was to be performed at every study visit. The recall period for MG-ADL was since the preceding study visit (1 or 2 weeks).

    Measured: 16 weeks

  4. Change From Baseline in the QoL Instrument, SF-36.

    The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, mental health, role-emotional, social functioning and vitality) as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. It is a generic measure, as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease or treatment group. The lower the score the more disability; the higher the score the less disability. Norm-based scoring involving a linear T-score transformation method was used so that scores for each of the health domain scales and component summary measures have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 based on the 1998 US general population. Thus, scores above and below 50 are above and below the average, respectively, in the 1998 US general.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in Respiratory Function Tests to Characterize the Degree of Involvement of Respiratory Muscles.

    Change from Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity

    Measured: 16 weeks

  6. Change From Baseline in Respiratory Function Tests to Characterize the Degree of Involvement of Respiratory Muscles.

    Change from Baseline in Negative Inspiratory Force. NIF is a measurement of respiratory muscle strength and ventilator reserve. NIF is represented by centimeters of water pressure (cmH2O). A normal NIF measurement is negative 60 cmH2O, or as 100% predicted value.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment (16 Weeks) in the Two Most Affected QMG Items for Disease Severity (Individual Test Item: Double Vision)

    The QMG scoring system is considered to be an objective evaluation of muscle strength based on quantitative testing of sentinel muscle groups. The MGFA task force has recommended that the QMG score be used in prospective studies of therapy for MG. All individual QMG items are scored 0 to 3, with 3 being the most severe. Negative values imply an improvement in QMG Item Score.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  8. Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment (16 Weeks) in the Two Most Affected QMG Items for Disease Severity (Individual Test Item: Ptosis)

    The QMG scoring system is considered to be an objective evaluation of muscle strength based on quantitative testing of sentinel muscle groups. The MGFA task force has recommended that the QMG score be used in prospective studies of therapy for MG. All individual QMG items are scored 0 to 3, with 3 being the most severe. Negative values imply an improvement in QMG Item Score.

    Measured: 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2008
  3. Primary completionMar 2011
  4. Study completionJul 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00727194
Sponsor's protocol ID
C08-001
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
30 Jul 2008
Last updated
24 Sep 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Howard JF Jr, Barohn RJ, Cutter GR, Freimer M, Juel VC, Mozaffar T, Mellion ML, Benatar MG, Farrugia ME, Wang JJ, Malhotra SS, Kissel JT; MG Study Group. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of eculizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2013 Jul;48(1):76-84. doi: 10.1002/mus.23839. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

    PubMed 23512355

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing eculizumab in people with Myasthenia Gravis, run by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 25 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Dec 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG): The Primary Efficacy Endpoint in This Study Was the Percentage of Patients With a 3-point Reduction From Baseline in the QMG Total Score for Disease Severity. (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00727194, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in