MyopiaNCT00725530
Evaluation of Deposits on Contact Lenses Worn Extended Wear
A study testing balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision) and etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2) in people with Myopia, run by Alcon Research at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to measure lipid deposits on commercially marketed contact lenses when worn on an extended wear (overnight) basis for 7 days. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myopia
- What is being tested?
- balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision) and etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2008to Oct 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 or older.
- Visual acuity correctable to 20/30 (Snellen) or better in each eye at distance with contact lenses.
- Successfully wearing hydrogel or silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Who cannot join
- Evidence or history of ocular conditions as prescribed in the protocol.
- One functional eye or a monofit lens.
- Any slit-lamp finding score of (1) at the Screening Visit as defined by the protocol.
- Use of concomitant topical ocular prescription or over-the-counter ocular medications.
- History of seasonal allergies with significant ocular side effects.
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Alcon Call Center for Trial Locations
Fort Worth, Texas, 76134
About this study
The purpose of this study was to measure lipid deposits on commercially marketed contact lenses when worn on an extended wear (overnight) basis for 7 days.
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Being tested
- balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision), etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2)
- Keywords
- Lens deposits, Soft contact lens wearers
- Medical subject headings
- Myopia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision)Device
Also called PureVision
Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel contact lens
etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2)Device
Also called Acuvue2
Commercially marketed, hydrogel contact lens
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| balafilcon A / etafilcon A | Active comparator | Balafilcon A worn first, with etafilcon A worn second. Each product worn bilaterally in an extended wear (overnight) basis for 7 days. Receives: Device: balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision); Device: etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2) |
| etafilcon A / balafilcon A | Active comparator | Etafilcon A worn first, with balafilcon A worn second. Each product worn bilaterally in an extended wear (overnight) basis for 7 days. Receives: Device: balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision); Device: etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Front Surface Lens Deposits
Film and discrete deposits were assessed with a slit-lamp after 2-5 hours of open eye lens wear. Film deposits were recorded on a 5-point scale, where 0=no deposition, clean surface; 1=slight, deposition occupying 1-5% of lens front surface; 2=mild, deposition occupying 6-15% of lens front surface; 3=moderate, deposition occupying 16-25% of lens front surface; 4=severe, deposition occupying >25% of lens front surface. Discrete deposits were recorded on a 5-point scale, where 0=no deposition, clean surface; 1=microdeposits (less than or equal to 10 dots); 2=microdeposits (greater than 10 dots); 3=macro deposits; 4=one or more jelly bumps. Participants were classified into Front Surface Lens Deposits <2 (less than grade 2 for both film and discrete) and into front surface lens deposits >1 (greater than grade 1 for either film, discrete, or both).
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2008
- Primary completionOct 2008
- Study completionOct 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for MyopiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alcon ResearchThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon Research
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00725530
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS-007
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Deposits on Contact Lenses Worn Extended Wear
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00725530
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS-007
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Keywords
- Lens deposits, Soft contact lens wearers
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon ResearchIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2008
- Primary completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Aug 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to measure lipid deposits on commercially marketed contact lenses when worn on an extended wear (overnight) basis for 7 days.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| balafilcon A / etafilcon A | Active comparator | Device: balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision), Device: etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2)Balafilcon A worn first, with etafilcon A worn second. Each product worn bilaterally in an extended wear (overnight) basis for 7 days. |
| etafilcon A / balafilcon A | Active comparator | Device: balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision), Device: etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2)Etafilcon A worn first, with balafilcon A worn second. Each product worn bilaterally in an extended wear (overnight) basis for 7 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18 or older.
- Visual acuity correctable to 20/30 (Snellen) or better in each eye at distance with contact lenses.
- Successfully wearing hydrogel or silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Evidence or history of ocular conditions as prescribed in the protocol.
- One functional eye or a monofit lens.
- Any slit-lamp finding score of (1) at the Screening Visit as defined by the protocol.
- Use of concomitant topical ocular prescription or over-the-counter ocular medications.
- History of seasonal allergies with significant ocular side effects.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision)Also: PureVisionCommercially marketed, silicone hydrogel contact lens | Device | balafilcon A / etafilcon A, etafilcon A / balafilcon A |
| etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2)Also: Acuvue2Commercially marketed, hydrogel contact lens | Device | balafilcon A / etafilcon A, etafilcon A / balafilcon A |
Primary outcome
Front Surface Lens Deposits
Time frame: 7 days
Film and discrete deposits were assessed with a slit-lamp after 2-5 hours of open eye lens wear. Film deposits were recorded on a 5-point scale, where 0=no deposition, clean surface; 1=slight, deposition occupying 1-5% of lens front surface; 2=mild, deposition occupying 6-15% of lens front surface; 3=moderate, deposition occupying 16-25% of lens front surface; 4=severe, deposition occupying >25% of lens front surface. Discrete deposits were recorded on a 5-point scale, where 0=no deposition, clean surface; 1=microdeposits (less than or equal to 10 dots); 2=microdeposits (greater than 10 dots); 3=macro deposits; 4=one or more jelly bumps. Participants were classified into Front Surface Lens Deposits <2 (less than grade 2 for both film and discrete) and into front surface lens deposits >1 (greater than grade 1 for either film, discrete, or both).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Myopia
Recruiting
Managing Premyopia in Chinese Children Using Artificial Intelligence Assisted Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments Based Spectacle Lens: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Pre-myopia, Myopia
Not yet recruiting
BRIGHT-LIGHT: Studying Red Light Therapy for Severe Short-Sightedness or Short-Sightedness That Worsens Despite Standard Treatment
Myopia, Myopia Progressing
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance and Outcomes After Toric Lens Transition
Astigmatism
Active, not recruiting
Effect of IOP Lowering on Progressive HM
High Myopia, Intraocular Pressure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a New Laser Refractive Vision Correction Using the TENEO™ 317 Model 2
Hyperopia and Myopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing balafilcon A contact lens (PureVision) and etafilcon A contact lens (Acuvue2) in people with Myopia, run by Alcon Research at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Front Surface Lens Deposits (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2012.