Febrile NeutropeniaNCT00723073
Caspofungin or Micafungin as Empiric Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Fever and Neutropenia
An observational study of Febrile Neutropenia, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with neutropenia who are receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Early diagnosis of these infections is difficult and fever may be the only sign. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Febrile Neutropenia
- How many people
- 323 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to May 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Cancer patients who are persistently febrile and neutropenic after receiving broad spectrum antibiotics and receive empiric antifungal therapy with either caspofungin or micafungin
Who may be able to join
- All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of caspofungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500, for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2006, as there first antifungal agent.
- All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of micafungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500 for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2006 - 10/31/2007 as there first antifungal agent
Who cannot join
- Patients receiving an echinocandin antifungal agent (micafungin or caspofungin) for an indication other then empiric therapy in febrile neutropenia
- Patients receiving therapy for an active or on-going invasive fungal infection
- Patients who received both caspofungin and micafungin during the same admission
- Patients with an ANC > 500 at when either micafungin or caspofungin was started
- Patients who received another antifungal agent for persistent febrile neutropenia, e.g., voriconazole, amphotericin B liposome, posaconazole, etc... Before they received an echinocandin (caspofungin or micafungin) will be excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Caspofungin or Micafungin as Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Adult Patients With Persistent Febrile Neutropenia: A Retrospective, Observational, Sequential Cohort Analysis
Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with neutropenia who are receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Early diagnosis of these infections is difficult and fever may be the only sign. A delay in treatment while a diagnosis is pursued may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. There are now several echinocandins available with similar in vitro spectrum of activity. Caspofungin is the only echinocandin Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for empiric antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenia. Although all echinocandin antifungal agents have similar spectrum of activity, there are limited data on the use of micafungin in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia (FN). In November 2006 the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee at Brigham \& Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) switched from caspofungin to micafungin as our formulary echinocandin. Given the limited clinical data on the use of micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with FN, we sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of micafungin, compared with caspofungin, for this indication using a sequential cohort analysis of patients treated before and after the formulary change at Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Read the detailed description
Objectives
This retrospective cohort analysis of converting from caspofungin to micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy for cancer patients who are persistently febrile and neutropenic after receiving broad spectrum antibiotics at Brigham \& Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) is designed to evaluate the following objectives:
- Safety of micafungin in this patient population
- Effective dose of 100 mg daily of micafungin compared to 70mg x1, then 50 mg daily of caspofungin
- Economic impact of converting or formulary echinocandin from micafungin to caspofungin
Study Design
- Retrospective cohort analysis - limited to medical records
- Data to be collected include the following:
- Demographic information: including: gender, age, race
- Past medical history and admitting diagnoses
- Laboratory results: Liver function tests (LFTs), Including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total bilirubin, as well as serum fungal assays: Serum Galactomannan assay, 1.3-BD Glucan assay
- Concomitant medications and duration of therapy for all systemic: antibiotics and antifungals
- All invasive breakthrough fungal infection details, including speciation and outcomes during echinocandin therapy
- Dosing, duration, and adverse events associated with echinocandin therapy
- Conditions
- Febrile Neutropenia
- Keywords
- micafungin, caspofungin, febrile neutropenia
- Medical subject headings
- Febrile Neutropenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Caspofungin arm | All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of caspofungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500, for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2006, as there first antifungal agent. | |
| Micafungin arm | All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of micafungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500 for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2006 - 10/31/2007 as there first antifungal agent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With an Overall Favorable Response to Echinocandin Therapy for Empiric Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
Overall favorable response was defined as achievement of successful treatment of baseline fungal infections, survival to hospital discharge, absence of breakthrough Ivasive fungal disese (IFD), and lack of advserse events (AE) attributable to treatment that led to discontinuation of echinocandin therapy.
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Successful Treatment of Any Baseline Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD)
Possible or proven baseline invasive fungal disease were defined as were diagnosed within the 2 days of initiating echinocandin therapy for persistent febrile neutropenia
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Mortality at Hospital Discharge
We assessed all patients in the study cohort who dischaged from the hospital alive
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Absence of Any Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD)
a breakthrough invasive fungal disesase was defined as any fungal infection that was diagnosed > 3 days on or during therapy or within 7 days after completion of therapy with an echinocandin
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Lack of an Adverse Drug Event (ADE) Attributable to Echinocandin (EC) Therapy That Led to Discontinuation of Therapy
Defined as any advsere event directly attributable to echinocandin treatment that led to discontinuation of therapy or switch to alternative therapy
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Secondary outcomes (5)
Duration of Echinocadin Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
median duration of therapy with an echinocandin (caspofungin or micafungin) for persistent febrile neutropenia (FN)
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Liver Function Tests (LFTs) Elevated During or After Echinocandin Therapy
aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT)> 5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin > 3x the upper limit of normal (ULN)
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Specific Type of Adverse Event That Resulted in Echinocandin (EC) Therapy Discontinuation
The description of the adverse event that resulted in discontinuation of echinocandin (EC) therapy
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Duration of Hospitization
Median number of days patients were hospitalized during the study period
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Duration of Neutropenia
Median number of days patients were neutropenic during the study period
Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionMay 2008
- Study completionMay 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Febrile NeutropeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 323 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
- Investigators
- David W Kubiak, PharmD, Principal investigator, Brigham and Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00723073
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008-P-000605/1; BWH
- Status last verified
- Aug 2010
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Schuler U, Bammer S, Aulitzky WE, Binder C, Bohme A, Egerer G, Sandherr M, Schwerdtfeger R, Silling G, Wandt H, Glasmacher A, Ehninger G. Safety and efficacy of itraconazole compared to amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever in patients with haematological malignancy. Onkologie. 2007 Apr;30(4):185-91. doi: 10.1159/000100055. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
PubMed 17396041Toubai T, Tanaka J, Ota S, Shigematsu A, Shono Y, Ibata M, Hashino S, Kondo T, Kakinoki Y, Masauzi N, Kasai M, Iwasaki H, Kurosawa M, Asaka M, Imamura M. Efficacy and safety of micafungin in febrile neutropenic patients treated for hematological malignancies. Intern Med. 2007;46(1):3-9. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6021. Epub 2007 Jan 1.
PubMed 17202726Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A, Flynn P, Shad A, Albano E, Keirns J, Lau WM, Facklam DP, Buell DN, Walsh TJ. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Aug;49(8):3317-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3317-3324.2005.
PubMed 16048942Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.
PubMed 15459300Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, Lazarus HM, Petersen F, Raffalli J, Yanovich S, Stiff P, Greenberg R, Donowitz G, Schuster M, Reboli A, Wingard J, Arndt C, Reinhardt J, Hadley S, Finberg R, Laverdiere M, Perfect J, Garber G, Fioritoni G, Anaissie E, Lee J; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):225-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200201243460403.
PubMed 11807146Wingard JR, White MH, Anaissie E, Raffalli J, Goodman J, Arrieta A; L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group. A randomized, double-blind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Nov;31(5):1155-63. doi: 10.1086/317451. Epub 2000 Nov 7.
PubMed 11073745Winston DJ, Hathorn JW, Schuster MG, Schiller GJ, Territo MC. A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Am J Med. 2000 Mar;108(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00457-x.
PubMed 11014720Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, Hiemenz J, Schwartz C, Bodensteiner D, Pappas P, Seibel N, Greenberg RN, Dummer S, Schuster M, Holcenberg JS. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 11;340(10):764-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903113401004.
PubMed 10072411Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, Bennett JE, Bille J, Crokaert F, Denning DW, Donnelly JP, Edwards JE, Erjavec Z, Fiere D, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Meis JF, Patterson TF, Ritter J, Selleslag D, Shah PM, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ; Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; Mycoses Study Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jan 1;34(1):7-14. doi: 10.1086/323335. Epub 2001 Nov 26.
PubMed 11731939Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, Feld R, Pizzo PA, Rolston KV, Shenep JL, Young LS. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Mar 15;34(6):730-51. doi: 10.1086/339215. Epub 2002 Feb 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 11850858Vartivarian SE, Anaissie EJ, Bodey GP. Emerging fungal pathogens in immunocompromised patients: classification, diagnosis, and management. Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Nov;17 Suppl 2:S487-91. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.supplement_2.s487.
PubMed 8274615Perfect JR, Dodds Ashley E, Drew R. Design of aerosolized amphotericin b formulations for prophylaxis trials among lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 15;39 Suppl 4:S207-10. doi: 10.1086/421958.
PubMed 15546119Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Kroeger J, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jan;46(1):150-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01901-07. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
PubMed 18032613Kuse ER, Chetchotisakd P, da Cunha CA, Ruhnke M, Barrios C, Raghunadharao D, Sekhon JS, Freire A, Ramasubramanian V, Demeyer I, Nucci M, Leelarasamee A, Jacobs F, Decruyenaere J, Pittet D, Ullmann AJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Lortholary O, Koblinger S, Diekmann-Berndt H, Cornely OA; Micafungin Invasive Candidiasis Working Group. Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60605-9.
PubMed 17482982Yanada M, Kiyoi H, Murata M, Suzuki M, Iwai M, Yokozawa T, Baba H, Emi N, Naoe T. Micafungin, a novel antifungal agent, as empirical therapy in acute leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia. Intern Med. 2006;45(5):259-64. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1498. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
PubMed 16595990
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Caspofungin or Micafungin as Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Adult Patients With Persistent Febrile Neutropenia: A Retrospective, Observational, Sequential Cohort Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00723073
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2008-P-000605/1; BWH
- Conditions
- Febrile Neutropenia
- Keywords
- micafungin, caspofungin, febrile neutropenia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 323 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Aug 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with neutropenia who are receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Early diagnosis of these infections is difficult and fever may be the only sign. A delay in treatment while a diagnosis is pursued may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. There are now several echinocandins available with similar in vitro spectrum of activity. Caspofungin is the only echinocandin Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for empiric antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenia. Although all echinocandin antifungal agents have similar spectrum of activity, there are limited data on the use of micafungin in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia (FN). In November 2006 the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee at Brigham \& Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) switched from caspofungin to micafungin as our formulary echinocandin. Given the limited clinical data on the use of micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with FN, we sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of micafungin, compared with caspofungin, for this indication using a sequential cohort analysis of patients treated before and after the formulary change at Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Detailed description
Objectives
This retrospective cohort analysis of converting from caspofungin to micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy for cancer patients who are persistently febrile and neutropenic after receiving broad spectrum antibiotics at Brigham \& Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) is designed to evaluate the following objectives:
- Safety of micafungin in this patient population
- Effective dose of 100 mg daily of micafungin compared to 70mg x1, then 50 mg daily of caspofungin
- Economic impact of converting or formulary echinocandin from micafungin to caspofungin
Study Design
- Retrospective cohort analysis - limited to medical records
- Data to be collected include the following:
- Demographic information: including: gender, age, race
- Past medical history and admitting diagnoses
- Laboratory results: Liver function tests (LFTs), Including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total bilirubin, as well as serum fungal assays: Serum Galactomannan assay, 1.3-BD Glucan assay
- Concomitant medications and duration of therapy for all systemic: antibiotics and antifungals
- All invasive breakthrough fungal infection details, including speciation and outcomes during echinocandin therapy
- Dosing, duration, and adverse events associated with echinocandin therapy
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Caspofungin arm | – | –All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of caspofungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500, for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2006, as there first antifungal agent. |
| Micafungin arm | – | –All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of micafungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500 for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2006 - 10/31/2007 as there first antifungal agent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Cancer patients who are persistently febrile and neutropenic after receiving broad spectrum antibiotics and receive empiric antifungal therapy with either caspofungin or micafungin
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of caspofungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500, for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2006, as there first antifungal agent.
- All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of micafungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500 for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2006 - 10/31/2007 as there first antifungal agent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients receiving an echinocandin antifungal agent (micafungin or caspofungin) for an indication other then empiric therapy in febrile neutropenia
- Patients receiving therapy for an active or on-going invasive fungal infection
- Patients who received both caspofungin and micafungin during the same admission
- Patients with an ANC > 500 at when either micafungin or caspofungin was started
- Patients who received another antifungal agent for persistent febrile neutropenia, e.g., voriconazole, amphotericin B liposome, posaconazole, etc... Before they received an echinocandin (caspofungin or micafungin) will be excluded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With an Overall Favorable Response to Echinocandin Therapy for Empiric Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Overall favorable response was defined as achievement of successful treatment of baseline fungal infections, survival to hospital discharge, absence of breakthrough Ivasive fungal disese (IFD), and lack of advserse events (AE) attributable to treatment that led to discontinuation of echinocandin therapy.
Successful Treatment of Any Baseline Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD)
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Possible or proven baseline invasive fungal disease were defined as were diagnosed within the 2 days of initiating echinocandin therapy for persistent febrile neutropenia
Mortality at Hospital Discharge
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
We assessed all patients in the study cohort who dischaged from the hospital alive
Absence of Any Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD)
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
a breakthrough invasive fungal disesase was defined as any fungal infection that was diagnosed > 3 days on or during therapy or within 7 days after completion of therapy with an echinocandin
Lack of an Adverse Drug Event (ADE) Attributable to Echinocandin (EC) Therapy That Led to Discontinuation of Therapy
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Defined as any advsere event directly attributable to echinocandin treatment that led to discontinuation of therapy or switch to alternative therapy
5 secondary outcomes
Duration of Echinocadin Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Liver Function Tests (LFTs) Elevated During or After Echinocandin Therapy
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Specific Type of Adverse Event That Resulted in Echinocandin (EC) Therapy Discontinuation
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Duration of Hospitization
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Duration of Neutropenia
Time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17396041Schuler U, Bammer S, Aulitzky WE, Binder C, Bohme A, Egerer G, Sandherr M, Schwerdtfeger R, Silling G, Wandt H, Glasmacher A, Ehninger G. Safety and efficacy of itraconazole compared to amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever in patients with haematological malignancy. Onkologie. 2007 Apr;30(4):185-91. doi: 10.1159/000100055. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
- Background: PubMed 17202726Toubai T, Tanaka J, Ota S, Shigematsu A, Shono Y, Ibata M, Hashino S, Kondo T, Kakinoki Y, Masauzi N, Kasai M, Iwasaki H, Kurosawa M, Asaka M, Imamura M. Efficacy and safety of micafungin in febrile neutropenic patients treated for hematological malignancies. Intern Med. 2007;46(1):3-9. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6021. Epub 2007 Jan 1.
- Background: PubMed 16048942Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A, Flynn P, Shad A, Albano E, Keirns J, Lau WM, Facklam DP, Buell DN, Walsh TJ. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Aug;49(8):3317-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3317-3324.2005.
- Background: PubMed 15459300Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.
- Background: PubMed 11807146Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, Lazarus HM, Petersen F, Raffalli J, Yanovich S, Stiff P, Greenberg R, Donowitz G, Schuster M, Reboli A, Wingard J, Arndt C, Reinhardt J, Hadley S, Finberg R, Laverdiere M, Perfect J, Garber G, Fioritoni G, Anaissie E, Lee J; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):225-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200201243460403.
- Background: PubMed 11073745Wingard JR, White MH, Anaissie E, Raffalli J, Goodman J, Arrieta A; L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group. A randomized, double-blind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Nov;31(5):1155-63. doi: 10.1086/317451. Epub 2000 Nov 7.
- Background: PubMed 11014720Winston DJ, Hathorn JW, Schuster MG, Schiller GJ, Territo MC. A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Am J Med. 2000 Mar;108(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00457-x.
- Background: PubMed 10072411Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, Hiemenz J, Schwartz C, Bodensteiner D, Pappas P, Seibel N, Greenberg RN, Dummer S, Schuster M, Holcenberg JS. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 11;340(10):764-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903113401004.
- Background: PubMed 11731939Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, Bennett JE, Bille J, Crokaert F, Denning DW, Donnelly JP, Edwards JE, Erjavec Z, Fiere D, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Meis JF, Patterson TF, Ritter J, Selleslag D, Shah PM, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ; Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; Mycoses Study Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jan 1;34(1):7-14. doi: 10.1086/323335. Epub 2001 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 11850858Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, Feld R, Pizzo PA, Rolston KV, Shenep JL, Young LS. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Mar 15;34(6):730-51. doi: 10.1086/339215. Epub 2002 Feb 13. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8274615Vartivarian SE, Anaissie EJ, Bodey GP. Emerging fungal pathogens in immunocompromised patients: classification, diagnosis, and management. Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Nov;17 Suppl 2:S487-91. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.supplement_2.s487.
- Background: PubMed 15546119Perfect JR, Dodds Ashley E, Drew R. Design of aerosolized amphotericin b formulations for prophylaxis trials among lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 15;39 Suppl 4:S207-10. doi: 10.1086/421958.
Related trials for Febrile Neutropenia
RecruitingPhase 4
Adjustment of Antibiotic Dosage in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia and Augmented Renal Clearance
Febrile Neutropenia
Not yet recruiting
Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Utility and Implementation of Point-of-Care Absolute Neutrophil Count in Suspected Neutropenic Fever (DUCATIS) - Diagnostic Accuracy (S1)
Suspected Neutropenic Fever, Confirmed Neutropenic Fever
RecruitingObservational study
Mecapegfilgrastim for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Advanced Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia
Not yet recruiting
Impact of a Telemonitoring Device on the Occurever at Home in Children at Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia
Oncopediatrics, Febrile Neutropenia
Recruiting
Swiss 2024 Continous Fever Monitoring in Pediatric Oncology Patients
Pediatric Oncology Patients With Risk for Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David W Kubiak, PharmD principal investigator
Brigham and Women's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Febrile Neutropenia, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Aug 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With an Overall Favorable Response to Echinocandin Therapy for Empiric Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN) (time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00723073, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2010.