AzTrials
AzTrials

Febrile NeutropeniaNCT00723073

Caspofungin or Micafungin as Empiric Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Fever and Neutropenia

An observational study of Febrile Neutropenia, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with neutropenia who are receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Early diagnosis of these infections is difficult and fever may be the only sign. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Febrile Neutropenia
How many people
323 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2008to May 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Cancer patients who are persistently febrile and neutropenic after receiving broad spectrum antibiotics and receive empiric antifungal therapy with either caspofungin or micafungin

Who may be able to join

  • All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of caspofungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500, for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2006, as there first antifungal agent.
  • All patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of micafungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500 for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2006 - 10/31/2007 as there first antifungal agent

Who cannot join

  • Patients receiving an echinocandin antifungal agent (micafungin or caspofungin) for an indication other then empiric therapy in febrile neutropenia
  • Patients receiving therapy for an active or on-going invasive fungal infection
  • Patients who received both caspofungin and micafungin during the same admission
  • Patients with an ANC > 500 at when either micafungin or caspofungin was started
  • Patients who received another antifungal agent for persistent febrile neutropenia, e.g., voriconazole, amphotericin B liposome, posaconazole, etc... Before they received an echinocandin (caspofungin or micafungin) will be excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Caspofungin or Micafungin as Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Adult Patients With Persistent Febrile Neutropenia: A Retrospective, Observational, Sequential Cohort Analysis

Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with neutropenia who are receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Early diagnosis of these infections is difficult and fever may be the only sign. A delay in treatment while a diagnosis is pursued may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. There are now several echinocandins available with similar in vitro spectrum of activity. Caspofungin is the only echinocandin Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for empiric antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenia. Although all echinocandin antifungal agents have similar spectrum of activity, there are limited data on the use of micafungin in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia (FN). In November 2006 the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee at Brigham \& Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) switched from caspofungin to micafungin as our formulary echinocandin. Given the limited clinical data on the use of micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with FN, we sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of micafungin, compared with caspofungin, for this indication using a sequential cohort analysis of patients treated before and after the formulary change at Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Read the detailed description

Objectives

This retrospective cohort analysis of converting from caspofungin to micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy for cancer patients who are persistently febrile and neutropenic after receiving broad spectrum antibiotics at Brigham \& Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) is designed to evaluate the following objectives:

  • Safety of micafungin in this patient population
  • Effective dose of 100 mg daily of micafungin compared to 70mg x1, then 50 mg daily of caspofungin
  • Economic impact of converting or formulary echinocandin from micafungin to caspofungin

Study Design

  • Retrospective cohort analysis - limited to medical records
  • Data to be collected include the following:
  • Demographic information: including: gender, age, race
  • Past medical history and admitting diagnoses
  • Laboratory results: Liver function tests (LFTs), Including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total bilirubin, as well as serum fungal assays: Serum Galactomannan assay, 1.3-BD Glucan assay
  • Concomitant medications and duration of therapy for all systemic: antibiotics and antifungals
  • All invasive breakthrough fungal infection details, including speciation and outcomes during echinocandin therapy
  • Dosing, duration, and adverse events associated with echinocandin therapy
Keywords
micafungin, caspofungin, febrile neutropenia
Medical subject headings
Febrile Neutropenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00723073
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Caspofungin armAll patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of caspofungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500, for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2006, as there first antifungal agent.
Micafungin armAll patients admitted to BWH/DFCI who received at least 2 doses of micafungin with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500 for persistent febrile neutropenia from 11/1/2006 - 10/31/2007 as there first antifungal agent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With an Overall Favorable Response to Echinocandin Therapy for Empiric Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN)

    Overall favorable response was defined as achievement of successful treatment of baseline fungal infections, survival to hospital discharge, absence of breakthrough Ivasive fungal disese (IFD), and lack of advserse events (AE) attributable to treatment that led to discontinuation of echinocandin therapy.

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  2. Successful Treatment of Any Baseline Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD)

    Possible or proven baseline invasive fungal disease were defined as were diagnosed within the 2 days of initiating echinocandin therapy for persistent febrile neutropenia

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  3. Mortality at Hospital Discharge

    We assessed all patients in the study cohort who dischaged from the hospital alive

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  4. Absence of Any Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD)

    a breakthrough invasive fungal disesase was defined as any fungal infection that was diagnosed > 3 days on or during therapy or within 7 days after completion of therapy with an echinocandin

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  5. Lack of an Adverse Drug Event (ADE) Attributable to Echinocandin (EC) Therapy That Led to Discontinuation of Therapy

    Defined as any advsere event directly attributable to echinocandin treatment that led to discontinuation of therapy or switch to alternative therapy

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Duration of Echinocadin Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN)

    median duration of therapy with an echinocandin (caspofungin or micafungin) for persistent febrile neutropenia (FN)

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  2. Liver Function Tests (LFTs) Elevated During or After Echinocandin Therapy

    aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT)> 5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin > 3x the upper limit of normal (ULN)

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  3. Specific Type of Adverse Event That Resulted in Echinocandin (EC) Therapy Discontinuation

    The description of the adverse event that resulted in discontinuation of echinocandin (EC) therapy

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  4. Duration of Hospitization

    Median number of days patients were hospitalized during the study period

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

  5. Duration of Neutropenia

    Median number of days patients were neutropenic during the study period

    Measured: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionMay 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
323 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00723073
Sponsor's protocol ID
2008-P-000605/1; BWH
Status last verified
Aug 2010
First submitted
24 Jul 2008
Last updated
31 Aug 2010
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Schuler U, Bammer S, Aulitzky WE, Binder C, Bohme A, Egerer G, Sandherr M, Schwerdtfeger R, Silling G, Wandt H, Glasmacher A, Ehninger G. Safety and efficacy of itraconazole compared to amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever in patients with haematological malignancy. Onkologie. 2007 Apr;30(4):185-91. doi: 10.1159/000100055. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

    PubMed 17396041
  • Toubai T, Tanaka J, Ota S, Shigematsu A, Shono Y, Ibata M, Hashino S, Kondo T, Kakinoki Y, Masauzi N, Kasai M, Iwasaki H, Kurosawa M, Asaka M, Imamura M. Efficacy and safety of micafungin in febrile neutropenic patients treated for hematological malignancies. Intern Med. 2007;46(1):3-9. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6021. Epub 2007 Jan 1.

    PubMed 17202726
  • Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A, Flynn P, Shad A, Albano E, Keirns J, Lau WM, Facklam DP, Buell DN, Walsh TJ. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Aug;49(8):3317-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3317-3324.2005.

    PubMed 16048942
  • Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.

    PubMed 15459300
  • Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, Lazarus HM, Petersen F, Raffalli J, Yanovich S, Stiff P, Greenberg R, Donowitz G, Schuster M, Reboli A, Wingard J, Arndt C, Reinhardt J, Hadley S, Finberg R, Laverdiere M, Perfect J, Garber G, Fioritoni G, Anaissie E, Lee J; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):225-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200201243460403.

    PubMed 11807146
  • Wingard JR, White MH, Anaissie E, Raffalli J, Goodman J, Arrieta A; L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group. A randomized, double-blind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Nov;31(5):1155-63. doi: 10.1086/317451. Epub 2000 Nov 7.

    PubMed 11073745
  • Winston DJ, Hathorn JW, Schuster MG, Schiller GJ, Territo MC. A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Am J Med. 2000 Mar;108(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00457-x.

    PubMed 11014720
  • Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, Hiemenz J, Schwartz C, Bodensteiner D, Pappas P, Seibel N, Greenberg RN, Dummer S, Schuster M, Holcenberg JS. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 11;340(10):764-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903113401004.

    PubMed 10072411
  • Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, Bennett JE, Bille J, Crokaert F, Denning DW, Donnelly JP, Edwards JE, Erjavec Z, Fiere D, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Meis JF, Patterson TF, Ritter J, Selleslag D, Shah PM, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ; Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; Mycoses Study Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jan 1;34(1):7-14. doi: 10.1086/323335. Epub 2001 Nov 26.

    PubMed 11731939
  • Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, Feld R, Pizzo PA, Rolston KV, Shenep JL, Young LS. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Mar 15;34(6):730-51. doi: 10.1086/339215. Epub 2002 Feb 13. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11850858
  • Vartivarian SE, Anaissie EJ, Bodey GP. Emerging fungal pathogens in immunocompromised patients: classification, diagnosis, and management. Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Nov;17 Suppl 2:S487-91. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.supplement_2.s487.

    PubMed 8274615
  • Perfect JR, Dodds Ashley E, Drew R. Design of aerosolized amphotericin b formulations for prophylaxis trials among lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 15;39 Suppl 4:S207-10. doi: 10.1086/421958.

    PubMed 15546119
  • Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Kroeger J, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jan;46(1):150-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01901-07. Epub 2007 Nov 21.

    PubMed 18032613
  • Kuse ER, Chetchotisakd P, da Cunha CA, Ruhnke M, Barrios C, Raghunadharao D, Sekhon JS, Freire A, Ramasubramanian V, Demeyer I, Nucci M, Leelarasamee A, Jacobs F, Decruyenaere J, Pittet D, Ullmann AJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Lortholary O, Koblinger S, Diekmann-Berndt H, Cornely OA; Micafungin Invasive Candidiasis Working Group. Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60605-9.

    PubMed 17482982
  • Yanada M, Kiyoi H, Murata M, Suzuki M, Iwai M, Yokozawa T, Baba H, Emi N, Naoe T. Micafungin, a novel antifungal agent, as empirical therapy in acute leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia. Intern Med. 2006;45(5):259-64. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1498. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

    PubMed 16595990

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Febrile Neutropenia, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Aug 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With an Overall Favorable Response to Echinocandin Therapy for Empiric Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Febrile Neutropenia (FN) (time frame: 11/1/2005 - 10/31/2007). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00723073, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in