Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT00720798
An Extension Study of Tocilizumab (Myeloma Receptor Antibody [MRA]) in Patients Completing Treatment in Tocilizumab Core Studies
A Phase 3 study testing Tocilizumab, Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 295 sites in 34 countries.
Trial summary
This single-arm study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in participants who had completed treatment in the tocilizumab core studies (NCT00106522 [Roche protocol WA18062], NCT00106574 [Roche protocol WA18063], and NCT00109408 [Roche protocol WA17824]) of adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Tocilizumab, Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,067 participants
- Where
- 295 sitesin 34 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who have completed participation in 1 of the core studies in adult rheumatoid arthritis.
Who cannot join
- Treatment with any investigational agent since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Treatment with iv gamma globulin, plasmapheresis, or prosorba column since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Treatment with an anti-TNF or anti-IL1 agent, a T-cell co-stimulation modulator, or any biologic since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Immunization with a live/attenuated vaccine since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies, including investigational agents.
- Parenteral, intramuscular, or intra-articular corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to baseline in this study.
Trial locations and contacts
295 sites in 34 countries.
295 sites in 34 countries
United States138 sites
Study site
Albany, New York, 12206
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
Study site
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
Study site
Amarillo, Texas, 79124
Study site
Anaheim, California, 92801
Study site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Study site
Austin, Texas, 78705
Study site
Austin, Texas, 78749
Study site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Study site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Study site
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015
Study site
Billings, Montana, 59107-5100
Study site
Binghamton, New York, 13905
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-7201
Study site
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
Study site
Boise, Idaho, 83702
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Study site
Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42102
Study site
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Study site
Canton, Ohio, 44718
Study site
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52401
Study site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7280
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Study site
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80910
Study site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75231-4406
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Study site
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Study site
Dayton, Ohio, 45408
Study site
Delray Beach, Florida, 33484
Study site
Des Moines, Iowa, 50322
Study site
Dover, New Hampshire, 03820
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Study site
Durham, North Carolina, 27704
Study site
Eagan, Minnesota, 55121
Study site
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Study site
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232
Study site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
Study site
Frederick, Maryland, 21702
Study site
Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217
Study site
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546
Study site
Great Neck, New York, 11020
Study site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Study site
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, 08035
Study site
Hickory Grove, South Carolina, 28602
Study site
Hixson, Tennessee, 37343
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5149
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Study site
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919
Study site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49048
Study site
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Study site
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40515
Study site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Study site
Long Beach, California, 90806
Study site
Long Beach, California, 90808
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Study site
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Study site
Meridian, Idaho, 83642
Study site
Mesa, Arizona, 85208
Study site
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Study site
Morton Grove, Illinois, 60053
Study site
Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Study site
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
Study site
New York, New York, 10021
Study site
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Study site
Olympia, Washington, 98502
Study site
Orchard Park, New York, 14127
Study site
Palm Desert, California, 92260
Study site
Palm Habor, Florida, 34684
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Study site
Palm Springs, California, 92262
Study site
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Study site
Paradise Valley, Arizona, 85253
Study site
Passaic, New Jersey, 07055
Study site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19152
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
Study site
Pittsfield, Massachusetts, 01201
Study site
Plainview, New York, 11803
Study site
Portland, Maine, 04102
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Study site
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Study site
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
Study site
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55426
Study site
San Diego, California, 92101
Study site
San Diego, California, 92108
Study site
San Jose, California, 95126
Study site
San Leandro, California, 94578
Study site
Santa Maria, California, 93454
Study site
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Study site
Shreverport, Louisiana, 71103
Study site
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Study site
Springfield, Illinois, 62704
Study site
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Study site
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Study site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33609
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Study site
Torrance, California, 90505
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85723
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Study site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Study site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Study site
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38802
Study site
Upland, California, 91786
Study site
Vernon Hills, Illinois, 60061
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
Study site
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902
Study site
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090
Study site
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 80045
Study site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
France20 sites
Study site
Amiens, 80054
Study site
Bordeaux, 33076
Study site
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104
Study site
Brest, 29609
Study site
Grenoble, 38042
Study site
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270
Study site
Lille, 59037
Study site
Lyon, 69437
Study site
Marseille, 13285
Study site
Montpellier, 34295
Study site
Nantes, 44035
Study site
Nice, 06202
Study site
Paris, 75181
Study site
Paris, 75679
Study site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Study site
Rennes, 35203
Study site
Rouen, 76031
Study site
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42277
Study site
Strasbourg, 67098
Study site
Toulouse, 31059
Canada16 sites
Study site
Burlington, Ontario, L7R 1E2
Study site
Calgary, Alberta, T2V 1P9
Study site
Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9
Study site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 2B6
Study site
Kitchener, Ontario, N2M 5N6
Study site
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2
Study site
Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2V8
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 1S6
Study site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1A2
Study site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7
Study site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Study site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8
Study site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 5E8
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3L9
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 3P9
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M3
Germany14 sites
Study site
Aachen, 52064
Study site
Berlin, 10117
Study site
Cologne, 50924
Study site
Dresden, 01067
Study site
Essen, 45239
Study site
Gommern, 39245
Study site
Herne, 44652
Study site
Hildesheim, 31134
Study site
München, 80335
Study site
München, 81541
Study site
Osnabrück, 49074
Study site
Sendenhorst, 48324
Study site
Wiesbaden, 65191
Study site
Würzburg, 97080
United Kingdom13 sites
Study site
Basingstoke, RG24 9NA
Study site
Birmingham, B29 6JD
Study site
Cannock, WS11 5XY
Study site
Derby, DE1 2QY
Study site
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Study site
London, SE1 9RT
Study site
Manchester, M13 9WL
Study site
Manchester, M41 5SL
Study site
Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW
Study site
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP
Study site
Oxford, OX3 7LD
Study site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Study site
Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG
Italy8 sites
Study site
Brescia, 25123
Study site
Genova, 16132
Study site
Milan, 20157
Study site
Padova, 35128
Study site
Pavia, 27100
Study site
Pisa, 56100
Study site
Siena, 53100
Study site
Udine, 33100
Mexico8 sites
Study site
Guadalajara, 44340
Study site
Guadalajara, 44620
Study site
Guadalajara, 45235
Study site
León, 37000
Study site
Mexico City, 06700
Study site
Mexico City, 07760
Study site
Mexico City, 14050
Study site
Tijuana, 22320
China7 sites
Study site
Beijing, 100032
Study site
Beijing, 100044
Study site
Guangzhou, 510630
Study site
Hefei Anhui, 230022
Study site
Jinan, 250012
Study site
Shanghai, 200127
Study site
Shanghai, 200433
Russia7 sites
Study site
Moscow, 105203
Study site
Moscow, 115522
Study site
Moscow, 117049
Study site
Ryazan, 390026
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 190068
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 191015
Study site
Tula, 300053
South Africa7 sites
Study site
Cape Town, 4001
Study site
Cape Town, 7500
Study site
Diepkloof, 1862
Study site
Durban, 4001
Study site
Pinelands, 7405
Study site
Pretoria, 0002
Study site
Radiokop, 2040
Spain6 sites
Study site
Barakaldo, 48903
Study site
Barcelona, 08035
Study site
Madrid, 28046
Study site
Málaga, 29010
Study site
Pontevedra, 36001
Study site
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Australia5 sites
Study site
Hobart, 7000
Study site
Malvern, 3144
Study site
Shenton Park, 6008
Study site
Sydney, 2050
Study site
Woolloongabba, 4102
Lithuania5 sites
Study site
Kaunas, 50009
Study site
Klaipėda, 92288
Study site
Panevezys, 35144
Study site
Šiauliai, 76231
Study site
Vilnius, LT-08661
Argentina4 sites
Study site
Buenos Aires, C1015ABO
Study site
Buenos Aires, C1428DQG
Study site
Rosario, S2000PBJ
Study site
San Juan Bautista, B1878DVB
Israel4 sites
Study site
Ashkelon, 78306
Study site
Haifa, 31048
Study site
Haifa, 34354
Study site
Rishon LeZiyyon, 70300
Brazil3 sites
Study site
Campinas, 13060-803
Study site
Goiânia, 74653-050
Study site
Rio de Janeiro, 20551030
Czechia3 sites
Study site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Study site
Prague, 128 50
Study site
Prague, 140 59
Thailand3 sites
Study site
Bangkok, 10330
Study site
Bangkok, 10400
Study site
Chiang Mai, 50200
About this study
Official title: Long-term Extension Study of Safety During Treatment With Tocilizumab (MRA) in Patients Completing Treatment in MRA Core Studies
This single-arm study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in participants who had completed treatment in the tocilizumab core studies (NCT00106522 [Roche protocol WA18062], NCT00106574 [Roche protocol WA18063], and NCT00109408 [Roche protocol WA17824]) of adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Participants received tocilizumab alone or in combination with standard anti-rheumatic treatment.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Tocilizumab, Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Oral corticosteroids
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TocilizumabDrug
Also called RoActemra, Actemra
For participants weighing > 100 kg, the maximum dose of tocilizumab was 800 mg. Tocilizumab was supplied as a sterile solution in vials.
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugsDrug
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs included methotrexate, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, and leflunomide. These drugs could be used alone or in combination, except for the combination of methotrexate and leflunomide, which was not allowed.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsDrug
Participants could be treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs up to the maximum recommended dose throughout the study. The choice and doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were at the discretion of the investigator.
Oral corticosteroidsDrug
Oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day) were permitted during the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Experimental | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks till the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months). In addition, participants may have also received disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and oral corticosteroids at the discretion of the investigator. Receives: Drug: Tocilizumab; Drug: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; Drug: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; Drug: Oral corticosteroids |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Adverse Event
Measured: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months)
Secondary outcomes (15)
Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew From Treatment
Measured: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months)
Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Oral Corticosteroid Therapy
Concomitant therapy with oral corticosteroids (up 5 to 10 mg daily prednisone or equivalent) was permitted in the study. Reduction of oral corticosteroids was permitted, but not required, if a patient achieved at least a 50% improvement from baseline in both tender joint count and swollen joint count.
The data are reported for each 6-month period of the study where a month = 28 days. The last 6-month period is for months 96 through 101. The actually study duration in 28-day months was 98.85 months.
Measured: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Changed From Monotherapy to Combination Therapy
Participants who entered this study from study WA17824 on tocilizumab monotherapy, who did not achieve a 50% reduction in tender and swollen joint counts from Baseline of study WA17824, could add methotrexate or another allowable disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, according to the investigator's practice and as tolerated by the patient, at any time during this study.
Measured: Baseline to Week 296
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, 70%, or 90% in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70/90) From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Improvement must be seen in tender (68 assessed joints) and swollen joint counts (66 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the left end of the scale "no disease activity" [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms], right end of the scale "maximum disease activity"); patient assessment of pain in the previous 24 hours on a VAS (left end of the scale "no pain", right end of the scale "unbearable pain"); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Major Clinical Response at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 264
A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an improvement of at least 70% in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) score (ACR70) for at least 24 weeks. Improvement must be seen in tender (68 assessed joints) and swollen joint counts (66 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the left end of the scale "no disease activity" [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms], right end of the scale "maximum disease activity"); patient assessment of pain in the previous 24 hours on a VAS (left end of the scale "no pain", right end of the scale "unbearable pain"); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) Consecutively for 24, 48, 96, and 264 Weeks at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 264
Improvement must be seen in tender (68 assessed joints) and swollen joint counts (66 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the left end of the scale "no disease activity" [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms], right end of the scale "maximum disease activity"); patient assessment of pain in the previous 24 hours on a VAS (left end of the scale "no pain", right end of the scale "unbearable pain"); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Swollen and Tender Joint Count (SJC/TJC) at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
The number of swollen (66 assessed joints) and tender (68 assessed joints) joints was assessed. Joints were physically examined and classified as swollen/not swollen and tender/not tender by pressure and joint manipulation.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Disease Activity and Pain at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Participant's made a global assessment of their current disease activity on a 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left end of the scale indicated "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms, score = 0) and the right end indicated "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity, score = 100). The participant's treating physician made a global assessment of the participant's current disease activity on a 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left end of the scale indicated "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms, score = 0) and the right end indicated "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity, score = 100). Participant's made an assessment of their current level of pain on a 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left end of the scale indicated "no pain" (score = 0) and the right end of the scale indicated "unbearable pain" (score = 100).
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Score at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), as a measure of functional ability, consists of 30 questions in 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 4 possible responses to each question (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do). A domain score is the highest score in that domain. To calculate the overall score, the patient must have a domain score in at least 6 of the 8 domains. The HAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score and ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A higher score indicates less ability.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was determined locally.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Change in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS-28) From Baseline to Weeks 24, 48, 96, and 264
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis (RA) and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms], right end = maximum disease activity [maximum arthritis disease activity]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Were Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS-28) Responders at Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
A DAS-28 responder was defined as someone who met the European League Against Rheumatism [EULAR] criteria of a good or moderate response. A change of the DAS-28 score from Baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS-28) Response for 24, 48, 96, 144, and 192 Weeks at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 264
A DAS-28 responder was defined as someone who met the European League Against Rheumatism [EULAR] criteria of a good or moderate response. A change of the DAS-28 score from Baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Relevant Improvement in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
The FACIT-F is a 13-item participant self-report questionnaire that assesses fatigue over the previous 7 days by scoring each item on a 5-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much). An overall FACIT-F score was obtained by summing the scores of all 13 items. The overall score ranged from 0 to 52. A lower score indicates less fatigue. A clinically relevant improvement in the FACIT-F score was defined as a ≥ 5-point increase from Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Relevant Improvement in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
The SF-36 Health Survey uses participant-reported symptoms on 8 subscales to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Physical Component Summary (PCS) score summarizes the subscales Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, and General Health. The Mental Component Summary (MCS) score summarizes the subscales Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Each score was scaled from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating better HRQoL. A clinically relevant improvement in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the SF-36 was defined as a ≥ 5-point increase from Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Week 264
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,067 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00720798
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WA18696
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Jones G, Wallace T, McIntosh MJ, Brockwell L, Gomez-Reino JJ, Sebba A. Five-year Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Were Methotrexate- and Biologic-naive or Free of Methotrexate for 6 Months: the AMBITION Study. J Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;44(2):142-146. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160287. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
PubMed 27909081
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Extension Study of Safety During Treatment With Tocilizumab (MRA) in Patients Completing Treatment in MRA Core Studies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00720798
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WA18696
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,067 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single-arm study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in participants who had completed treatment in the tocilizumab core studies (NCT00106522 [Roche protocol WA18062], NCT00106574 [Roche protocol WA18063], and NCT00109408 [Roche protocol WA17824]) of adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Participants received tocilizumab alone or in combination with standard anti-rheumatic treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Experimental | Drug: Tocilizumab, Drug: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, Drug: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Drug: Oral corticosteroidsParticipants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks till the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months). In addition, participants may have also received disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and oral corticosteroids at the discretion of the investigator. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who have completed participation in 1 of the core studies in adult rheumatoid arthritis.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Treatment with any investigational agent since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Treatment with iv gamma globulin, plasmapheresis, or prosorba column since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Treatment with an anti-TNF or anti-IL1 agent, a T-cell co-stimulation modulator, or any biologic since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Immunization with a live/attenuated vaccine since the last administration of study drug in the core studies.
- Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies, including investigational agents.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TocilizumabAlso: RoActemra, ActemraFor participants weighing > 100 kg, the maximum dose of tocilizumab was 800 mg. Tocilizumab was supplied as a sterile solution in vials. | Drug | Tocilizumab |
| Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugsDisease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs included methotrexate, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, and leflunomide. These drugs could be used alone or in combination, except for the combination of methotrexate and leflunomide, which was not allowed. | Drug | Tocilizumab |
| Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsParticipants could be treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs up to the maximum recommended dose throughout the study. The choice and doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were at the discretion of the investigator. | Drug | Tocilizumab |
| Oral corticosteroidsOral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day) were permitted during the study. | Drug | Tocilizumab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Adverse Event
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months)
15 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew From Treatment
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months)
Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Oral Corticosteroid Therapy
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Changed From Monotherapy to Combination Therapy
Time frame: Baseline to Week 296
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, 70%, or 90% in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70/90) From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Major Clinical Response at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) Consecutively for 24, 48, 96, and 264 Weeks at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Swollen and Tender Joint Count (SJC/TJC) at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Disease Activity and Pain at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Score at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Change in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS-28) From Baseline to Weeks 24, 48, 96, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Were Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS-28) Responders at Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS-28) Response for 24, 48, 96, 144, and 192 Weeks at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Relevant Improvement in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Relevant Improvement in the Physical and Mental Component Scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Weeks 24, 48, 108, 156, 204, and 264
Time frame: Baseline to Week 264
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27909081Jones G, Wallace T, McIntosh MJ, Brockwell L, Gomez-Reino JJ, Sebba A. Five-year Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Were Methotrexate- and Biologic-naive or Free of Methotrexate for 6 Months: the AMBITION Study. J Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;44(2):142-146. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160287. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
295 sites in 34 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Tocilizumab, Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 295 sites in 34 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 295 sites in United States, France, Canada, Germany, United Kingdom and 29 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Adverse Event (time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 7 years, 7 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00720798, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2014.