Primary Immune DeficiencyPhase 3NCT00719680
Extension Study of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Human in Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency (PID)
A Phase 3 study testing IgPro20 in people with Primary Immune Deficiency, run by CSL Behring at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a long-term use of a new human immunoglobulin G with proline (IgPro) is safe and effective in the treatment of primary immunodeficiency. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Immune Deficiency
- What is being tested?
- IgPro20
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Jun 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with primary humoral immunodeficiency who have participated in the study ZLB04_009CR (NCT00419341), namely with a diagnosis of Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) as defined by PAGID (Pan-American Group for Immunodeficiency) and ESID (European Society for Immunodeficiencies) or X-linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) as defined by PAGID and ESID
- Women of childbearing potential must be using and agree to continue using medically approved contraception and must have a negative pregnancy test at screening
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Ongoing serious bacterial infection at the time of screening
- Malignancies of lymphoid cells such as lymphocytic leukemia, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and immunodeficiency with thymoma
- Hypoalbuminemia, protein-losing enteropathies, and any proteinuria (defined by total urine protein concentration > 0.2 g/L)
- Other significant medical conditions that could increase the risk to the patient
- Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding or planning a pregnancy during the course of the study
- A positive result at screening on any of the following viral markers: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or Hepatitis B virus (HBV)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) or Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) concentration > 2.5 times Upper Normal Limit (UNL) at Completion Visit of study ZLB04_009CR (NCT00419341)
- Creatinine concentration > 1.5 times UNL at Completion Visit of study ZLB04_009CR (NCT00419341)
- Participation in a study with an investigational product other than IgPro20 within 3 months prior to enrollment
- Evidence of uncooperative attitude
- Any condition that is likely to interfere with evaluation of the study drug or satisfactory conduct of the trial
- Subjects who are employees at the investigational site, relatives or spouse of the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
Contact CSL Behring for facility details
Centennial, Colorado, 80112
Contact CSL Behring for facility details
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Contact CSL Behring for facility details
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Contact CSL Behring for facility details
North Palm Beach, Florida, 33408
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter Extension Study of the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human) IgPro20 in Subjects With Primary Immunodeficiency (PID)
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a long-term use of a new human immunoglobulin G with proline (IgPro) is safe and effective in the treatment of primary immunodeficiency.
- Conditions
- Primary Immune Deficiency
- Being tested
- IgPro20
- Keywords
- CVID, XLA
- Medical subject headings
- Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IgPro20Biological
Also called IgG with Proline
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IgPro20 | Experimental | The IgPro20 dose will be the same as in the previous pivotal study ZLB04_009CR (NCT00419341) infused subcutaneously weekly or twice a week (in the latter case, half of a weekly dose will be used) Receives: Biological: IgPro20 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Annualized Rate of Serious Bacterial Infection (Intention-to-Treat Population)
The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of subject study days for all subjects in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days.
Acute serious bacterial infections included pneumonia, bacteremia/septicemia, osteomyelitis/septic arthritis, bacterial meningitis, and visceral abscess.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Annualized Rate of Serious Bacterial Infection (Per-Protocol Efficacy Population)
The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of subject study days for all subjects in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days.
Acute serious bacterial infections included pneumonia, bacteremia/septicemia, osteomyelitis/septic arthritis, bacterial meningitis, and visceral abscess.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Secondary outcomes (15)
Annualized Rate of Any Infection
The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of subject study days for all subjects in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Trough Levels of Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Serum Concentrations
Mean of individual median total IgG trough concentration.
Measured: Before infusion at Weeks 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Number of Days Out of Work / School / Kindergarten / Day Care or Inability to Perform Normal Activities Due to Infection
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Annualized Rate of Days Out of Work / School / Kindergarten / Day Care or Inability to Perform Normal Activities Due to Infection
The annualized rate was based on the total number of days out of work / school / kindergarten / day care or inability to perform normal activities due to infection, and the total number of subject study days for all subjects in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Number of Days of Hospitalization Due to Infection
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Annualized Rate of Hospitalization Due to Infection
The annualized rate was based on the total number of days of hospitalization due to infection and the total number of subject study days for all subjects in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Use of Antibiotics for Infection Prophylaxis and Treatment
Annualized rate of days with antibiotics for infection prophylaxis and treatment.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Rate of All AEs by Relatedness and Severity
The rate of AEs was the number of AEs over the number of infusions administered.
At least possibly related AEs included possibly related AEs, probably related AEs, and related AEs.
Mild AE: Did not interfere with routine activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Relatedness and Severity of All AEs (Percentage of Total AEs)
At least possibly related AEs included possibly related AEs, probably related AEs, and related AEs.
Mild AE: Did not interfere with routine activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Number of Subjects With Any Temporally Associated Adverse Event (AE) Within 24 or 72 Hours After an Infusion
AEs were considered temporally associated if they occurred between the start of infusion and within 24 or 72 hours after the end of infusion.
Measured: Within 24 or 72 hours after each infusion
Rate of Temporally Associated AEs Within 24 or 72 Hours of an Infusion
The rate of AEs was the number of AEs over the number of infusions administered.
AEs were considered temporally associated if they occurred between the start of infusion and within 24 or 72 hours after the end of infusion.
Measured: Within 24 or 72 hours after each infusion
Number of Subjects Reporting Mild, Moderate, or Severe Local AEs
In addition to the standard MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC) AE assignments, the category of 'local reactions' was defined to provide the possibility for a combined analysis of local reactions and included AEs of infusion site oedema, infusion site reaction, injection site pain, injection site rash, and injection site reaction.
Mild AE: Did not interfere with routine activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities.
Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to the Completion Visit in Vital Signs
Vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), heart rate, and body temperature.
Measured: At weeks 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to the Completion Visit in Routine Laboratory Parameters
Routine laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis parameters.
Measured: At Week 1, and study completion (approximately 104 weeks)
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to the Completion Visit in Viral Safety Markers
Viral safety markers included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, HIV-2, hepatitis A virus (HAV), HBV, HCV, and parvovirus B19.
Measured: At Week 1, and study completion (approximately 104 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionJun 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Primary Immune DeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CSL BehringThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CSL Behring
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Program Director, Study director, CSL Behring
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00719680
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IgPro20_3001
- Other IDs
- 1473
- Status last verified
- Dec 2012
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Jolles S, Borte M, Nelson RP Jr, Rojavin M, Bexon M, Lawo JP, Wasserman RL. Long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Hizentra(R) for treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;150(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
PubMed 24412910
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter Extension Study of the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human) IgPro20 in Subjects With Primary Immunodeficiency (PID)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00719680
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IgPro20_3001
- Conditions
- Primary Immune Deficiency
- Keywords
- CVID, XLA
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CSL BehringIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jan 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a long-term use of a new human immunoglobulin G with proline (IgPro) is safe and effective in the treatment of primary immunodeficiency.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IgPro20 | Experimental | Biological: IgPro20The IgPro20 dose will be the same as in the previous pivotal study ZLB04_009CR (NCT00419341) infused subcutaneously weekly or twice a week (in the latter case, half of a weekly dose will be used) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects with primary humoral immunodeficiency who have participated in the study ZLB04_009CR (NCT00419341), namely with a diagnosis of Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) as defined by PAGID (Pan-American Group for Immunodeficiency) and ESID (European Society for Immunodeficiencies) or X-linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) as defined by PAGID and ESID
- Women of childbearing potential must be using and agree to continue using medically approved contraception and must have a negative pregnancy test at screening
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Ongoing serious bacterial infection at the time of screening
- Malignancies of lymphoid cells such as lymphocytic leukemia, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and immunodeficiency with thymoma
- Hypoalbuminemia, protein-losing enteropathies, and any proteinuria (defined by total urine protein concentration > 0.2 g/L)
- Other significant medical conditions that could increase the risk to the patient
- Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding or planning a pregnancy during the course of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IgPro20Also: IgG with Proline | Biological | IgPro20 |
Primary outcome
Annualized Rate of Serious Bacterial Infection (Intention-to-Treat Population)
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of subject study days for all subjects in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days. Acute serious bacterial infections included pneumonia, bacteremia/septicemia, osteomyelitis/septic arthritis, bacterial meningitis, and visceral abscess.
Annualized Rate of Serious Bacterial Infection (Per-Protocol Efficacy Population)
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of subject study days for all subjects in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days. Acute serious bacterial infections included pneumonia, bacteremia/septicemia, osteomyelitis/septic arthritis, bacterial meningitis, and visceral abscess.
15 secondary outcomes
Annualized Rate of Any Infection
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Trough Levels of Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Serum Concentrations
Time frame: Before infusion at Weeks 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Number of Days Out of Work / School / Kindergarten / Day Care or Inability to Perform Normal Activities Due to Infection
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Annualized Rate of Days Out of Work / School / Kindergarten / Day Care or Inability to Perform Normal Activities Due to Infection
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Number of Days of Hospitalization Due to Infection
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Annualized Rate of Hospitalization Due to Infection
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Use of Antibiotics for Infection Prophylaxis and Treatment
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Rate of All AEs by Relatedness and Severity
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Relatedness and Severity of All AEs (Percentage of Total AEs)
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Number of Subjects With Any Temporally Associated Adverse Event (AE) Within 24 or 72 Hours After an Infusion
Time frame: Within 24 or 72 hours after each infusion
Rate of Temporally Associated AEs Within 24 or 72 Hours of an Infusion
Time frame: Within 24 or 72 hours after each infusion
Number of Subjects Reporting Mild, Moderate, or Severe Local AEs
Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to the Completion Visit in Vital Signs
Time frame: At weeks 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to the Completion Visit in Routine Laboratory Parameters
Time frame: At Week 1, and study completion (approximately 104 weeks)
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to the Completion Visit in Viral Safety Markers
Time frame: At Week 1, and study completion (approximately 104 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 24412910Jolles S, Borte M, Nelson RP Jr, Rojavin M, Bexon M, Lawo JP, Wasserman RL. Long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Hizentra(R) for treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;150(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
Related trials for Primary Immune Deficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Bronchiectasis
Bronchiectasis, Cystic Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Leukapheresis Procedures to Obtain Plasma and Lymphocytes for Research Studies on Antiretroviral Naive HIV-1 Research Participants
HIV
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History, Management, and Genetics of the Hyperimmunoglobulin E Recurrent Infection Syndrome (HIES)
Infections, Pneumonia
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Basis of Immunodeficiency
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Detection and Characterization of Infections and Infection Susceptibility
Immune Deficiencies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Program Director study director
CSL Behring
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing IgPro20 in people with Primary Immune Deficiency, run by CSL Behring at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jan 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Annualized Rate of Serious Bacterial Infection (Intention-to-Treat Population) (time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 104 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00719680, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2014.