CarcinomaPhase 2NCT00719264
Safety and Efficacy of Bevacizumab Plus RAD001 Versus Interferon Alfa-2a and Bevacizumab for the First-line Treatment in Adult Patients With Kidney Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing RAD001(everolimus), interferon alfa-2a and bevacizumab in people with Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 109 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
To estimate the difference in efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and RAD001 compared to bevacizumab and interferon alfa-2a for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the kidney. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Renal Cell
- What is being tested?
- RAD001(everolimus), interferon alfa-2a and bevacizumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 365 participants
- Where
- 109 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Nov 2008to 15 Apr 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
- Patients with at least one measurable lesion
- Patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma
- Patients who had a prior partial or complete nephrectomy
- Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70%.
- Adequate bone marrow function
Show all 9Show fewer
- Adequate liver function
- Adequate renal function
- Adequate coagulation profile
Who cannot join
- 4 weeks post-major surgery
- Patients who had radiation therapy within 28 days prior to start of study
- Patients in need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study.
- Patients with a serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture.
- Patients with a history of seizure(s) not controlled with standard medical therapy.
- Patients who have received prior systemic treatment for their metastatic RCC.
Show all 25Show fewer
- Patients who received prior therapy with VEGF pathway inhibitor
- Patients who have previously received systemic mTOR inhibitors
- Patients with a known hypersensitivity RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins or to its excipients.
- Patients with history or current central nervous system (CNS) metastases or spinal cord compression.
- Patients with a history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within 6 months prior to study enrollment.
- Patients with proteinuria at screening.
- Patients with inadequately controlled hypertension
- Patients receiving ongoing or with recent need for full therapeutic dose of oral or parenteral anticoagulants or chronic daily treatment with aspirin
- Patients receiving chronic systemic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent.
- Patients with a known history of HIV
- Patients with hypersensitivity to interferon alfa-2a or any component of the product.
- Patients with an active, bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or recurrent thromboembolism
- Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions or other conditions
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction < lower limit of institutional normal assessed by ECHO or MUGA
- Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy ≤ 3 years
- Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs ≤ 4 weeks prior to study treatment start.
- Patients unwilling to or unable to comply with the protocol
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
109 sites in 21 countries.
109 sites in 21 countries
Italy14 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aviano, PN, 33081
Novartis Investigative Site
Brescia, BS, 25123
Novartis Investigative Site
Catanzaro, CZ, 88100
Novartis Investigative Site
Cremona, CR, 26100
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, FI, 50134
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20133
Novartis Investigative Site
Modena, MO, 41100
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Negrar, VR, 37024
Novartis Investigative Site
Pavia, PV, 27100
Novartis Investigative Site
Perugia, PG, 06129
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00128
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00152
Novartis Investigative Site
Trento, TN, 38100
Germany13 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10117
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13055
Novartis Investigative Site
Dessau, 06846
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45122
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60488
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60590
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, 37075
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20246
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, 30625
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, 69115
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04109
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131
Novartis Investigative Site
Tübingen, 72076
France12 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Avignon, 84000
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33075
Novartis Investigative Site
Caen, 14021
Novartis Investigative Site
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Novartis Investigative Site
Montellier Cedex 5, 34298
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, 44202
Novartis Investigative Site
Reims, 51100
Novartis Investigative Site
Rouen, 76031
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, Cedex, 67091
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67010
Novartis Investigative Site
Suresnes, France, 92150
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059
United States9 sites
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network St. Luke's Cancer Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Karmanos Cancer Institute Dept.of KarmanosCancerInst (5)
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
City of Hope National Medical Center Dept.ofCityofHopeMedicalCtr(3)
Duarte, California, 91010-3000
Highlands Oncology Group Dept of Highlands Oncology Grp
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
Las Colinas Hematology Oncology Grapevine
Irving, Texas, 75038
Nevada Cancer Institute Dept. of Nevada Cancer (3)
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135
USC/Kenneth Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Regulatory Contact 3
Los Angeles, California, 90053
University of California at Los Angeles Dept. of Hem/Oncology
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Dept. of SCCA
Seattle, Washington, 98105
Spain7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08041
Novartis Investigative Site
Jaén, Andalusia, 23007
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
Novartis Investigative Site
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Novartis Investigative Site
Santander, 39008
Novartis Investigative Site
Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009
Turkey (Türkiye)7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Adana, Turkey, 01330
Novartis Investigative Site
Altunizade, 34662
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
Novartis Investigative Site
Antalya, 07070
Novartis Investigative Site
Balcova / Izmir, 35340
Novartis Investigative Site
Bursa, Turkey, 16059
Novartis Investigative Site
Mecidiyekoy/Istanbul, 34394
Belgium6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1070
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1200
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleroi, 6000
Novartis Investigative Site
Kortrijk, 8500
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Novartis Investigative Site
Liège, 4000
Brazil6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90560-030
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Novartis Investigative Site
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14015-130
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130
Novartis Investigative Site
Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000
Russia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, Moscow, 115478
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 125284
Novartis Investigative Site
Obninsk, Russia, 249036
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 191104
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
South Korea5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Daegu, 705-703
Novartis Investigative Site
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 03722
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 06351
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 136-705
Novartis Investigative Site
Taegu, 700 -721
Taiwan5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Linkou District, 33305
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, 114
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, 112
South Africa3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Johannesburg, 2196
Novartis Investigative Site
Pretoria, 0001
Novartis Investigative Site
Pretoria, 0044
United Kingdom3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, G12 0YN
Novartis Investigative Site
Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN
Novartis Investigative Site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Czechia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Olomouc, 775 20
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 140 00
Egypt2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cairo, Egypt
Novartis Investigative Site
Cairo
Hong Kong2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
Novartis Investigative Site
Tuenmen, Hong Kong
Hungary2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1086
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1122
Switzerland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bern, Switzerland, 3010
Novartis Investigative Site
Chur, 7000
Thailand2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10330
Novartis Investigative Site
Songkhla, 90110
Netherlands1 site
Novartis Investigative Site
Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase II Study to Compare Bevacizumab Plus RAD001 Versus Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Bevacizumab for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Kidney
To estimate the difference in efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and RAD001 compared to bevacizumab and interferon alfa-2a for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the kidney.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Renal Cell, Nephroid Carcinoma, Hypernephroid
- Being tested
- RAD001(everolimus), interferon alfa-2a, bevacizumab
- Keywords
- Renal cell carcinoma, Adults, Bevacizumab, RAD001, Everolimus, Interferon, Clear, Roferon, Avastin, Nephrectomy, newly diagnosed
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Margins of Excision
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RAD001(everolimus)Drug
Also called Afinitor
10 mg qd
interferon alfa-2aDrug
dose escalated from 3 MIU (million international unit) during week 1, 6 MIU during week 2, and 9 MIU during week 3
bevacizumabDrug
10 mg/kg every 2 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| bevacizumab, RAD001 (everolimus) | Experimental | Participants received oral everolimus 10 mg qd plus intravenous bevacizumab 10mg/kg every 2 weeks Receives: Drug: RAD001(everolimus); Drug: bevacizumab |
| bevacizumab, interferon alfa-2a (IFN) | Active comparator | Participants received subcutaneous IFN dose escalated from 3 MIU (million international unit) during week 1, 6 MIU during week 2, and 9 MIU during week 3 of treatment and subsequently (if tolerated), 3 times per week plus intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks Receives: Drug: interferon alfa-2a; Drug: bevacizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
Tumor response and disease progression were assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. All target and non-target lesions identified at baseline were assessed using the same method, CT scan with contrast or MRI with contrast, throughout the trial. All scans were reviewed by independent, central radiology. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.
Measured: Time from randomization to the date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death from any cause, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Measured: Time from randomization to the date of death from any cause, reported between date of first participant randomized and up to 2 years after the last participant randomized (data cutoff: 30Aug2012)
Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
Overall response is defined as the number of participants having achieved confirmed Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Confirmed CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Confirmed PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. CR required a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.
Measured: Time from first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.
Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
The duration of response, applied only to participants with best overall response at CR or PR, is defined as the number of days between the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the date of the event: radiological progression as per central review or death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurs first. If no event, participant is censored at the last adequate assessment.
Measured: Time from first documented response date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death due to underlying cancer, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cut-off date.
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and Deaths
Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths throughout the study. Participants were assessed continuously at each 28-day cycle.
Measured: From the first participant randomized until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units
The analysis of this outcome measure was based on the FKSI-DRS scale which is a validated disease-related symptom index containing 9 items that measure symptoms predominantly related to kidney cancer. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). If at least 5 of the 9 questions have been answered, the FKSI-DRS total score is calculated by subtracting nine times the mean of the scores of the answered items from 36. Participants with less than 5 out of the 9 questions answered will have a missing FKSI-DRS total score. The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration is defined as a decrease by at least 2 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the participant.
Measured: Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first patient randomized until 31Dec2011
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%
The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). The PF subscale consists of 5 questions each scored from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The score for the PF subscale and global health status range from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the participant.
Measured: Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011
Duration of Exposure of RAD001 in Participants Randomized to the Treatment Combination of RAD001 and Bevacizumab
This outcome measure was assessed continuously.
Measured: From the date of the first participant treated until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study start12 Nov 2008
- Primary completion31 Dec 2011
- Study completion15 Apr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 365 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00719264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRAD001L2201
- Other IDs
- 2008-000077-38, 2008
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
PubMed 37146227Ravaud A, Barrios CH, Alekseev B, Tay MH, Agarwala SS, Yalcin S, Lin CC, Roman L, Shkolnik M, Anak O, Gogov S, Pelov D, Louveau AL, Melichar B. RECORD-2: phase II randomized study of everolimus and bevacizumab versus interferon alpha-2a and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1378-84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv170. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PubMed 25851632
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase II Study to Compare Bevacizumab Plus RAD001 Versus Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Bevacizumab for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Kidney
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00719264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRAD001L2201
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Renal Cell, Nephroid Carcinoma, Hypernephroid
- Keywords
- Renal cell carcinoma, Adults, Bevacizumab, RAD001, Everolimus, Interferon, Clear, Roferon
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 365 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Study start
- 12 Nov 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To estimate the difference in efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and RAD001 compared to bevacizumab and interferon alfa-2a for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the kidney.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| bevacizumab, RAD001 (everolimus) | Experimental | Drug: RAD001(everolimus), Drug: bevacizumabParticipants received oral everolimus 10 mg qd plus intravenous bevacizumab 10mg/kg every 2 weeks |
| bevacizumab, interferon alfa-2a (IFN) | Active comparator | Drug: interferon alfa-2a, Drug: bevacizumabParticipants received subcutaneous IFN dose escalated from 3 MIU (million international unit) during week 1, 6 MIU during week 2, and 9 MIU during week 3 of treatment and subsequently (if tolerated), 3 times per week plus intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
- Patients with at least one measurable lesion
- Patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma
- Patients who had a prior partial or complete nephrectomy
- Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70%.
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- 4 weeks post-major surgery
- Patients who had radiation therapy within 28 days prior to start of study
- Patients in need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study.
- Patients with a serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture.
- Patients with a history of seizure(s) not controlled with standard medical therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RAD001(everolimus)Also: Afinitor10 mg qd | Drug | bevacizumab, RAD001 (everolimus) |
| interferon alfa-2adose escalated from 3 MIU (million international unit) during week 1, 6 MIU during week 2, and 9 MIU during week 3 | Drug | bevacizumab, interferon alfa-2a (IFN) |
| bevacizumab10 mg/kg every 2 weeks | Drug | bevacizumab, RAD001 (everolimus), bevacizumab, interferon alfa-2a (IFN) |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death from any cause, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.
Tumor response and disease progression were assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. All target and non-target lesions identified at baseline were assessed using the same method, CT scan with contrast or MRI with contrast, throughout the trial. All scans were reviewed by independent, central radiology. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.
7 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of death from any cause, reported between date of first participant randomized and up to 2 years after the last participant randomized (data cutoff: 30Aug2012)
Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
Time frame: Time from first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.
Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab
Time frame: Time from first documented response date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death due to underlying cancer, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cut-off date.
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and Deaths
Time frame: From the first participant randomized until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units
Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first patient randomized until 31Dec2011
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%
Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011
Duration of Exposure of RAD001 in Participants Randomized to the Treatment Combination of RAD001 and Bevacizumab
Time frame: From the date of the first participant treated until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37146227Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25851632Ravaud A, Barrios CH, Alekseev B, Tay MH, Agarwala SS, Yalcin S, Lin CC, Roman L, Shkolnik M, Anak O, Gogov S, Pelov D, Louveau AL, Melichar B. RECORD-2: phase II randomized study of everolimus and bevacizumab versus interferon alpha-2a and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1378-84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv170. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
- Visit NovartisClinicalTrials.com: Pre-qualify for a trial, and view a list of trials and participating study centers.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
109 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing RAD001(everolimus), interferon alfa-2a and bevacizumab in people with Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 109 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 109 sites in Italy, Germany, France, United States, Spain and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab (time frame: Time from randomization to the date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death from any cause, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00719264, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2017.