AzTrials
AzTrials

Intracerebral HemorrhageINTERACT2NCT00716079

The Second Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Trial

A study testing Blood pressure management policies in people with Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Stroke, run by The George Institute at 62 sites in 19 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this academic lead study is to determine if a treatment strategy of early intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering compared to conservative BP lowering policy in patients with elevated blood pressure within 6 hours of acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) improves the outcome of death and disability at 3… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke, Hypertension
What is being tested?
Blood pressure management policies
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,839 participants
Where
62 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
Sep 2008to Dec 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with CT-confirmed spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage (ICH)
  • Elevated systolic blood pressure (>150mmHg and <220mmHg)
  • Capacity to commence randomly assigned treatment within 6 hours of onset of ICH.
  • Able to be 'actively' treated and admitted to a monitored facility

Who cannot join

  • Clear indication or contraindication to intensive BP lowering.
  • Evidence ICH secondary to a structural abnormality
  • Use of thrombolytic agent
  • Previous ischaemic stroke within 30 days
  • A very high likelihood that the patient will die within the next 24 hours on the basis of clinical and/or radiological criteria
  • Score of 3-5 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (indicating deep coma)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Significant pre-stroke disability or advanced dementia
  • Planned early neurological intervention
  • Participation in another clinical trial.
  • A high likelihood that the patient will not adhere to the study treatment and follow-up regimen.

Trial locations and contacts

62 sites in 19 countries.

62 sites in 19 countries

France15 sites
  • Hôpital Jean Minjoz

    Besançon, 25030

  • Hopital de la Cavale-Blanche

    Brest, 29609

  • Centre Hospitalier de Calais

    Calais, 62107

  • CHU Bicetre

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275

  • Hopital Roger Salengro

    Lille, 59037

  • Centre Hospitalier de Meaux

    Meaux, 77104

  • CHU Nantes - Hopital Laennec

    Nantes, 44093

  • Hopital de Lariboisiere

    Paris, 75010

  • Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne

    Paris, 75014

  • Regional Coordinating Centre Europe: Unite de recherche clinique Lariboisiere

    Paris, 75475

  • Hôpital de la Salpêtrière

    Paris, 75651

  • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

    Paris, 75674

  • Hopital Tenon

    Paris, 75970

  • Hopital Delafontaine

    Saint-Denis, 27993

  • Centre Hospitalier de Versailles

    Versailles, 78157

Other trials in France

Germany13 sites
  • Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin (CCBF)

    Berlin, 12200

  • Universitatsklinikum Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • Heinrich-Heine-Universitat

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Klinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt, 15236

  • Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt, 60528

  • Martin-Luther-Universität

    Halle, 06120

  • Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Asklepios Klinik Barmbek

    Hamburg, 22291

  • Asklepios Klinik Altona

    Hamburg, 22763

  • University of Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Universitatsklinikum Mannheim

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Universitatsklinikum Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Australia12 sites
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Health Service District

    Brisbane, Queensland, 4029

  • Canberra Hospital

    Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2605

  • Concord Hospital

    Concord, New South Wales, 2138

  • Gosford Hospital

    Gosford, New South Wales, 2250

  • Western Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3011

  • Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3050

  • Austin Repatriation General Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3081

  • Box Hill Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3128

  • Monash Medical Centre

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3168

  • John Hunter Hospital

    Newcastle, New South Wales, 2310

  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

    Perth, Western Australia, 6009

  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2050

Other trials in Australia

Austria3 sites
  • University of Graz

    Graz, 8036

  • Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck

    Innsbruck, A-6020

  • Allgemeines Krankenhaus Linz

    Linz, 4020

Other trials in Austria

Spain3 sites
  • Hospital General Universitario de Albacete

    Albacete

  • Hospital Clinic Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta

    Girona, 17007

Other trials in Spain

Belgium2 sites
  • AZ-VUB (University hospital Brussels)

    Jette, 1090

  • CHU Tivoli

    La Louvière, 7100

Other trials in Belgium

China2 sites
  • Regional Coordinating Centre China: The George Institute China

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100088

  • Regional Coordinating and Monitoring Centre: Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Second Medical University

    Shanghai, 200025

Other trials in China

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

Argentina1 site
  • Regional Coordinating Centre Argentina

    Buenos Aires

Other trials in Argentina

Brazil1 site
  • Regional Coordinating Centre Brazil

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Chile1 site
  • Regional Coordnating Centre Chile

    Santiago

Other trials in Chile

Finland1 site
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki, 00290

Other trials in Finland

Hong Kong1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Shatin

Other trials in Hong Kong

India1 site
  • Regional Coordinating Centre India: The George Institute India

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 033

Other trials in India

Italy1 site
  • Ospedale di Citta di Castello

    Città di Castello, 6012

Other trials in Italy

Pakistan1 site
  • The Aga Khan University Hospital

    Karachi

Other trials in Pakistan

Portugal1 site
  • Hospital de Sao Joao

    Porto, 4202-451

Other trials in Portugal

Switzerland1 site
  • Inselspital Neurologische Klinik

    Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom1 site
  • Regional Coordinating Centre United Kingdom

    Leicester

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: An International Randomised Controlled Trial to Establish the Effects of Early Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients With Intracerebral Haemorrhage.

The purpose of this academic lead study is to determine if a treatment strategy of early intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering compared to conservative BP lowering policy in patients with elevated blood pressure within 6 hours of acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) improves the outcome of death and disability at 3 months after onset.

Read the detailed description

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most serious subtypes of stroke, affecting over a million people worldwide each year, most of whom live in Asia. About one third of people with ICH die early after onset and the majority of survivors are left with major long-term disability. Despite the magnitude of the disease burden and cost on healthcare resources, there remains uncertainty about the role of surgery for ICH and no acute medical therapies have been shown to definitely alter outcome in ICH.

The INTERACT2 study follows the recently completed initial pilot study vanguard phase) which established the feasibility of the protocol, safety of early intensive BP lowering, and effects on haematoma expansion within 6 hours of onset of ICH. Having established 'proof-of-concept' that BP lowering may improve outcome by reducing haematoma expansion, INTERACT2 aims to establish the effects of the treatment on major clinical endpoints in patients with ICH recruited from an expanding clinical network around the world.

Being tested
Blood pressure management policies
Keywords
Cerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke, antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure, disability, clinical trial, outcomes
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke, Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood pressure management policiesOther

    Also called Labetalol Hydrochloride, Metoprolol tartrate, Hydralazine Hydrochloride, Glycerol Trinitrate

    The trial is an assessment of BP lowering management strategies, using routinely available drugs. There is some flexibility in the use of particular BP lowering agents to achieve BP targets.

Study groups in NCT00716079
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intensive BP loweringOtherManagement policy to lower the systolic Blood pressure (BP) to a target of 140mmHg within 1 hour of randomization and sustained for 24 hours. Sites were provided with protocols for different intravenous agents and used whichever routinely available drugs were in their hospital.
Receives: Other: Blood pressure management policies
Guideline recommended BP loweringOtherPatients received management of BP based on the standard guidelines at the time, as published by the American Heart Association (AHA) in 2007 and 2010. The attending clinician may consider commencing BP treatment if the systolic level is greater than 180 mmHg, however and the first line treatment will be oral (including nasogastric if required) and/or transdermal routes. Should control of systolic BP not be achieved via these routes, intravenous treatment may be started until the target systolic BP of 180 mmHg is achieved.
Receives: Other: Blood pressure management policies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. A Composite of Death or Dependency, With Dependency Being Defined by a Score of 3 to 5 on the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Death at 90 Days

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,839 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00716079
Sponsor's protocol ID
NHMRC-571281
Acronym
INTERACT2
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
14 Jul 2008
Last updated
13 Dec 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Anderson CS, Huang Y, Wang JG, Arima H, Neal B, Peng B, Heeley E, Skulina C, Parsons MW, Kim JS, Tao QL, Li YC, Jiang JD, Tai LW, Zhang JL, Xu E, Cheng Y, Heritier S, Morgenstern LB, Chalmers J; INTERACT Investigators. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 May;7(5):391-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70069-3. Epub 2008 Apr 7.

    PubMed 18396107
  • Delcourt C, Huang Y, Wang J, Heeley E, Lindley R, Stapf C, Tzourio C, Arima H, Parsons M, Sun J, Neal B, Chalmers J, Anderson C; INTERACT2 Investigators. The second (main) phase of an open, randomised, multicentre study to investigate the effectiveness of an intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT2). Int J Stroke. 2010 Apr;5(2):110-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00415.x.

    PubMed 20446945
  • Ren X, Chen X, Hu X, Lin Y, Chen C, Wang J, Robinson TG, Liu L, Venturelli PM, Martins SC, Pontes-Neto OM, Qureshi AI, Song L, Anderson C, Wang X; as the INTERACT and ATACH-II Investigators. Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering by Hematoma Location in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurology. 2026 Nov 10;107(9):e218514. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000218514. Epub 2026 Oct 8.

    PubMed 42848972
  • Wang X, Phan TG, Ren X, Ma HH, Li Q, Ouyang M, Delcourt C, Chen X, Wang J, Robinson TG, Arima H, Ma L, Hu X, You C, Liu L, Venturelli PM, Martins SC, Pontes-Neto OM, Chalmers JP, Song L, Qureshi AI, Anderson C. Systolic Blood Pressure Trajectory and Outcomes in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pooled Analysis of the 4 INTERACT and ATACH-II Clinical Trials. Neurology. 2026 Apr 14;106(7):e214671. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000214671. Epub 2026 Mar 19.

    PubMed 41855454
  • Wang X, Ren X, Li Q, Ouyang M, Chen C, Delcourt C, Chen X, Wang J, Robinson T, Arima H, Ma L, Hu X, You C, Li G, Jie Y, Lin Y, Billot L, Munoz-Venturelli P, Martins S, Pontes-Neto OM, Liu L, Chalmers J, Carcel C, Song L, Anderson CS; INTERACT Investigators. Effects of blood pressure lowering in relation to time in acute intracerebral haemorrhage: a pooled analysis of the four INTERACT trials. Lancet Neurol. 2025 Jul;24(7):571-579. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00160-7.

    PubMed 40541207
  • You S, Zheng D, Chen X, Wang X, Ouyang M, Han Q, Cao Y, Delcourt C, Song L, Carcel C, Arima H, Liu CF, Lindley RI, Robinson T, Anderson CS, Chalmers J; INTERACT Investigators. Subacute Neurological Improvement Predicts Favorable Functional Recovery After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: INTERACT2 Study. Stroke. 2025 Mar;56(3):621-627. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048847. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

    PubMed 39895502
  • You S, Zheng D, Yoshimura S, Ouyang M, Han Q, Wang X, Cao Y, Delcourt C, Song L, Arima H, Chen X, Liu CF, Lindley RI, Robinson T, Anderson CS, Chalmers J; INTERACT Investigators. Optimum Baseline Clinical Severity Scale Cut Points for Prognosticating Intracerebral Hemorrhage: INTERACT Studies. Stroke. 2024 Jan;55(1):139-145. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044538. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

    PubMed 38018833
  • Malavera A, You S, Zheng D, Delcourt C, Anderson CS; INTERACT2 Investigators. Prognostic significance of early pyrexia in acute intracerebral haemorrhage: The INTERACT2 study. J Neurol Sci. 2021 Apr 15;423:117364. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117364. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

    PubMed 33647734
  • Sandset EC, Wang X, Carcel C, Sato S, Delcourt C, Arima H, Stapf C, Robinson T, Lavados P, Chalmers J, Woodward M, Anderson CS. Sex differences in treatment, radiological features and outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage: Pooled analysis of Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage trials 1 and 2. Eur Stroke J. 2020 Dec;5(4):345-350. doi: 10.1177/2396987320957513. Epub 2020 Sep 20.

    PubMed 33598552
  • Song L, Wang X, Ouyang M, Sun L, Chen X, Arima H, Sandset EC, Delcourt C, Wang J, Chen G, Robinson T, Lindley RI, Chalmers J, Anderson CS; INTERACT2 Investigators. Associations of an Abnormal Physiological Score With Outcomes in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: INTERACT2 Study. Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(2):722-725. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030435. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

    PubMed 33423518
  • Wang X, Moullaali TJ, Li Q, Berge E, Robinson TG, Lindley R, Zheng D, Delcourt C, Arima H, Song L, Chen X, Yang J, Chalmers J, Anderson CS, Sandset EC. Utility-Weighted Modified Rankin Scale Scores for the Assessment of Stroke Outcome: Pooled Analysis of 20 000+ Patients. Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2411-2417. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028523. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

    PubMed 32640944
  • You S, Zheng D, Delcourt C, Sato S, Cao Y, Zhang S, Yang J, Wang X, Lindley RI, Robinson T, Anderson CS, Chalmers J. Determinants of Early Versus Delayed Neurological Deterioration in Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019 Jun;50(6):1409-1414. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024403. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

    PubMed 31136288
  • Wang X, Sandset EC, Moullaali TJ, Chen G, Song L, Carcel C, Delcourt C, Woodward M, Robinson T, Chalmers J, Arima H, Anderson CS; INTERACT2 Investigators. Determinants of the high admission blood pressure in mild-to-moderate acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Hypertens. 2019 Jul;37(7):1463-1466. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002056.

    PubMed 31085948
  • Chen R, Wang X, Anderson CS, Robinson T, Lavados PM, Lindley RI, Chalmers J, Delcourt C. Infratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1257-1259. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023766.

    PubMed 30890109
  • Moullaali TJ, Wang X, Martin RH, Shipes VB, Qureshi AI, Anderson CS, Palesch YY. Statistical analysis plan for pooled individual patient data from two landmark randomized trials (INTERACT2 and ATACH-II) of intensive blood pressure lowering treatment in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Stroke. 2019 Apr;14(3):321-328. doi: 10.1177/1747493018813695. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

    PubMed 30418098

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood pressure management policies in people with Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Stroke, run by The George Institute at 62 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 62 sites in France, Germany, Australia, Austria, Spain and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Oct 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

A Composite of Death or Dependency, With Dependency Being Defined by a Score of 3 to 5 on the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00716079, which also lists 43 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
INTERACT2 Clinical Trial NCT00716079 | AzTrials