AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer's DiseasePhase 2NCT00708552

Study of SB-742457 or Donepezil Versus Placebo in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease

A Phase 2 study testing SB-742457 and Donepezil in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 72 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is designed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SB-742457 versus placebo in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. SB-742457 is an experimental treatment which increases the levels of certain chemicals in the brain that are often decreased in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Alzheimer's Disease
What is being tested?
SB-742457 and Donepezil
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
576 participants
Where
72 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
4 Jul 2008to 9 Mar 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects and their caregivers must provide informed consent prior to study entry.
  • Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of probable mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease with a documented 6-month history of AD symptoms
  • Subjects must have a regular caregiver who is willing to attend visits, oversee the subject's compliance with the study and report on the subject's status.
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential must agree to pregnancy testing and approved form of birth control.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of possible, probable or definite vascular dementia.
  • History/evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia
  • History of known or suspected seizures, loss of consciousness or significant head trauma
  • Subjects with ECG, blood pressure and laboratory values outside of protocol criteria are excluded.
  • Subjects with known photosensitivity
  • Subjects with a history of previous exposure to SB-742457, taking agents for which there is a theoretical risk of interaction with SB-742457, or taking medication for Alzheimer's disease or centrally acting agents which might impact study outcomes may not participate.

Trial locations and contacts

72 sites in 11 countries.

72 sites in 11 countries

Germany23 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Achim, Lower Saxony, 28832

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bad Homburg, Hesse, 61348

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44805

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44892

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50935

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dresden, Saxony, 01097

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, 47051

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Düren, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52349

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Erbach im Odenwald, Hesse, 64711

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hamburg, 20249

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30559

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hattingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45525

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hüttenberg, Hesse, 35625

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04107

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04157

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 80331

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 81675

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Neuburg an der Donau, Bavaria, 86633

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90402

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Siegen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 57072

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70178

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Unterhaching, Bavaria, 82008

Other trials in Germany

Czechia6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brno, 656 91

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Olomouc, 775 20

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 100 00

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 10000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 110 00

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 120 00

Other trials in Czechia

Mexico6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aguascalientes, Ags, Aguascalientes, 20127

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mexico City, 06700

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mexico City, 14050

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64660

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saltillo, Coahuila, 25000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tijuana, Baja California Norte, 22320

Other trials in Mexico

Poland6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-094

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-796

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mosina, 62-050

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Poznan, 61-298

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sopot, 81-824

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 02-097

Other trials in Poland

South Africa6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Durban, 4001

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Loeventstein, 7530

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Oakdale, 7530

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pretoria, 0181

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rosebank, 2196

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sunninghill, 2157

Other trials in South Africa

Greece5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Athens, 115 21

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Athens, 11528

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Athens

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Melíssia, 151 27

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Thessaloniki, 57010

Other trials in Greece

South Korea5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Busan, 602-715

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seoul, 133-792

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seoul, 135-710

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seoul, 138-736

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seoul, 158-710

Other trials in South Korea

Bulgaria4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shumen, 9700

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1113

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1431

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Varna, 9010

Other trials in Bulgaria

Chile4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7510186

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7560356

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 252-0997

Other trials in Chile

Russia4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 115522

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 115552

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 117049

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 198103

Other trials in Russia

Estonia3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tallinn, 10138

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tallinn, 10617

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tartu, 51014

Other trials in Estonia

About this study

Official title: Study AZ3110865, a Study Comparing SB-742457 or Donepezil Versus Placebo in Subjects With Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease

The study is designed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SB-742457 versus placebo in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. SB-742457 is an experimental treatment which increases the levels of certain chemicals in the brain that are often decreased in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Being tested
SB-742457, Donepezil, Placebo
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Cognition, SB-742457
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SB-742457Drug

    investigational drug

  • DonepezilDrug

    comparator

  • PlaceboDrug

    comparator

Study groups in NCT00708552
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SB-742457 - 15mgExperimentalSB-742457 - 15mg
Receives: Drug: SB-742457
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo
SB-742457 - 35mgExperimentalSB-742457 - 35mg
Receives: Drug: SB-742457
DonepezilActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Donepezil

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 24

    ADAS-Cog assesses a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items are evaluated by tests, but some are dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. The ADAS-Cog total score is the sum of the calculated scores for Questions 1 (Word recall task), 2 (Naming objects and fingers), and 7 (Word recognition task) and the scores recorded on the CRF for Questions 3 to 6 (Commands, Constructional praxis, Ideational praxis, Orientation) and 8 to 11 (Remembering test instructions, Spoken language ability, Word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, Comprehension). The total score ranges from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction while lower indicates better cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the value at Week 0. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  2. Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change - Plus (CIBIC+) Score at Week 24

    The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse).

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (35)
  1. Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score at Week 24

    RBANS is an individually administered neurocognitive battery comprising 12 subtests across five domains (Attention, Language, Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, and Immediate and Delayed memory). The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist, psychiatrist or neuropsychologist, or another trained and experienced person. It is preferred that this individual is the same person who administers the ADAS-Cog, but he/she must be a separate individual from the person who completes the CIBIC+. The scale is based on the performance of the participant and takes approximately 25-30 minutes to administer. Raw total scores are calculated by adding up the scores for each of the 12 individual subtests and ranges between 0 and 311, where low score= (greater impairment) and high score=(better cognitive function). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  2. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] Scores 16-26) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 24

    The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 16-26. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  3. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline [MMSE Scores 10-20) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 24

    The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 10-20. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  4. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 24

    The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE 16-26. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  5. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 24

    The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Higher scores indicate worst outcome. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with baseline MMSE 10-20. Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 12

    ADAS-Cog assesses a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items are evaluated by tests, but some are dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. The ADAS-Cog total score is the sum of the calculated scores for Questions 1 (Word recall task), 2 (Naming objects and fingers), and 7 (Word recognition task) and the scores recorded on the CRF for Questions 3 to 6 (Commands, Constructional praxis, Ideational praxis, Orientation) and 8 to 11 (Remembering test instructions, Spoken language ability, Word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, Comprehension). The total score ranges from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction while lower indicates better cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

  7. CIBIC+ Score at Week 12

    The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse).

    Measured: Week 12

  8. Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12

    RBANS is an individually administered neurocognitive battery comprising 12 subtests across five domains (Attention, Language, Visuospatial/Constructional Abilities, and Immediate and Delayed memory). The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist, psychiatrist or neuropsychologist, or another trained and experienced person. It is preferred that this individual is the same person who administers the ADAS-Cog, but he/she must be a separate individual from the person who completes the CIBIC+. The scale is based on the performance of the participant and takes approximately 25-30 minutes to administer. Raw total scores are calculated by adding up the scores for each of the 12 individual subtests and ranges between 0 and 311, where low score= (greater impairment) and high score=(better cognitive function). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

  9. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12

    The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for Participants with Baseline MMSE score 16-26. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

  10. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score, the Change From Baseline in RBANS Total Score at Week 12

    The MMSE was used to measure cognitive impairment. The MMSE consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing and drawing corresponding to 5 domains orientation, memory, attention, and construction. All items were scored as 0 (incorrect response) or 1 (correct response). Total scores ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better function. Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 10-20. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 12.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

  11. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 16-26) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 12

    The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 16-26.

    Measured: Week 12

  12. Effect of Baseline Severity (Including Subgroup Analyses Based on Baseline MMSE Scores 10-20) on the CIBIC+ Score at Week 12

    The CIBIC+ is a rating scale derived from an interview with the participant and caregiver with an independent rater designed to measure several domains of participant function, such as mental/cognitive state, behavior, and functioning. The scores are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as follows: 1 (marked improvement), 2 (moderately improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (moderately worse) and 7 (markedly worse). Stratification by Baseline severity, using MMSE score at Baseline, with the strata being MMSE score of 10-15, 16-20 and 21-26. Two subgroups using MMSE score at Baseline were also examined, moderate 10-20 and mild 16-26. Data has been presented for participants with Baseline MMSE score 10-20.

    Measured: Week 12

  13. Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 24

    The ADCS-ADL measures functional impairment in terms of activities of daily living. The ADCS-ADL is an interviewer-administered informant-based scale where the informant (caregiver) responds to 23 activities of daily living questions (i.e. those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, making judgments and decisions) about the participant. The questions range from basic to instrumental activities of daily living and take approximately 20 minutes to complete. The Total score ranges from 0-78 and a higher score signifies greater functional ability and lower scores indicating greater impairment. The total score is the sum of all items and sub-questions. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 12 and 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 12 and 24

  14. Change From Baseline in Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Total Score at Week 24

    The CSDD is used to assess signs and symptoms of major depression in demented participants. The CSDD scale contains 19 items on mood-related signs of depression, behavioral disturbance, physical signs of depression, cyclic functions and ideational disturbances, where each item is rated for severity on a scale of 0-2 (0=absent, 1=mild/intermittent, 2=severe). Scores above 10 (probable major depression),scores above 18 (definite major depression), scores below 6 (absence of significant depressive symptoms). The total score was calculated as a weighted average of the scores provided for the remaining 18 questions as follows: Imputed Total= Observed Total Score x 1+ Maximum Score of the missing value/ Sum of the Maximum Score of the non -missing values) and ranges from 0-38. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  15. Change From Baseline in MMSE Total Score at Week 24

    The MMSE is used to test for cognitive dysfunction. The scale is completed by a trained and experienced neurologist/psychiatrist/neuropsychologist based on the performance of the participants, and takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. It consists of 11 tests namely orientation to time, orientation to place, registration, attention and calculation, recall, naming, repetition, comprehension, reading, writing, drawing across 5 sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language). Scoring was done by circling 0 if the response was incorrect, or 1 if the response was correct. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher scores indicating better cognitive function. The total MMSE score was a sum of all item scores. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  16. Change From Baseline in ADCS-ADL-Basic Score; ADCS-ADL: Instrumental Score and ADCS-ADL: Total Independence Score at Weeks 12 and 24

    Basic score was calculated as the sum of questions 1-6b and ranges from 0-22 (activities included are: eating, walking, using the toilet, bathing, grooming and dressing) and Instrumental score, sum of questions 7-23, ranges from 0-56 (activities included are: using the telephone, watching television, conversations, clearing dishes, personal belongings, making drinks, making snacks, taking rubbish out, getting out and about, shopping, keeping appointments, being left alone, current events, reading, writing, pastimes/hobbies, household chores). Total independence score is calculated by re-scoring the individual questions for each activity. The total independence score therefore ranges between 0 to 23, where 23 indicates that a participant is independent (based on these 23 ADL). Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 12 and 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 12 and 24

  17. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Number of participants with any adverse event (serious and non-serious) and SAEs were reported.

    Measured: Upto Week 24

  18. Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT)

    Vital sign measurements included systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Heart Rate (HR), Body weight (BW). SBP and DBP and HR were measured once after the participant sat quietly for at least 5 minutes and in addition, upon standing to assess participants for postural hypotension. DBP was measured at the disappearance of Korotkoff sounds (Phase V). The plethysmographic method (preferably with a column sphygmomanometer where available) was used to measure blood pressure throughout the study. Body weight was measured, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The PCC range were as follows: SBP (Reference Range [RR] <90-140> Increase from Baseline [IFB]>=40 and decrease from baseline [DFB] >=30), DBP (RR < 50-90> IFB>=30 and DFB >=20), HR (RR <50-100> IFB >=30 and DFB >=30, BW (IFB >= 7% and DFB >=7%).

    Measured: Upto Week 24

  19. Number of Participants With Hematology Data of PCC ATOT

    Hematology parameters included hematocrit ratio (reference range males 0.410-0.500, females 0.350-0.460 [18-64 years] and males 0.360-0.490, females 0.330-0.460 [65+ years]), hemoglobin grams per liter (13.8-17.2), lymphocytes giga per liter (0.85-4.10), monocytes giga per liter (0.20-1.10), platelet count giga per liter (130-400), segmented neutrophils giga per liter (1.80-8.00), total neutrophils (1.80-8.00). Data has been presented in a consolidated format for hematology parameters high and low from the reference range of PCC ATOT.

    Measured: Upto Week 24

  20. Number of Participants With Chemistry Data of PCC ATOT

    Clinical chemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase international units per liter (IU/L) RR [0-48], alkaline phosphatase IU/L (20-125), aspartate amino transferase international units per liter (0-55), blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (24-101), calcium millimoles per liter (mmol/L) [2.12-2.56], carbon dioxide content/bicarbonate mmol/L (20-32), cholesterol mmol/L (0.00-5.15), creatine kinase IU/L (males 0-235 and females 0-190), creatinine micromoles per liter (umol/L) [44-124], direct bilirubin umol/L (0-6), gamma glutamyl transferase IU/L (males 0-65 and females 0-45), glucose mmol/L (3.9-6.9), low density lipoprotein cholesterol mmol/L (0.00-3.35), lactate dehydrogenase IU/L (0-270), potassium mmol/L (3.5-5.3), sodium mmol/L (135-146), total bilirubin umol/L (0-22), triglycerides mmol/L (0.00-2.24), urea/blood urea nitrogen mmol/L (2.5-10.5). Data has been presented in a consolidated format for clinical chemistry parameters high and low from the RR of PCC ATOT.

    Measured: Upto Week 24

  21. Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Alanine Amino Transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Amino Transferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Lactate Dehydrogenase at Week 24

    Clinical chemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate amino transferase, creatine kinase, gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Weeks 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  22. Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Albumin and Total Protein at Week 24

    Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin and total protein. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  23. Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter Blood Urea Nitrogen /Creatinine Ratio at Week 24

    Clinical chemistry parameter included blood urea nitrogen /creatinine ratio. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  24. Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Calcium, CO2 Content/Bicarbonate, Chloride, Glucose, HDL Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen at Week 24

    Clinical chemistry parameters included calcium, CO2 content/bicarbonate, chloride, glucose, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, urea/blood urea nitrogen. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  25. Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin at Week 24

    Clinical chemistry parameters included creatinine, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  26. Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils, White Blood Cell Count at Week 24

    Hematology parameters included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils, white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  27. Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Hematocrit

    Hematology parameter included hematocrit. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  28. Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration at Week 24

    Hematology parameter included hemoglobin and mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  29. Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin at Week 24

    Hematology parameter included mean corpuscle hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  30. Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Mean Corpuscle Volume and Mean Platelet Volume at Week 24

    Hematology parameter included mean corpuscle volume and mean platelet volume. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  31. Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Red Blood Cell Count at Week 24

    Hematology parameter included red blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the value at Visit 3 (Week 0). Change from Baseline was obtained by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-randomization value at Week 24.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  32. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings as Assessed by Investigator and Central Cardiologist

    The clinical interpretation of the ECG by the investigator was recorded as Normal, Abnormal but not clinically significant (ANCS) and Abnormal clinically significant (ACS). ECG interpretation by the central cardiologist included the most extreme result of the available ECGs where the central cardiologist's interpretation of the ECG was recorded as Normal, Unable to Evaluate and Abnormal. Data has been presented for number of participants with most severe on-treatment abnormal ECG findings.

    Measured: Upto Week 24

  33. Exposure Estimates for SB-742457 Area Under Curve Over the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτss)

    A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participant were collected for the purpose of assessing plasma concentrations of SB-742457 and donepezil. At each visit (Day 28±5, 56±5, 84±5, 126±5 and 168±5) one sample was collected post 24 hours of last dose.

    Measured: One sample at Day 28±5, 56±5, 84±5, 126±5 and 168±5 post 24 hours of last dose

  34. Exposure Estimates for SB-742457 Minimum Concentration at Steady State (Cmin-ss)

    Blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis, were obtained within 24 hours of last dose. A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participants were taken at Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24. The SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cmin-ss for each participant were estimated via nonlinear mixed effect analysis. Data has been presented in a consolidated format for SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cmin-ss.

    Measured: One sample at Day 28±5, 56±5, 84±5, 126±5 and 168±5 post 24 hours of last dose

  35. Exposure Estimates for Donepezil Average Concentration at Steady State (Cavgss)

    Blood sample for pharmacokinetic analysis, were obtained within 24 hours of last dose. A total of five pharmacokinetic samples per participants were taken at Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24. The Donepezil exposures at steady state Cavgss for each participant were estimated via nonlinear mixed effect analysis. Data has been presented in a consolidated format for SB-742457 exposures at steady state Cavgss.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8,12,18 and Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start4 Jul 2008
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2010
  4. Study completion9 Mar 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
576 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00708552
Sponsor's protocol ID
AZ3110865
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
30 Jun 2008
Last updated
27 Jul 2018

Publications

  • Maher-Edwards G, Watson C, Ascher J, Barnett C, Boswell D, Davies J, Fernandez M, Kurz A, Zanetti O, Safirstein B, Schronen JP, Zvartau-Hind M, Gold M. Two randomized controlled trials of SB742457 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2015 May 7;1(1):23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2015.04.001. eCollection 2015 Jun.

    PubMed 29854923

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing SB-742457 and Donepezil in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 72 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 72 sites in Germany, Czechia, Mexico, Poland, South Africa and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00708552, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in