AzTrials
AzTrials

TuberculosisTBNET-TIPSNCT00707317

T Cell Interferon-gamma Release Assay (TIGRA) in Immunocompromised Individuals

An observational study of Tuberculosis and Monitoring, Immunologic, run by Tuberculosis Network European Trialsgroup at 21 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Until recently, the tuberculin skin test (TST) was the only available diagnostic assay for detection of latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI). Despite the low overall incidence of symptomatic tuberculosis infection in low-prevalence countries, the potential mortality and morbidity mandate constant vigilance to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tuberculosis, Monitoring, Immunologic
How many people
1,843 participants
Where
21 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
Jun 2008to May 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients

Who may be able to join

  • Individual as specified for the study population
  • Written informed consent
  • Indication to perform tuberculin skin test(suspect latent infection, according to standard guidelines, differential diagnosis)

Who cannot join

  • <18 years of age

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 14 countries.

21 sites in 14 countries

Germany4 sites
  • Research Center Borstel

    Borstel

  • HIV Treatment and Clinical Research Unit

    Frankfurt

  • Department of Infectious Diseases, Univ. of Freiburg

    Freiburg im Breisgau

  • University of the Saarland

    Homburg

Other trials in Germany

Italy3 sites
  • Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit

    Milan

  • National Institute for Infectious Diseases L. Spallanzani

    Roma

  • WHO Collaborating Center for TB and Lung Diseases

    Tradate

Other trials in Italy

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Baþkent Üniversitesi Týp Fakültesi

    Ankara

  • Department of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis

    Ankara

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Chest Clinic

    London

  • Imperial College London

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

Australia1 site
  • Cellestis Limited

    Carnegie

Other trials in Australia

Bulgaria1 site
  • National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Denmark1 site
  • Herlev Hospital

    Herlev

Other trials in Denmark

Greece1 site
  • Respiratory Medicine, University of Thessaly

    Mezourlo-Larissa

Other trials in Greece

Netherlands1 site
  • KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation

    The Hague

Other trials in Netherlands

Portugal1 site
  • Centro de Diagnóstico Pneumológico

    Lisbon

Other trials in Portugal

Romania1 site
  • Clinica de Pneumologie, Marius Nasta Institute of Pneumology

    Bucharest

Other trials in Romania

Spain1 site
  • Servei de Microbiologia

    Barcelona

Other trials in Spain

Sweden1 site
  • Karolinska Institute

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

Switzerland1 site
  • Centre Antituberculeux, Hôpital Cantonal Universitarie

    Geneva

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Prospective Head-to-head Comparison of the Two Commercially Available Approved TIGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB) With the Established Mendel-Mantoux Skin-test in Immunocompromized Patients

Until recently, the tuberculin skin test (TST) was the only available diagnostic assay for detection of latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI). Despite the low overall incidence of symptomatic tuberculosis infection in low-prevalence countries, the potential mortality and morbidity mandate constant vigilance to identify patients at risk for reactivation. Due to systemic immunosuppression, immunocompromised patients with latent M. tuberculosis infection are at increased risk of progression to active disease. This applies to patients with various causes of immunodeficiency such as HIV-infected patients, allogeneic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with chronic renal failure. Therefore, current guidelines aimed at preventing tuberculosis infection in immunocompromized individuals recommend a generalized screening for evidence of latent infection to target appropriate preventative prophylaxis. At present, tuberculosis control programs exclusively rely on the tuberculin skin test to identify a latent infection in asymptomatic individuals.

Recently, novel in vitro assays termed T cell interferon-gamma release assay (TIGRA) have become available that are based on the detection of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production in T cells or supernatants after stimulation with highly specific antigens of M. tuberculosis. Two TIGRA are commercially available, the ELISPOT based T.SPOT.TB and the ELISA based QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (now available as an "IN-TUBE" version).

Read more

The aim of the study is a prospective comparison of the two commercially available approved TIGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB) with the established Mendel-Mantoux skin-test in immunocompromized patients (main focus on sensitivity and specificity).

The study hypotheses are as follows:

  1. In immunocompromised patients, the two commercially available approved TIGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB) have increased sensitivity and specificity as compared to the established Mendel-Mantoux skin-test.
  2. Results from QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB do not differ in immunocompromised patients.
Read the detailed description

Until recently, the tuberculin skin test (TST) was the only available diagnostic assay for detection of latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI). Despite the low overall incidence of symptomatic tuberculosis infection in low-prevalence countries, the potential mortality and morbidity mandate constant vigilance to identify patients at risk for reactivation. Due to systemic immunosuppression, immunocompromised patients with latent M. tuberculosis infection are at increased risk of progression to active disease. This applies to patients with various causes of immunodeficiency such as HIV-infected patients, allogeneic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with chronic renal failure. Therefore, current guidelines aimed at preventing tuberculosis infection in immunocompromized individuals recommend a generalized screening for evidence of latent infection to target appropriate preventative prophylaxis. At present, tuberculosis control programs exclusively rely on the tuberculin skin test to identify a latent infection in asymptomatic individuals.

Recently, novel in vitro assays termed T cell interferon-gamma release assay (TIGRA) have become available that are based on the detection of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production in T cells or supernatants after stimulation with highly specific antigens of M. tuberculosis. Two TIGRA are commercially available, the ELISPOT based T.SPOT.TB and the ELISA based QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (now available as an "IN-TUBE" version). Current evidence suggests that TIGRA based on cocktails containing ESAT-6 and CFP-10 have the potential to become useful diagnostic tools. It has, however, been shown, that rates of indeterminate and positive results may differ between both tests, suggesting that they might provide different results in routine clinical practice. Moreover, there is only inadequate evidence on the value of those TIGRA in the management of immunocompromised individuals. Based on the current literature and most recent meta-analyses, there is an urgent need for head-to-head comparative studies of the two commercially available tests in immunocompromised patients. This study is designed to carry out a head-to-head comparison of the T.SPOT.TB and the ELISA based QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test with the TST in immunosuppressed populations. In a second step that will be addressed at a later stage, this study may be extended to longitudinally assess the predictive value of a positive blood test for progression to active disease.

The study will be performed within the tuberculosis network european trialsgroup (TBNET). It will be performed in a multicenter setting involving 23 participating centers from a total of 14 european countries. The study aims to include a total of 1800 study subjects distributed as follows: 200 HIV infected individuals with high and low CD4 T cells/µl (above and below 250 CD4 T cell/µl), respectively, 200 patients with chronic renal failure, 200 stem cell transplant recipients, 200 solid organ transplantation (lung, liver, kidney, kidney-pancreas) patients, 200 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, 200 immunocompromised patients with confirmed tuberculosis, 200 immunocompetent individuals with similar risk factors as patients, and 200 immunocompetent controls with no known risk of exposure or tuberculosis will serve as control groups.

Keywords
M. tuberculosis, latent tuberculosis infection, Quantiferon assay, ELISPOT assay, tuberculin skin test, immunocompromised patients
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00707317
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1HIV infected individuals
2patients with chronic renal failure
3patients after solid organ transplantation (lung, liver, kidney, kidney-pancreas)
4patients with rheumatoid arthritis
5stem cell transplant recipients
6immunocompromised patients with confirmed tuberculosis
7immunocompetent controls with no known risk of exposure or tuberculosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. IGRA performance

    performance of two IGRAs and skin test in immunocompromised patients

    Measured: at the time of analysis

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. active tuberculosis on follow-up

    Active TB on follow-up depending on test result

    Measured: variable follow-up on all patients

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,843 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00707317
Sponsor's protocol ID
TBNET-TIGRA
Acronym
TBNET-TIPS
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
25 Jun 2008
Last updated
16 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Sester M, van Leth F, Bruchfeld J, Bumbacea D, Cirillo DM, Dilektasli AG, Dominguez J, Duarte R, Ernst M, Eyuboglu FO, Gerogianni I, Girardi E, Goletti D, Janssens JP, Julander I, Lange B, Latorre I, Losi M, Markova R, Matteelli A, Milburn H, Ravn P, Scholman T, Soccal PM, Straub M, Wagner D, Wolf T, Yalcin A, Lange C; TBNET. Risk assessment of tuberculosis in immunocompromised patients. A TBNET study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 15;190(10):1168-76. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201405-0967OC.

    PubMed 25303140
  • Lange C, van Leth F, Sester M; TBnet. Viral Load and Risk of Tuberculosis in HIV Infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Feb 1;71(2):e51-3. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000834. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26761521

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Tuberculosis and Monitoring, Immunologic, run by Tuberculosis Network European Trialsgroup at 21 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in Germany, Italy, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, Australia and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

IGRA performance (time frame: at the time of analysis). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00707317, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in