Malignant LymphomaNCT00685997
Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Staging Malignant Lymphomas
An observational study of Malignant Lymphoma and Hodgkin's Disease, run by UMC Utrecht at 3 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Background: The malignant lymphomas, Hodgkin´s disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma (NHL), comprise approximately 5-6% of all malignancies in adults and account for 10% of childhood cancers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malignant Lymphoma, Hodgkin's Disease, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- How many people
- 135 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients, aged 8 years and older, with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, who will undergo computed tomography (CT) for staging
Who may be able to join
- male or female patients
- age: 8 years and older
- histologically proven Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- patients scheduled for a CT of the body for initial staging
- participant's parents (participant < 18 years) or the participant (participant >18 years) must willingly give written informed consent prior to the start of the study
- whole-body MRI has to be performed within 10 days before or after CT, and before therapy has been started.
Who cannot join
- patients with a general contraindication for MRI (including cardiovascular pacemakers, claustrophobia)
- patients who have had a previous malignancy
- patients who are pregnant or nursing
- patients in whom therapy has already started after CT and before MRI could be performed
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands3 sites
Meander Medical Center Amersfoort
Amersfoort, Utrecht, 3818 ES
Academic Medical Center Amsterdam
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CX
About this study
Official title: Whole-body MR Imaging for Staging Malignant Lymphomas
Background:
The malignant lymphomas, Hodgkin´s disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma (NHL), comprise approximately 5-6% of all malignancies in adults and account for 10% of childhood cancers. Once the diagnosis has been established histologically, extent of disease (staging) and response to therapy will be assessed by means of a computed tomography (CT) scan of the body. The staging at presentation is important for determining prognosis and choice of treatment. Unfortunately, CT is accompanied by a significant amount of radiation exposure which may induce second cancers. This is especially important in childhood, because rapidly dividing cells are more sensitive to radiation induced effects and children will have more years ahead in which cancerous changes might occur. New magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques offer an alternative way for staging and follow-up of cancers, including the malignant lymphomas. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is a radiation-free method which allows imaging of the body with excellent soft tissue contrast in a single examination.
Read more
Purpose:
The aim of this study is to examine if WB-MRI can replace CT in staging of patients with a malignant lymphoma.
Design:
This will be a multicenter, prospective, diagnostic cohort study (timeschedule: 36 months). 135 eligible patients will undergo WB-MRI on top of the protocolar imaging routinely done.
Study population:
Patients aged 8 years and older with a histological diagnosis of HD or NHL.
Statistical analysis:
The challenge of this study will be to show non-inferiority of WB-MRI compared to CT in staging malignant lymphoma. Testing of this hypothesis will be one-sided and performed using recently proposed techniques by Lui et al.
Radiation-related risk assessment:
A risk model will be used, based on the BEIR VII report, for modelling the late-term mortality from radiation induced tumors after exposure to ionizing radiation.
Economic evaluation:
Actual costs (from a societal perspective) will be determined for the two diagnostic tests. In case of clinical equivalence and similar costs or cost savings associated with MRI the latter can be considered dominant, obviating further economic evaluation. Otherwise, through modelling of expected long term health impact and associated outcomes such as quality of life and costs the incremental cost effectiveness will be evaluated.
- Keywords
- Malignant lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Imaging, Whole-Body MRI, CT, Radiation
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Hodgkin Disease, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI findings and according to CT-findings. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Ann Arbor classification system.
Measured: December 2010
Secondary outcomes (1)
The secondary outcome will be a (subjective) assessment of image quality and presence of artefacts, for both T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR images as well as CT.
Measured: December 2010
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionJan 2012
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Malignant LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UMC UtrechtThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UMC Utrecht
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, R.A.J. Nievelstein, UMC Utrecht
- Investigators
- Rutger A. J. Nievelstein, MD PhD, Principal investigator, UMC Utrecht
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00685997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 80-82310-98-08012
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 27 May 2008
- Last updated
- 3 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Brennan DD, Gleeson T, Coate LE, Cronin C, Carney D, Eustace SJ. A comparison of whole-body MRI and CT for the staging of lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):711-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850711.
PubMed 16120924Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Miller SF, Babyn PS. Fast STIR whole-body MR imaging in children. Radiographics. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):1317-30. doi: 10.1148/rg.245045048.
PubMed 15371611Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, Goyen M, Oberhoff C, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J. Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):139-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331030777. Epub 2004 Aug 18.
PubMed 15317952Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, Nazaradeh F, Goehde SC, Barkhausen J, Dahmen G, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA. 2003 Dec 24;290(24):3199-206. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.24.3199.
PubMed 14693872Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. No abstract available.
PubMed 18046031
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Whole-body MR Imaging for Staging Malignant Lymphomas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00685997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 80-82310-98-08012
- Keywords
- Malignant lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Imaging, Whole-Body MRI, CT, Radiation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UMC UtrechtUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
The malignant lymphomas, Hodgkin´s disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma (NHL), comprise approximately 5-6% of all malignancies in adults and account for 10% of childhood cancers. Once the diagnosis has been established histologically, extent of disease (staging) and response to therapy will be assessed by means of a computed tomography (CT) scan of the body. The staging at presentation is important for determining prognosis and choice of treatment. Unfortunately, CT is accompanied by a significant amount of radiation exposure which may induce second cancers. This is especially important in childhood, because rapidly dividing cells are more sensitive to radiation induced effects and children will have more years ahead in which cancerous changes might occur. New magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques offer an alternative way for staging and follow-up of cancers, including the malignant lymphomas. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is a radiation-free method which allows imaging of the body with excellent soft tissue contrast in a single examination.
Purpose:
The aim of this study is to examine if WB-MRI can replace CT in staging of patients with a malignant lymphoma.
Design:
This will be a multicenter, prospective, diagnostic cohort study (timeschedule: 36 months). 135 eligible patients will undergo WB-MRI on top of the protocolar imaging routinely done.
Study population:
Patients aged 8 years and older with a histological diagnosis of HD or NHL.
Statistical analysis:
The challenge of this study will be to show non-inferiority of WB-MRI compared to CT in staging malignant lymphoma. Testing of this hypothesis will be one-sided and performed using recently proposed techniques by Lui et al.
Radiation-related risk assessment:
A risk model will be used, based on the BEIR VII report, for modelling the late-term mortality from radiation induced tumors after exposure to ionizing radiation.
Economic evaluation:
Actual costs (from a societal perspective) will be determined for the two diagnostic tests. In case of clinical equivalence and similar costs or cost savings associated with MRI the latter can be considered dominant, obviating further economic evaluation. Otherwise, through modelling of expected long term health impact and associated outcomes such as quality of life and costs the incremental cost effectiveness will be evaluated.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients, aged 8 years and older, with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, who will undergo computed tomography (CT) for staging
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- male or female patients
- age: 8 years and older
- histologically proven Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- patients scheduled for a CT of the body for initial staging
- participant's parents (participant < 18 years) or the participant (participant >18 years) must willingly give written informed consent prior to the start of the study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients with a general contraindication for MRI (including cardiovascular pacemakers, claustrophobia)
- patients who have had a previous malignancy
- patients who are pregnant or nursing
- patients in whom therapy has already started after CT and before MRI could be performed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The primary outcome will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI findings and according to CT-findings. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Ann Arbor classification system.
Time frame: December 2010
1 secondary outcome
The secondary outcome will be a (subjective) assessment of image quality and presence of artefacts, for both T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR images as well as CT.
Time frame: December 2010
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jul 2013.
- Background: PubMed 16120924Brennan DD, Gleeson T, Coate LE, Cronin C, Carney D, Eustace SJ. A comparison of whole-body MRI and CT for the staging of lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):711-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850711.
- Background: PubMed 15371611Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Miller SF, Babyn PS. Fast STIR whole-body MR imaging in children. Radiographics. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):1317-30. doi: 10.1148/rg.245045048.
- Background: PubMed 15317952Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, Goyen M, Oberhoff C, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J. Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):139-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331030777. Epub 2004 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 14693872Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, Nazaradeh F, Goehde SC, Barkhausen J, Dahmen G, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA. 2003 Dec 24;290(24):3199-206. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.24.3199.
- Background: PubMed 18046031Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. No abstract available.
Related trials for Malignant Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rutger A. J. Nievelstein, MD PhD principal investigator
UMC Utrecht
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Malignant Lymphoma and Hodgkin's Disease, run by UMC Utrecht at 3 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI findings and according to CT-findings. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Ann Arbor classification system. (time frame: December 2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00685997, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2013.