Compartment SyndromeTS2NCT00681616
Study of New Catheter & Pressure Monitor System to Help Prevent Compartment Syndrome From Developing in the Injured Leg
A study testing Compartment Monitoring System (CMS), Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal and Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removal in people with Compartment Syndrome, run by Twin Star Medical, Inc. at 13 sites in United States.
Trial summary
An investigation of a new catheter and pressure monitor system that may help to prevent a complication called compartment syndrome from developing in an injured leg. Compartment syndrome occurs when too much fluid builds up in the muscles of the injured leg. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Compartment Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Compartment Monitoring System (CMS), Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal and Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removal
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject with a tibial shaft fracture requiring intramedullary nailing or bicondylar tibial plateau fracture requiring application of a knee-spanning external fixator.
- Operative procedure (nailing or external fixation) performed within 72 hours of injury.
- The Subject is between 18 and 60 years of age.
- Able to understand what he/she is being asked to do, willing/able to understand and sign the Informed Consent to return for follow-up visits at 2 weeks and 3 months post surgery.
Who cannot join
- Current evidence of CS prior to Study.
- Surgical stabilization will result in the presence of a bead pouch or wound vac or other dressing that would interfere with placement of any of the three Catheters in the anterior compartment.
- The Subject has a medical condition(s) that precludes use of Catheters, such as dermatologic conditions, immunological deficits or traumatic skin lesions that interfere with Catheter placement.
- The Subject has co-morbidities that may place the Subject at risk of hypotension (e.g., significant blood loss, heart failure, significant chest or abdominal trauma, septicemia, pelvic fractures, femur fractures or massive soft tissue trauma.)
- Likely problems, in the investigator's judgment, with maintaining follow-up (including developmental delay, address greater than 2 hours drive from the treating institution, substance abuse problems, intoxication, current or pending incarceration, etc.).
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
Janelle M Antil contact
Debbie A Cooper contact
13 sites in 1 country
United States13 sites, 13 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0328
Amy Drongowski, 734-647-6936, adrongo@umich.edu
Jim Goulet, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Lisa Shaughnessy, 617-414-6295, lisa.shaughnessy@bmc.org
Paul Tornetta, III, MD
- Not yet recruiting
ECMC - SUNY Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Cathy Buyea, MS, 716-898-3383, buyea@buffalo.edu
Mark Anders, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
Skye Macalester, 614-293-9013, skye.macalester@osumc.edu
Laura Phieffer, MD
- Recruiting
Denver Health Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80204
Andrea Baron, 303-436-5825, Andrea.Baron@dhha.org
Steven Morgan, MD
- Recruiting
Brooke Army Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234
Socorro Garcia, 210-916-3365, Socorro.garcia1@us.army.mil
James Ficke, MD
- Recruiting
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153-3328
Leslie Manion, RN, 708-216-5494, Lmanion@LUMC.edu
Michael Stover, MD
- Recruiting
University of Tennessee/Campbell Clinic-InMotion Musculoskeletal Institute
Memphis, Tennessee, 38103
Jennifer Vest, 901-271-0013
Edward Perez, MD
- Recruiting
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
JR Westberg, 612-873-4634, Jerald.Westberg@hcmed.org
Andrew Schmidt, MD
- Not yet recruiting
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868
Emilia Castaneda, 714-456-5759
David Zamorano, MD
- Not yet recruiting
University of California - San Francisco / San Franciso General Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94110
Cindy Lin, 415-206-4977, cindyl@orthosurg.ucsf.edu
Theodore Miclau, MD
- Recruiting
St. Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-0250
Barb Scott, RN, 314-256-3853, scottb@SLU.EDU
J. Tracy Watson, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Washington University Orthopedics
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Angel D Brandt, 314-747-2811
William M Ricci, MD
About this study
Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial of Tissue Ultrafiltration and Pressure Monitoring for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Compartment Syndrome
An investigation of a new catheter and pressure monitor system that may help to prevent a complication called compartment syndrome from developing in an injured leg. Compartment syndrome occurs when too much fluid builds up in the muscles of the injured leg. This causes a lot of swelling and increases pressures within the leg that can cause permanent damage muscles and nerves in the leg.
Read the detailed description
Compartment Syndrome (CS) may occur in patients with a fracture or crushing injury to an extremity. The current standard-of-care for patients at risk of developing CS is clinical by watching for signs and symptoms of CS, and if needed, measuring the pressure within the muscle compartment (intramuscular pressure, IMP). Currently, IMP measurements are made by placing a percutaneous pressure sensor into the targeted muscle compartment, which is then attached to a pressure monitor. Whenever the clinical exam and/or pressure measurements suggest that CS is developing, fasciotomy is generally performed immediately.
Twin Star Medical has developed a novel Compartment Monitoring System (CMS) that consists of a pressure monitoring module and two types of catheters. Both Twin Star Catheters remove interstitial tissue fluid, which may contribute to a reduction in compartment pressure, and which may be used for clinical analysis to determine if certain analyte indicators of muscle injury (biomarkers) can be predictive of CS development. One type of catheter Pressure Measurement/Fluid Collection, (PMFC), removes fluid and monitors pressure via a solid-state fiber optic transducer at the tip of the catheter. The other type of catheter, Fluid Collection (FC), only removes fluid and does not have a pressure transducer at the tip. The monitoring module senses, displays and records pressure as measured by the PMFC catheter as well as provides a vacuum source, which is required for the operation of the fluid removal catheter. The Twin Star CMS Monitoring Module has been successfully tested to (1) ensure the delivery of the specified functional performance requirements needed to reliably operate the Twin Star Catheter, and (2) meet current electrical safety standards established for clinical use. The first model of the Twin Star catheter and monitor was reviewed and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the indications of pressure measurement and the withdrawal of interstitial fluid. The devices being used for this clinical study represent the newly designed catheter and monitor and are not FDA approved and are therefore considered investigational. It is anticipated that the second-generation model of the catheter and monitor will be submitted to the FDA for approval while this study is being conducted.
The purpose of this Study is to determine if the removal of interstitial fluid by the Twin Star Catheter can lower muscle compartment pressure and impact other measures of subject clinical status, including possible reduction of the need for fasciotomy. The Study population will be Subjects who have suffered an isolated tibial fracture (open or closed) requiring surgical stabilization within 72 hours of injury. This Study will use an Adaptive study design in which a total of up to 90 subjects will be enrolled. All Subjects will receive the Twin Star catheters, which will be inserted at the end of the surgical procedure to stabilize the tibia fracture and will be connected to the pressure monitor before leaving the surgical room. The catheters will be used for the first 24-hours after surgical fixation of the affected lower leg in order to (1) measure and record muscle compartment pressure, and (2) remove accumulated interstitial fluid in the subset of subjects that are randomized to the Treatment Group. The first 20 Subjects (Phase 1) will not be randomized; all will be actively treated but with different combinations of catheters and vacuum levels. The purpose of Phase I of the study is to optimize treatment parameters that will be used in the remaining 70 subjects, which will constitute Phase II. All subjects will receive a total of 3 catheters placed in the anterior compartment. Subjects in Phase 1 will be enrolled into two groups: 1) receiving constant vacuum (-150 mmHg) and fluid removal or, 2) receiving intermittent vacuum (-50 mmHg) and fluid removal. Within the anterior compartment, there will be one PMFC and 2 FC catheters inserted.
The first 10 subjects in Phase 1 will all be treated with single-fiber catheters, but with one of two different vacuum levels (intermittent at -50 mmHg or constant at -150 mmHg). After the first 10 subjects have completed the study, fluid removal results will be analyzed. If results demonstrate that fluid in the anterior compartment is being withdrawn at a rate of ≥ 0.5 mls/24 hours, the second group of 10 subjects will continue using the same single fiber catheters. If the results of the first 10 subjects demonstrate fluid is being withdrawn in the anterior compartment at < 0.5 mls/24 hours, the next 10 subjects will instead receive treatment with two multi-fiber FC catheters plus the same PMFC catheter.
After the first 20 subjects have been enrolled in the study, the remaining subjects to be enrolled in Phase 2 will be randomized to either a Treatment or Control group. Both groups will receive treatment with whichever combination of catheter type (single or multi-fiber) and vacuum (constant or intermittent) was most efficacious in terms of fluid removal in Phase 1. The randomization will determine whether subjects will receive no vacuum at all (Control Group: Monitoring alone) or the fluid removal mode that was shown to be best in the first phase of the study (Treatment Group: Monitoring plus Fluid Removal).
The rationale for the adaptive study design is that we have developed second-generation catheters whose fluid removal function has not been optimized in vivo in humans. Although our first generation catheter used multi-fibers, animal study results have demonstrated that single-fiber catheters remove the same amount of fluid in vivo as multi-fiber catheters, but can be made much smaller than multi-fiber catheters.
The Subject's length of initial hospital stay will be determined by the attending physician based on the subject's medical condition(s). The standard-of-care for routine clinical compartment pressure monitoring will apply to both the vacuum and non-vacuum groups in this Study with the catheters being left in place for 24 hours. Compartment syndrome is a dignosis that depends on clinical assessment supplemented by pressure measurement. Throughout the study, the treating physicians will monitor the subjects according to standard clinical practice and will apply standard clinical judgment regarding the diagnosis of compartment syndrome. Treating physicians may end the study and perform fasciotomy if they feel it is necessary because of clinical suspicion that compartment syndrome is developing. A two-week and a 3-month follow-up visit will be required post discharge, coinciding with typical clinical follow-up visits. The purpose of the two-week visit will be primarily to assess whether there have been any adverse consequences related to the catheter. The purpose of the three-month assessment will be primarily to look for any evidence of the sequelae of missed or untreated compartment syndrome, such as clawing of the toes or persistent neurologic dysfunction. Functional outcomes will be measured during these follow-up visits as well as the occurrence of any adverse events since discharge. Functional outcomes will include an assessment of whether any loss of motor function resulted as part of the primary injury.
- Conditions
- Compartment Syndrome
- Being tested
- Compartment Monitoring System (CMS), Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal, Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removal
- Keywords
- Anterior compartment syndrome, Tibia, Trauma, Blood circulation, Nerve compression syndromes
- Medical subject headings
- Compartment Syndromes, Anterior Compartment Syndrome, Wounds and Injuries, Nerve Compression Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Compartment Monitoring System (CMS)Device
Also called Twin Star Monitor, Twin Star Catheters
The CMS consists of an Introducer, Pressure Measurement \& Fluid Collection (PMFC) catheter, a Fluid Collection (FC) catheter and Compartment Pressure Monitor. The PMFC catheter removes fluid and monitors pressure via a solid-state fiber optic transducer at the tip of the catheter. The FC catheter only removes fluid and does not have a pressure transducer at the tip. The CMS Monitor senses, displays and records compartment pressure as measured by up to two PMFC catheters. In addition, the CMS Monitor measures subject blood pressure using a provided cuff for calculating the perfusion pressure of the muscle compartment.
Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid RemovalDevice
Also called Twin Star Monitor, Twin Star Catheters
Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal
Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removalDevice
Also called Twin Star Monitor, Twin Star Catheters
Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removal
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal Receives: Device: Compartment Monitoring System (CMS); Device: Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal |
| 2 | Active comparator | Compartment Monitoring System (CMS) without fluid removal Receives: Device: Compartment Monitoring System (CMS); Device: Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removal |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To determine if use of Twin Star catheter with active fluid removal reduces muscle compartment pressure vs Twin Star catheter without fluid removal by comparing the randomized groups. Success will be defined by a p-value less than 0.05 (two-sided).
Measured: fluid removal will be collected & recorded at 2, 4, 8, 16, & 24 hrs after catether insertion.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Compares the treatment and control groups on change in perfusion pressure (defined as diastolic blood pressure minus IMP) over time. The randomized groups will be compared with a two-sided p-value less than 0.05 defining success.
Measured: Perfusion pressure will be collected and recorded at 2, 4, 8, 16 & 24 hrs post-catheter insertion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionJul 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Compartment SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Twin Star Medical, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Investigators
- Andrew Schmidt, MD, Principal investigator, Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC)Janelle M Antil, Study director, Twin Star Medical, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00681616
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GE-4073
- Other IDs
- DoD Proposal:06275001, Award #:W81XWH-07-1-0243
- Acronym
- TS2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2009
- First submitted
- 19 May 2008
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Burgess AR, Ebraheim NA. Compartment syndrome in open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Dec;68(9):1348-53.
PubMed 3782206Hargens AR, Akeson WH, Mubarak SJ, Owen CA, Evans KL, Garetto LP, Gonsalves MR, Schmidt DA. Fluid balance within the canine anterolateral compartment and its relationship to compartment syndromes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Jun;60(4):499-505.
PubMed 670272Hargens AR, Schmidt DA, Evans KL, Gonsalves MR, Cologne JB, Garfin SR, Mubarak SJ, Hagan PL, Akeson WH. Quantitation of skeletal-muscle necrosis in a model compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Apr;63(4):631-6.
PubMed 7217130Heppenstall RB, Scott R, Sapega A, Park YS, Chance B. A comparative study of the tolerance of skeletal muscle to ischemia. Tourniquet application compared with acute compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jul;68(6):820-8.
PubMed 3733772Janzing HM, Broos PL. Routine monitoring of compartment pressure in patients with tibial fractures: Beware of overtreatment! Injury. 2001 Jun;32(5):415-21. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00005-5.
PubMed 11382429Schmidt AH, Tvedte E. The Financial Implications of Compartment Syndrome. Poster, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, Feb 13-18, 2007.
Tornetta P 3rd, Templeman D. Compartment syndrome associated with tibial fracture. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:303-8. No abstract available.
PubMed 9143975Woll TS, Duwelius PJ. The segmental tibial fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Aug;(281):204-7.
PubMed 1499212
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Tissue Ultrafiltration and Pressure Monitoring for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Compartment Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00681616
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TS2 / GE-4073
- Conditions
- Compartment Syndrome
- Keywords
- Anterior compartment syndrome, Tibia, Trauma, Blood circulation, Nerve compression syndromes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Twin Star Medical, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 May 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An investigation of a new catheter and pressure monitor system that may help to prevent a complication called compartment syndrome from developing in an injured leg. Compartment syndrome occurs when too much fluid builds up in the muscles of the injured leg. This causes a lot of swelling and increases pressures within the leg that can cause permanent damage muscles and nerves in the leg.
Detailed description
Compartment Syndrome (CS) may occur in patients with a fracture or crushing injury to an extremity. The current standard-of-care for patients at risk of developing CS is clinical by watching for signs and symptoms of CS, and if needed, measuring the pressure within the muscle compartment (intramuscular pressure, IMP). Currently, IMP measurements are made by placing a percutaneous pressure sensor into the targeted muscle compartment, which is then attached to a pressure monitor. Whenever the clinical exam and/or pressure measurements suggest that CS is developing, fasciotomy is generally performed immediately.
Twin Star Medical has developed a novel Compartment Monitoring System (CMS) that consists of a pressure monitoring module and two types of catheters. Both Twin Star Catheters remove interstitial tissue fluid, which may contribute to a reduction in compartment pressure, and which may be used for clinical analysis to determine if certain analyte indicators of muscle injury (biomarkers) can be predictive of CS development. One type of catheter Pressure Measurement/Fluid Collection, (PMFC), removes fluid and monitors pressure via a solid-state fiber optic transducer at the tip of the catheter. The other type of catheter, Fluid Collection (FC), only removes fluid and does not have a pressure transducer at the tip. The monitoring module senses, displays and records pressure as measured by the PMFC catheter as well as provides a vacuum source, which is required for the operation of the fluid removal catheter. The Twin Star CMS Monitoring Module has been successfully tested to (1) ensure the delivery of the specified functional performance requirements needed to reliably operate the Twin Star Catheter, and (2) meet current electrical safety standards established for clinical use. The first model of the Twin Star catheter and monitor was reviewed and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the indications of pressure measurement and the withdrawal of interstitial fluid. The devices being used for this clinical study represent the newly designed catheter and monitor and are not FDA approved and are therefore considered investigational. It is anticipated that the second-generation model of the catheter and monitor will be submitted to the FDA for approval while this study is being conducted.
The purpose of this Study is to determine if the removal of interstitial fluid by the Twin Star Catheter can lower muscle compartment pressure and impact other measures of subject clinical status, including possible reduction of the need for fasciotomy. The Study population will be Subjects who have suffered an isolated tibial fracture (open or closed) requiring surgical stabilization within 72 hours of injury. This Study will use an Adaptive study design in which a total of up to 90 subjects will be enrolled. All Subjects will receive the Twin Star catheters, which will be inserted at the end of the surgical procedure to stabilize the tibia fracture and will be connected to the pressure monitor before leaving the surgical room. The catheters will be used for the first 24-hours after surgical fixation of the affected lower leg in order to (1) measure and record muscle compartment pressure, and (2) remove accumulated interstitial fluid in the subset of subjects that are randomized to the Treatment Group. The first 20 Subjects (Phase 1) will not be randomized; all will be actively treated but with different combinations of catheters and vacuum levels. The purpose of Phase I of the study is to optimize treatment parameters that will be used in the remaining 70 subjects, which will constitute Phase II. All subjects will receive a total of 3 catheters placed in the anterior compartment. Subjects in Phase 1 will be enrolled into two groups: 1) receiving constant vacuum (-150 mmHg) and fluid removal or, 2) receiving intermittent vacuum (-50 mmHg) and fluid removal. Within the anterior compartment, there will be one PMFC and 2 FC catheters inserted.
The first 10 subjects in Phase 1 will all be treated with single-fiber catheters, but with one of two different vacuum levels (intermittent at -50 mmHg or constant at -150 mmHg). After the first 10 subjects have completed the study, fluid removal results will be analyzed. If results demonstrate that fluid in the anterior compartment is being withdrawn at a rate of ≥ 0.5 mls/24 hours, the second group of 10 subjects will continue using the same single fiber catheters. If the results of the first 10 subjects demonstrate fluid is being withdrawn in the anterior compartment at < 0.5 mls/24 hours, the next 10 subjects will instead receive treatment with two multi-fiber FC catheters plus the same PMFC catheter.
After the first 20 subjects have been enrolled in the study, the remaining subjects to be enrolled in Phase 2 will be randomized to either a Treatment or Control group. Both groups will receive treatment with whichever combination of catheter type (single or multi-fiber) and vacuum (constant or intermittent) was most efficacious in terms of fluid removal in Phase 1. The randomization will determine whether subjects will receive no vacuum at all (Control Group: Monitoring alone) or the fluid removal mode that was shown to be best in the first phase of the study (Treatment Group: Monitoring plus Fluid Removal).
The rationale for the adaptive study design is that we have developed second-generation catheters whose fluid removal function has not been optimized in vivo in humans. Although our first generation catheter used multi-fibers, animal study results have demonstrated that single-fiber catheters remove the same amount of fluid in vivo as multi-fiber catheters, but can be made much smaller than multi-fiber catheters.
The Subject's length of initial hospital stay will be determined by the attending physician based on the subject's medical condition(s). The standard-of-care for routine clinical compartment pressure monitoring will apply to both the vacuum and non-vacuum groups in this Study with the catheters being left in place for 24 hours. Compartment syndrome is a dignosis that depends on clinical assessment supplemented by pressure measurement. Throughout the study, the treating physicians will monitor the subjects according to standard clinical practice and will apply standard clinical judgment regarding the diagnosis of compartment syndrome. Treating physicians may end the study and perform fasciotomy if they feel it is necessary because of clinical suspicion that compartment syndrome is developing. A two-week and a 3-month follow-up visit will be required post discharge, coinciding with typical clinical follow-up visits. The purpose of the two-week visit will be primarily to assess whether there have been any adverse consequences related to the catheter. The purpose of the three-month assessment will be primarily to look for any evidence of the sequelae of missed or untreated compartment syndrome, such as clawing of the toes or persistent neurologic dysfunction. Functional outcomes will be measured during these follow-up visits as well as the occurrence of any adverse events since discharge. Functional outcomes will include an assessment of whether any loss of motor function resulted as part of the primary injury.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Device: Compartment Monitoring System (CMS), Device: Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid RemovalCompartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal |
| 2 | Active comparator | Device: Compartment Monitoring System (CMS), Device: Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removalCompartment Monitoring System (CMS) without fluid removal |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject with a tibial shaft fracture requiring intramedullary nailing or bicondylar tibial plateau fracture requiring application of a knee-spanning external fixator.
- Operative procedure (nailing or external fixation) performed within 72 hours of injury.
- The Subject is between 18 and 60 years of age.
- Able to understand what he/she is being asked to do, willing/able to understand and sign the Informed Consent to return for follow-up visits at 2 weeks and 3 months post surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Current evidence of CS prior to Study.
- Surgical stabilization will result in the presence of a bead pouch or wound vac or other dressing that would interfere with placement of any of the three Catheters in the anterior compartment.
- The Subject has a medical condition(s) that precludes use of Catheters, such as dermatologic conditions, immunological deficits or traumatic skin lesions that interfere with Catheter placement.
- The Subject has co-morbidities that may place the Subject at risk of hypotension (e.g., significant blood loss, heart failure, significant chest or abdominal trauma, septicemia, pelvic fractures, femur fractures or massive soft tissue trauma.)
- Likely problems, in the investigator's judgment, with maintaining follow-up (including developmental delay, address greater than 2 hours drive from the treating institution, substance abuse problems, intoxication, current or pending incarceration, etc.).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Compartment Monitoring System (CMS)Also: Twin Star Monitor, Twin Star CathetersThe CMS consists of an Introducer, Pressure Measurement \& Fluid Collection (PMFC) catheter, a Fluid Collection (FC) catheter and Compartment Pressure Monitor. The PMFC catheter removes fluid and monitors pressure via a solid-state fiber optic transducer at the tip of the catheter. The FC catheter only removes fluid and does not have a pressure transducer at the tip. The CMS Monitor senses, displays and records compartment pressure as measured by up to two PMFC catheters. In addition, the CMS Monitor measures subject blood pressure using a provided cuff for calculating the perfusion pressure of the muscle compartment. | Device | 1, 2 |
| Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid RemovalAlso: Twin Star Monitor, Twin Star CathetersCompartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal | Device | 1 |
| Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removalAlso: Twin Star Monitor, Twin Star CathetersCompartment Monitoring System without fluid removal | Device | 2 |
Primary outcome
To determine if use of Twin Star catheter with active fluid removal reduces muscle compartment pressure vs Twin Star catheter without fluid removal by comparing the randomized groups. Success will be defined by a p-value less than 0.05 (two-sided).
Time frame: fluid removal will be collected & recorded at 2, 4, 8, 16, & 24 hrs after catether insertion.
1 secondary outcome
Compares the treatment and control groups on change in perfusion pressure (defined as diastolic blood pressure minus IMP) over time. The randomized groups will be compared with a two-sided p-value less than 0.05 defining success.
Time frame: Perfusion pressure will be collected and recorded at 2, 4, 8, 16 & 24 hrs post-catheter insertion
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2009.
- Background: PubMed 3782206Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Burgess AR, Ebraheim NA. Compartment syndrome in open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Dec;68(9):1348-53.
- Background: PubMed 670272Hargens AR, Akeson WH, Mubarak SJ, Owen CA, Evans KL, Garetto LP, Gonsalves MR, Schmidt DA. Fluid balance within the canine anterolateral compartment and its relationship to compartment syndromes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Jun;60(4):499-505.
- Background: PubMed 7217130Hargens AR, Schmidt DA, Evans KL, Gonsalves MR, Cologne JB, Garfin SR, Mubarak SJ, Hagan PL, Akeson WH. Quantitation of skeletal-muscle necrosis in a model compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Apr;63(4):631-6.
- Background: PubMed 3733772Heppenstall RB, Scott R, Sapega A, Park YS, Chance B. A comparative study of the tolerance of skeletal muscle to ischemia. Tourniquet application compared with acute compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jul;68(6):820-8.
- Background: PubMed 11382429Janzing HM, Broos PL. Routine monitoring of compartment pressure in patients with tibial fractures: Beware of overtreatment! Injury. 2001 Jun;32(5):415-21. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00005-5.
- BackgroundSchmidt AH, Tvedte E. The Financial Implications of Compartment Syndrome. Poster, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, Feb 13-18, 2007.
- Background: PubMed 9143975Tornetta P 3rd, Templeman D. Compartment syndrome associated with tibial fracture. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:303-8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 1499212Woll TS, Duwelius PJ. The segmental tibial fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Aug;(281):204-7.
Related trials for Compartment Syndrome
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
WSACS 2026 Delphi Consensus on the Practical Management of Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension, Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
From Blast Injury to Multicompartment Dysfunction:
Compartment Syndrome, Compartment Syndrome Nontraumatic Lower Extremity
Recruiting
Physiotherapy or Fasciotomy as Treatment for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in the Lower Leg?
Compartment Syndrome Nontraumatic Lower Leg
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Intra-Abdominal Pressure, Respiratory Mechanics, and Ventilator Liberation After Emergency Major Laparotomy
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension, Respiratory Mechanics
RecruitingPhase 4
Preoperative BOTOX® Injection for Large Ventral Hernia Repair
Hernia Abdominal Wall, Botox Injection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janelle M Antil contact
Debbie A Cooper contact
Andrew Schmidt, MD principal investigator
Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC)
Janelle M Antil study director
Twin Star Medical, Inc.
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Compartment Monitoring System (CMS), Compartment Monitoring System with Active Fluid Removal and Compartment Monitoring System without fluid removal in people with Compartment Syndrome, run by Twin Star Medical, Inc. at 13 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Janelle M Antil (651-209-0556 ext. fax), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To determine if use of Twin Star catheter with active fluid removal reduces muscle compartment pressure vs Twin Star catheter without fluid removal by comparing the randomized groups. Success will be defined by a p-value less than 0.05 (two-sided). (time frame: fluid removal will be collected & recorded at 2, 4, 8, 16, & 24 hrs after catether insertion.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00681616, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2009.