Alzheimer's DiseasePhase 3NCT00679627
A Study of Galantamine Used to Treat Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Galantamine in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 95 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of 2 years of treatment with galantamine as compared with placebo of patients who have mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Galantamine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2,051 participants
- Where
- 95 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to May 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Outpatients
- diagnosed with mild to moderately-severe, probable or possible AD, established in accordance with the criteria defined by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease Related Disorders Association or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition
- living with or have regular and frequent visits from a responsible caregiver.
Who cannot join
- Neurodegenerative disorders other than AD, such as Parkinson's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia or Huntington's disease
- Any of specified conditions which may contribute to dementia
- any of specified coexisting diseases, including significant cardiovascular disease.
Trial locations and contacts
95 sites in 12 countries.
95 sites in 12 countries
Germany26 sites
Study site
Bad Aibling
Study site
Bad Homburg
Study site
Bad Honnef
Study site
Bamberg
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Bielefeld
Study site
Bochum
Study site
Butzbach
Study site
Franfurt
Study site
Fürth
Study site
Gelsenkirchen
Study site
Göttingen
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Hanover
Study site
Hattingen
Study site
Karlstadt am Main
Study site
Leverkusen
Study site
Lüneburg
Study site
Mittweida
Study site
Mönchengladbach
Study site
Nuremberg
Study site
Oldenburg
Study site
Ulm
Study site
Unterhaching
Study site
Westerstede
Study site
Wiesbaden
Russia19 sites
Study site
Kazan'
Study site
Kazan’
Study site
Kirov
Study site
Krasnodar
Study site
Lipetsk
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Moscow Russia
Study site
Nizny Novgorod
Study site
Novosibirsk
Study site
Rostov-on-Don
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Samara
Study site
Saratov
Study site
Smolensk
Study site
Smolensk Region N/A
Study site
Tomsk Na
Study site
Voronezh
Study site
Yaroslavl
Study site
Yekaterinburg
Ukraine14 sites
Study site
Chernivtsy
Study site
Dnipro
Study site
Dnipropetrovsk
Study site
Donetsk
Study site
Kharkiv
Study site
Kherson
Study site
Kiev
Study site
Kyiv
Study site
Lviv
Study site
Odesa
Study site
Poltava
Study site
Simferopol
Study site
Uzhhorod
Study site
Vinnitsa
Romania8 sites
Study site
Arad
Study site
Bucharest
Study site
Bucharest Sector 5
Study site
Cluj-Napoca
Study site
Constanța
Study site
Craiova
Study site
Iași
Study site
Tg Mures
Slovakia7 sites
Study site
Bratislava
Study site
Dubnica nad Váhom
Study site
Košice
Study site
Plešivec
Study site
Šenkvice
Study site
Spišská Nová Ves
Study site
Vranov nad Topľou
Czechia5 sites
Study site
Hradec Králové
Study site
Mìlník 1
Study site
Olomouc
Study site
Ostrava
Study site
Prague
Estonia4 sites
Study site
Tallinn
Study site
Tartu
Study site
Viljandi
Study site
Vorumaa
Slovenia4 sites
Study site
Kamnik
Study site
Lesce
Study site
Ljubljana
Study site
Maribor
Greece3 sites
Study site
Athens
Study site
Heraklion Crete
Study site
Thessalonikis
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Long-term (2-year) Treatment of Galantamine in Mild to Moderately-Severe Alzheimer's Disease
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of 2 years of treatment with galantamine as compared with placebo of patients who have mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Read the detailed description
This is a long-term (2-year), randomized (patients will be assigned to treatment by chance), double blind (neither the physician nor the patient will know which treatment is assigned) study of galantamine versus placebo in subjects with mild to moderately-severe AD. Approximately 2,000 patients will participate in this study. The study length for each patient is approximately 25.5 months. The study consists of 3 phases: a pretreatment phase, a treatment phase, and a posttreatment phase. The pretreatment phase includes a 2-week screening period (to obtain a patient's and his or her caregiver's informed consent and to confirm eligibility for the study) and a baseline visit at which subjects will be randomly assigned, in a 1 to 1 ratio, to receive either galantamine or placebo once a day in the morning. Study drug will first be dispensed at the baseline visit. The treatment phase is composed of a titration period (the study drug will be introduced gradually) and a maintenance period and includes 9 visits (3 of which are conducted by telephone). The titration period is 12 weeks long, and visits occur about every 28 days. In the first 4 weeks of the titration period, subjects will receive either 8 mg galantamine or matching placebo, and this dose will be increased to 16 mg galantamine or placebo in the second 4 weeks. The dose will then be increased to 24 mg galantamine or placebo for the final 4 weeks of the titration period if the investigator believes the subject will benefit from and will safely tolerate 24 mg/day. If not, the subject may continue to receive 16 mg galantamine or placebo through the end of the titration period. After the titration period, subjects will enter the maintenance period and continue to take study drug at the dosage they received at the end of the titration period. This dosage may be continued through the end of the study or may be changed once (either up from 16 to 24 mg or down from 24 to 16 mg), depending upon the benefit and the safety of such a change for the individual patient as judged by the investigator. No dosage will exceed 24 mg/day. The posttreatment phase includes an End-of-Study Visit that occurs at the end of the maintenance period. A follow-up telephone contact (interview) is conducted 1 month after the End-of-Study Visit. The effectiveness of galantamine will be evaluated using the following tools: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); the Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD); and the Assessment of Patient Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS CarB). Safety evaluations for the study include the monitoring of vital status and institutionalization status, adverse events, vital signs, weight, physical and neurologic examinations. A Data Safety Monitoring Board, external to the company, has been commissioned for this study to monitor the progress of the study and to ensure that the safety of patients is not compromised. The effectiveness hypothesis of this study is that galantamine, 16 to 24 mg per day, is superior to placebo in reducing cognitive decline from baseline (start of study drug) as measured by the MMSE over the course of 2 years. The safety hypothesis is that the mortality rate in the galantamine 16 to 24 mg per day treatment group will be the same as that in the placebo group over the course of 2 years.
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Being tested
- Galantamine, Placebo
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's Disease, Galantamine, Dementia, Alzheimer type, Memory loss
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease, Memory Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GalantamineDrug
8mg/ day oral capsule increased to 16mg/day then to 24 mg per day
PlaceboDrug
Matching placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Galantamine | Experimental | Galantamine 8mg/ day oral capsule increased to 16mg/day then to 24 mg per day Receives: Drug: Galantamine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching placeco Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score
The MMSE is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used or the assessment of dementia patients' cognitive impairment. Evaluation of points are as follows: 24 to 30 = no cognitive impairment, 18 to 23 = mild cognitive impairment, 0 to 17 = severe cognitive impairment. Lower scores indicate worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Month 24
The Number of Deaths Reported in Participants
An external Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) was assigned for this study to monitor the progress of the study and to ensure that the safety of participants was not compromised.
Measured: Up to 2 years
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score
The MMSE is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used or the assessment of dementia patients' cognitive impairment. Evaluation of points are as follows: 24 to 30 = no cognitive impairment, 18 to 23 = mild cognitive impairment, 0 to 17 = severe cognitive impairment. Lower scores indicate worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) Scores
The DAD assesses physical activities of daily living and instrumental-activities of daily livings of participants with Alzheimer disease. This measure is a validated, disability assessment scale that collects information regarding the ability of a participant to initiate, plan, organize, and perform activities of daily living, as based on a structured interview with the caregiver. The maximum scores were 13 for initiation, 10 for planning and organizing, and 17 for effective performance in order to yield a total maximum score of 40. These scores were normalized to a scale of 100 for analysis.A higher score, or percentage of items that can be performed represents fewer disabilities in carrying out activities of daily living while a lower percentage indicates an increase in disabilities.
Measured: Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Accommodation Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)
The APAS-CarB is a measure used to evaluate participant status and caregiver burden. The table below presents Patient Accommodation assessed as the percentage of participants "home with friend or relative" using the APAS-CarB.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Caregiver Time Spent With the Patient Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)
The table below presents the number of days that caregiving activities were provided during the past week.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Institutional Status
This table describes the number of participants who were reported as institutionalized at baseline and Month 24.
Measured: Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Subscales (Orientation, Registration, Attention and Calculation, Recall, and Language)
The MMSE, is a validated, brief examination that rates subjects on orientation (total score, 10), registration (total score, 3), attention (total score, 5), calculation (total score, 5), recall (total score, 3), and language (total score, 9). The maximum score is 30 (only the higher of the two scores for attention and calculation [each with a maximum score of 5] was used). A higher score compared with baseline indicates less impairment.
Measured: Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in the Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) Subscales (Initiation, Planning and Organization, Effective Performance, Basic, Instrumental, and Leisure)
The DAD assesses physical activities of daily living and instrumental-activities of daily livings of participants with Alzheimer disease. This measure is a validated, disability assessment scale that collects information regarding the ability of a participant to initiate, plan, organize, and perform activities of daily living, as based on a structured interview with the caregiver. The maximum scores were 13 for initiation, 10 for planning and organizing, and 17 for effective performance in order to yield a total maximum score of 40. These scores were normalized to a scale of 100 for analysis.A higher score, or percentage of items that can be performed represents fewer disabilities in carrying out activities of daily living while a lower percentage indicates an increase in disabilities.
Measured: Baseline, Month 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Why it stopped: Due to a pre-specified imbalance of deaths between treatment groups, the DSMB recommended early termination of the trial
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alzheimer's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,051 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00679627
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR012463
- Other IDs
- GALALZ3005
- Status last verified
- Sep 2013
- First submitted
- 15 May 2008
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Lim AWY, Schneider L, Loy C. Galantamine for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD001747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001747.pub4.
PubMed 39498781Hager K, Baseman AS, Nye JS, Brashear HR, Han J, Sano M, Davis B, Richards HM. Effect of concomitant use of memantine on mortality and efficacy outcomes of galantamine-treated patients with Alzheimer's disease: post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Nov 15;8(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0214-x.
PubMed 27846868Hager K, Baseman AS, Nye JS, Brashear HR, Han J, Sano M, Davis B, Richards HM. Effects of galantamine in a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Feb 21;10:391-401. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S57909. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24591834
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Long-term (2-year) Treatment of Galantamine in Mild to Moderately-Severe Alzheimer's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00679627
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR012463
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's Disease, Galantamine, Dementia, Alzheimer type, Memory loss
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Due to a pre-specified imbalance of deaths between treatment groups, the DSMB recommended early termination of the trial
- Enrolment
- 2,051 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Sep 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of 2 years of treatment with galantamine as compared with placebo of patients who have mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Detailed description
This is a long-term (2-year), randomized (patients will be assigned to treatment by chance), double blind (neither the physician nor the patient will know which treatment is assigned) study of galantamine versus placebo in subjects with mild to moderately-severe AD. Approximately 2,000 patients will participate in this study. The study length for each patient is approximately 25.5 months. The study consists of 3 phases: a pretreatment phase, a treatment phase, and a posttreatment phase. The pretreatment phase includes a 2-week screening period (to obtain a patient's and his or her caregiver's informed consent and to confirm eligibility for the study) and a baseline visit at which subjects will be randomly assigned, in a 1 to 1 ratio, to receive either galantamine or placebo once a day in the morning. Study drug will first be dispensed at the baseline visit. The treatment phase is composed of a titration period (the study drug will be introduced gradually) and a maintenance period and includes 9 visits (3 of which are conducted by telephone). The titration period is 12 weeks long, and visits occur about every 28 days. In the first 4 weeks of the titration period, subjects will receive either 8 mg galantamine or matching placebo, and this dose will be increased to 16 mg galantamine or placebo in the second 4 weeks. The dose will then be increased to 24 mg galantamine or placebo for the final 4 weeks of the titration period if the investigator believes the subject will benefit from and will safely tolerate 24 mg/day. If not, the subject may continue to receive 16 mg galantamine or placebo through the end of the titration period. After the titration period, subjects will enter the maintenance period and continue to take study drug at the dosage they received at the end of the titration period. This dosage may be continued through the end of the study or may be changed once (either up from 16 to 24 mg or down from 24 to 16 mg), depending upon the benefit and the safety of such a change for the individual patient as judged by the investigator. No dosage will exceed 24 mg/day. The posttreatment phase includes an End-of-Study Visit that occurs at the end of the maintenance period. A follow-up telephone contact (interview) is conducted 1 month after the End-of-Study Visit. The effectiveness of galantamine will be evaluated using the following tools: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); the Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD); and the Assessment of Patient Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS CarB). Safety evaluations for the study include the monitoring of vital status and institutionalization status, adverse events, vital signs, weight, physical and neurologic examinations. A Data Safety Monitoring Board, external to the company, has been commissioned for this study to monitor the progress of the study and to ensure that the safety of patients is not compromised. The effectiveness hypothesis of this study is that galantamine, 16 to 24 mg per day, is superior to placebo in reducing cognitive decline from baseline (start of study drug) as measured by the MMSE over the course of 2 years. The safety hypothesis is that the mortality rate in the galantamine 16 to 24 mg per day treatment group will be the same as that in the placebo group over the course of 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Galantamine | Experimental | Drug: GalantamineGalantamine 8mg/ day oral capsule increased to 16mg/day then to 24 mg per day |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboMatching placeco |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Outpatients
- diagnosed with mild to moderately-severe, probable or possible AD, established in accordance with the criteria defined by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease Related Disorders Association or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition
- living with or have regular and frequent visits from a responsible caregiver.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Neurodegenerative disorders other than AD, such as Parkinson's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia or Huntington's disease
- Any of specified conditions which may contribute to dementia
- any of specified coexisting diseases, including significant cardiovascular disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Galantamine8mg/ day oral capsule increased to 16mg/day then to 24 mg per day | Drug | Galantamine |
| PlaceboMatching placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
The MMSE is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used or the assessment of dementia patients' cognitive impairment. Evaluation of points are as follows: 24 to 30 = no cognitive impairment, 18 to 23 = mild cognitive impairment, 0 to 17 = severe cognitive impairment. Lower scores indicate worsening.
The Number of Deaths Reported in Participants
Time frame: Up to 2 years
An external Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) was assigned for this study to monitor the progress of the study and to ensure that the safety of participants was not compromised.
7 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Accommodation Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Caregiver Time Spent With the Patient Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Institutional Status
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Subscales (Orientation, Registration, Attention and Calculation, Recall, and Language)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in the Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) Subscales (Initiation, Planning and Organization, Effective Performance, Basic, Instrumental, and Leisure)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39498781Lim AWY, Schneider L, Loy C. Galantamine for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD001747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001747.pub4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27846868Hager K, Baseman AS, Nye JS, Brashear HR, Han J, Sano M, Davis B, Richards HM. Effect of concomitant use of memantine on mortality and efficacy outcomes of galantamine-treated patients with Alzheimer's disease: post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Nov 15;8(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0214-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24591834Hager K, Baseman AS, Nye JS, Brashear HR, Han J, Sano M, Davis B, Richards HM. Effects of galantamine in a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Feb 21;10:391-401. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S57909. eCollection 2014.
Related trials for Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
95 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Galantamine in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 95 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 95 sites in Germany, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Slovakia and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Sep 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (time frame: Baseline, Month 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00679627, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2013.