HIV InfectionsPhase 4CCSNCT00674921
Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis Cessation Study Among Stabilized HIV-Infected Adult Patients on HAART in Entebbe, Uganda
A Phase 4 study testing cotrimoxazole in people with HIV Infections, run by MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit at 1 site in Uganda.
Trial summary
According to the national guidelines in Uganda and to the World Health Organization guidelines, HIV-infected patients should receive cotrimoxazole prophylaxis indefinitely. There are, however, concerns regarding the indefinite application of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients immunologically stabilized on HAART… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 59 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- cotrimoxazole
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,650 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUganda
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 59 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Consenting HIV-infected patient aged 16 years or older,
- Resident within 40 kms of study clinics
- Regularly attending clinics
- Documented HAART intake for at least 3 months
- Clinically healthy and stable
- Confirmed CD4 count of 200 cells/ul more.
Who cannot join
- Acutely ill patients with opportunistic or other infections
- Patients already enrolled in other HAART trials (e.g DART trial)
- First trimester pregnancy at enrolment
- Clinical and immunological evidence of HAART treatment failure
- Unable to attend study clinics regularly
- Hypersensitivity to cotrimoxazole
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
According to the national guidelines in Uganda and to the World Health Organization guidelines, HIV-infected patients should receive cotrimoxazole prophylaxis indefinitely. There are, however, concerns regarding the indefinite application of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients immunologically stabilized on HAART (e.g. high pill burden, drug-drug interactions, toxicity and poor adherence because of treatment fatigue). To date no empirical evidence is available regarding the safety and optimal timing for the cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among HAART patients who successfully restored immunological competence.
Research question: Does morbidity significantly differ between continuation (orthodox) and cessation (experimental) of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among immuno-competent patients stable HAART in the resource-limited setting of Uganda?
Read the detailed description
Randomized double-blind placebo controlled equivalence trial to be conducted among consenting clinically healthy patients on HAART with 2 or more CD4 counts of 200 cells/ul or more for at least 3 months. The study will enable comparison of effects of randomized cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis at 2 CD4-guided thresholds (200 Vs 350 cells/ul).
Rationale for inclusion of the placebo-controlled design
- The double-blind placebo controlled approach is feasible and ethically justified in this equipoise situation to allow for concealment of allocated intervention among investigators and patients and avoids accidental unblinding of investigators to the allocated interventions by trial patients.
- Maintenance of continued cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients randomized to this intervention will be easier if there is no awareness that those patients randomized to cessation of prophylaxis have a relative advantage of reduced pill burden.
- It would be very difficult to maintain cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients randomized to do so in our setting where cotrimoxazole is readily and cheaply available in drug shops, drug stores and pharmacies.
First randomisation
Patients who have been on HAART for at least 3 months and who have a confirmed CD4 count between 200 and 349 cells/ul will be randomized to continue prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole or to cease prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole but continue with ingestion of the placebo cotrimoxazole daily.
Second randomization
Patients who achieve a confirmed CD4 count of 350 cells/ul or more while on HAART will be randomized to continue prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole or to cease prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole but continue with ingestion of placebo cotrimoxazole daily. Some patients will have participated already in 1st randomization but others will be entering the trial at this stage for the first time.
Rationale for 4 trial arms
In order to assess the separate effects of cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in trial patients at the 2 randomization stages above, those continuing with prophylaxis will be compared with those ceasing prophylaxis, necessitating 2 arms at each stage.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- cotrimoxazole, Placebo
- Keywords
- Opportunistic Infections, AIDS, HIV, Treatment Experienced
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, Opportunistic Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cotrimoxazoleDrug
cotrimoxazole 800/160 mg once daily as indicated by the start and end times of the specified arms for continued prevention of HIV-related infections
PlaceboDrug
starch, magnesium stearate, sodium lauryl sulphate
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | It will comprise patients randomized to receive the placebo (stop cotrimoxazole prophylaxis) at CD4 counts of 200 or more but less than 350 cells/ul as they continue with HAART. Patients will be followed until they achieve a CD4 count of 350 cells/ul. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| 2 | Active comparator | It will comprise patients randomized to continue with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and HAART at CD4 counts of 200 or more but less than 350 cells/ul. These patients will be followed until they achieve a CD4 count of 350 cells/ul and above, at which point they will be considered for the second randomization. Receives: Drug: cotrimoxazole |
| A | Placebo comparator | This arm will comprise patients who have achieved a CD4 count of 350 or more cells/ul either at the beginning of the study or once they have reached this threshold at the end of follow up in arms 1 and 2. They (including those previously in Arm 1) will receive the placebo (stop cotrimoxazole prophylaxis) after the second randomization but continue with HAART. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| B | Active comparator | It will comprise patients randomized to continue or start with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and HAART at CD4 of 350 or more cells/ul after second randomization. Some of them will have used cotrimoxazole prophylaxis whilst they were in arm 2 and others in arm 1 will restart cotrimoxazole prophylaxis at this stage. Receives: Drug: cotrimoxazole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
all-cause morbidity such as pneumonia or malaria (presumptive and definitive diagnosis)
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
sub-clinical laboratory abnormalities (such as neutropenia) and serious adverse events (such as death)
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionJun 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,650 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Council
- Investigators
- George Miiro, MSc, MBChB, Principal investigator, MRC/UVRI UnitHeiner Grosskurth, PhD, MD, Study director, MRC/UVRI UnitPaula Munderi, MRCP, MBChB, Principal investigator, MRC/UVRI Unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00674921
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 009/ESR/NDA/DID-01/2008
- Acronym
- CCS
- Status last verified
- May 2008
- First submitted
- 6 May 2008
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Zellweger C, Opravil M, Bernasconi E, Cavassini M, Bucher HC, Schiffer V, Wagels T, Flepp M, Rickenbach M, Furrer H; Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Long-term safety of discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia: prospective multicentre study. AIDS. 2004 Oct 21;18(15):2047-53. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200410210-00009.
PubMed 15577626Mussini C, Pezzotti P, Antinori A, Borghi V, Monforte Ad, Govoni A, De Luca A, Ammassari A, Mongiardo N, Cerri MC, Bedini A, Beltrami C, Ursitti MA, Bini T, Cossarizza A, Esposito R; Changes in Opportunistic Prophylaxis (CIOP) Study Group. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a randomized trial by the CIOP Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):645-51. doi: 10.1086/367659. Epub 2003 Feb 12.
PubMed 12594647Ledergerber B, Mocroft A, Reiss P, Furrer H, Kirk O, Bickel M, Uberti-Foppa C, Pradier C, D'Arminio Monforte A, Schneider MM, Lundgren JD; Eight European Study Groups. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who have a response to antiretroviral therapy. Eight European Study Groups. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 18;344(3):168-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101183440302.
PubMed 11188837Esposito S, Bojanin J, Porta A, Cesati L, Gualtieri L, Principi N. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Dec;24(12):1117-20. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000190038.53813.d2.
PubMed 16371882Lopez Bernaldo de Quiros JC, Miro JM, Pena JM, Podzamczer D, Alberdi JC, Martinez E, Cosin J, Claramonte X, Gonzalez J, Domingo P, Casado JL, Ribera E; Grupo de Estudio del SIDA 04/98. A randomized trial of the discontinuation of primary and secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia after highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. Grupo de Estudio del SIDA 04/98. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 18;344(3):159-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101183440301.
PubMed 11172138Furrer H, Egger M, Opravil M, Bernasconi E, Hirschel B, Battegay M, Telenti A, Vernazza PL, Rickenbach M, Flepp M, Malinverni R. Discontinuation of primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected adults treated with combination antiretroviral therapy. Swiss HIV Cohort Study. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 29;340(17):1301-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904293401701.
PubMed 10219064Weverling GJ, Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Kirk O, Gonzales-Lahoz J, d'Arminio Monforte A, Proenca R, Phillips AN, Lundgren JD, Reiss P. Discontinuation of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis after start of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. EuroSIDA Study Group. Lancet. 1999 Apr 17;353(9161):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03287-0.
PubMed 10218526
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis Cessation Study Among Stabilized HIV-Infected Adult Patients on HAART in Entebbe, Uganda
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00674921
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CCS / 009/ESR/NDA/DID-01/2008
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- Opportunistic Infections, AIDS, HIV, Treatment Experienced
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,650 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research UnitUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Council
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 May 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
According to the national guidelines in Uganda and to the World Health Organization guidelines, HIV-infected patients should receive cotrimoxazole prophylaxis indefinitely. There are, however, concerns regarding the indefinite application of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients immunologically stabilized on HAART (e.g. high pill burden, drug-drug interactions, toxicity and poor adherence because of treatment fatigue). To date no empirical evidence is available regarding the safety and optimal timing for the cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among HAART patients who successfully restored immunological competence.
Research question: Does morbidity significantly differ between continuation (orthodox) and cessation (experimental) of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among immuno-competent patients stable HAART in the resource-limited setting of Uganda?
Detailed description
Randomized double-blind placebo controlled equivalence trial to be conducted among consenting clinically healthy patients on HAART with 2 or more CD4 counts of 200 cells/ul or more for at least 3 months. The study will enable comparison of effects of randomized cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis at 2 CD4-guided thresholds (200 Vs 350 cells/ul).
Rationale for inclusion of the placebo-controlled design
- The double-blind placebo controlled approach is feasible and ethically justified in this equipoise situation to allow for concealment of allocated intervention among investigators and patients and avoids accidental unblinding of investigators to the allocated interventions by trial patients.
- Maintenance of continued cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients randomized to this intervention will be easier if there is no awareness that those patients randomized to cessation of prophylaxis have a relative advantage of reduced pill burden.
- It would be very difficult to maintain cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among patients randomized to do so in our setting where cotrimoxazole is readily and cheaply available in drug shops, drug stores and pharmacies.
First randomisation
Patients who have been on HAART for at least 3 months and who have a confirmed CD4 count between 200 and 349 cells/ul will be randomized to continue prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole or to cease prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole but continue with ingestion of the placebo cotrimoxazole daily.
Second randomization
Patients who achieve a confirmed CD4 count of 350 cells/ul or more while on HAART will be randomized to continue prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole or to cease prophylaxis with active cotrimoxazole but continue with ingestion of placebo cotrimoxazole daily. Some patients will have participated already in 1st randomization but others will be entering the trial at this stage for the first time.
Rationale for 4 trial arms
In order to assess the separate effects of cessation of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in trial patients at the 2 randomization stages above, those continuing with prophylaxis will be compared with those ceasing prophylaxis, necessitating 2 arms at each stage.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboIt will comprise patients randomized to receive the placebo (stop cotrimoxazole prophylaxis) at CD4 counts of 200 or more but less than 350 cells/ul as they continue with HAART. Patients will be followed until they achieve a CD4 count of 350 cells/ul. |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: cotrimoxazoleIt will comprise patients randomized to continue with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and HAART at CD4 counts of 200 or more but less than 350 cells/ul. These patients will be followed until they achieve a CD4 count of 350 cells/ul and above, at which point they will be considered for the second randomization. |
| A | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboThis arm will comprise patients who have achieved a CD4 count of 350 or more cells/ul either at the beginning of the study or once they have reached this threshold at the end of follow up in arms 1 and 2. They (including those previously in Arm 1) will receive the placebo (stop cotrimoxazole prophylaxis) after the second randomization but continue with HAART. |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: cotrimoxazoleIt will comprise patients randomized to continue or start with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and HAART at CD4 of 350 or more cells/ul after second randomization. Some of them will have used cotrimoxazole prophylaxis whilst they were in arm 2 and others in arm 1 will restart cotrimoxazole prophylaxis at this stage. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Consenting HIV-infected patient aged 16 years or older,
- Resident within 40 kms of study clinics
- Regularly attending clinics
- Documented HAART intake for at least 3 months
- Clinically healthy and stable
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Acutely ill patients with opportunistic or other infections
- Patients already enrolled in other HAART trials (e.g DART trial)
- First trimester pregnancy at enrolment
- Clinical and immunological evidence of HAART treatment failure
- Unable to attend study clinics regularly
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cotrimoxazolecotrimoxazole 800/160 mg once daily as indicated by the start and end times of the specified arms for continued prevention of HIV-related infections | Drug | 2, B |
| Placebostarch, magnesium stearate, sodium lauryl sulphate | Drug | 1, A |
Primary outcome
all-cause morbidity such as pneumonia or malaria (presumptive and definitive diagnosis)
Time frame: 3 years
1 secondary outcome
sub-clinical laboratory abnormalities (such as neutropenia) and serious adverse events (such as death)
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2008.
- Results publication: PubMed 15577626Zellweger C, Opravil M, Bernasconi E, Cavassini M, Bucher HC, Schiffer V, Wagels T, Flepp M, Rickenbach M, Furrer H; Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Long-term safety of discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia: prospective multicentre study. AIDS. 2004 Oct 21;18(15):2047-53. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200410210-00009.
- Results publication: PubMed 12594647Mussini C, Pezzotti P, Antinori A, Borghi V, Monforte Ad, Govoni A, De Luca A, Ammassari A, Mongiardo N, Cerri MC, Bedini A, Beltrami C, Ursitti MA, Bini T, Cossarizza A, Esposito R; Changes in Opportunistic Prophylaxis (CIOP) Study Group. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a randomized trial by the CIOP Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):645-51. doi: 10.1086/367659. Epub 2003 Feb 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 11188837Ledergerber B, Mocroft A, Reiss P, Furrer H, Kirk O, Bickel M, Uberti-Foppa C, Pradier C, D'Arminio Monforte A, Schneider MM, Lundgren JD; Eight European Study Groups. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who have a response to antiretroviral therapy. Eight European Study Groups. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 18;344(3):168-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101183440302.
- Results publication: PubMed 16371882Esposito S, Bojanin J, Porta A, Cesati L, Gualtieri L, Principi N. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Dec;24(12):1117-20. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000190038.53813.d2.
- Results publication: PubMed 11172138Lopez Bernaldo de Quiros JC, Miro JM, Pena JM, Podzamczer D, Alberdi JC, Martinez E, Cosin J, Claramonte X, Gonzalez J, Domingo P, Casado JL, Ribera E; Grupo de Estudio del SIDA 04/98. A randomized trial of the discontinuation of primary and secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia after highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. Grupo de Estudio del SIDA 04/98. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 18;344(3):159-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101183440301.
- Results publication: PubMed 10219064Furrer H, Egger M, Opravil M, Bernasconi E, Hirschel B, Battegay M, Telenti A, Vernazza PL, Rickenbach M, Flepp M, Malinverni R. Discontinuation of primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected adults treated with combination antiretroviral therapy. Swiss HIV Cohort Study. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 29;340(17):1301-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904293401701.
- Results publication: PubMed 10218526Weverling GJ, Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Kirk O, Gonzales-Lahoz J, d'Arminio Monforte A, Proenca R, Phillips AN, Lundgren JD, Reiss P. Discontinuation of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis after start of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. EuroSIDA Study Group. Lancet. 1999 Apr 17;353(9161):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03287-0.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
George Miiro, MSc, MBChB principal investigator
MRC/UVRI Unit
Heiner Grosskurth, PhD, MD study director
MRC/UVRI Unit
Paula Munderi, MRCP, MBChB principal investigator
MRC/UVRI Unit
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing cotrimoxazole in people with HIV Infections, run by MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit at 1 site in Uganda.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact George Mukalazi Miiro, MSc, MBChB (256-414-320-272, george.miiro@mrcuganda.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
all-cause morbidity such as pneumonia or malaria (presumptive and definitive diagnosis) (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00674921, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2008.