AzTrials
AzTrials

InfectionsPhase 4TIVADNCT00665873

Antibiotic Therapy is Not Necessary to Implant Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices: Randomized Prospective Study

A Phase 4 study testing PORT-A-CATH (Smiths Medical Inc., MN) and Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in people with Infections, run by University of Catania.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BACKGROUND: The growing use of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) has caused the simultaneous increase of various complications. The infection of the TIVAD or the subcutaneous pocket in which the device is positioned is one of the most encountered complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Infections
What is being tested?
PORT-A-CATH (Smiths Medical Inc., MN) and Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2004to Sep 2006
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age
  • Gender
  • Comorbidity
  • White cells
  • Platelets
  • Prothrombin time
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Any kind of tumoral disease
  • Numbers of chemotherapeutical cures before the surgical procedure
  • Experience of surgeons
  • Preparation of the skin of the patients
  • Time and kind of hand scrub of the surgeons
  • Kind of antibiotic used, and time of administration.

Who cannot join

  • None

About this study

BACKGROUND: The growing use of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) has caused the simultaneous increase of various complications. The infection of the TIVAD or the subcutaneous pocket in which the device is positioned is one of the most encountered complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of the antibiotic in the prevention of the infection of the surgical site and the TIVAD until 30 days after the implant.

METHODS: The authors enrolled one hundred consecutive patients divided into two randomized arms: group A (antibiotic), group B (no antibiotic), each of 50 patients. All the patients were affected by solid tumors needing chemotherapy continuously. TIVADs were implanted surgically in cephalic vein. Signs or symptoms considered were: pain, localized swelling, redness, and heat. White cell count was considered on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days, and the tests were made in the in-hospital laboratory. Body temperatures were checked twice daily for 7 days.

Read the detailed description

PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred consecutive patients were enrolled for the present study from January 2004 to September 2006. The patients were divided into two arms, each of 50 patients, and they were randomized using sealed envelopes that were opened only in the operating room 30 min before the start of the procedure. All the patients were aged more than 18 years and were affected by solid tumors. In all the patients, the TIVAD was necessary to infuse chemotherapy continuously. The type of device utilized in all patients was composed of a catheter of polyurethane and a titanium portal reservoir covered with polysulfone (PORT-A-CATH, Smiths Medical Inc., MN).

Age, gender, comorbidity (cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, coagulopathy, diabetes), white cells, platelets, prothrombin time (less than 70%), kind of tumoral disease, numbers of chemotherapeutical cures before the surgical procedure, experience of surgeons (resident or surgeon), preparation of the skin of the patients, time and kind of hand scrub of the surgeons, kind of antibiotic used, and time of administration were considered for the present study. All the devices were implanted in the operating room using the cephalic vein dissected surgically; the technique used has been previously described.3 White cell count was considered on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days, and the tests were made in the in-hospital laboratory. Body temperatures were checked twice daily for 7 days. Eight days after the surgical procedure, sutures of the skin were removed. The skin wound was covered with a sterile drape until the ninth postoperative day. After this time, the patients used any skin protection, but the skin wound was checked one time each week for a total of 30 days. All the devices were used to infuse chemotherapy drugs 10 days after the surgical procedure. From the 10th to the 30th days, the devices were used, at minimum, one time.

A single dose of cephalosporin (1 gr of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid ) was administered intravenously 10 min before the skin incision.

For the surgical site infections (SSI), the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia,9 were applied. By these criteria, SSIs are classified as being either incisional or organ/space. Incisional SSIs are further divided into those involving only skin and subcutaneous tissue (superficial incisional SSI) and those involving deeper soft tissues of the incision (deep incisional SSI). Organ/space SSIs involve any part of the anatomy (e.g., organ or space) other than incised body wall layers that was opened or manipulated during the operation (Fig. 1).

The following signs or symptoms for defining a superficial incisional infection were considered: pain, localized swelling, redness, and heat.9 Infection was considered if these signs and symptoms occurred within 30 days after the surgical procedure, and the end points were considered to be a body temperature more than 37.5°C, white cells more than 11,000 K/æL, and one or more of the following signs: pain, localized swelling, redness, or heat.

The state of the skin was evaluated in people with the same surgical team, which was composed of the surgeons (one skilled, with more than 400 previous procedures, and one resident, with 20 previous procedures) and two nurses.

Following these rules, depending on the results of a computer-generated randomization enclosed in sealed envelopes, 100 patients were divided into two groups of 50 patients: group A (patients were submitted to the short-term prophylaxis with cefalosporin 10 min before skin incision) and group B (patients without any antibiotic prophylaxis). All the patients were hospitalized the night after the surgical procedure. A statistical study, to compare the means and standard deviations of each group, was performed using Student's t-test (independent, two-sided).

Conditions
Infections
Being tested
PORT-A-CATH (Smiths Medical Inc., MN), Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid
Keywords
Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices, Infections, Chemotherapy, Valuated infections TIVAD
Medical subject headings
Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PORT-A-CATH (Smiths Medical Inc., MN)Device

    Also called Totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD)

    Port a Cath implanted by surgical cut-down

  • Amoxicillin and clavulanic acidDrug

    Also called Antibiotics vs no antibiotics

    1 gr i.v. before the procedure

Study groups in NCT00665873
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AActive comparatorAntibiotics
Receives: Device: PORT-A-CATH (Smiths Medical Inc., MN); Drug: Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid
BActive comparatorNo Antibiotics
Receives: Device: PORT-A-CATH (Smiths Medical Inc., MN)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2004
  3. Primary completionSep 2006
  4. Study completionSep 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00665873
Sponsor's protocol ID
1-28064152
Acronym
TIVAD
Status last verified
May 2008
First submitted
2 Apr 2008
Last updated
8 May 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing PORT-A-CATH (Smiths Medical Inc., MN) and Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in people with Infections, run by University of Catania.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in