AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Mountain SicknessPhase 3NCT00664001

Anti-Oxidant Supplementation for the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness

A Phase 3 study testing Anti-oxidant supplementation in people with Acute Mountain Sickness, run by Altitude Physiology Expeditions at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute mountain sickness (AMS), high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), and high altitude cerebral edema (HACE) are complications of rapid ascent to high altitude. Several features suggest that raised intracranial pressure (ICP) may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of AMS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Acute Mountain Sickness
What is being tested?
Anti-oxidant supplementation
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
83 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2003to Dec 2003
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants in Apex 2 trial

Who cannot join

  • High altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE)
  • Gasto-intestinal illness

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • University of Edinburgh

    Edinburgh

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Oral Anti-Oxidant Supplementation for the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness.

Acute mountain sickness (AMS), high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), and high altitude cerebral edema (HACE) are complications of rapid ascent to high altitude. Several features suggest that raised intracranial pressure (ICP) may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of AMS. Magnetic resonance imaging of HACE patients has demonstrated that the oedema in HACE is of the vasogenic, rather that cytotoxic, type. Thus it is likely that cerebrovascular permeability has an important role in the development of AMS and HACE.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to alter the permeability of the blood-brain barrier in severe ischaemia, causing vasogenic cerebral oedema. Endogenous antioxidant systems may have some capacity to respond to oxidative stress in hypoxia. The plasma concentration of urate, a powerful endogenous antioxidant, rises on acute exposure to high altitude and may play a crucial antioxidant role in systemic hypoxia. This antioxidant prevents free-radical induced cerebral oedema in animal models.

Read more

There are numerous sources of ROS in hypoxia, including the mitochondrial electron transfer chain, haemoglobin (Hb) autoxidation and xanthine oxidase activity. There have been several reports of raised markers of oxidative stress in humans at moderate altitude (<3000m).

Oral antioxidant supplementation with preparations containing vitamins C and E in humans at altitude has been shown to decrease breath pentanes (a marker of oxidative stress), and improve erythrocyte filterability. In a small randomised controlled trial, Bailey and Davies demonstrated a significant reduction in symptoms of AMS in subjects taking an oral antioxidant cocktail.

The antioxidants alpha-lipoic acid, vitamin C and vitamin E act synergistically to provide membrane protection from free radical damage, and may protect against hypoxia-induced vascular leakage. We hypothesised that this combination of antioxidants would reduce the severity of acute mountain sickness, and reduce pulmonary artery pressures, in healthy lowlanders acutely exposed to high altitude.

Read the detailed description

Acute mountain sickness (AMS), high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), and high altitude cerebral edema (HACE) are complications of rapid ascent to high altitude. By definition, AMS is a benign condition, but it is likely that the same pathology underlies high altitude cerebral oedema (HACE). In contrast, HAPE occurs in the context of pathologically elevated pulmonary artery pressures and uneven distribution of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction across the pulmonary vascular bed.

Several features suggest that raised intracranial pressure (ICP) may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of AMS. Magnetic resonance imaging of HACE patients has demonstrated that the oedema in HACE is of the vasogenic, rather that cytotoxic, type. Thus it is likely that cerebrovascular permeability has an important role in the development of AMS and HACE.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to alter the permeability of the blood-brain barrier in severe ischaemia, causing vasogenic cerebral oedema. Endogenous antioxidant systems may have some capacity to respond to oxidative stress in hypoxia. The plasma concentration of urate, a powerful endogenous antioxidant, rises on acute exposure to high altitude and may play a crucial antioxidant role in systemic hypoxia. This antioxidant prevents free-radical induced cerebral oedema in animal models.

The pathogenesis of HAPE is understood to have two components: (i) increased pulmonary arterial pressures secondary to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and; (ii) an increase in endothelial permeability, possibly due to stress rupture of pulmonary capillaries. There is much debate surrounding the cellular mechanisms of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, but it is likely that ROS have an important role.

There are numerous sources of ROS in hypoxia, including the mitochondrial electron transfer chain, haemoglobin (Hb) autoxidation and xanthine oxidase activity. There have been several reports of raised markers of oxidative stress in humans at moderate altitude (<3000m).

Oral antioxidant supplementation with preparations containing vitamins C and E in humans at altitude has been shown to decrease breath pentanes (a marker of oxidative stress), and improve erythrocyte filterability. In a small randomised controlled trial, Bailey and Davies demonstrated a significant reduction in symptoms of AMS in subjects taking an oral antioxidant cocktail.

The antioxidants alpha-lipoic acid, vitamin C and vitamin E act synergistically to provide membrane protection from free radical damage, and may protect against hypoxia-induced vascular leakage. We hypothesised that this combination of antioxidants would reduce the severity of acute mountain sickness, and reduce pulmonary artery pressures, in healthy lowlanders acutely exposed to high altitude.

Being tested
Anti-oxidant supplementation, Matched placebo for anti-oxidant supplementation
Medical subject headings
Altitude Sickness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anti-oxidant supplementationDietary supplement

    Daily dose of 1g L-ascorbic acid, 400 IU of alpha-tocopherol acetate, and 600mg of alpha-lipoic acid in sealed capsules as anti-oxidant supplementation.

  • Matched placebo for anti-oxidant supplementationDietary supplement

    Matched placebo for anti-oxidant supplementation

Study groups in NCT00664001
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlPlacebo comparatorPlacebo tablet
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Matched placebo for anti-oxidant supplementation
InterventionActive comparatorAnti-oxidant supplementation
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Anti-oxidant supplementation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS) as assessed by Lake Louise Consensus symptom score

    Measured: Day 2

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure

    Measured: Day 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2003
  3. Primary completionAug 2003
  4. Study completionDec 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
83 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00664001
Sponsor's protocol ID
Anti-oxidant
Status last verified
Apr 2008
First submitted
7 Apr 2008
Last updated
22 Apr 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Hall DP, MacCormick IJ, Phythian-Adams AT, Rzechorzek NM, Hope-Jones D, Cosens S, Jackson S, Bates MG, Collier DJ, Hume DA, Freeman T, Thompson AA, Baillie JK. Network analysis reveals distinct clinical syndromes underlying acute mountain sickness. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e81229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081229. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24465370
  • MacCormick IJ, Somner J, Morris DS, MacGillivray TJ, Bourne RR, Huang SS, MacCormick A, Aspinall PA, Baillie JK, Thompson AA, Dhillon B. Retinal vessel tortuosity in response to hypobaric hypoxia. High Alt Med Biol. 2012 Dec;13(4):263-8. doi: 10.1089/ham.2011.1097.

    PubMed 23270443
  • Baillie JK, Thompson AA, Irving JB, Bates MG, Sutherland AI, Macnee W, Maxwell SR, Webb DJ. Oral antioxidant supplementation does not prevent acute mountain sickness: double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. QJM. 2009 May;102(5):341-8. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp026. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

    PubMed 19273551

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Anti-oxidant supplementation in people with Acute Mountain Sickness, run by Altitude Physiology Expeditions at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS) as assessed by Lake Louise Consensus symptom score (time frame: Day 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00664001, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in