AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary Bladder, OveractivePhase 3ARIESNCT00662909

A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 125 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is intended to test the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What is being tested?
Mirabegron
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
2,149 participants
Where
125 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
28 Mar 2008to 22 Apr 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
  • Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥ 3 months
  • Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period

Who cannot join

  • Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
  • Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
  • Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
  • Patient has diabetic neuropathy
  • Patient has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
  • Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patient has severe hypertension
  • Patient has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or any of the other inactive ingredients
  • Patient has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days
  • Patient had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Patient has serum creatinine of >150 μmol/L, or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or Gamma glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) > 3x ULN
  • Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)

Trial locations and contacts

125 sites in 2 countries.

125 sites in 2 countries

United States109 sites
  • Study site

    Albany, New York, 12208

  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109

  • Study site

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005

  • Study site

    Anchorage, Alaska, 99508

  • Study site

    Arlington, Texas, 76017

  • Study site

    Atherton, California, 94027

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30328

  • Study site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80012

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas, 78759

  • Study site

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Study site

    Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004

  • Study site

    Bethany, Oklahoma, 73008

  • Study site

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Study site

    Billings, Montana, 59102

  • Study site

    Bristol, Tennessee, 37620

  • Study site

    Buena Park, California, 90620

  • Study site

    Burbank, California, 91506

  • Study site

    Carmichael, California, 95608

  • Study site

    Cary, North Carolina, 27518

  • Study site

    Celebration, Florida, 34747

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212

  • Study site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Study site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33761

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44122

  • Study site

    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214

  • Study site

    Concord, North Carolina, 28025

  • Study site

    Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Study site

    Decatur, Georgia, 30034

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado, 80211

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado, 80218

  • Study site

    Des Moines, Iowa, 50309

  • Study site

    Edmond, Oklahoma, 73034

  • Study site

    Endwell, New York, 13760

  • Study site

    Englewood, Colorado, 80112

  • Study site

    Fargo, North Dakota, 58104

  • Study site

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33916

  • Study site

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825

  • Study site

    Fresno, California, 93720

  • Study site

    Garden City, New York, 11530

  • Study site

    Greenbelt, Maryland, 20770

  • Study site

    Greer, South Carolina, 29650

  • Study site

    Homewood, Alabama, 35209

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77024

  • Study site

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • Study site

    Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404

  • Study site

    Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130

  • Study site

    Kingston, New York, 12401

  • Study site

    La Mesa, California, 91942

  • Study site

    Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148

  • Study site

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California, 90017

  • Study site

    Lyndhurst, Ohio, 44124

  • Study site

    Melrose Park, Illinois, 60160

  • Study site

    Mission Hills, California, 91345

  • Study site

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Study site

    Montgomery, Alabama, 36117

  • Study site

    Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043

  • Study site

    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464

  • Study site

    New Britain, Connecticut, 06052

  • Study site

    Newburgh, Indiana, 47630

  • Study site

    Newport Beach, California, 92660

  • Study site

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Study site

    North Kansas City, Missouri, 64116

  • Study site

    Ocala, Florida, 34471

  • Study site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Study site

    Orange, California, 92869

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida, 32803

  • Study site

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024

  • Study site

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33027

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85051

  • Study site

    Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601

  • Study site

    Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611

  • Study site

    Roswell, Georgia, 30076

  • Study site

    Sacramento, California, 95816

  • Study site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Study site

    San Bernardino, California, 92404

  • Study site

    San Diego, California, 92108

  • Study site

    San Diego, California, 92120

  • Study site

    San Francisco, California, 94102

  • Study site

    Sarasota, Florida, 34237

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington, 98166

  • Study site

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106

  • Study site

    Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681

  • Study site

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Study site

    Springfield, Massachusetts, 01103

  • Study site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Study site

    Tallahassee, Florida, 32308

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • Study site

    Tarzana, California, 91356

  • Study site

    Torrance, California, 90505

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85741

  • Study site

    Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281

  • Study site

    Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886

  • Study site

    Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708

  • Study site

    Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472

  • Study site

    Wellington, Florida, 33414

  • Study site

    West Orange, New Jersey, 07052

  • Study site

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407

  • Study site

    Wichita, Kansas, 57207

  • Study site

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401

  • Study site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

Canada16 sites
  • Study site

    Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1

  • Study site

    Brampton, Ontario, L6T 4S5

  • Study site

    Granby, Quebec, J2G 8Z9

  • Study site

    Kitchener, Ontario, N2N 2B9

  • Study site

    Newmarket, Ontario, L3X 1W1

  • Study site

    North Bay, Ontario, P1B 7K8

  • Study site

    Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 1B9

  • Study site

    Owen Sound, Ontario, M4K 2J1

  • Study site

    Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 4S3

  • Study site

    Saint Johns, New Brunswick, E2L 3J8

  • Study site

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1N1

  • Study site

    Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 6E7

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M6S 4W4

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8T 5G1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

The study is intended to test the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder

Being tested
Mirabegron, Placebo
Keywords
Frequency, YM178, Overactive bladder (OAB), Micturition, Urgency, Urinary urge incontinence, Urinary incontinence
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence, Urge, Urinary Incontinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MirabegronDrug

    Also called YM178, Myrebtriq

    Oral

  • PlaceboDrug

    Oral

Study groups in NCT00662909
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Mirabegron 50 mgExperimentalParticipants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Mirabegron
Mirabegron 100 mgExperimentalParticipants received mirabegron 100 m tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Mirabegron

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)

  2. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

    The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency

    Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

    Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

    The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  12. Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit

    The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  13. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit

    The percentage of participants with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score

    Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score

    Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  16. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week12

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  18. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  19. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  20. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  21. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

    The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  22. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)

    The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  23. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician

    The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  24. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit

    The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a 1 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a 2 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  25. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed.

    In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  26. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  27. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score

    The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  28. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  29. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Mar 2008
  3. Primary completion22 Apr 2009
  4. Study completion22 Apr 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
2,149 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00662909
Sponsor's protocol ID
178-CL-047
Acronym
ARIES
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
17 Apr 2008
Last updated
20 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Publications

  • Nitti VW, Auerbach S, Martin N, Calhoun A, Lee M, Herschorn S. Results of a randomized phase III trial of mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder. J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

    PubMed 23079373
  • Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.

    PubMed 24246044

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 125 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 125 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours (time frame: Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00662909, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in