Substance-Related DisordersNCT00661674
Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine to Reduce Opioid Withdrawal
A study testing Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine in people with Substance-Related Disorders, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Opioid medications are commonly used for pain relief. When given over time, physical dependence can occur. This results in unpleasant side effects--such as agitation and nausea--if opioid medications are suddenly stopped. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Substance-Related Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2008to Aug 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy males
- Ages 18-35
- No allergies to morphine or palonosetron
- No history of addiction or substance abuse
Who cannot join
- Female
- Younger than 18 or older than 35
- History of substance abuse
- Raynaud's disease or coronary artery disease
- Allergies to morphine or palonosetron
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: Examination of Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine Pre-treatment as a Possible Method to Reduce the Objective Signs of Experimentally-induced Acute Opioid Withdrawal in Humans: a Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study
Opioid medications are commonly used for pain relief. When given over time, physical dependence can occur. This results in unpleasant side effects--such as agitation and nausea--if opioid medications are suddenly stopped. We are interested in knowing if a medication named Ondansetron can help ease or prevent symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal. We are also interested in knowing if a similar (but more potent FDA-approved drug, palonosetron) can more effectively treat withdrawal symptoms with or without combination with an antihistamine called hydroxyzine (vistaril).
Read the detailed description
We hope to learn if Palonosetron and/or combination with hydroxyzine can be used to prevent or attenuate the signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal. If we find that it can help prevent these symptoms, it may become a new treatment that can aid patients suffering from these symptoms.
- Conditions
- Substance-Related Disorders
- Being tested
- Palonosetron, Hydroxyzine, Placebo
- Keywords
- Palonosetron, Hydroxyzine, Acute opioid withdrawal
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PalonosetronDrug
Also called Aloxi
Over 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens:
- Placebo saline IV and sugar pill
- 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill
- 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO
HydroxyzineDrug
Also called Vistaril, Atarax
Over 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens:
- Placebo saline IV and sugar pill
- 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill
- 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO
PlaceboOther
Over 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens:
- Placebo saline IV and sugar pill
- 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill
- 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron | Experimental | At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15.
Week 1: Placebo
Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Week 3: Palonosetron Receives: Drug: Palonosetron; Drug: Hydroxyzine; Other: Placebo |
| Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo | Experimental | At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15.
Week 1: Palonosetron
Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Week 3: Placebo Receives: Drug: Palonosetron; Drug: Hydroxyzine; Other: Placebo |
| Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron | Experimental | At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15.
Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Week 2: Placebo
Week 3: Palonosetron Receives: Drug: Palonosetron; Drug: Hydroxyzine; Other: Placebo |
| Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo | Experimental | At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15.
Week 1: Placebo
Week 2: Palonosetron only
Week 3: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Receives: Drug: Palonosetron; Drug: Hydroxyzine; Other: Placebo |
| Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo | Experimental | At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15.
Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Week 2: Palonosetron only
Week 3: Placebo Receives: Drug: Palonosetron; Drug: Hydroxyzine; Other: Placebo |
| Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo | Experimental | At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15.
Week 1: Palonosetron only
Week 2: Placebo
Week 3:Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Receives: Drug: Palonosetron; Drug: Hydroxyzine; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
OOWS Score
The OOWS is a 13-item instrument documenting physically observable signs of withdrawal, which are rated as present (1) or absent (0) during the observation period. Maximum score possible = 13, minimum score possible = 0. T=15 minutes post naloxone administration coordinates with T = 180 (min) for the entire study session.
OOWS scores at T=180 is the primary outcome measure of the study compared with baseline OOWS scores at T=-30 (30 minutes prior to study medication administration). Reported time frames are in relation to time past since administration of study medications.
Mean post-Naloxone OOWS scores (+/- SEM) were determined for pretreatment groups
Measured: Change from baseline in OOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)
Secondary outcomes (1)
SOWS Score
The SOWS score is composed of 16 subjective symptoms rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 4=extremely) based on what subjects were experiencing at the time of testing. 15 minutes post naloxone administration coordinates with T = 180 (min) for the entire study session.
The highest score possible (64) would indicate that the individual was experiencing every symptom of opioid withdrawal to the fullest extent possible while the lowest score (0) would indicate that the individual was not experiencing any symptoms of opioid withdrawal.
Mean post-naloxone SOWS scores (+/- SEM) were computed for pretreatment groups: Placebo, palonosetron, and palonosetron with hydroxyzine
Measured: Change from baseline in SOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2008
- Primary completionAug 2008
- Study completionAug 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (33)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Substance-Related DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- There were three treatment arms to the study: Placebo, Palonosetron, and Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine (Combo). Participants were not randomized in between these arms, all participants completed each arm of the study in a cross-over study methodology (Placebo, Palonosetron, Palonosetron + Hydroxyzene (combo). Participants were individually randomized into the order in which they participated in each arm. Per sequence each individual participant underwent the following randomization schedule: Participant 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron Participant 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo Participant 3: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo Participant 4: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron Participant 5: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo Participant 6: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo Participant 7: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron Participant 8: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo Participant 9: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo Participant 10: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Larry Fu-nien Chu, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Dr Larry Fu-nien Chu, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00661674
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SU-04152008-1099
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2008
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Committee on Advancing Pain Research Care and Education, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine. A call for cultural transformation of attitudes toward pain and its prevention and management. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25(4):365-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2011.621516.
PubMed 22126167Kuehn BM. Opioid prescriptions soar: increase in legitimate use as well as abuse. JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):249-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.249. No abstract available.
PubMed 17227967Manchikanti L, Helm S 2nd, Fellows B, Janata JW, Pampati V, Grider JS, Boswell MV. Opioid epidemic in the United States. Pain Physician. 2012 Jul;15(3 Suppl):ES9-38.
PubMed 22786464Kobinger W, Walland A. Investigations into the mechanism of the hypotensive effect of 2-(2,6-dichlorphenylamino)-2-imidazoline-HCl. Eur J Pharmacol. 1967 Dec;2(3):155-62. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(67)90080-5. No abstract available.
PubMed 5626889Chu LF, Liang DY, Li X, Sahbaie P, D'arcy N, Liao G, Peltz G, David Clark J. From mouse to man: the 5-HT3 receptor modulates physical dependence on opioid narcotics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009 Mar;19(3):193-205. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328322e73d.
PubMed 19214139Costall B, Jones BJ, Kelly ME, Naylor RJ, Onaivi ES, Tyers MB. Sites of action of ondansetron to inhibit withdrawal from drugs of abuse. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 May;36(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90132-2.
PubMed 2140900Gulati A, Bhargava HN. Brain and spinal cord 5-HT2 receptors of morphine-tolerant-dependent and -abstinent rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989 Aug 22;167(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90578-5.
PubMed 2591474Tao R, Ma Z, Auerbach SB. Alteration in regulation of serotonin release in rat dorsal raphe nucleus after prolonged exposure to morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Jul;286(1):481-8.
PubMed 9655893Ingram SL, Vaughan CW, Bagley EE, Connor M, Christie MJ. Enhanced opioid efficacy in opioid dependence is caused by an altered signal transduction pathway. J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 15;18(24):10269-76. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10269.1998.
PubMed 9852564Tao R, Auerbach SB. Involvement of the dorsal raphe but not median raphe nucleus in morphine-induced increases in serotonin release in the rat forebrain. Neuroscience. 1995 Sep;68(2):553-61. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00154-b.
PubMed 7477965Pinelli A, Trivulzio S, Tomasoni L. Effects of ondansetron administration on opioid withdrawal syndrome observed in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997 Dec 11;340(2-3):111-9. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(97)01349-6.
PubMed 9537805Smith HS, Cox LR, Smith EJ. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the treatment of nausea/vomiting. Ann Palliat Med. 2012 Jul;1(2):115-20. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2012.07.07.
PubMed 25841471Compton P, Miotto K, Elashoff D. Precipitated opioid withdrawal across acute physical dependence induction methods. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Feb;77(2):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2003.10.017.
PubMed 14751453Grunberg SM, Koeller JM. Palonosetron: a unique 5-HT3-receptor antagonist for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003 Dec;4(12):2297-303. doi: 10.1517/14656566.4.12.2297.
PubMed 14640928Mustian KM, Devine K, Ryan JL, Janelsins MC, Sprod LK, Peppone LJ, Candelario GD, Mohile SG, Morrow GR. Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting During Chemotherapy. US Oncol Hematol. 2011;7(2):91-97. doi: 10.17925/ohr.2011.07.2.91.
PubMed 24466408
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Examination of Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine Pre-treatment as a Possible Method to Reduce the Objective Signs of Experimentally-induced Acute Opioid Withdrawal in Humans: a Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00661674
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SU-04152008-1099
- Conditions
- Substance-Related Disorders
- Keywords
- Palonosetron, Hydroxyzine, Acute opioid withdrawal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2008
- Primary completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jun 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Opioid medications are commonly used for pain relief. When given over time, physical dependence can occur. This results in unpleasant side effects--such as agitation and nausea--if opioid medications are suddenly stopped. We are interested in knowing if a medication named Ondansetron can help ease or prevent symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal. We are also interested in knowing if a similar (but more potent FDA-approved drug, palonosetron) can more effectively treat withdrawal symptoms with or without combination with an antihistamine called hydroxyzine (vistaril).
Detailed description
We hope to learn if Palonosetron and/or combination with hydroxyzine can be used to prevent or attenuate the signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal. If we find that it can help prevent these symptoms, it may become a new treatment that can aid patients suffering from these symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- There were three treatment arms to the study: Placebo, Palonosetron, and Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine (Combo). Participants were not randomized in between these arms, all participants completed each arm of the study in a cross-over study methodology (Placebo, Palonosetron, Palonosetron + Hydroxyzene (combo). Participants were individually randomized into the order in which they participated in each arm. Per sequence each individual participant underwent the following randomization schedule: Participant 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron Participant 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo Participant 3: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo Participant 4: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron Participant 5: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo Participant 6: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo Participant 7: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron Participant 8: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo Participant 9: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo Participant 10: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron | Experimental | Drug: Palonosetron, Drug: Hydroxyzine, Other: PlaceboAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Palonosetron |
| Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Palonosetron, Drug: Hydroxyzine, Other: PlaceboAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Placebo |
| Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron | Experimental | Drug: Palonosetron, Drug: Hydroxyzine, Other: PlaceboAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Placebo Week 3: Palonosetron |
| Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo | Experimental | Drug: Palonosetron, Drug: Hydroxyzine, Other: PlaceboAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo |
| Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Palonosetron, Drug: Hydroxyzine, Other: PlaceboAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Placebo |
| Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo | Experimental | Drug: Palonosetron, Drug: Hydroxyzine, Other: PlaceboAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron only Week 2: Placebo Week 3:Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Healthy males
- Ages 18-35
- No allergies to morphine or palonosetron
- No history of addiction or substance abuse
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Female
- Younger than 18 or older than 35
- History of substance abuse
- Raynaud's disease or coronary artery disease
- Allergies to morphine or palonosetron
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PalonosetronAlso: AloxiOver 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens: * Placebo saline IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO | Drug | Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron, Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo, Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron, Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo, Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo, Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo |
| HydroxyzineAlso: Vistaril, AtaraxOver 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens: * Placebo saline IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO | Drug | Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron, Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo, Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron, Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo, Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo, Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo |
| PlaceboOver 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens: * Placebo saline IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO | Other | Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron, Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo, Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron, Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo, Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo, Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo |
Primary outcome
OOWS Score
Time frame: Change from baseline in OOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)
The OOWS is a 13-item instrument documenting physically observable signs of withdrawal, which are rated as present (1) or absent (0) during the observation period. Maximum score possible = 13, minimum score possible = 0. T=15 minutes post naloxone administration coordinates with T = 180 (min) for the entire study session. OOWS scores at T=180 is the primary outcome measure of the study compared with baseline OOWS scores at T=-30 (30 minutes prior to study medication administration). Reported time frames are in relation to time past since administration of study medications. Mean post-Naloxone OOWS scores (+/- SEM) were determined for pretreatment groups
1 secondary outcome
SOWS Score
Time frame: Change from baseline in SOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22126167Committee on Advancing Pain Research Care and Education, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine. A call for cultural transformation of attitudes toward pain and its prevention and management. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25(4):365-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2011.621516.
- Background: PubMed 17227967Kuehn BM. Opioid prescriptions soar: increase in legitimate use as well as abuse. JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):249-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.249. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22786464Manchikanti L, Helm S 2nd, Fellows B, Janata JW, Pampati V, Grider JS, Boswell MV. Opioid epidemic in the United States. Pain Physician. 2012 Jul;15(3 Suppl):ES9-38.
- Background: PubMed 5626889Kobinger W, Walland A. Investigations into the mechanism of the hypotensive effect of 2-(2,6-dichlorphenylamino)-2-imidazoline-HCl. Eur J Pharmacol. 1967 Dec;2(3):155-62. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(67)90080-5. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19214139Chu LF, Liang DY, Li X, Sahbaie P, D'arcy N, Liao G, Peltz G, David Clark J. From mouse to man: the 5-HT3 receptor modulates physical dependence on opioid narcotics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009 Mar;19(3):193-205. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328322e73d.
- Background: PubMed 2140900Costall B, Jones BJ, Kelly ME, Naylor RJ, Onaivi ES, Tyers MB. Sites of action of ondansetron to inhibit withdrawal from drugs of abuse. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 May;36(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90132-2.
- Background: PubMed 2591474Gulati A, Bhargava HN. Brain and spinal cord 5-HT2 receptors of morphine-tolerant-dependent and -abstinent rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989 Aug 22;167(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90578-5.
- Background: PubMed 9655893Tao R, Ma Z, Auerbach SB. Alteration in regulation of serotonin release in rat dorsal raphe nucleus after prolonged exposure to morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Jul;286(1):481-8.
- Background: PubMed 9852564Ingram SL, Vaughan CW, Bagley EE, Connor M, Christie MJ. Enhanced opioid efficacy in opioid dependence is caused by an altered signal transduction pathway. J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 15;18(24):10269-76. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10269.1998.
- Background: PubMed 7477965Tao R, Auerbach SB. Involvement of the dorsal raphe but not median raphe nucleus in morphine-induced increases in serotonin release in the rat forebrain. Neuroscience. 1995 Sep;68(2):553-61. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00154-b.
- Background: PubMed 9537805Pinelli A, Trivulzio S, Tomasoni L. Effects of ondansetron administration on opioid withdrawal syndrome observed in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997 Dec 11;340(2-3):111-9. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(97)01349-6.
- Background: PubMed 25841471Smith HS, Cox LR, Smith EJ. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the treatment of nausea/vomiting. Ann Palliat Med. 2012 Jul;1(2):115-20. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2012.07.07.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Substance-Related Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Development of an Interview-Informed Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) for Opioid Use in the Era of Fentanyl
Substance Use Disorders (SUDs)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Substance Use and Media Preferences
Substance Use Behavior, Cannabis Intoxication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr Larry Fu-nien Chu principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine in people with Substance-Related Disorders, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
OOWS Score (time frame: Change from baseline in OOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00661674, which also lists 33 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2017.