Plaque PsoriasisPhase 4NCT00658606
Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept With Narrow Band Ultraviolet B Phototherapy (nbUVB) vs. Alefacept Alone in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Subjects
A Phase 4 study testing alefacept and Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 12 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Assess the efficacy and safety of alefacept with nbUVB compared to alefacept alone in chronic plaque psoriasis subjects. Combination therapy may improve the clinical response to psoriatic subjects as both modalities have an effect on T cells Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Plaque Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- alefacept and Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has given written informed consent
- Subject has a diagnosis of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis involving >=10% with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score >=10 at Baseline
- Subject has CD4+ T lymphocyte (CD4) count at or above the lower limit of normal
- Male and female subjects must use an adequate means of contraception from screening to end of study.
Who cannot join
- Subject who received alefacept in the past
- Subject who has shown no improvement following an adequate course of nbUVB in the past
- Subject who has been treated in the past with either therapy or cyclosporine
- Subject with any active cancer, including skin cancer at Baseline
- Subject with erythrodermic, pustular or predominantly guttate psoriasis
- Subject who has used treatment for psoriasis prior to Baseline as follows:
Show all 16Show fewer
- Topical treatment within 14 days
- Oral treatment within 28 days
- Broad band UVB (bbUVB) or nbUVB treatment within 56 days
- Biological treatment within 84 days
- Serious local infection or serious systemic infection within the 3 months prior to the first dose of study drug
- Subject with a history of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years
- Subject that is known to be infected with the AIDS virus
- Subject with any other skin disease or other disease that might interfere with psoriasis status assessments
- Female subject who is nursing, pregnant or planning to become pregnant while in this study
- Subject who is currently enrolled in any other investigational drug or device study
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Canada12 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta, T2S 3B3
Study site
London, Ontario, N5X 2P1
Study site
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1A8
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4L5
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1V4
Study site
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1X7
Study site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4X7
Study site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8
Study site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 2H5
Study site
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B6
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E8
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Combination With Narrow-band UVB (nbUVB) Compared to Alefacept Alone in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Assess the efficacy and safety of alefacept with nbUVB compared to alefacept alone in chronic plaque psoriasis subjects. Combination therapy may improve the clinical response to psoriatic subjects as both modalities have an effect on T cells
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Being tested
- alefacept, Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy
- Keywords
- plaque psoriasis, alefacept, Amevive, narrow band ultraviolet B, phototherapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
alefaceptDrug
Also called Amevive, ASP0485
IM
Narrow Band UVB PhototherapyProcedure or surgery
UVB Phototherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alefacept alone | Active comparator | 15 mg alefacept intramuscularly (IM) once weekly for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: alefacept |
| Alefacept + nbUVB | Experimental | 15 mg alefacept intramuscularly once weekly and narrow band Ultraviolet B (nbUVB) phototherapy 3 times per week for 12 weeks Receives: Procedure: Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 16
The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).
PASI 75 was defined as an improvement of at least 75% in PASI as compared to Baseline.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of Subjects Reaching PASI 75 Over the Entire Course of the Study
The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).
PASI 75 was defined as an improvement of at least 75% in PASI as compared to Baseline.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Week 36
Change in Body Surface Area (BSA) Covered With Psoriasis at Week 16
A negative change from Baseline represents improvement.
Change is calculated as Week 16- Baseline.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change in Body Surface Area (BSA) Covered With Psoriasis Over the Entire Course of the Study
A negative change from Baseline represents improvement.
Change is calculated as Week 36- Baseline.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Physical Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 16
The PGA scale is a tool used to evaluate the degree of overall lesion severity. The scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). Clear is defined as a score of 0; Almost Clear is defined as a score of 1.
Subjects who achieved PGA of clear or almost clear at any visit during the study were assigned to the YES category for their respective groups.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Physical Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Almost Clear Over the Entire Course of the Study
The PGA scale is a tool used to evaluate the degree of overall lesion severity. The scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). Clear is defined as a score of 0; Almost Clear is defined as a score of 1.
Subjects who achieved PGA of clear or almost clear at any visit during the study were assigned to the YES category for their respective groups.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Week 36
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve PASI 90 at Week 16
The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).
PASI 90 was defined as an improvement of at least 90% in PASI as compared to Baseline.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Week 16
Time to Relapse
The analysis only included subjects who achieved a 75% improvement in PASI and then relapsed.
Relapse is defined by a loss of 50% of improvement in PASI.
Measured: Week 36
Time for 50% Decrease in PASI
The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).
Only subjects who experienced 50% decrease in PASI were included in the analysis.
Measured: Week 36
Time for a 75% Decrease in PASI
The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).
Only subjects who experienced 75% decrease in PASI were included in the analysis.
Measured: Week 36
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
The DLQI questionnaire is intended to measure how much a subject's skin problem affects the subject's life. Subjects provide answers considering the past week. The scale of the DQLI ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst).
A negative change from Baseline represents improvement.
Change is calculated as Week 36- Baseline.
The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma Canada, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Use Central Contact, Study director, Astellas Pharma Canada, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00658606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AME-001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2008
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lui H, Gulliver W, Tan J, Hong CH, Hull P, Shear NH, Paradiso-Hardy F, Bissonette R. A randomized controlled study of combination therapy with alefacept and narrow band UVB phototherapy (UVB) for moderate to severe psoriasis: efficacy, onset, and duration of response. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Aug;11(8):929-37.
PubMed 22859237
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Combination With Narrow-band UVB (nbUVB) Compared to Alefacept Alone in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00658606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AME-001
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Keywords
- plaque psoriasis, alefacept, Amevive, narrow band ultraviolet B, phototherapy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma Canada, Inc.
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Apr 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Assess the efficacy and safety of alefacept with nbUVB compared to alefacept alone in chronic plaque psoriasis subjects. Combination therapy may improve the clinical response to psoriatic subjects as both modalities have an effect on T cells
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alefacept alone | Active comparator | Drug: alefacept15 mg alefacept intramuscularly (IM) once weekly for 12 weeks |
| Alefacept + nbUVB | Experimental | Procedure: Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy15 mg alefacept intramuscularly once weekly and narrow band Ultraviolet B (nbUVB) phototherapy 3 times per week for 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject has given written informed consent
- Subject has a diagnosis of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis involving >=10% with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score >=10 at Baseline
- Subject has CD4+ T lymphocyte (CD4) count at or above the lower limit of normal
- Male and female subjects must use an adequate means of contraception from screening to end of study.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subject who received alefacept in the past
- Subject who has shown no improvement following an adequate course of nbUVB in the past
- Subject who has been treated in the past with either therapy or cyclosporine
- Subject with any active cancer, including skin cancer at Baseline
- Subject with erythrodermic, pustular or predominantly guttate psoriasis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| alefaceptAlso: Amevive, ASP0485IM | Drug | Alefacept alone |
| Narrow Band UVB PhototherapyUVB Phototherapy | Procedure or surgery | Alefacept + nbUVB |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst). PASI 75 was defined as an improvement of at least 75% in PASI as compared to Baseline. The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Subjects Reaching PASI 75 Over the Entire Course of the Study
Time frame: Week 36
Change in Body Surface Area (BSA) Covered With Psoriasis at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change in Body Surface Area (BSA) Covered With Psoriasis Over the Entire Course of the Study
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Physical Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Physical Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Almost Clear Over the Entire Course of the Study
Time frame: Week 36
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve PASI 90 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Time to Relapse
Time frame: Week 36
Time for 50% Decrease in PASI
Time frame: Week 36
Time for a 75% Decrease in PASI
Time frame: Week 36
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22859237Lui H, Gulliver W, Tan J, Hong CH, Hull P, Shear NH, Paradiso-Hardy F, Bissonette R. A randomized controlled study of combination therapy with alefacept and narrow band UVB phototherapy (UVB) for moderate to severe psoriasis: efficacy, onset, and duration of response. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Aug;11(8):929-37.
- Link to Prescribing InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Plaque Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CS32582 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Non-pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis
Palmoplantar Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) Following Initiation of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque PsO and Obesity or Overweight in Clinical Practice (TOGETHER AMPLIFY-PsO)
Psoriasis, Overweight or Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Use Central Contact study director
Astellas Pharma Canada, Inc.
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing alefacept and Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 12 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Apr 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00658606, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2013.