Bronchogenic CarcinomaPhase 3BOOSTNCT00652769
A New Pathway With BronchOscopic or Oesophageal Ultrasound for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and STaging (BOOST)
A Phase 3 study testing Endobronchial or Endoscopic Ultrasound and Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, Mediastinoscopy in people with Bronchogenic Carcinoma, run by University College London Hospitals at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
In the UK, staging of lung cancer is time consuming (taking on average more than 3 weeks), costly and inaccurate in up to 20% of cases. The investigators wish to determine whether using the newer techniques of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) improves lung cancer staging. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bronchogenic Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Endobronchial or Endoscopic Ultrasound and Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, Mediastinoscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 168 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Mar 2008to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Consecutive patients suspected of lung cancer on CT scan
- Written informed consent
- Able to tolerate bronchoscopy and thoracic surgery
Who cannot join
- Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial
- Any disorder making reliable informed consent impossible
- Patients with extra-thoracic disease, supraclavicular lymphadenopathy or pleural effusion
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom4 sites
Barnet General Hospital
London, EN5 3DJ
North Middlesex University Hospital
London, N18 1QX
Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
London, N19 5NF
University College London Hospital NHS Trust
London, WC1E 6AU
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endobronchial or Endoscopic Ultrasound as a First Test in the Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer
In the UK, staging of lung cancer is time consuming (taking on average more than 3 weeks), costly and inaccurate in up to 20% of cases. The investigators wish to determine whether using the newer techniques of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) improves lung cancer staging. The investigators' hypothesis is that EUS (endoscopic ultrasound) or EBUS (endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspirate) as a first test after CT scan in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer will result in a reduction in the time from first outpatient appointment to treatment decision, a reduction in the total number of scans and investigative operations, fewer outpatient attendances and a reduction in healthcare costs.
- Conditions
- Bronchogenic Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Endobronchial or Endoscopic Ultrasound, Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, Mediastinoscopy
- Keywords
- Lung, Cancer, Staging, Endobronchial, Ultrasound, Endoscopic
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endobronchial or Endoscopic UltrasoundProcedure or surgery
Also called EBUS: Olympus Keymed BF-UC260F-OL8
Patients with anterior mediastinal or subcarinal disease will undergo EBUS. Patients with posterior, subcarinal or AP window disease will undergo EUS. Patients with no mediastinal disease on CT scan will undergo EBUS.
Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, MediastinoscopyProcedure or surgery
Investigations will be determined by the multi-disciplinary team responsible for the patient
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| B | Active comparator | Control arm: Current practice for diagnosing and staging lung cancer. Most patients with intra-thoracic disease suspected of lung cancer will undergo bronchoscopy (or CT guided biopsy), PET scan and possibly mediastinoscopy. Receives: Procedure: Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, Mediastinoscopy |
| A | Experimental | Active arm: A new pathway for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer with endobronchial (EBUS) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a first test. If EBUS or EUS is negative the patient will have PET scan +/- mediastinoscopy. Receives: Procedure: Endobronchial or Endoscopic Ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time from first outpatient appointment to decision to treat
Measured: 1 - 3 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
The healthcare costs for diagnosing and staging lung cancer
Measured: End of study
The number of tests and outpatient visits a patient requires to be diagnosed and staged with lung cancer
Measured: 1 - 3 months
The proportion of lung cancer patients that are diagnosed and staged with a single test after CT scan
Measured: 1 - 3 months
The time from first outpatient appointment to treatment
Measured: 1 - 3 months
The number of futile thoracotomies
Measured: 1 - 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2008
- Primary completionSep 2011
- Study completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bronchogenic CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College London Hospitals
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- North Middlesex University Hospital, Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust, The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sam Janes, University College London Hospitals
- Investigators
- Stephen Spiro, MD, Principal investigator, Univeristy College London NHS TrustSam Janes, MD PhD, Study chair, University College, LondonNeal Navani, MD, Study director, University College, London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00652769
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07/0156
- Acronym
- BOOST
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2008
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Herder GJ, Verboom P, Smit EF, van Velthoven PC, van den Bergh JH, Colder CD, van Mansom I, van Mourik JC, Postmus PE, Teule GJ, Hoekstra OS. Practice, efficacy and cost of staging suspected non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in two Dutch hospitals. Thorax. 2002 Jan;57(1):11-4. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.1.11.
PubMed 11809983Detterbeck FC, Jantz MA, Wallace M, Vansteenkiste J, Silvestri GA; American College of Chest Physicians. Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):202S-220S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1362.
PubMed 17873169Silvestri GA, Gould MK, Margolis ML, Tanoue LT, McCrory D, Toloza E, Detterbeck F; American College of Chest Physicians. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):178S-201S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1360.
PubMed 17873168De Leyn P, Lardinois D, Van Schil PE, Rami-Porta R, Passlick B, Zielinski M, Waller DA, Lerut T, Weder W. ESTS guidelines for preoperative lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jul;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.075. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
PubMed 17448671Janes SM, Spiro SG. Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound/endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a new dawn for the respiratory physician? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb 15;175(4):297-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1390ED. No abstract available.
PubMed 17277288Navani N, Spiro SG, Janes SM. Mediastinal staging of NSCLC with endoscopic and endobronchial ultrasound. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 May;6(5):278-86. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.39.
PubMed 19390554Navani N, Nankivell M, Lawrence DR, Lock S, Makker H, Baldwin DR, Stephens RJ, Parmar MK, Spiro SG, Morris S, Janes SM; Lung-BOOST trial investigators. Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Apr;3(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00029-6. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
PubMed 25660225
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endobronchial or Endoscopic Ultrasound as a First Test in the Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00652769
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BOOST / 07/0156
- Conditions
- Bronchogenic Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Lung, Cancer, Staging, Endobronchial, Ultrasound, Endoscopic
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University College London HospitalsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- North Middlesex University Hospital, Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust, The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
- Study start
- Mar 2008
- Primary completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the UK, staging of lung cancer is time consuming (taking on average more than 3 weeks), costly and inaccurate in up to 20% of cases. The investigators wish to determine whether using the newer techniques of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) improves lung cancer staging. The investigators' hypothesis is that EUS (endoscopic ultrasound) or EBUS (endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspirate) as a first test after CT scan in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer will result in a reduction in the time from first outpatient appointment to treatment decision, a reduction in the total number of scans and investigative operations, fewer outpatient attendances and a reduction in healthcare costs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| B | Active comparator | Procedure: Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, MediastinoscopyControl arm: Current practice for diagnosing and staging lung cancer. Most patients with intra-thoracic disease suspected of lung cancer will undergo bronchoscopy (or CT guided biopsy), PET scan and possibly mediastinoscopy. |
| A | Experimental | Procedure: Endobronchial or Endoscopic UltrasoundActive arm: A new pathway for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer with endobronchial (EBUS) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a first test. If EBUS or EUS is negative the patient will have PET scan +/- mediastinoscopy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Consecutive patients suspected of lung cancer on CT scan
- Written informed consent
- Able to tolerate bronchoscopy and thoracic surgery
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial
- Any disorder making reliable informed consent impossible
- Patients with extra-thoracic disease, supraclavicular lymphadenopathy or pleural effusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endobronchial or Endoscopic UltrasoundAlso: EBUS: Olympus Keymed BF-UC260F-OL8Patients with anterior mediastinal or subcarinal disease will undergo EBUS. Patients with posterior, subcarinal or AP window disease will undergo EUS. Patients with no mediastinal disease on CT scan will undergo EBUS. | Procedure or surgery | A |
| Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, MediastinoscopyInvestigations will be determined by the multi-disciplinary team responsible for the patient | Procedure or surgery | B |
Primary outcome
Time from first outpatient appointment to decision to treat
Time frame: 1 - 3 months
5 secondary outcomes
The healthcare costs for diagnosing and staging lung cancer
Time frame: End of study
The number of tests and outpatient visits a patient requires to be diagnosed and staged with lung cancer
Time frame: 1 - 3 months
The proportion of lung cancer patients that are diagnosed and staged with a single test after CT scan
Time frame: 1 - 3 months
The time from first outpatient appointment to treatment
Time frame: 1 - 3 months
The number of futile thoracotomies
Time frame: 1 - 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2017.
- Background: PubMed 11809983Herder GJ, Verboom P, Smit EF, van Velthoven PC, van den Bergh JH, Colder CD, van Mansom I, van Mourik JC, Postmus PE, Teule GJ, Hoekstra OS. Practice, efficacy and cost of staging suspected non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in two Dutch hospitals. Thorax. 2002 Jan;57(1):11-4. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.1.11.
- Background: PubMed 17873169Detterbeck FC, Jantz MA, Wallace M, Vansteenkiste J, Silvestri GA; American College of Chest Physicians. Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):202S-220S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1362.
- Background: PubMed 17873168Silvestri GA, Gould MK, Margolis ML, Tanoue LT, McCrory D, Toloza E, Detterbeck F; American College of Chest Physicians. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):178S-201S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1360.
- Background: PubMed 17448671De Leyn P, Lardinois D, Van Schil PE, Rami-Porta R, Passlick B, Zielinski M, Waller DA, Lerut T, Weder W. ESTS guidelines for preoperative lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jul;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.075. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
- Background: PubMed 17277288Janes SM, Spiro SG. Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound/endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a new dawn for the respiratory physician? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb 15;175(4):297-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1390ED. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19390554Navani N, Spiro SG, Janes SM. Mediastinal staging of NSCLC with endoscopic and endobronchial ultrasound. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 May;6(5):278-86. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.39.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25660225Navani N, Nankivell M, Lawrence DR, Lock S, Makker H, Baldwin DR, Stephens RJ, Parmar MK, Spiro SG, Morris S, Janes SM; Lung-BOOST trial investigators. Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Apr;3(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00029-6. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
Related trials for Bronchogenic Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen Spiro, MD principal investigator
Univeristy College London NHS Trust
Sam Janes, MD PhD study chair
University College, London
Neal Navani, MD study director
University College, London
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Endobronchial or Endoscopic Ultrasound and Bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, PET scan, Mediastinoscopy in people with Bronchogenic Carcinoma, run by University College London Hospitals at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time from first outpatient appointment to decision to treat (time frame: 1 - 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00652769, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2017.