Stent ThrombosisNIVUSNCT00647504
Prospective Clinical Observational Registry Including Consecutive Patients With In-stent Restenosis or Stent Thrombosis
An observational study of Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis, run by Tampere University at 5 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
Prospective clinical observational registry study including consecutive patients with clinical signs or symptoms due to in-stent restenosis (ISR) or definite (ARC criteria) stent thrombosis (ST). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stent Thrombosis, Restenosis
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 10-15 Nordic high volume PCI centers with experience in IVUS.
Who may be able to join
- All Consecutive consented patients with a suspected ST either with BMS or DES. (estimated number of patients >100), admitted to one of the participating hospitals:
- Typical symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia (stable AP, UAP/NSTEMI, STEMI)
- Clinical suspicion of ST is based on the ARC criteria (probable ST). ST will be verified by coronary angiography.
- All consecutive patients with symptoms or signs of ischemia (angina pectoris, unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI, or documented myocardial ischemia) due to ISR with DES (target about 200 patients) and respective BMS patients up to maximum 100 patients.
Who cannot join
- Informed consent cannot be obtained
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 5 countries.
5 sites in 5 countries
About this study
Official title: Nordic IVUS Study: Prospective Clinical Observational Registry Study Including Consecutive Patients With Clinical Signs or Symptoms Due to In-stent Restenosis (ISR) or Definite (ARC Criteria) Stent Thrombosis (ST)
Prospective clinical observational registry study including consecutive patients with clinical signs or symptoms due to in-stent restenosis (ISR) or definite (ARC criteria) stent thrombosis (ST).
Study hypothesis:
Read more
Initial Stent implantation quality (due to technique/problems) are possible major determinants of ST and ISR in real life practice.
Both early, late, and very late ST, and ISR are important factors for long term outcome after initial stent implantation.
Primary objective:
- To elucidate the possible cause(s) of thrombosis or restenosis after stent implantation in real life practice by clinical, angiographic and IVUS evaluation.
Secondary objective:
- To describe the clinical manifestation [stable angina pectoris (AP), unstable AP, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST-elevation MI] of the index event (inclusion).
- To describe the characteristics of patient, lesion and procedure of the initial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To describe the antithrombotic pharmacological therapy preceding the index event.
- To describe clinical outcome (death, MI, revascularization, CCS angina class) following treatment of the index event during 12 month follow-up.
- To describe safety of the IVUS procedure (product or procedural related complications/ malfunctions).
Read the detailed description
Investigational sites:
10-15 high volume Nordic PCI centres with experience in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Patients:
- All consecutive patients admitted with an ischemic event due to ST (estimated number of patients >100) either with BMS or DES.
- All consecutive patients with symptoms or signs of ischemia due to in-stent restenosis with DES (target about 200 patients) and respective BMS patients up to maximum 100 patients.
Total number of patients 400. Control groups 1) Lesions treated during the initial PCI, other than the index lesion, will be used as control lesions for the stent with failure; ST or ISR (IVUS findings).
- The study patients will be compared with a matched population from the Westdenmark Heart Database to compare the patient characteristics and clinical manifestation during initial PCI to find out possible differences in patients with and without stent failure Methods: Detailed description of the characteristics of the patient, lesion and procedure of the index PCI. Thorough description of the antithrombotic pharmacological therapy from index PCI to index event.
Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) of index lesion at stent implantation and at the index event.
IVUS of the index lesion at the index event.
Logistics A one year workload of 10.000 PCI-patients from 10-15 the participating centres will constitute the population at risk. With a stent thrombosis (definitive stent thrombosis) rate of 1,5 % and a clinical restenosis rate of 4 % there will be 150 patients with any stent thrombosis and 400 patients with any restenosis during a twelve months period. With a DES penetration rate of 50 % about 75 DES-treated patients will experience a stent thrombosis and 200 patients a restenosis.
Ethical approval, data registration and analysis The study will be approved by ethical committees and the data management authorities in the participating Nordic countries.
Data will be registered in a dedicated case report form (CRF).
Continuous variables will be expressed as mean value +SD and discrete variables as absolute values and percentages. Clinical and angiographic variables in the control and index event groups will be compared using the Student's t- and the chi-square tests.
Inclusion criteria Consecutive consented patients with a suspected coronary stent related clinical event, admitted to one of the participating hospitals:
- Typical symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia (stable AP, UAP/NSTEMI, STEMI)
- Clinical suspicion of ST is based on the ARC criteria (probable ST). ST will be verified by coronary angiography.
- ISR resulting in clinical symptoms/events (angina pectoris, unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI, or documented myocardial ischemia). ISR will be verified by coronary angiography.
IVUS will be performed whenever feasible based on the patient's clinical condition. If IVUS study can not be performed, the above mentioned patients will be included in the initial registry (to evaluate feasibility of IVUS in real life), while final analysis will be based on data obtained from patients with IVUS study performed.
Exclusion criteria:
- Informed consent cannot be obtained. IVUS assessment IVUS will be performed whenever feasible based on the patient's clinical condition primary to treatment of the index lesion. If the IVUS catheter cannot be advanced, the lesion may be dilated by a 2 mm balloon. Mechanical pullback will be used (pull-back speed 0.5 mm/sec). The IVUS examination will be stored on VHS or CD and send to the IVUS core lab. at Odense University Hospital.
All events (technical problems and clinical events) possibly related to the IVUS investigation will be registered and reported following the standard complaint procedure process of the manufacturer. In addition, quarterly progress reports (including complaints) will be provided to the financial supporting company.
QCA The angiography obtained during the index lesion PCI-procedure will be used for qualitative and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) assessment using a computerized QCA system (Medis, Leiden, Holland).
At the index event angiography, there should be at least two cine-runs before the PCI-procedure and after the procedure with the same angulations as in the index-PCI procedure. The angiograms will be stored on CD and sent to the angiographic core laboratory, Skejby Sygehus, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
End points Primary: Angiographic and IVUS findings:
- procedure related findings at inclusion
- Tabulation and classification of IVUS and angiographic outcomes
Secondary:
- Clinical manifestation of the index event
- IVUS procedure related events Compliance to antithrombotic therapy
- Outcome of treatment (SR and ST) during the 12 month follow-up: clinical status and major cardiac events Safety reporting An appropriate safety plan will be established by the initiating investigator. Relevant procedure, product and study-related events will be reported following the local regulations. Furthermore, any procedural complications and other adverse events as defined by the principle investigator and the study team will be reported to the study coordinator and tracked. The coordinating center and the principle investigator will review tables and listings of all adverse events from the study on a regular basis, analyze these for trends, report unexpected adverse device or procedural events to the appropriate bodies/committees as per local requirements and do an on-going review of the study to ensure patient safety. The coordinating center will follow their procedure for document handling and database reconciliation.
Complaint reporting Device malfunctions, device-related adverse events and product nonconformities will be reported to the appropriate manufacturers following the local product complaint procedures by all participating site(s). Complaints will also be reported to regulatory authorities as per local requirements
- Conditions
- Stent Thrombosis, Restenosis
- Keywords
- stent thrombosis, stent restenosis, intravascular ultrasound
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Restenosis in Bare metal stent | |
| 2 | Restenosis in Drug eluting stent | |
| 3 | Stent thrombosis | |
| 4 | Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tabulation and classification of IVUS outcomes
Measured: first day
Secondary outcomes (5)
Clinical manifestation of the index event
Measured: 12 months
IVUS procedure related events
Measured: 1 week
Outcome of treatment during the 12 month follow-up: clinical status and major cardiac events
Measured: 12 months follow-up
Compliance to antithrombotic therapy
Measured: 12 month follow-up
Tabulation and classification of angiographic outcomes
Measured: first day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stent ThrombosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tampere University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Saila Vikman, Tampere University
- Investigators
- Kari Niemelä, MD, CEO, Principal investigator, Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00647504
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R07054
- Acronym
- NIVUS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2011
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2008
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kosonen P, Vikman S, Jensen LO, Lassen JF, Harnek J, Olivecrona GK, Erglis A, Fossum E, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Ylitalo A, Pietila M, Aaroe J, Kellerth T, Saunamaki K, Thayssen P, Hellsten L, Thuesen L, Niemela K. Intravascular ultrasound assessed incomplete stent apposition and stent fracture in stent thrombosis after bare metal versus drug-eluting stent treatment the Nordic Intravascular Ultrasound Study (NIVUS). Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1010-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.033. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
PubMed 23164593
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nordic IVUS Study: Prospective Clinical Observational Registry Study Including Consecutive Patients With Clinical Signs or Symptoms Due to In-stent Restenosis (ISR) or Definite (ARC Criteria) Stent Thrombosis (ST)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00647504
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NIVUS / R07054
- Conditions
- Stent Thrombosis, Restenosis
- Keywords
- stent thrombosis, stent restenosis, intravascular ultrasound
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tampere UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective clinical observational registry study including consecutive patients with clinical signs or symptoms due to in-stent restenosis (ISR) or definite (ARC criteria) stent thrombosis (ST).
Study hypothesis:
Initial Stent implantation quality (due to technique/problems) are possible major determinants of ST and ISR in real life practice.
Both early, late, and very late ST, and ISR are important factors for long term outcome after initial stent implantation.
Primary objective:
- To elucidate the possible cause(s) of thrombosis or restenosis after stent implantation in real life practice by clinical, angiographic and IVUS evaluation.
Secondary objective:
- To describe the clinical manifestation [stable angina pectoris (AP), unstable AP, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST-elevation MI] of the index event (inclusion).
- To describe the characteristics of patient, lesion and procedure of the initial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To describe the antithrombotic pharmacological therapy preceding the index event.
- To describe clinical outcome (death, MI, revascularization, CCS angina class) following treatment of the index event during 12 month follow-up.
- To describe safety of the IVUS procedure (product or procedural related complications/ malfunctions).
Detailed description
Investigational sites:
10-15 high volume Nordic PCI centres with experience in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Patients:
- All consecutive patients admitted with an ischemic event due to ST (estimated number of patients >100) either with BMS or DES.
- All consecutive patients with symptoms or signs of ischemia due to in-stent restenosis with DES (target about 200 patients) and respective BMS patients up to maximum 100 patients.
Total number of patients 400. Control groups 1) Lesions treated during the initial PCI, other than the index lesion, will be used as control lesions for the stent with failure; ST or ISR (IVUS findings).
- The study patients will be compared with a matched population from the Westdenmark Heart Database to compare the patient characteristics and clinical manifestation during initial PCI to find out possible differences in patients with and without stent failure Methods: Detailed description of the characteristics of the patient, lesion and procedure of the index PCI. Thorough description of the antithrombotic pharmacological therapy from index PCI to index event.
Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) of index lesion at stent implantation and at the index event.
IVUS of the index lesion at the index event.
Logistics A one year workload of 10.000 PCI-patients from 10-15 the participating centres will constitute the population at risk. With a stent thrombosis (definitive stent thrombosis) rate of 1,5 % and a clinical restenosis rate of 4 % there will be 150 patients with any stent thrombosis and 400 patients with any restenosis during a twelve months period. With a DES penetration rate of 50 % about 75 DES-treated patients will experience a stent thrombosis and 200 patients a restenosis.
Ethical approval, data registration and analysis The study will be approved by ethical committees and the data management authorities in the participating Nordic countries.
Data will be registered in a dedicated case report form (CRF).
Continuous variables will be expressed as mean value +SD and discrete variables as absolute values and percentages. Clinical and angiographic variables in the control and index event groups will be compared using the Student's t- and the chi-square tests.
Inclusion criteria Consecutive consented patients with a suspected coronary stent related clinical event, admitted to one of the participating hospitals:
- Typical symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia (stable AP, UAP/NSTEMI, STEMI)
- Clinical suspicion of ST is based on the ARC criteria (probable ST). ST will be verified by coronary angiography.
- ISR resulting in clinical symptoms/events (angina pectoris, unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI, or documented myocardial ischemia). ISR will be verified by coronary angiography.
IVUS will be performed whenever feasible based on the patient's clinical condition. If IVUS study can not be performed, the above mentioned patients will be included in the initial registry (to evaluate feasibility of IVUS in real life), while final analysis will be based on data obtained from patients with IVUS study performed.
Exclusion criteria:
- Informed consent cannot be obtained. IVUS assessment IVUS will be performed whenever feasible based on the patient's clinical condition primary to treatment of the index lesion. If the IVUS catheter cannot be advanced, the lesion may be dilated by a 2 mm balloon. Mechanical pullback will be used (pull-back speed 0.5 mm/sec). The IVUS examination will be stored on VHS or CD and send to the IVUS core lab. at Odense University Hospital.
All events (technical problems and clinical events) possibly related to the IVUS investigation will be registered and reported following the standard complaint procedure process of the manufacturer. In addition, quarterly progress reports (including complaints) will be provided to the financial supporting company.
QCA The angiography obtained during the index lesion PCI-procedure will be used for qualitative and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) assessment using a computerized QCA system (Medis, Leiden, Holland).
At the index event angiography, there should be at least two cine-runs before the PCI-procedure and after the procedure with the same angulations as in the index-PCI procedure. The angiograms will be stored on CD and sent to the angiographic core laboratory, Skejby Sygehus, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
End points Primary: Angiographic and IVUS findings:
- procedure related findings at inclusion
- Tabulation and classification of IVUS and angiographic outcomes
Secondary:
- Clinical manifestation of the index event
- IVUS procedure related events Compliance to antithrombotic therapy
- Outcome of treatment (SR and ST) during the 12 month follow-up: clinical status and major cardiac events Safety reporting An appropriate safety plan will be established by the initiating investigator. Relevant procedure, product and study-related events will be reported following the local regulations. Furthermore, any procedural complications and other adverse events as defined by the principle investigator and the study team will be reported to the study coordinator and tracked. The coordinating center and the principle investigator will review tables and listings of all adverse events from the study on a regular basis, analyze these for trends, report unexpected adverse device or procedural events to the appropriate bodies/committees as per local requirements and do an on-going review of the study to ensure patient safety. The coordinating center will follow their procedure for document handling and database reconciliation.
Complaint reporting Device malfunctions, device-related adverse events and product nonconformities will be reported to the appropriate manufacturers following the local product complaint procedures by all participating site(s). Complaints will also be reported to regulatory authorities as per local requirements
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | –Restenosis in Bare metal stent |
| 2 | – | –Restenosis in Drug eluting stent |
| 3 | – | –Stent thrombosis |
| 4 | – | –Control group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 10-15 Nordic high volume PCI centers with experience in IVUS.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- All Consecutive consented patients with a suspected ST either with BMS or DES. (estimated number of patients >100), admitted to one of the participating hospitals:
- All consecutive patients with symptoms or signs of ischemia (angina pectoris, unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI, or documented myocardial ischemia) due to ISR with DES (target about 200 patients) and respective BMS patients up to maximum 100 patients.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Informed consent cannot be obtained
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Tabulation and classification of IVUS outcomes
Time frame: first day
5 secondary outcomes
Clinical manifestation of the index event
Time frame: 12 months
IVUS procedure related events
Time frame: 1 week
Outcome of treatment during the 12 month follow-up: clinical status and major cardiac events
Time frame: 12 months follow-up
Compliance to antithrombotic therapy
Time frame: 12 month follow-up
Tabulation and classification of angiographic outcomes
Time frame: first day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23164593Kosonen P, Vikman S, Jensen LO, Lassen JF, Harnek J, Olivecrona GK, Erglis A, Fossum E, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Ylitalo A, Pietila M, Aaroe J, Kellerth T, Saunamaki K, Thayssen P, Hellsten L, Thuesen L, Niemela K. Intravascular ultrasound assessed incomplete stent apposition and stent fracture in stent thrombosis after bare metal versus drug-eluting stent treatment the Nordic Intravascular Ultrasound Study (NIVUS). Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1010-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.033. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
Related trials for Stent Thrombosis
Active, not recruiting
Thromboelastography With Platelet Mapping to Guide Antiplatelet Therapy After Lower Extremity Revascularization
Thrombosis, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
RevCore for In Stent Thrombosis
In-stent Thrombosis
Recruiting
The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent Post-Approval Study
Venous Thromboses, Venous Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The ReCAna for Lower ExtremIty Venous OBstructions and In-StEnt Restenosis Registry
Chronic Venous Disease, Chronic Venous Insufficiency, CVI
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Percutaneous Portal Vein Recanalization for Refractory Portal Hypertension in Children With Non-Cirrhotic Extrahepatic Portal Vein Obstruction
Hypertension, Portal, Interventional Radiology
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kari Niemelä, MD, CEO principal investigator
Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital
5 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis, run by Tampere University at 5 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Denmark, Finland, Latvia, Norway, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tabulation and classification of IVUS outcomes (time frame: first day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00647504, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2011.