Atrial FibrillationPhase 4CASTLE-AFNCT00643188
Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF
A Phase 4 study testing Radiofrequency ablation and Conventional treatment in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 32 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The incidence and prevalence of AF increase exponentially with increasing age and AF is associated with higher mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and lower quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Radiofrequency ablation and Conventional treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 398 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
- Failure or intolerance of antiarrhythmic drug therapy or unwillingness to take antiarrhythmic drugs
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <= 35%
- NYHA >= II
- ICD for primary or secondary prevention with atrial sensing capabilities or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy plus Defibrillator (CRT-D) device, both with Home Monitoring® technology already implanted
- Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol and has written informed consent
- Age >= 18 years
Who cannot join
- Contraindication for chronic anticoagulation therapy and heparin
- Documented left atrial diameter > 6 cm
- Previous left heart ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation
- Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac surgery, angioplasty or stroke within 2 months prior to enrollment
- Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
- Enrollment in another investigational drug or device study
Show all 15Show fewer
- Woman currently pregnant or breastfeeding or not using reliable contraceptive measures during fertility age
- Mental or physical inability to take part in the study
- Listed for heart transplant
- Cardiac assist device implanted
- Planned cardiovascular intervention
- Life expectancy ≤ 12 months
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Requirement for dialysis due to terminal renal failure
- Participation in another telemonitoring concept
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 8 countries.
32 sites in 8 countries
Germany17 sites
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen
Bad Oeynhausen
Charité Campus Mitte
Berlin
Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin
Franz-Volhard-Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Charité
Berlin
Vivantes-Klinikum am Urban
Berlin
Städtische Kliniken Bielefeld
Bielefeld
St. Marien Hospital
Bonn
Zentralkrankenhaus Links der Weser, Siebels & Langes Partnerschaft
Bremen
Klinikum Coburg
Coburg
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf
Kardiocentrum Frankfurt an der Klinik Rotes Kreuz
Frankfurt am Main
Universitätsklinikum der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald
Greifswald
Krankenhaus Landshut-Achdorf
Landshut
Klinikum Lüdenscheid
Lüdenscheid
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
München
St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus
Paderborn
Universitätsklinikum Rostock
Rostock
Russia4 sites
HRD Surgical Department; Federal Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery
Krasnoyarsk
N.S.B.R.I. of Circulation Pathology
Novosibirsk
Arrhythmology Department; Federal Heart Blood and Endocrinology Center n.a. V. A. Almazov
Saint Petersburg
FSBI Research Institute of Cardiology, Siberian Branch of RAMS
Tomsk
Netherlands3 sites
Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam
Isala Klinieken
Zwolle
Australia2 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston
Austria2 sites
A. ö. Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Linz
Linz
Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien
Vienna
Hungary2 sites
Semmelweis Medical University
Budapest
The Debrecen University of Medicine
Debrecen
About this study
Official title: Catheter Ablation Versus Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The incidence and prevalence of AF increase exponentially with increasing age and AF is associated with higher mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and lower quality of life. Furthermore, AF is often associated with heart failure. The majority of AF is initiated by ectopic foci found primarily in the pulmonary veins. It was shown that catheter ablation of those veins could eliminate episodes of AF. In patients with heart failure, catheter ablation could improve cardiac function, symptoms and quality of life. It remains still unknown whether AF ablation is more effective than conventional treatment in terms of mortality and morbidity.
Read the detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice; its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and decreased quality of life.
An initial approach to the cure of patients suffering from AF was surgical intervention with the Maze procedure, which involved the creation of linear lesions in the atria to break the re-entrant wavefronts responsible for maintenance of AF. Subsequently, less invasive procedures have been developed to achieve the same results. One of them is catheter based radio frequency ablation, in which a catheter is placed in the heart percutaneously, followed by application of electrical energy to the target regions, thereby creating a permanent lesion.
The origin of AF is often localized in the pulmonary veins (PVs); therefore one common approach is to ablate them in order to electrically isolate them from the left atrium (LA). Several strategies have been developed, such as linear, segmental, circumferential, and double-lasso.
Additionally, other anatomical regions such as the right atrium (RA), superior vena cava (SVC), and coronary sinus (CS) can be ablated in order to eliminate non-PV drivers of AF.
Heart failure (HF) is frequently a chronic and lethal condition, causing substantial morbidity and, after initial diagnosis, results in mortality rates which come close to or exceed those of many malignancies.
Both AF and HF have a significant impact on the health care expenditures. The two diseases often coexist, there is a complex interaction between them: many of the processes that predispose to HF, such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease, are also risk factors for the development of AF. Similarly, many of the echocardiographic findings that are common in patients with HF, including LA enlargement, increased left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, and reduced LV fractional shortening, predispose patients in the development of AF.
In small groups of patients suffering from HF and AF, radio frequency ablation has been performed; the restoration of sinus rhythm resulted in the improvement of quality of life, exercise performance, and cardiac parameters like ejection fraction and fractional shortening. It is still unknown if such therapy is also effective in reducing mortality and morbidity.
CASTLE-AF is a prospective, unblinded, randomized, multicenter study whose aim is to compare the effect of radio frequency catheter-based ablation on mortality and morbidity with that of conventional treatment in HF subjects with AF. About 420 patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 35%) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ II, already implanted with a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with Home Monitoring® capabilities, will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to undergo either AF ablation or standard treatment as indicated in the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with AF. In addition to planned and unplanned visits, the ablated patients will be constantly monitored remotely via Home Monitoring®, in order to detect any recurrences of AF episodes, even if non-symptomatic or short in duration, during an observational period of minimum 3 years for each patient.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Radiofrequency ablation, Conventional treatment
- Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Heart failure, Home Monitoring
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery
Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation
Conventional treatmentOther
The best medical treatment according to the ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult and the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation:
Subjects assigned to the catheter AF ablation strategy will undergo ablation within 48 hours after baseline evaluation. The aim of the procedure is to achieve isolation of all Pulmonary Veins (PVs) and to restore sinus rhythm. Only radiofrequency catheter based AF ablation is permitted; other methods, like cryoablation, ultrasound and laser, are not permitted in this study.
Before ablation, a transesophageal echocardiogram must be performed in order to rule out presence of atrial thrombi.
Anticoagulation should be initiated, or continued, for at least six months post ablation. Six months after successful ablation and in absence of any recurrence of AF, antiarrhythmic drugs should be discontinued. Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation |
| 2 | Active comparator | Conventional treatment:
Subjects assigned to the conventional treatment strategy will be treated according to current guidelines for the management of patients with chronic heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation. Efforts to maintain sinus rhythm in this study arm are recommended.
Anticoagulation will be initiated, if not already started, and maintained throughout the study according to current guidelines. Receives: Other: Conventional treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause mortality or worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization
Measured: 7 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
All-cause mortality Cardiovascular mortality Unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular reason Worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization Cerebrovascular accidents Left ventricular function Exercise tolerance Quality of life
Measured: 7 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionMar 2017
- Study completionMar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 398 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Johannes Brachmann, Prof. Dr., Study chair, Klinikum Coburg, GermanyNassir F. Marrouche, Dr., Study chair, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah Health Sciences Cente, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00643188
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EP020
- Acronym
- CASTLE-AF
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 18 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: It is planned to publish results of this investigation in peer-reviewed journals (online: open-access), but it is not yet decided to annex individual participant data (IPD).
Publications
Marrouche NF, Brachmann J; CASTLE-AF Steering Committee. Catheter ablation versus standard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (CASTLE-AF) - study design. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;32(8):987-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02428.x.
PubMed 19659616Brachmann J, Sohns C, Andresen D, Siebels J, Sehner S, Boersma L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Schunkert H, Bansch D, Dagher L, Zhao Y, Mahnkopf C, Wegscheider K, Marrouche NF. Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 May;7(5):594-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.021. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
PubMed 33640355Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Proff J, Schunkert H, Christ H, Vogt J, Bansch D; CASTLE-AF Investigators. Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):417-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707855.
PubMed 29385358
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Catheter Ablation Versus Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00643188
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CASTLE-AF / EP020
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Heart failure, Home Monitoring
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 398 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The incidence and prevalence of AF increase exponentially with increasing age and AF is associated with higher mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and lower quality of life. Furthermore, AF is often associated with heart failure. The majority of AF is initiated by ectopic foci found primarily in the pulmonary veins. It was shown that catheter ablation of those veins could eliminate episodes of AF. In patients with heart failure, catheter ablation could improve cardiac function, symptoms and quality of life. It remains still unknown whether AF ablation is more effective than conventional treatment in terms of mortality and morbidity.
Detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice; its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and decreased quality of life.
An initial approach to the cure of patients suffering from AF was surgical intervention with the Maze procedure, which involved the creation of linear lesions in the atria to break the re-entrant wavefronts responsible for maintenance of AF. Subsequently, less invasive procedures have been developed to achieve the same results. One of them is catheter based radio frequency ablation, in which a catheter is placed in the heart percutaneously, followed by application of electrical energy to the target regions, thereby creating a permanent lesion.
The origin of AF is often localized in the pulmonary veins (PVs); therefore one common approach is to ablate them in order to electrically isolate them from the left atrium (LA). Several strategies have been developed, such as linear, segmental, circumferential, and double-lasso.
Additionally, other anatomical regions such as the right atrium (RA), superior vena cava (SVC), and coronary sinus (CS) can be ablated in order to eliminate non-PV drivers of AF.
Heart failure (HF) is frequently a chronic and lethal condition, causing substantial morbidity and, after initial diagnosis, results in mortality rates which come close to or exceed those of many malignancies.
Both AF and HF have a significant impact on the health care expenditures. The two diseases often coexist, there is a complex interaction between them: many of the processes that predispose to HF, such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease, are also risk factors for the development of AF. Similarly, many of the echocardiographic findings that are common in patients with HF, including LA enlargement, increased left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, and reduced LV fractional shortening, predispose patients in the development of AF.
In small groups of patients suffering from HF and AF, radio frequency ablation has been performed; the restoration of sinus rhythm resulted in the improvement of quality of life, exercise performance, and cardiac parameters like ejection fraction and fractional shortening. It is still unknown if such therapy is also effective in reducing mortality and morbidity.
CASTLE-AF is a prospective, unblinded, randomized, multicenter study whose aim is to compare the effect of radio frequency catheter-based ablation on mortality and morbidity with that of conventional treatment in HF subjects with AF. About 420 patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 35%) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ II, already implanted with a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with Home Monitoring® capabilities, will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to undergo either AF ablation or standard treatment as indicated in the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with AF. In addition to planned and unplanned visits, the ablated patients will be constantly monitored remotely via Home Monitoring®, in order to detect any recurrences of AF episodes, even if non-symptomatic or short in duration, during an observational period of minimum 3 years for each patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Procedure: Radiofrequency ablationRadiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: Subjects assigned to the catheter AF ablation strategy will undergo ablation within 48 hours after baseline evaluation. The aim of the procedure is to achieve isolation of all Pulmonary Veins (PVs) and to restore sinus rhythm. Only radiofrequency catheter based AF ablation is permitted; other methods, like cryoablation, ultrasound and laser, are not permitted in this study. Before ablation, a transesophageal echocardiogram must be performed in order to rule out presence of atrial thrombi. Anticoagulation should be initiated, or continued, for at least six months post ablation. Six months after successful ablation and in absence of any recurrence of AF, antiarrhythmic drugs should be discontinued. |
| 2 | Active comparator | Other: Conventional treatmentConventional treatment: Subjects assigned to the conventional treatment strategy will be treated according to current guidelines for the management of patients with chronic heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation. Efforts to maintain sinus rhythm in this study arm are recommended. Anticoagulation will be initiated, if not already started, and maintained throughout the study according to current guidelines. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
- Failure or intolerance of antiarrhythmic drug therapy or unwillingness to take antiarrhythmic drugs
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <= 35%
- NYHA >= II
- ICD for primary or secondary prevention with atrial sensing capabilities or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy plus Defibrillator (CRT-D) device, both with Home Monitoring® technology already implanted
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Contraindication for chronic anticoagulation therapy and heparin
- Documented left atrial diameter > 6 cm
- Previous left heart ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation
- Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac surgery, angioplasty or stroke within 2 months prior to enrollment
- Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency ablationRadiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
| Conventional treatmentThe best medical treatment according to the ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult and the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. | Other | 2 |
Primary outcome
All-cause mortality or worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization
Time frame: 7 years
1 secondary outcome
All-cause mortality Cardiovascular mortality Unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular reason Worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization Cerebrovascular accidents Left ventricular function Exercise tolerance Quality of life
Time frame: 7 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2017.
- Background: PubMed 19659616Marrouche NF, Brachmann J; CASTLE-AF Steering Committee. Catheter ablation versus standard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (CASTLE-AF) - study design. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;32(8):987-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02428.x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33640355Brachmann J, Sohns C, Andresen D, Siebels J, Sehner S, Boersma L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Schunkert H, Bansch D, Dagher L, Zhao Y, Mahnkopf C, Wegscheider K, Marrouche NF. Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 May;7(5):594-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.021. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29385358Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Proff J, Schunkert H, Christ H, Vogt J, Bansch D; CASTLE-AF Investigators. Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):417-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707855.
- Click here for more information about this study: CASTLE-AFLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. It is planned to publish results of this investigation in peer-reviewed journals (online: open-access), but it is not yet decided to annex individual participant data (IPD).
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Johannes Brachmann, Prof. Dr. study chair
Klinikum Coburg, Germany
Nassir F. Marrouche, Dr. study chair
Division of Cardiology, University of Utah Health Sciences Cente, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
32 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Radiofrequency ablation and Conventional treatment in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 32 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in Germany, Russia, Netherlands, Australia, Austria and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause mortality or worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization (time frame: 7 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00643188, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2017.