AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationPhase 4CASTLE-AFNCT00643188

Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF

A Phase 4 study testing Radiofrequency ablation and Conventional treatment in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 32 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The incidence and prevalence of AF increase exponentially with increasing age and AF is associated with higher mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and lower quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency ablation and Conventional treatment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
398 participants
Where
32 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Jan 2008to Mar 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Failure or intolerance of antiarrhythmic drug therapy or unwillingness to take antiarrhythmic drugs
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <= 35%
  • NYHA >= II
  • ICD for primary or secondary prevention with atrial sensing capabilities or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy plus Defibrillator (CRT-D) device, both with Home Monitoring® technology already implanted
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol and has written informed consent
  • Age >= 18 years

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication for chronic anticoagulation therapy and heparin
  • Documented left atrial diameter > 6 cm
  • Previous left heart ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation
  • Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac surgery, angioplasty or stroke within 2 months prior to enrollment
  • Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
  • Enrollment in another investigational drug or device study
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Woman currently pregnant or breastfeeding or not using reliable contraceptive measures during fertility age
  • Mental or physical inability to take part in the study
  • Listed for heart transplant
  • Cardiac assist device implanted
  • Planned cardiovascular intervention
  • Life expectancy ≤ 12 months
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Requirement for dialysis due to terminal renal failure
  • Participation in another telemonitoring concept

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 8 countries.

32 sites in 8 countries

Germany17 sites
  • Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen

    Bad Oeynhausen

  • Charité Campus Mitte

    Berlin

  • Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum

    Berlin

  • Franz-Volhard-Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Charité

    Berlin

  • Vivantes-Klinikum am Urban

    Berlin

  • Städtische Kliniken Bielefeld

    Bielefeld

  • St. Marien Hospital

    Bonn

  • Zentralkrankenhaus Links der Weser, Siebels & Langes Partnerschaft

    Bremen

  • Klinikum Coburg

    Coburg

  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf

    Düsseldorf

  • Kardiocentrum Frankfurt an der Klinik Rotes Kreuz

    Frankfurt am Main

  • Universitätsklinikum der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald

    Greifswald

  • Krankenhaus Landshut-Achdorf

    Landshut

  • Klinikum Lüdenscheid

    Lüdenscheid

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum München

    München

  • St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus

    Paderborn

  • Universitätsklinikum Rostock

    Rostock

Other trials in Germany

Russia4 sites
  • HRD Surgical Department; Federal Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery

    Krasnoyarsk

  • N.S.B.R.I. of Circulation Pathology

    Novosibirsk

  • Arrhythmology Department; Federal Heart Blood and Endocrinology Center n.a. V. A. Almazov

    Saint Petersburg

  • FSBI Research Institute of Cardiology, Siberian Branch of RAMS

    Tomsk

Other trials in Russia

Netherlands3 sites
  • Antonius Ziekenhuis

    Nieuwegein

  • Erasmus Medical Center

    Rotterdam

  • Isala Klinieken

    Zwolle

Other trials in Netherlands

Australia2 sites
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital

    Adelaide

  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

    Herston

Other trials in Australia

Austria2 sites
  • A. ö. Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Linz

    Linz

  • Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Hungary2 sites
  • Semmelweis Medical University

    Budapest

  • The Debrecen University of Medicine

    Debrecen

Other trials in Hungary

Poland1 site
  • National Institute of Cardiology

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

United Kingdom1 site
  • The Heart Hospital

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Catheter Ablation Versus Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The incidence and prevalence of AF increase exponentially with increasing age and AF is associated with higher mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and lower quality of life. Furthermore, AF is often associated with heart failure. The majority of AF is initiated by ectopic foci found primarily in the pulmonary veins. It was shown that catheter ablation of those veins could eliminate episodes of AF. In patients with heart failure, catheter ablation could improve cardiac function, symptoms and quality of life. It remains still unknown whether AF ablation is more effective than conventional treatment in terms of mortality and morbidity.

Read the detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice; its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization, and decreased quality of life.

An initial approach to the cure of patients suffering from AF was surgical intervention with the Maze procedure, which involved the creation of linear lesions in the atria to break the re-entrant wavefronts responsible for maintenance of AF. Subsequently, less invasive procedures have been developed to achieve the same results. One of them is catheter based radio frequency ablation, in which a catheter is placed in the heart percutaneously, followed by application of electrical energy to the target regions, thereby creating a permanent lesion.

The origin of AF is often localized in the pulmonary veins (PVs); therefore one common approach is to ablate them in order to electrically isolate them from the left atrium (LA). Several strategies have been developed, such as linear, segmental, circumferential, and double-lasso.

Additionally, other anatomical regions such as the right atrium (RA), superior vena cava (SVC), and coronary sinus (CS) can be ablated in order to eliminate non-PV drivers of AF.

Heart failure (HF) is frequently a chronic and lethal condition, causing substantial morbidity and, after initial diagnosis, results in mortality rates which come close to or exceed those of many malignancies.

Both AF and HF have a significant impact on the health care expenditures. The two diseases often coexist, there is a complex interaction between them: many of the processes that predispose to HF, such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease, are also risk factors for the development of AF. Similarly, many of the echocardiographic findings that are common in patients with HF, including LA enlargement, increased left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, and reduced LV fractional shortening, predispose patients in the development of AF.

In small groups of patients suffering from HF and AF, radio frequency ablation has been performed; the restoration of sinus rhythm resulted in the improvement of quality of life, exercise performance, and cardiac parameters like ejection fraction and fractional shortening. It is still unknown if such therapy is also effective in reducing mortality and morbidity.

CASTLE-AF is a prospective, unblinded, randomized, multicenter study whose aim is to compare the effect of radio frequency catheter-based ablation on mortality and morbidity with that of conventional treatment in HF subjects with AF. About 420 patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 35%) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ II, already implanted with a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with Home Monitoring® capabilities, will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to undergo either AF ablation or standard treatment as indicated in the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with AF. In addition to planned and unplanned visits, the ablated patients will be constantly monitored remotely via Home Monitoring®, in order to detect any recurrences of AF episodes, even if non-symptomatic or short in duration, during an observational period of minimum 3 years for each patient.

Being tested
Radiofrequency ablation, Conventional treatment
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Heart failure, Home Monitoring
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiofrequency ablationProcedure or surgery

    Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation

  • Conventional treatmentOther

    The best medical treatment according to the ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult and the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Study groups in NCT00643188
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalRadiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: Subjects assigned to the catheter AF ablation strategy will undergo ablation within 48 hours after baseline evaluation. The aim of the procedure is to achieve isolation of all Pulmonary Veins (PVs) and to restore sinus rhythm. Only radiofrequency catheter based AF ablation is permitted; other methods, like cryoablation, ultrasound and laser, are not permitted in this study. Before ablation, a transesophageal echocardiogram must be performed in order to rule out presence of atrial thrombi. Anticoagulation should be initiated, or continued, for at least six months post ablation. Six months after successful ablation and in absence of any recurrence of AF, antiarrhythmic drugs should be discontinued.
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation
2Active comparatorConventional treatment: Subjects assigned to the conventional treatment strategy will be treated according to current guidelines for the management of patients with chronic heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation. Efforts to maintain sinus rhythm in this study arm are recommended. Anticoagulation will be initiated, if not already started, and maintained throughout the study according to current guidelines.
Receives: Other: Conventional treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All-cause mortality or worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization

    Measured: 7 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. All-cause mortality Cardiovascular mortality Unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular reason Worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization Cerebrovascular accidents Left ventricular function Exercise tolerance Quality of life

    Measured: 7 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionMar 2017
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
398 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00643188
Sponsor's protocol ID
EP020
Acronym
CASTLE-AF
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
22 Feb 2008
Last updated
18 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided: It is planned to publish results of this investigation in peer-reviewed journals (online: open-access), but it is not yet decided to annex individual participant data (IPD).

Publications

  • Marrouche NF, Brachmann J; CASTLE-AF Steering Committee. Catheter ablation versus standard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (CASTLE-AF) - study design. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;32(8):987-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02428.x.

    PubMed 19659616
  • Brachmann J, Sohns C, Andresen D, Siebels J, Sehner S, Boersma L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Schunkert H, Bansch D, Dagher L, Zhao Y, Mahnkopf C, Wegscheider K, Marrouche NF. Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 May;7(5):594-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.021. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

    PubMed 33640355
  • Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Proff J, Schunkert H, Christ H, Vogt J, Bansch D; CASTLE-AF Investigators. Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):417-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707855.

    PubMed 29385358

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Radiofrequency ablation and Conventional treatment in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 32 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in Germany, Russia, Netherlands, Australia, Austria and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All-cause mortality or worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization (time frame: 7 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00643188, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in