EdentulousMaximusNCT00641277
Longitudinal Efficacy of Dental Implants in Anterior Areas
An observational study of Edentulous, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Dental implants are used in dentistry to reestablish function and appearance to areas of the mouth where natural teeth are missing. Implants can be a good choice for almost all areas of the mouth except where the space left by missing teeth is too narrow. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Edentulous
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2004to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Dental clinic
Who may be able to join
- Missing anterior teeth
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Cigarette smoking
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Other significant medical conditions or habits likely to compromise bone healing
- Chronic use of medications likely to compromise bone healing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294 0007
About this study
Official title: A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the 3mm Maximus Dental Implant in Areas of Limited Tooth-to-tooth Spacing
Dental implants are used in dentistry to reestablish function and appearance to areas of the mouth where natural teeth are missing. Implants can be a good choice for almost all areas of the mouth except where the space left by missing teeth is too narrow. This is usually the case when front teeth are lost of have been missing since birth.
The Maximus dental implant is the smallest implant made, just 3mm in diameter, and is especially designed to replace missing front teeth and yet be strong enough to function as a natural tooth.
Read more
This study will assess the functional success of BioHorizons Maximus one-piece endosseous dental implant.
We hypothesize that placement of the 3mm dental implant in areas of limited tooth-to-tooth spacing will be an efficacious tooth root replacement.
Read the detailed description
When maxillary anterior (upper front)and/or mandibular incisors are congenitally missing or lost due to other causes, the space between adjacent teeth is frequently too narrow to support traditional implant therapy and patients are often advised to fill the space with conventional fixed or removable prosthetic appliances.
The one-piece titanium construction of the Maximus design is believed to retain optimal biomechanical stength while remaining small enough for use in anterior reconstruction thereby allowing access to spaces that were previously beyond the scope of implant dentistry.
- Conditions
- Edentulous
- Keywords
- endosseous dental implants, dental aesthetics
- Medical subject headings
- Mouth, Edentulous
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
peri-implant bone support
Measured: 5 years following prosthetic attachment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Aesthetics and function
Measured: 5 years following prosthectic attachment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2004
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EdentulousStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BioHorizons, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Reddy, DMD, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Michael S Reddy, DMD, DMSc, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00641277
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- W040218006
- Acronym
- Maximus
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2008
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036699. No abstract available.
PubMed 4924041Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.
PubMed 6809663Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Winter;5(4):347-59.
PubMed 2094653Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, Feldmann G, Freiberg N, Glantz PO, Kjellman O, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988 May;59(5):287-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287.
PubMed 3290429Albrektsson T. On long-term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust Prosthodont J. 1993;7 Suppl:15-24.
PubMed 8054223Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 Summer;3(2):129-34. No abstract available.
PubMed 3075194Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Fall;4(3):211-7.
PubMed 2700745Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):161-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
PubMed 9586460Wedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, Laird WR, Quayle AA. Experience with ITI osseointegrated implants at five centres in the UK. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Dec;30(6):377-81. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(92)90204-v.
PubMed 1450160
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the 3mm Maximus Dental Implant in Areas of Limited Tooth-to-tooth Spacing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00641277
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Maximus / W040218006
- Conditions
- Edentulous
- Keywords
- endosseous dental implants, dental aesthetics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BioHorizons, Inc.
- Study start
- Mar 2004
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dental implants are used in dentistry to reestablish function and appearance to areas of the mouth where natural teeth are missing. Implants can be a good choice for almost all areas of the mouth except where the space left by missing teeth is too narrow. This is usually the case when front teeth are lost of have been missing since birth.
The Maximus dental implant is the smallest implant made, just 3mm in diameter, and is especially designed to replace missing front teeth and yet be strong enough to function as a natural tooth.
This study will assess the functional success of BioHorizons Maximus one-piece endosseous dental implant.
We hypothesize that placement of the 3mm dental implant in areas of limited tooth-to-tooth spacing will be an efficacious tooth root replacement.
Detailed description
When maxillary anterior (upper front)and/or mandibular incisors are congenitally missing or lost due to other causes, the space between adjacent teeth is frequently too narrow to support traditional implant therapy and patients are often advised to fill the space with conventional fixed or removable prosthetic appliances.
The one-piece titanium construction of the Maximus design is believed to retain optimal biomechanical stength while remaining small enough for use in anterior reconstruction thereby allowing access to spaces that were previously beyond the scope of implant dentistry.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Dental clinic
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Missing anterior teeth
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Cigarette smoking
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Other significant medical conditions or habits likely to compromise bone healing
- Chronic use of medications likely to compromise bone healing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
peri-implant bone support
Time frame: 5 years following prosthetic attachment
1 secondary outcome
Aesthetics and function
Time frame: 5 years following prosthectic attachment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2013.
- Background: PubMed 4924041Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036699. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6809663Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.
- Background: PubMed 2094653Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Winter;5(4):347-59.
- Background: PubMed 3290429Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, Feldmann G, Freiberg N, Glantz PO, Kjellman O, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988 May;59(5):287-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287.
- Background: PubMed 8054223Albrektsson T. On long-term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust Prosthodont J. 1993;7 Suppl:15-24.
- Background: PubMed 3075194Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 Summer;3(2):129-34. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 2700745Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Fall;4(3):211-7.
- Background: PubMed 9586460Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):161-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
- Background: PubMed 1450160Wedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, Laird WR, Quayle AA. Experience with ITI osseointegrated implants at five centres in the UK. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Dec;30(6):377-81. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(92)90204-v.
Related trials for Edentulous
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
Active, not recruiting
The Aim of the Study Will be Clinically and Radio Graphically Comparison of Two Implant Designs Used to Treat Atrophied Mandible . Implant Design Comparison Will Done for Implant Stability,Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health Changes and Bone Changes .Patients Will be Divided Randomly Into Two Group
Dental Implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Health
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Printable Denture Base Material
Edentulous Mouth
Recruiting
Comparison of Conventional and Face Scan in Recording the Vertical Dimension of Completely Edentulous Patients
Edentulous Complete Denture Wearers
Recruiting
Two Bovine Xenografts in Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation With or Without Bone Marrow Blood
Alveolar Bone Loss, Sinus Floor Augmentation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael S Reddy, DMD, DMSc principal investigator
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Edentulous, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
peri-implant bone support (time frame: 5 years following prosthetic attachment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00641277, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2013.