Bacterial PneumoniaPhase 3CAPNCT00621504
Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Ceftriaxone in Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
A Phase 3 study testing Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection, IV Ceftriaxone and Clarithromycin in people with Bacterial Pneumonia, run by Forest Laboratories at 168 sites in 23 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bacterial Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection, IV Ceftriaxone and Clarithromycin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 606 participants
- Where
- 168 sitesin 23 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Jun 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects are required to meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Community-acquired pneumonia
- initial hospitalization, or treatment in an emergency room or urgent care setting
- infection would require initial treatment with IV antimicrobials.
Who cannot join
- Subjects must NOT meet any of the following exclusion criteria:
- CAP suitable for outpatient therapy with an oral antimicrobial agent
- respiratory tract infections not due to community-acquired bacterial
- Non-infectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates
- Pleural empyema
- Infection with an atypical organism
- History of any hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any ß-lactam antimicrobial
- History of any hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to clarithromycin or any macrolide/ ketolide
Trial locations and contacts
168 sites in 23 countries.
168 sites in 23 countries
Poland17 sites
Investigational Site
Będzin, 42-500
Investigational Site
Brzesku, 32-800
Investigational Site
Bytom, 41-902
Investigational Site
Chodzież, 64-800
Investigational Site
Częstochowa, 42-200
Investigational Site
Katowice-Ochojec, 40-635
Investigational Site
Krakow, 30-053
Investigational Site
Lublin, 20-178
Investigational Site
Lublin, 20-718
Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-479
Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-569
Investigational Site
Tychy, 43-100
Investigational Site
Warsaw, 01-138
Investigational Site
Warsaw, 03-401
Investigational Site
Warsaw, 03-737
Investigational Site
Warsaw, 127 02-507
Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 53-439
Germany13 sites
Investigational Site
Berlin, 13353
Investigational Site
Bochum, 44793
Investigational Site
Bochum, 44879
Investigational Site
Erfurt, 99089
Investigational Site
Heppenheim an der Bergstrasse, 64646
Investigational Site
Lich, 53545
Investigational Site
Lindenberger, State of Berlin, 13125
Investigational Site
Lübeck, 23538
Investigational Site
Lüdenscheid, 58515
Investigational Site
Paderborn, 33098
Investigational Site
Schkeuditz, 04435
Investigational Site
Ulm, 89081
Investigational Site
Wiesbaden, 65199
Russia13 sites
Investigational Site
Arkhangelsk, 163045
Investigational Site
Moscow, 119048
Investigational Site
Moscow, 123182
Investigational Site
Moscow, 125206
Investigational Site
Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, 185014
Investigational Site
Rostov-on-Don, 344010
Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 191104
Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194354
Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 195257
Investigational Site
Saratov, 410-002
Investigational Site
Tatarstan, 420-101
Investigational Site
Yekaterinburg, 620109
Investigational Site
Yekaterinburg, 620137
Ukraine13 sites
Investigational Site
Aviv, 79013
Investigational Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49074
Investigational Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49102
Investigational Site
Donetsk, 83099
Investigational Site
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76025
Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61018
Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61035
Inestigational Site
Kyiv, 02091
Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03680
Investigational Site
Luhansk, 91045
Investigational Site
Odesa, 65025
Investigational Site
Poltava, 36038
Investigational Site
Uzhhorod, 88015
United States12 sites
Investigational Site
Akron, Ohio, 44305
Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
Investigational Site
Butte, Montana, 59701
Investigational Site
Fort Gordon, Georgia, 30905
Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Investigational site
Los Angeles, California, 90015
Investigational site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55422
Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Investigational Site
Pasadena, California, 91105
Investigational Site
Peoria, Illinois, 61603
Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95817
Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92114
Brazil12 sites
Investigational Site 2
Belo Horizonte, 30140-062
Investigational Site 1
Belo Horizonte MG, 30150-221
Investigational Site
Campinas, SP 13059-900
Investigational Site
Curitiba-PR, 80810-040
Investigational Site
Goiânia, G.o., 74465-539
Investigational Site
Juiz de Fora, 36036-110
Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090
Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-001
Investigational site
Porto Alegre, 90035-001
Investigational Site
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000
Investigational Site
São Paulo, 04038-905
Investigational Site
São Paulo, 17201-340
South Africa12 sites
Investigational Site
Bellville, Capetown, 7530
Investigational Site
Benomi, 1500
Investigational Site
Cape Town, 7505
Investigational Site
Cape Town, 7530
Investigational Site
Krugersdorp, 1752
Investigational Site
Port Elizabeth, 6020
Investigational Site
Pretoria, 0001
Investigational Site
Pretoria, 0084
Investigational Site
Pretoria, 0140
Investigational Site
Pretoria, 0188
Investigational Site
Somerset West, 7130
Investigational Site
Worcester, 6850
Argentina10 sites
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C.a.b.a., C1431FWO
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, 1650
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, 1748
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, B1702FWM
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, B6700AQJ
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1155ADP
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1430BKC
Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1437 BZK
Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000IIH
Investigational Site
Vicente López, 1602
Hungary8 sites
Investigational Site
Budapest, 1125
Investigational Site
Mátraháza, 3233
Investigational Site
Miskolc, 3529
Investigational Site
Pécs, 7623
Investigational Site
Sopron, 9400
Investigational Site
Tatabánya, Szanatorium, 2800
Investigational Site
Tatabánya, 2800
Investigational Site
Törökbálint, 2045
Romania8 sites
Inestigational Site
Bucharest, 042122
Investigational Site
Bucharest, 050098
Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, 400238
Investigational Site
Constanța
Investigational Site
Oradea, 410176
Investigational Site
Saint Brasov, 25-27
Investigational Site
Târgu Mureş, 540136
Investigational Site
Timișoara
Spain7 sites
Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08035
Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08036
Investigational Site
Elche, 03203
Investigational Site
León, 24411
Investigational Site
Madrid, 28007
Investigational Site
Valencia, 46009
Investigational Site
Vizcaya, 48960
Thailand7 sites
Investigational Site
Bangkok, 10110
Investigational Site
Bangkok, 10400
InvestigationalSite
Bangkok, 10400
Investigational Site
Bangkok, 10700
Investigational Site
Chiang Mai, 50200
Investigational Site
Khonkaen, 40002
Investigational Site
Nonthaburi, 11000
Lithuania6 sites
Investigational Site
Kaunas, LT-45130
Investigational Site
Kaunas, LT-50009
Investigational Site
Klaipėda, LT-92231
Investigational Site
Klaipėda, LT-92288
Investigational Site
Šiauliai, LT-76231
Investigational Site
Vilnius, LT-10207
France5 sites
Investigational Site
Annecy, 74000
Investigational Site
Argenteuil, 95100
Investigational Site
Paris, 750120
Investigational Site
Paris, 75475
Investigational Site
Paris, 75674
Malaysia5 sites
Inestigational Site
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 05460
Investigational Site
George Town, Pulau Pinang, 10990
Investigational Site
Johor Bahru, Johor, 80100
Investigational Site
Kedah, 05460
Investigational Site
Kuala Lumpur, 50590
Switzerland4 sites
Investigational Site
Biel, 2501
Investigational Site
Geneva, 1211
Investigational Site
La Chaux-de-Fonds, 2300
Investigational Site
Lugano, 46,6903
Bulgaria3 sites
Investigational Site
Burgas, 8000
Investigational Site
Sofia, 1431
Investigational Site
Varna, 9010
Estonia3 sites
Investigational Site
Tallinn, 10138
Investigational Site
Tallinn, 13419
Investigational Site
Tartu, 51014
Serbia3 sites
Investigational Site
Belgrade, 11080
Investigational Site
Knez-Selo, 18204
Investigational Site
Kragujevac, 34000
Austria2 sites
Investigational Site
Vienna, A-1030
Investigational Site
Vienna, A-1090
Georgia2 sites
Investigational Site
Tbilisi, 0144
Investigational Site
Tbilisi, 0160
Slovakia2 sites
Investigational Site
Bratislava, 813 69
Slovakia
Nitra-Zobor, 948 88
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone, With Adjunctive Clarithromycin, in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Clinical trials for this study is held in many countries
- Conditions
- Bacterial Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection, IV Ceftriaxone, Placebo, Clarithromycin
- Keywords
- ceftaroline, Community-acquired pneumonia, CAP, IV (intravenous), Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila spp, Legionella spp, Multi-drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), antimicrobial resistance, pneumococci, Ceftriaxone, bacteria, ß-lactam, beta-lactam, antibiotic
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Bacterial, Community-Acquired Pneumonia, Haemophilus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ceftaroline fosamil for InjectionDrug
2 consecutive, 300 mg dose parenteral infused over 30 minutes, every 12 hours, for 5 to 7 days
IV CeftriaxoneDrug
Also called Ceftriaxone
1 g dose parenteral infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours, for 5 to 7 days
PlaceboDrug
Subjects randomized to receive ceftriaxone will receive ceftriaxone at a dose of 1 g infused over 30 minutes followed by IV saline placebo infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours (q24h). Twelve hours after each dose of ceftriaxone and saline placebo (ie, between ceftriaxone doses), subjects in this group will receive two consecutive saline placebo infusions, each infused over 30 minutes q24h. The ceftriaxone and saline placebo infusions will correspond to the q12h infusions of ceftaroline, thereby maintaining the blind
ClarithromycinDrug
In both treatment groups, two doses of oral clarithromycin (500 mg q12h), defined as adjunctive therapy, were initiated on Study Day 1 with study drug therapy in order to provide an immunomodulatory benefit and initial therapy for possible infection due to an atypical organism.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection | Experimental | Ceftaroline fosamil was administered in two consecutive 300-mg IV infusions over 30 minutes, every 12 hours (q12h).
In both treatment groups, two doses of oral clarithromycin (500 mg q12h), defined as adjunctive therapy, were initiated on Study Day 1 with study drug therapy in order to provide an immunomodulatory benefit and initial therapy for possible infection due to an atypical organism. Receives: Drug: Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection; Drug: Clarithromycin |
| IV Ceftriaxone | Active comparator | Ceftriaxone was administered as a 1-g IV infusion over 30 minutes followed by IV saline placebo infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours (q24h).
In both treatment groups, two doses of oral clarithromycin (500 mg q12h), defined as adjunctive therapy, were initiated on Study Day 1 with study drug therapy in order to provide an immunomodulatory benefit and initial therapy for possible infection due to an atypical organism. Receives: Drug: IV Ceftriaxone; Drug: Placebo; Drug: Clarithromycin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Cure Rate at Test-of-Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent-to-Treat Efficacy (MITTE) Populations
Cure:Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of pneumonia (ie,CABP), or improvement to such an extent that further antimicrobial therapy was not necessary
Failure: Any of the following:
- Persistence, incomplete clinical resolution, or worsening in signs and symptoms of CABP that required alternative antimicrobial therapy
- Treatment-limiting adverse event (AE) leading to discontinuation of study drug therapy, when subject required alternative antimicrobial therapy to treat the pneumonia
- Death wherein pneumonia (ie,CABP) was considered causative
Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome
Measured: 8 to 15 days after last dose of study drug
Clinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at Test-of-Cure (TOC) in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Measured: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Secondary outcomes (7)
Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT)
Measured: Last day of study drug administration
Microbiological Success Rate at Test of Cure (TOC)
Measured: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Overall (Clinical and Radiographic) Success Rate at Test of Cure (TOC)
Measured: 8-15 days after last day of study drug
Clinical and Microbiological Response by Pathogen at TOC
Measured: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Clinical Relapse at Late Follow Up (LFU)
Measured: 21-35 days after last dose of study drug
Microbiological Re-infection/Recurrence at LFU
Measured: 21 to 35 days after last dose of study drug
Evaluate Safety
Measured: first dose, throughout the treatment period, and up to the TOC visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionDec 2008
- Study completionJun 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bacterial PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 606 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Forest Laboratories
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas M File, MD, MS, Study director, Summa Health System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00621504
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P903-08
- Acronym
- CAP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dryden M, Kantecki M, Yan JL, Stone GG, Leister-Tebbe H, Wilcox M. Treatment outcomes of secondary bacteraemia in patients treated with ceftaroline fosamil: pooled results from six phase III clinical trials. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar;28:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.027. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
PubMed 34922058Cheng K, Pypstra R, Yan JL, Hammond J. Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1086-1091. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky519.
PubMed 30597021Taboada M, Melnick D, Iaconis JP, Sun F, Zhong NS, File TM, Llorens L, Friedland HD, Wilson D. Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):862-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv415. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
PubMed 26702925Lodise TP, Anzueto AR, Weber DJ, Shorr AF, Yang M, Smith A, Zhao Q, Huang X, File TM. Assessment of time to clinical response, a proxy for discharge readiness, among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received either ceftaroline fosamil or ceftriaxone in two phase III FOCUS trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb;59(2):1119-26. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03643-14. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
PubMed 25487791Shorr AF, Kollef M, Eckburg PB, Llorens L, Friedland HD. Assessment of ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae: insights from two randomized trials. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;75(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
PubMed 23357290Rank DR, Friedland HD, Laudano JB. Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: Phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii53-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr099.
PubMed 21482570File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, Talbot GH, Friedland HD, Lee J, Llorens L, Critchley IA, Thye DA; FOCUS 1 investigators. FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii19-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr096.
PubMed 21482566
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone, With Adjunctive Clarithromycin, in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00621504
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAP / P903-08
- Conditions
- Bacterial Pneumonia
- Keywords
- ceftaroline, Community-acquired pneumonia, CAP, IV (intravenous), Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila spp
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 606 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Forest LaboratoriesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Nov 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Clinical trials for this study is held in many countries
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection | Experimental | Drug: Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection, Drug: ClarithromycinCeftaroline fosamil was administered in two consecutive 300-mg IV infusions over 30 minutes, every 12 hours (q12h). In both treatment groups, two doses of oral clarithromycin (500 mg q12h), defined as adjunctive therapy, were initiated on Study Day 1 with study drug therapy in order to provide an immunomodulatory benefit and initial therapy for possible infection due to an atypical organism. |
| IV Ceftriaxone | Active comparator | Drug: IV Ceftriaxone, Drug: Placebo, Drug: ClarithromycinCeftriaxone was administered as a 1-g IV infusion over 30 minutes followed by IV saline placebo infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours (q24h). In both treatment groups, two doses of oral clarithromycin (500 mg q12h), defined as adjunctive therapy, were initiated on Study Day 1 with study drug therapy in order to provide an immunomodulatory benefit and initial therapy for possible infection due to an atypical organism. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Community-acquired pneumonia
- initial hospitalization, or treatment in an emergency room or urgent care setting
- infection would require initial treatment with IV antimicrobials.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- CAP suitable for outpatient therapy with an oral antimicrobial agent
- respiratory tract infections not due to community-acquired bacterial
- Non-infectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates
- Pleural empyema
- Infection with an atypical organism
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection2 consecutive, 300 mg dose parenteral infused over 30 minutes, every 12 hours, for 5 to 7 days | Drug | Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection |
| IV CeftriaxoneAlso: Ceftriaxone1 g dose parenteral infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours, for 5 to 7 days | Drug | IV Ceftriaxone |
| PlaceboSubjects randomized to receive ceftriaxone will receive ceftriaxone at a dose of 1 g infused over 30 minutes followed by IV saline placebo infused over 30 minutes, every 24 hours (q24h). Twelve hours after each dose of ceftriaxone and saline placebo (ie, between ceftriaxone doses), subjects in this group will receive two consecutive saline placebo infusions, each infused over 30 minutes q24h. The ceftriaxone and saline placebo infusions will correspond to the q12h infusions of ceftaroline, thereby maintaining the blind | Drug | IV Ceftriaxone |
| ClarithromycinIn both treatment groups, two doses of oral clarithromycin (500 mg q12h), defined as adjunctive therapy, were initiated on Study Day 1 with study drug therapy in order to provide an immunomodulatory benefit and initial therapy for possible infection due to an atypical organism. | Drug | Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection, IV Ceftriaxone |
Primary outcome
Clinical Cure Rate at Test-of-Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent-to-Treat Efficacy (MITTE) Populations
Time frame: 8 to 15 days after last dose of study drug
Cure:Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of pneumonia (ie,CABP), or improvement to such an extent that further antimicrobial therapy was not necessary Failure: Any of the following: * Persistence, incomplete clinical resolution, or worsening in signs and symptoms of CABP that required alternative antimicrobial therapy * Treatment-limiting adverse event (AE) leading to discontinuation of study drug therapy, when subject required alternative antimicrobial therapy to treat the pneumonia * Death wherein pneumonia (ie,CABP) was considered causative Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome
Clinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at Test-of-Cure (TOC) in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug
7 secondary outcomes
Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT)
Time frame: Last day of study drug administration
Microbiological Success Rate at Test of Cure (TOC)
Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Overall (Clinical and Radiographic) Success Rate at Test of Cure (TOC)
Time frame: 8-15 days after last day of study drug
Clinical and Microbiological Response by Pathogen at TOC
Time frame: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug
Clinical Relapse at Late Follow Up (LFU)
Time frame: 21-35 days after last dose of study drug
Microbiological Re-infection/Recurrence at LFU
Time frame: 21 to 35 days after last dose of study drug
Evaluate Safety
Time frame: first dose, throughout the treatment period, and up to the TOC visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34922058Dryden M, Kantecki M, Yan JL, Stone GG, Leister-Tebbe H, Wilcox M. Treatment outcomes of secondary bacteraemia in patients treated with ceftaroline fosamil: pooled results from six phase III clinical trials. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar;28:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.027. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30597021Cheng K, Pypstra R, Yan JL, Hammond J. Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1086-1091. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky519.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26702925Taboada M, Melnick D, Iaconis JP, Sun F, Zhong NS, File TM, Llorens L, Friedland HD, Wilson D. Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):862-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv415. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25487791Lodise TP, Anzueto AR, Weber DJ, Shorr AF, Yang M, Smith A, Zhao Q, Huang X, File TM. Assessment of time to clinical response, a proxy for discharge readiness, among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received either ceftaroline fosamil or ceftriaxone in two phase III FOCUS trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb;59(2):1119-26. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03643-14. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23357290Shorr AF, Kollef M, Eckburg PB, Llorens L, Friedland HD. Assessment of ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae: insights from two randomized trials. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;75(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21482570Rank DR, Friedland HD, Laudano JB. Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: Phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii53-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr099.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21482566File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, Talbot GH, Friedland HD, Lee J, Llorens L, Critchley IA, Thye DA; FOCUS 1 investigators. FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii19-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr096.
Related trials for Bacterial Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Echinocandin Added to Standard Treatment for Severe Pneumocystis Pneumonia
Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia
RecruitingObservational study
Fungal Infection Susceptibility
Cryptococcal Infection, Cryptococcal Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 3
Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia
Respiratory Tract Diseases, Influenza (Pandemic)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of VAX-31 With Influenza Vaccine in Adults ≥ 50 Years of Age
Pneumococcal Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas M File, MD, MS study director
Summa Health System
168 sites in 23 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ceftaroline fosamil for Injection, IV Ceftriaxone and Clarithromycin in people with Bacterial Pneumonia, run by Forest Laboratories at 168 sites in 23 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 168 sites in Poland, Germany, Russia, Ukraine, United States and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Nov 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Cure Rate at Test-of-Cure (TOC) in the Modified Intent-to-Treat Efficacy (MITTE) Populations (time frame: 8 to 15 days after last dose of study drug). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00621504, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2017.