AzTrials
AzTrials

Suspected Sleep ApneaTelesleepNCT00614952

Cost/Effectiveness Analysis of the Respiratory Poligraphy at Home

A study testing PSG (polysomnography) and PR (respiratory polygraphy) in people with Suspected Sleep Apnea and Daytime Sleepiness, run by Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The abbreviated diagnostic sleep studies (RP), made at home and transferred telematically to the sleep laboratory, are useful for the diagnosis of sleep apnea and due to a lower cost, it could be an alternative to conventional polysomnography. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Suspected Sleep Apnea, Daytime Sleepiness
What is being tested?
PSG (polysomnography) and PR (respiratory polygraphy)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Jan 2006to Jan 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 70 years.
  • Without clinical suspicion referred to any other sleep pathology susceptible of presenting daytime sleepiness.
  • Living 20 Km or more far from the hospital participating in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Psychophysical incapacity to answer questionnaires.
  • Patients who do not get pass the proof of placing the PR (see below).
  • Patients who present restrictive chronic disease previously diagnosed (neoplasy, any origin chronic pain, renal failure, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and any other limited chronic disease)
  • Structural cardiopaty or coronary documented non controlled by means of medical treatment .
  • Toxicomanies. Alcoholism (more than 80 gr/day in men and 60 gr/day in women.
  • Informed consent not obtained.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara. Servicio Extremeño de Salud

    Cáceres, Caceres, 10003

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Diagnostic Validity Study and Cost Analysis of Domiciliary Respiratory

The abbreviated diagnostic sleep studies (RP), made at home and transferred telematically to the sleep laboratory, are useful for the diagnosis of sleep apnea and due to a lower cost, it could be an alternative to conventional polysomnography. Objectives: 1) Usefulness of domiciliary study evaluated by percentage of patients diagnosed of SAHS compared with PSG and agreement in the therapeutic decision. 2) Direct costs of patients included in the study. Design: controlled, randomized, crossed and blind (320 patients) comparing PR made at home with PSG, in patients suspicious of SAHS. The equipment transfer will be made by a transport agency from home to home in order to be universal the access to this diagnostic model. The file transmission with the raw data of the study will be made telematically by GPRS. If the aims of the study reach an end there will be a considerable change in the clinical practice making possible the international acceptation of domiciliary PR as diagnosis of SAHS and adapting the diagnosis of this syndrome to the new technologies of communication. The universalization of domiciliary PR would make possible that the diagnosis of SAHS could be done in any patient and in any country with GPRS technology and a transport agency, that is to say in all developed countries. As sleep apneas affect 5-7 million persons in Spain and there is association between sleep apneas and cardiovascular risk, in the immediate future we must evaluate this disease as we do today with the cholesterol determination. If our results are as predicted, the primary care physician could start and in a lot of cases finish the SAHS diagnostic process. This would simplify remarkably the diagnosis of SAHS and would alleviate a lot the process cost all over the world.

Being tested
PSG (polysomnography), PR (respiratory polygraphy)
Medical subject headings
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PSG (polysomnography)Device

    POLYSOMNOGRAPHY

  • PR (respiratory polygraphy)Other

    respiratory polygraphy: level III of AASM

Study groups in NCT00614952
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PRExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: PR (respiratory polygraphy)
PSGActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: PSG (polysomnography)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effectiveness of the two diagnostic models (PR at home and PSG) evaluated by means of percentage of patients who have established the diagnosis of SAHS and agreement in the therapeutic decision.

    Measured: at the end of the study

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Direct and indirect cost of patients included in the study.

    Measured: at the end of the study

  2. Relationship cost/efficacy

    Measured: at the end of study

  3. Number of non valid studies in each group

    Measured: at the end of study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionJan 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
320 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00614952
Sponsor's protocol ID
PI 050444
Acronym
Telesleep
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
1 Feb 2008
Last updated
20 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PSG (polysomnography) and PR (respiratory polygraphy) in people with Suspected Sleep Apnea and Daytime Sleepiness, run by Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effectiveness of the two diagnostic models (PR at home and PSG) evaluated by means of percentage of patients who have established the diagnosis of SAHS and agreement in the therapeutic decision. (time frame: at the end of the study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in