AzTrials
AzTrials

Nosocomial PneumoniaPhase 4NCT00610324

Effect of Oral Decontamination Using Chlorhexidine or Potassium Permanganate in ICU Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Chlorhexidine gluconate and Potassium permanganate in people with Nosocomial Pneumonia and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, run by King Edward Memorial Hospital at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Oropharyngeal bacteria play an important role in the pathogenesis of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine has been shown to decrease incidence of pneumonia in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Its role in critically ill general ICU patients is not yet proven. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 years and older
What is being tested?
Chlorhexidine gluconate and Potassium permanganate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
512 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
May 2004to Dec 2007
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit and are expected to stay in ICU for > 48 hours

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant women
  • Patients with nosocomial pneumonia at time of ICU admission
  • Patients with community-acquired pneumonia at time of ICU admission
  • Patients in whom oropharyngeal cleansing is contra-indicated

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Medical-Neuro Intensive Care Unit, K E M Hospital, Parel

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Effect of Oral Decontamination Using Chlorhexidine or Potassium Permanganate in ICU Patients: an Open-Labelled Randomized Controlled Trial

Oropharyngeal bacteria play an important role in the pathogenesis of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine has been shown to decrease incidence of pneumonia in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Its role in critically ill general ICU patients is not yet proven. The present study proposes to study the effectiveness of twice-daily oral cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution on the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU patients admitted to a single intensive care unit of an Indian public hospital

Read the detailed description

Nosocomial pneumonia is common in intensive care units (ICU) patients and is associated with increase in mortality rates by 24% to 76% in various studies. Interventions that effectively prevent nosocomial pneumonia are strategically important in order to reduce morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Colonization of the pharynx has been implicated as the reservoirs for pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia and interventions like selective digestive decontamination have been tried to control this source of infection. Recently, colonization of the dental plaque by aerobic organisms with subsequent aspiration into the lower respiratory tract has received attention. Previous smaller studies using antiseptic agents to sterilize dental plaques in patients at risk of pneumonia have shown conflicting results. The present study aims to determine whether twice daily oral cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine reduces the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients staying in the ICU for >48 hours.

After obtaining informed consent, subjects would be randomized to treatment with either 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) solution or 0.01% potassium permanganate solution (PP) (Control Group), as per the protocol approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. At baseline, the parameters which would be noted are: age, sex, surgical or non-surgical status, immunosuppression, chronic ailments, smoking and alcohol consumption, Glasgow coma scale score (GCS), laboratory parameters and blood gas analysis. All subjects would be followed up daily and the GCS, presence of nasogastric tube (feeds), endotracheal tube, tracheostomy, ventilator, central venous and urinary catheterization, anti-stress ulcer prophylaxis and prior antibiotic use will be noted. Presence or absence of nosocomial pneumonia would also be noted daily. Lower respiratory secretions would be obtained by the protected non-bronchoscopic mini-BAL technique in order to identify the causative organisms. All the subjects will be followed up daily until discharge from the ICU or death.

Primary outcome variable was the development of nosocomial pneumonia during the ICU stay. Secondary outcome variables were hospital mortality, length of ICU stay.

A total of 506 patients will have to be studied (approximately 253 patients in each treatment group). This study will have a statistical power of 75% to detect a 50% reduction in the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in the intervention group with a 95% level of confidence assuming that incidence of pneumonia in the control group is 16%.

Being tested
Chlorhexidine gluconate, Potassium permanganate
Keywords
oropharyngeal cleansing, oral decontamination, oropharyngeal bacterial flora, oropharyngeal colonization, critical illness, mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, prophylaxis
Medical subject headings
Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, Critical Illness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Chlorhexidine gluconateDrug

    Twice-daily oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate

  • Potassium permanganateDrug

    Twice-daily oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.01% Potassium permanganate

Study groups in NCT00610324
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalTwice-daily oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate
Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine gluconate
2Active comparatorTwice-daily oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.01% Potassium permanganate
Receives: Drug: Potassium permanganate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Development of nosocomial pneumonia

    Measured: During hospital stay

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. In-hospital mortality

    Measured: During hospital stay

  2. Length of ICU stay (days)

    Measured: Till discharge from ICU or death

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2004
  3. Primary completionOct 2007
  4. Study completionDec 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
512 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00610324
Sponsor's protocol ID
DRK-CHEX
Status last verified
Jan 2008
First submitted
16 Jan 2008
Last updated
7 Feb 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Abele-Horn M, Dauber A, Bauernfeind A, Russwurm W, Seyfarth-Metzger I, Gleich P, Ruckdeschel G. Decrease in nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients by selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD). Intensive Care Med. 1997 Feb;23(2):187-95. doi: 10.1007/s001340050314.

    PubMed 9069004
  • DeRiso AJ 2nd, Ladowski JS, Dillon TA, Justice JW, Peterson AC. Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.12% oral rinse reduces the incidence of total nosocomial respiratory infection and nonprophylactic systemic antibiotic use in patients undergoing heart surgery. Chest. 1996 Jun;109(6):1556-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.6.1556.

    PubMed 8769511
  • Fourrier F, Cau-Pottier E, Boutigny H, Roussel-Delvallez M, Jourdain M, Chopin C. Effects of dental plaque antiseptic decontamination on bacterial colonization and nosocomial infections in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep;26(9):1239-47. doi: 10.1007/s001340000585.

    PubMed 11089748
  • Francis JR, Hunter B, Addy M. A comparison of three delivery methods of chlorhexidine in handicapped children. I. Effects on plaque, gingivitis, and toothstaining. J Periodontol. 1987 Jul;58(7):451-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.1987.58.7.451.

    PubMed 2957488

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Chlorhexidine gluconate and Potassium permanganate in people with Nosocomial Pneumonia and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, run by King Edward Memorial Hospital at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Development of nosocomial pneumonia (time frame: During hospital stay). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00610324, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in